An Evolutionarily Conserved Form of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Coordinates Energy and Reproductive Behavior
Program in Neuroscience (J.L.T., E.F.R) and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics (E.F.R.), University of Virginia Medical School, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908; and Medical Research Council Human Reproductive Sciences Unit (R.P.M.), Edinburgh EH3 9ET, Scotland, United Kingdom2q, http://www.100md.com
Abstract2q, http://www.100md.com
Top2q, http://www.100md.com
Abstract2q, http://www.100md.com
Introduction2q, http://www.100md.com
Materials and Methods2q, http://www.100md.com
Results2q, http://www.100md.com
Discussion2q, http://www.100md.com
References2q, http://www.100md.com
GnRH is the master neuropeptide that coordinates and regulates reproduction in all vertebrates and in some nonvertebrate species. Sixteen forms of GnRH have been isolated in brain. In the vast majority of species, two or more forms occur in anatomically and developmental distinct neuronal populations. In mammalian brain, two GnRH forms, mammalian (GnRH-I) and chicken-II (GnRH-II), exist. The distribution and functions of GnRH-I have been well characterized and intensively studied. However, the function of GnRH-II, which is the most evolutionarily conserved form of GnRH, has been elusive. Here we demonstrate that in a primitive mammal, the musk shrew (Suncus murinus), GnRH-II activates mating behavior in nutritionally challenged females within a few minutes after administration. In addition GnRH-II immunoreactive cell numbers and fibers increase in food-restricted females. Furthermore, GnRH type II receptor immunoreactivity was detected in musk shrew brain in regions associated with mating behavior. Our results lead us to hypothesize that the role of the evolutionarily conserved GnRH-II peptide is to coordinate reproductive behavior as appropriate to the organism’s energetic condition.
Introductionwdc, 百拇医药
Topwdc, 百拇医药
Abstractwdc, 百拇医药
Introductionwdc, 百拇医药
Materials and Methodswdc, 百拇医药
Resultswdc, 百拇医药
Discussionwdc, 百拇医药
Referenceswdc, 百拇医药
GnRH is present in all vertebrate and some nonvertebrate brains, where it acts to regulate reproduction in both males and females. There are 16 different forms of GnRH, each named for the species in which it was first isolated (1, 2, 3, 4). In mammals, the form of GnRH (so called mammalian or GnRH-I) that has been best characterized is produced by a loose continuum of neurons in the anterior portion of the medial ventral forebrain that project to the portal system connecting the brain to the pituitary where its pulsatile secretion stimulates gonadotropin release (5). Most vertebrates have two forms of GnRH in brain (6, 7, 8). One of these, first isolated from chicken brain (chicken GnRH-II), is evolutionarily conserved from bony fish to man. This form has been recently designated GnRH-II (9). GnRH-II is present in an anatomically distinct cell population residing in the midbrain. These cells project to many anterior and posterior locations. In addition to multiple forms of GnRH peptide in brain, two distinct receptors for GnRH exist (termed type I and type II) and both are present in mammal brain (2, 10, 11). Receptor binding assays revealed that the type II GnRH receptor has a higher selectivity for GnRH-II relative to GnRH-I (2). Despite this descriptive information, the function of GnRH-II has not been established but has been proposed to be a neuromodulator affecting reproductive behavior (1, 2, 12).
Almost 10 yr ago, GnRH-II was discovered in musk shrew (Suncus murinus) brain making this species the first placental mammal shown to have two forms of GnRH including GnRH-I and GnRH-II (13). Since that time, several other primitive mammals (tree shrews and golden moles), as well as several primates (humans, rhesus monkeys, and marmosets), have been examined either by in situ hybridization, HPLC, or immunocytochemistry, and GnRH-II has been located in brain tissues (1, 8, 14, 15, 16, 17). Although early studies indicated that GnRH-II was not present in rodent brain (18), recently it has been isolated in the midbrain of capybara and mouse (19, 20). These data remain controversial, however, as the GnRH-II peptide gene is not present in the completed mouse genome. When GnRH-II was first discovered, there was some speculation that this form of the peptide could have specific gonadotropin-releasing characteristics. However, few data support a primarily physiological role of GnRH-II in release of either FSH or LH (21). Once the anatomy of the neurons and their projections were defined, it was hypothesized that GnRH-II may be involved in regulation of behavior (1, 2, 12, 22). In several species of birds, sexual behavior in females is enhanced, to a modest degree, by infusion of GnRH-II (1, 23). In female musk shrews, however, intraventricular infusion of GnRH-II has no facilitatory effect on sexual receptivity (24).
In previous studies, we have shown that a mild 48-h food restriction blocks sexual receptivity in female musk shrews. However, 90 min of ad libitum (AL) food reinstates sexual behavior (25). Several lines of evidence lead us to hypothesize that this behavioral activation may be caused by one of the two GnRH peptides. Notably, others have shown that GnRH-I can stimulate sexual behavior in a variety of species from newts to rats (26, 27, 28, 29). To investigate this hypothesis, we administered saline, or GnRH-II to AL-fed and foodrestricted (FR) females. Next we asked whether the reinstatement of sexual receptivity we noted in FR females treated with GnRH-II was specific by repeating the study and administering GnRH-I, GnRH-II, or saline to FR females only. We found again that GnRH-II had a facilitatory effect, and GnRH-I had no effect on mating behavior. To ask whether endogenous concentrations of GnRH-II vary with nutritional condition, we used immunocytochemistry and analyzed both fiber density and cell numbers in brains of AL-fed and FR females. Finally, we used immunocytochemistry to determine whether the specific type II GnRH receptor was present in musk shrew brain. Our data show that GnRH-II, but not GnRH-I, activates mating in energetically challenged musk shrews, that immunoreactivity for GnRH-II cell bodies and fibers varies with nutritional status, and that this species has the GnRH-II selective type II GnRH receptors in brain.
Materials and Methods93, 百拇医药
Top93, 百拇医药
Abstract93, 百拇医药
Introduction93, 百拇医药
Materials and Methods93, 百拇医药
Results93, 百拇医药
Discussion93, 百拇医药
References93, 百拇医药
Musk shrews93, 百拇医药
All subjects were adult, sexually naive female musk shrews (S. murinus) that were born in our colony at the University of Virginia. Female musk shrews attain reproductive maturity by 25 d of age, as defined by their ability to become pregnant and give birth to offspring (Rissman, E. F., unpublished observations). After weaning, at 21 d of age, females were housed individually in cages (28 x 17 x 12 cm) containing pine wood shavings and paper towels for bedding. The room was kept on a 14-h light, 10-h dark cycle (lights on at 0700 h Eastern standard time) and only contained other females. The room temperature was 23 ± 1 C. All animals were fed Purina Cat Chow (Ralston-Purina, St. Louis, MO) and provided water AL.
Food restrictiond^+*{0, http://www.100md.com
Between the ages of 30 and 50 d, females with average body weights (between 19 and 27 g) were monitored for food intake daily for 4 d. To monitor food intake, the shrews received preweighed cat chow in clean small food cups between 1200 and 1400 h, at the same time body weights were recorded. Twenty-four hours later, the residual food was retrieved from the bowl as well as from the bedding on the floor of the cage and weighed. The average daily intake over the 4-d period was determined for each animal. Females were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The animals in the FR group received 60% of their average AL intake for the next 48 h. Females in the AL group continued to be fed as described above. These methods have been described previously (25). The University of Virginia Committee on Animal Care and use has approved all procedures in these experiments.d^+*{0, http://www.100md.com
Surgical proceduresd^+*{0, http://www.100md.com
To implant intraventricular cannula, females between 35 and 55 d of age were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (4.5 mg/kg; 0.1 ml/10 g body weight). The animal was placed into the stereotaxic apparatus (Kopf Instruments, Tujunga, CA). The guide cannulae (33 gauge, 2.2 mm; Plastics One, Roanoke, VA) were aimed at the lateral ventricle by centering on the intersection of the sagittal suture and the most caudal portion of the olfactory bulb and moving -4.5 rostral-caudal and -1.0 medial-lateral. A hole was drilled and a cannula was lowered to a depth of 2.2 mm, aimed at the lateral ventricle. When the guide cannula was secure, a cannula insert was placed inside. For sham-operated animals, all procedures were the same as described above with the exception of the insertion of the guide cannulae.
The day after surgery, females were assigned to either the AL or FR feeding condition (described above). For 2 d, they were maintained on this feeding regimen. On the third day, each female was tested a single time for sexual behavior. All testing took place between 0800 and 1100 h. Before testing, females were briefly anesthetized with halothane and infused with saline (0.09%), GnRH-I (1 µg), or GnRH-II (1 µg), all peptides were dissolved in saline and given in a volume of 30 µl. The infusions were delivered by removing the cannula insert and replacing it with a longer cannulae that projected 0.1 mm further into the brain than the guide. Infusion was conducted by hand-delivery slowly over the course of 20–30 sec. Thirty seconds after the infusion, the temporary cannulae was removed, the insert replaced and the female was returned to her home cage. Fifteen to twenty minutes later, females were placed into a clean, clear Plexiglas test box with a sexually experienced male. Behavior was observed for 30 min in experiment 1 and 45 min in experiment 2 or until the male achieved ejaculation, whichever occurred first.
Experimental designs%hrsqwf, http://www.100md.com
In the first experiment, AL and FR females were infused with either saline (0.09%; AL, n = 10; FR, n = 11) or GnRH-II (1 µg; AL, n = 11, FR, n = 8). Doses for GnRH-I and -II were based on previous work done in our laboratory (24). Sham-operated females (AL, n = 8; FR, n = 9) did not receive infusions. In the second study, all the females were food restricted and each received saline (n = 8), GnRH-I (1 µg; n = 8) or GnRH-II (1 µg; n = 8). For GnRH-II immunocytochemistry, animals were maintained for 2 d in either the FR (n = 10) or the AL (n = 7) condition then killed and brains collected as described below. To validate the presence of the type II GnRH receptor in musk shrew brain, five AL females were used.%hrsqwf, http://www.100md.com
Behavioral testing%hrsqwf, http://www.100md.com
One notable aspect of sexual behavior in female musk shrews is the absence of a behavioral, vaginal, or ovarian estrous cycle (30). Thus, we can select females on any day and mating behavior ensures within a few minutes after introduction to the male. During a mating bout, sexually naive females are initially aggressive toward males. Sexual receptivity is marked by a significant reduction of aggression and the onset of rump presentations and tail wagging (31). At this time, the male begins to mount and intromit. Because female musk shrews do not have a reflexive posture such as lordosis, it is often difficult for the male to achieve a placed intromission (one in which the penis enters the vagina). Therefore, we score both missed and placed intromissions. Typically, a male will ejaculate after four to seven placed intromissions. During these tests, latencies for the female to rump present, tail wag, receive mounts, receive missed intromissions, receive placed intromissions, and receive five placed intromissions or an ejaculation were recorded by an experimenter blind to the treatment of the animals.
Confirmation of cannula placement and ovulation43mruk, 百拇医药
Twenty to 24 h after behavioral testing, females were overdosed with halothane inhalant. India ink was injected into the cannulae and placement of the cannula was considered correct if the ventricles were filled with ink. Ovaries were examined for ovulation, which was scored if a corpus luteum was visible and at least one ovum was present in the oviduct. Female musk shrews exhibit mating-induced ovulation; however, typically few females ovulate after the first virgin mating (30).43mruk, 百拇医药
Immunocytochemistry43mruk, 百拇医药
Females were deeply anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (10 mg/kg, ip) before perfusion between 0800 and 1200 h. Females were perfused with heparinized saline (100 U heparin/1 ml of 0.9% saline) followed immediately by Zamboni’s fixative (4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 15% saturated picric acid). Brains were removed, cryoprotected overnight in 30% sucrose at 4 C, and quickly frozen in chilled 2-methyl butane. Brains were stored at -70 C until they were sectioned.
Brains were sectioned coronally at 30 µm and collected in a series of four wells. One well of tissue (one-quarter of the sections collected) was processed for immunocytochemistry using an antibody to GnRH-II (diluted 1:1000; antibody no. 741). This antiserum has no cross-reactivity with GnRH-I and has been previously validated for use in the musk shrew (32, 33). A subset of this same tissue was processed for type II GnRH receptor using an antibody made to the highly specific extracellular loop three domain of the human type II GnRH receptor (2). Because this antibody had not been tested in musk shrew, we also examined brain sections that were processed without primary antibody or secondary antibody. Immunoreactivity was visualized using the Vector Elite ABC method (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA). All rinses and solutions were made in 0.02 M Tris-buffered saline (pH 7.8). Sections were pretreated in 1% sodium borohydride to remove residual aldehydes. Tissue was incubated in avidin and biotin blocking solutions (Vector Blocking Kit) to block endogenous biotin. Next, the tissue was incubated in the primary antiserum (a rabbit polyclonal used at a dilution of 1:1000) for 48 h at 4 C. After rinses, tissue was incubated in secondary antiserum (biotinylated goat antirabbit IgG from Vector Laboratories, Inc., 1:500) for 1 h. After incubation in secondary antiserum, the tissue was treated with avidin-biotin complex. Immunoreactivity was visualized with nickel intensified diaminobenzidine solution (0.25% nickel ammonium sulfate and 0.05% diaminobenzidine) and activated by 0.001% hydrogen peroxide. All tissue was processed at the same time for each study to eliminate inter-run variability and incubation and development times remained constant.
Quantification of GnRH-II-immunoreactive (ir) cell number and fiber densityh0w}, 百拇医药
Brains were processed as described and images were analyzed using the Metamorph Image analysis program for fiber density, cell bodies were counted manually. The majority of GnRH-II cell bodies are located in the midbrain just ventral to the periaqueductal gray. They form a cluster of cells that extend approximately 700–800 µm rostral to caudal. Cell bodies were counted throughout the extent of the midbrain. The midbrain was divided into anterior and posterior portions based on the presence or absence of the brachium pontis. The GnRH-II-ir fibers project to a number of areas, but the majority reside in the medial habenula (33). Immunoreactive fiber area was quantified in the preoptic area (POA), the medial habenula, and the median eminence. The habenula is a large structure and representative sections from the anterior, medial, and posterior portion of this nucleus were scored. The observer was blind to the feeding condition of the animals.
Statistical analysess, 百拇医药
In the first experiment, latencies to perform various behaviors were analyzed using two-way ANOVA with feeding condition and drug treatment as the factors. In the second experiment, the effect of drug treatment was analyzed within each feeding condition using a one-way ANOVA. The numbers of females in each feeding/drug group displaying tail wagging and receiving mounts were analyzed using 2 and Fisher’s exact tests. For ANOVA, all post hoc comparisons were made using Bonferroni’s multiple comparison tests. The number of GnRH-II cell bodies and fiber density were analyzed using a Student’s t test. Data were considered significantly different if P < 0.05.s, 百拇医药
Resultss, 百拇医药
Tops, 百拇医药
Abstracts, 百拇医药
Introductions, 百拇医药
Materials and Methodss, 百拇医药
Resultss, 百拇医药
Discussions, 百拇医药
Referencesw, 百拇医药
GnRH-II activates mating behaviors in FR femalesw, 百拇医药
A two-way ANOVA was conducted for each behavioral latency measure: the two factors were food condition and drug treatment. For rump present, tail wag, mount, placed intromission, and ejaculation an effect of drug treatment was noted [F(2,58) = 3.42, 3.52, 3.58, 6.43, and 9.43, respectively, P < 0.04]. For rump present, tail wag, and mount latency, differences were noted between GnRH-II and saline infused animals. Latencies to display behaviors were always shorter for females receiving GnRH-II (P < 0.05). Differences between saline and sham surgery animals were noted in the case of latencies for males to begin to intromit and ejaculate, with males performing faster when paired with sham-operated females as compared with saline-infused test partners (P < 0.05). Effects of food condition were noted for two measures, rump presentation and intromission [F(1,58) = 10.63, 5.75 respectively, P < 0.02 at least]. In both cases, AL-fed females were faster to engage in these behaviors than were FR animals (P < 0.05). Finally an interaction between drug treatment and food was evident for one behavior, rump presentation [F(2,58) = 5.14, P < 0.01, Fig. 1A]. Paired comparisons reveal that sham operated females took longer to rump present if they had been FR as opposed to fed AL (P < 0.05). Even more interestingly, FR females treated with GnRH-II were faster to perform the behavior than FR saline treated or sham operated females (P < 0.05).
fig.ommitteed'm+g61g, 百拇医药
Figure 1. Effect of GnRH-II administration on female musk shrew sexual behavior. A, Mean ± SEM latency to display rump presentations in AL-fed and FR females. The open bars represent females that underwent a sham surgery; the hatched bars show data from females that received intracerebroventricular treatment with saline, and the black bars represent data from females infused intracerebroventricular with GnRH-II (1 µg). A two-way ANOVA revealed a significant interaction between food condition and drug treatment (P < 0.01). Planned comparisons showed two significant (P < 0.05) effects. *, Significantly different from both other FR groups; **, significantly different from FR sham females. B, The percentage of females in each condition that received mounts. *, Significantly different from both of the FR groups.'m+g61g, 百拇医药
To make comparisons between the total numbers of animals in each group that displayed or did not display a particular behavior, we conducted 2 and Fisher exact tests. The numbers of FR females in each of the treatment groups that displayed tail wagging or received mounts from males did not differ [2(2) = 2.83, 4.71, respectively]. However, more selective Fisher exact tests between saline and GnRH-II-treated females revealed a trend whereby more GnRH-II-treated females performed tail wagging (P = 0.051) and a significant difference between numbers of saline vs. GnRH-II-treated females receiving mounts (P = 0.01; Fig. 1B).
Females treated with GnRH-II ovulated, and the numbers doing so did not vary with food condition (82% in the AL and 63% in the FR groups). In addition, one saline-treated animal that received an ejaculation ovulated.2e, 百拇医药
GnRH-I has no effect on sexual receptivity in FR females2e, 百拇医药
A one-way ANOVA performed on behavioral latency measures revealed a significant effect for tail wag, mounts and missed intromissions [F(2,24) = 7.14, 7.57, and 4.37 respectively; P < 0.026 at least; Fig. 2A]. Specifically for tail wag and mounts, administration of GnRH-II resulted in faster latencies than infusion of saline or GnRH-I (P < 0.05). The onset for males to perform a missed intromission was faster when test partners were GnRH-II-infused females as compared with GnRH-I-treated females (P < 0.05).2e, 百拇医药
fig.ommitteed2e, 百拇医药
Figure 2. Effect of saline GnRH-I or GnRH-II administration on sexual behavior in FR females. A, Mean ± SEM latency to display tail wagging behavior. B, The percentage of females in each condition that received mounts. *, Significantly different from females in GnRH-I treatment group (P < 0.05). When GnRH-II- and saline-treated females are compared a trend (P < 0.055) was noted.
The numbers of FR females in each of the treatment groups that displayed tail wagging or received mounts from males was significantly different [2(2) = 6.39, P < 0.05]. More GnRH-II-treated females displayed each behavior as compared with GnRH-I-infused females (P = 0.005, Fig. 2B). A trend was noted when saline and GnRH-II-treated females were compared (P = 0.055).a|, http://www.100md.com
Both GnRH treatments promoted ovulation; 88% of the GnRH-II- and 76% of the GnRH-I-treated females ovulated as compared with none of the saline-treated females.a|, http://www.100md.com
Food restriction significantly decreases the number of GnRH-II-ir cellsa|, http://www.100md.com
Food status had no effect on total numbers of GnRH-II-ir cell bodies [t(13) = 1.29]. When the anterior and posterior regions were analyzed separately, we did note a significant change in cell numbers in the anterior midbrain [t(13) = 1.88, P < 0.04; Fig. 3A] but not the posterior area [t(13) = 0.99]. More GnRH-II-ir cells were observed in brains of FR as compared with AL-fed females.
fig.ommitteedf:22, http://www.100md.com
Figure 3. GnRH-II-ir cell numbers and fibers. A, Mean ± SEM. GnRH-II cell bodies counted in the anterior midbrain in brains of females that were fed AL or food restricted. B, Mean ± SEM. GnRH-II-ir fiber area (µm2) in the median eminence from females that were fed AL or FR. *, Significantly different from AL-fed females (P < 0.05).f:22, http://www.100md.com
Immunoreactive fiber density was examined in three areas, and in one of these a significant difference was noted. In the median eminence, immunoreactive fibers filled a greater area in FR than in AL-fed female brains [t(15) = 2.01, P < 0.033; Fig. 3B]. There were no differences in fiber density among females in the two feeding conditions in the habenula [t(15) = 1.26] or the POA [t(15) = 0.11].f:22, http://www.100md.com
Type II GnRH receptor distribution in musk shrew brainf:22, http://www.100md.com
Type II GnRH receptor staining was present in many areas of the brain, including POA, cingulate cortex, arcuate nucleus, habenula, and infundibular stalk (Fig. 4A). The immunoreactivity was isolated to the membrane, which is similar to previously published results from other species (Ref. 2 ; Fig. 4B). No positive staining was observed in control tissue run without primary or secondary antibody (data not shown).
fig.ommitteed^/p$, 百拇医药
Figure 4. A, Camera lucida drawings of four coronal sections from the musk shrew brain where type II GnRH receptor immunoreactivity was observed. The black squares represent immunoreactive areas containing neurons with putative membrane staining indicative of membrane receptors. 3v, Third ventricle; ac, anterior commissure; ARC, arcuate nucleus; ca, cerebral aqueduct; cc, corpus callosum; CCtx, cingulate cortex; INF, infundibular stalk; lv, lateral ventricle; MH, medial habenula. B, Photomicrograph of type II GnRH receptor immunoreactivity in the female musk shrew POA. The immunoreactivity appears as outlines of neurons, suggesting cell membrane staining. Scale bar, 10 µm.^/p$, 百拇医药
Discussion^/p$, 百拇医药
Top^/p$, 百拇医药
Abstract^/p$, 百拇医药
Introduction^/p$, 百拇医药
Materials and Methods^/p$, 百拇医药
Results^/p$, 百拇医药
Discussion^/p$, 百拇医药
References^/p$, 百拇医药
GnRH-II mRNA or peptide has been detected in brains of several mammalian species, yet, until now its function has remained elusive. Here we demonstrate that GnRH-II facilitates sexual receptivity in females, and this effect is only displayed by animals that are energetically challenged by food restriction, and not by AL-fed controls. Intracerebroventricular infusion iv of GnRH-I did not induce mating behavior in nutritionally challenged animals. Thus, the actions of GnRH-II on behavior are selective and likely via the type II GnRH receptor.
It has been well documented that both peptide content and pulsatile release of GnRH-I is responsive to nutritional status. Food restriction inhibits LH and GnRH-I pulsatility, GnRH-I immunoreactivity, and GnRH-I content in brain (34, 35, 36, 37, 38). However, the effects of nutritional status on GnRH-II-ir cell number and fiber density reported here have not been observed previously. Thus, our data are consistent with data from other species showing, both directly and indirectly, that food restriction inhibits the release of GnRH peptide. However, our findings are novel because we have focused on the evolutionarily conserved GnRH-II, and we have revealed a direct relationship between food, mating behavior, and GnRH-II. The increased number of immunoreactive cell bodies and fiber dense area after food restriction suggests that an individual’s nutritional status affects either the production and/or the release of GnRH-II peptide. Furthermore, because administration of GnRH-II to FR females reinstates mating behavior, we hypothesize that food restriction inhibits release of GnRH-II, thus causing accumulation of the peptide in cell bodies and their terminals.
In addition to having different projection sites, GnRH-I and GnRH-II bind to different GnRH receptor subtypes with different affinities (2). GnRH-II has a 24-fold higher affinity for the type II, compared with the type I receptor, and GnRH-II has only 9–10% of the activity of GnRH-I at the type I receptor (2). Here we have mapped the distribution of immunoreactive type II GnRH receptors in the female musk shrew brain. The extracellular loop three antibody used for these studies has also been used in human, monkey, sheep, and mouse brains and in all cases membrane-like immunoreactivity was noted. In musk shrew, specific membrane-like staining was present in several brain regions including; olfactory forebrain, cingulate cortex, POA, arcuate nucleus, ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus (VMN), and medial habenula. This distribution overlaps with that reported in other species, with the exception of the cingulate cortex (2). In brains of AL-fed musk shrews, fibers immunoreactive for GnRH-II are located in all these regions. Of those regions mentioned above and assayed for GnRH-II peptide, we have noted its presence in POA, hypothalamus (that includes arcuate nucleus and VMN), and in the medial habenula (33). In fact, in musk shrew brain the highest concentration of GnRH-II peptide, outside of the region containing its cell bodies, is the medial habenula and electron microscopy reveals GnRH-II in presynaptic vesicles in this area (33). Because type II GnRH receptors are located in regions associated with mating behavior in the musk shrew, namely, POA and VMN (39), and we saw no behavioral effect with administration of GnRH-I, it is likely that the effects that we observed are mediated by actions of GnRH-II via the type II GnRH receptors in one or both locations.
Administration of GnRH-I can facilitate sexual receptivity in gonadectomized female rats (26, 27, 28). Work done on fragments of the GnRH-I peptide illustrate that specifically amino acids 5–10 are responsible for the behavioral actions of GnRH-I (28). Interestingly, only 3 of these 6 amino acids overlap with the GnRH-II peptide. More recently, a few studies suggest that GnRH-II is involved in the regulation of sexual behavior in birds. Administration of GnRH-II, but not chicken GnRH-I, to female sparrows facilitated solicitation behavior in response to male song (23). In addition, GnRH-II initiates courtship in female ring doves (1). To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first study showing any effect of GnRH-II on any behavior in a mammalian species.a\, http://www.100md.com
The fact that the behavioral effect is only seen in energetically challenged females raises the possibility that GnRH-II evolved specifically to coordinate changes in nutrition with reproductive status. In the musk shrew, food restriction for 48 h inhibits mating behavior, and 90 min of refeeding reverses this effect (25). This rapid behavioral transition is not accompanied by changes in endogenous cortisol or testosterone concentrations in plasma (25). Estradiol levels are extremely low in plasma of mating females, and we have shown that estradiol is likely produced neurally for local actions at estrogen receptors which are essential for display of female sexual behavior in this species (39). Yet, we have also examined steroid receptors in brains of AL, FR, and refed females and found no differences in the POA or VMN in the numbers of cells expressing immunoreactive estrogen or androgen receptors (40). These results lead us to hypothesize that a neuropeptide was responsible for mediating these rapid behavioral effects.
Based on the current data, we hypothesize that GnRH-II acting at the type II GnRH receptor is responsible for rapid behavioral recovery in FR females after refeeding. The type II receptor has a carboxyl-terminal tail that the type I receptor lacks (2). This C-terminal tail in the GnRH-II receptor is implicated in rapid desensitization of G protein-coupled signaling and is present in all nonmammalian vertebrates (41). Because of the wide distribution of type II receptors, it has been hypothesized that GnRH-II may be involved in the regulation behavior including sexual arousal (2). In addition, because there is a high colocalization of type I and type II receptors in pituitary gonadotrophs (2), it is also possible that GnRH-II and GnRH-I operate in concert to control the release of FSH and LH. In birds, administration of either GnRH-II or chicken GnRH-I triggers the release of FSH and LH (42). Similarly, administration of either GnRH-I or GnRH-II in musk shrews stimulates ovulation (33). Considering that the hypothesis of specific roles for GnRH-I and GnRH-II have not been tested in FR animals, it may be the case that the function of GnRH-II has been somewhat masked.
Musk shrews live in tropical and semitropical geographical regions (43, 44) and, like early mammals that evolved in the tropics, their reproductive success depends on assessment of unpredictable nutritional resources. Under these conditions, a fast-acting peptide, such as GnRH-II, would be an ideal candidate to synchronize nutritional status and mating behavior. Our findings support much speculation that the conserved GnRH-II regulates behavioral aspects of reproduction, whereas the GnRH-I controls gonadotropin secretion. These two GnRH systems likely evolved together and act at present in a synergistic manner. In fact, in the musk shrew both GnRH systems are impacted by nutritional status (34). Nutrition and reproduction are inextricably linked, and we propose that over the course of evolution first the ancient GnRH (GnRH-II) served all functions that coordinated energy and reproduction. At some later point during evolution, a second gene evolved and usurped many of the nonbehavioral functions of the GnRH-II peptide. In mammals, this more recently evolved GnRH, GnRH-I, controls the interactions between the pituitary and gonads. Most studies of the HPG axis are conducted in domesticated, well-fed laboratory mammals, which may or may not even produce GnRH-II. Thus, the choice of animal models, up until now, may have hindered our ability to discover the behavioral role of GnRH-II. By manipulating nutritional status in musk shrews, we have uncovered one of the roles of GnRH-II and expect that this discovery will lead to more informed investigations of the function of this neuropeptide in other species.
Referencesqly, 百拇医药
Topqly, 百拇医药
Abstractqly, 百拇医药
Introductionqly, 百拇医药
Materials and Methodsqly, 百拇医药
Resultsqly, 百拇医药
Discussionqly, 百拇医药
Referencesqly, 百拇医药
King JA, Millar RP 1997 Coordinated evolution of GnRHs and their receptors. In: Parhar I, Sakuma Y, eds. GnRH neurones: gene to behavior. Tokyo: Brain Shuppan; 51–77qly, 百拇医药
Millar R, Lowe S, Conklin D, Pawson A, Maudsley S, Troskie B, Ott T, Millar M, Lincoln G, Sellar R, Faurholm B, Scobie G, Kuestner R, Terasawa E, Katz A 2001 A novel mammalian receptor for the evolutionarily conserved type II GnRH. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:9636–9641qly, 百拇医药
Iwakoshi E, Takuwa-Kuroda K, Fujisawa Y, Hisada M, Ukena K, Tsutsui K, Minakata H 2002 Isolation and characterization of a GnRH-like peptide from Octopus vulgaris. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 291:1187–1193qly, 百拇医药
Grove-Strawser D, Sower SA, Ronsheim PM, Connolly JB, Bourn CG, Rubin BS 2002 Guinea pig GnRH: localization and physiological activity reveal that it, not mammalian GnRH, is the major neuroendocrine form in guinea pigs. Endocrinology 143:1602–1612
Silverman AJ, Livne I, Witkin JW 1993 The gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neuronal systems: immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization. In: Knobil E, Neill JD, eds. The physiology and reproduction. New York: Raven Press; 1683–1710mw], 百拇医药
Yu K, Sherwood N, Peter R 1988 Differential distribution of two molecular forms of gonadotropin-releasing hormone in discrete brain areas of the goldfish (Carassius auratus). Peptides 9:625–630mw], 百拇医药
Amano M, Oka Y, Aida K, Okumoto N, Kawashima S, Hasegawa Y 1991 Immunocytochemical demonstration of salmon GnRH and chicken GnRH-II in the brain of masu salmon (Oncorhynchus masou). Comp Endocrinol 314:587–597mw], 百拇医药
Sherwood N, Eiden L, Brownstein M, Spiess J, Rivier J, Vale W 1993 Gonadotropin-releasing hormones, including a novel form, in snook (Centroppomus undecimalis), in comparison with forms in black sea bass (Centropristis striata). Regul Pept 46:523–534mw], 百拇医药
Millar R, Conklin D, Lofton-Day C, Hutchinson E, Troskie B, Illing N, Sealfon SC, Hapgood J 1999 A novel human GnRH receptor homolog gene: abundant and wide tissue distribution of the antisense transcript. J Endocrinol 162:117–126
Neill JD, Duck LW, Sellers JC, Musgrove LC 2001 A gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor specific for GnRH II in primates. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 282:1012–10187f@-, 百拇医药
Sun YM, Flanagan CA, Illing N, Ott TR, Sellar R, Fromme BJ, Hapgood J, Sharp P, Sealfon SC, Millar RP 2001 A chicken gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor that confers agonist activity to mammalian antagonists. J Biol Chem 276:7754–77617f@-, 百拇医药
Muske L 1993 Evolution of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neuronal systems. Brain Behav Evol 42:215–2307f@-, 百拇医药
Dellovade T, King J, Millar R, Rissman EF 1993 Presence and differential distribution of distinct forms of immunoreactive gonadotropin-releasing hormone in the musk shrew brain. Neuroendocrinology 58:166–1777f@-, 百拇医药
King J, Hinds L, Mehl A, Saunders N, Millar R 1990 Chicken GnRH II occurs together with mammalian GnRH in South American species of marsupial (Monodelphis domestica). Peptides 11:521–5257f@-, 百拇医药
Kasten TL, White SA, Norton TT, Bond CT, Adelman JP, Fernald RD 1996 Characterization of two new preproGnRH mRNAs in the tree shrew: first direct evidence for mesencephalic GnRH gene expression in a placental mammal. Gen Comp Endocrinol 104:7–19
White RB, Eisen JA, Kasten TL, Fernald RD 1998 Second gene for gondaotropin-releasing hormone in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:305–3095, http://www.100md.com
King JA, Steneveld AA, Curlewis JD, Rissman EF, Millar RP1994 Identification of chicken GnRH II in brains of metatherian and early-evolved eutherian species of mammals. Regul Pept 54:467–4775, http://www.100md.com
Kelsall R, Coe IR, Sherwood NM 1990 Phylogeny and ontogeny of gonadotropin-releasing hormone: comparison of guinea pig, rat, and a protochordate. Gen Comp Endocrinol 78:479–4945, http://www.100md.com
Montaner AD, Affanni JM, King JA, Bianchini JJ, Tonarelli G, Somoza GM 1999 Differential distribution of gonadotropin-releasing hormone variants in the brain of Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris (Mammalia, Rodentia). Cell Mol Neurobiol 19:635–6515, http://www.100md.com
Chen A, Yahalom D, Ben-Aroya N, Kaganovsky E, Okon E, Koch Y 1998 A second isoform of gonadotropin-releasing hormone is present in he brain of human and rodents. FEBS Lett 435:199–2035, http://www.100md.com
McCann SM, Karanth S, Mastronardi CA, Dees WL, Childs G, Millar B, Sower S, Yu WH 2001 Control of gonadotropin secretion by follicle-stimulating hormone-releasing factor, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone, and leptin. Arch Med Res 32:476–485
Volkoff H, Peter RE 1999 Actions of two forms of gonadotropin releasing hormone and a GnRH antagonist on spawning behavior of the goldfish Carassius auratus. Gen Comp Endocrinol 116:347–35508s[}g4, http://www.100md.com
Maney DL, Richardson RD, Wingfield JC 1997 Central administration of chicken gonadotropin-releasing hormone-II enhances courtship behavior in a female sparrow. Horm Behav 32:11–1808s[}g4, http://www.100md.com
Schiml PA, Rissman EF 2000 Effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormones, corticotropin-releasing hormone, and vasopressin on female sexual behavior. Horm Behav 37:212–22008s[}g4, http://www.100md.com
Temple JL, Rissman EF 2000 Brief re-feeding restores reproductive readiness in food restricted female musk shrews. Horm Behav 38:21–2808s[}g4, http://www.100md.com
Moss RL, McCann SM 1973 Induction of mating behavior in rats by luteinizing hormone releasing factor. Science 181:177–17908s[}g4, http://www.100md.com
Pfaff DW 1973 Luteinizing hormone-releasing factor potentiates lordosis behavior in hypophysectomized ovariectomized female rats. Science 182:1148–114908s[}g4, http://www.100md.com
Dudley CA, Moss RL 1991 Facilitation of sexual receptivity in the female rat by C-terminal fragments of LHRH. Physiol Behav 50:1205–12080!xd, 百拇医药
Moore FL, Miller LJ, Spielvogel SP, Kubiak T, Folkers K 1982 Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone involvement in the reproductive behavior of a male amphibian. Neuroendocrinology 35:212–2160!xd, 百拇医药
Rissman EF 1992 Mating induces puberty in the female musk shrew. Biol Reprod 47:1–50!xd, 百拇医药
Schiml PA, Douris N, Isaac AC, Rissman EF 1999 Temporal aspects of female musk shrew (Suncus murinus) sexual behavior. J Comp Psychol 113:85–900!xd, 百拇医药
Rissman EF, Li X 1998 Sex differences in mammalian and chicken-II gonadotropin-releasing hormone immunoreactivity in musk shrew brain. Gen Comp Endocrinol 112:346–3550!xd, 百拇医药
Rissman EF, Alones V, Craig-Veit CB, Millam JR 1995 Distribution of chicken-II gonadotropin-releasing hormone in mammalian brain. J Comp Neurol 357:524–5310!xd, 百拇医药
Temple JL, Rissman EF 2000 Acute re-feeding reverses food restriction-induced hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis deficits. Biol Reprod 63:1721–1726
Kriegsfeld LJ, Ranalli NJ, Trasy AG, Nelson RJ 2001 Food restriction affects the gonadotropin releasing hormone neuronal system of male prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). J Neuroendocrinol 13:791–7981i, 百拇医药
Bronson FH 1986 Food-restricted, prepubertal, female rats: rapid recovery of luteinizing hormone pulsing with excess food, and full recovery of pubertal development with gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Endocrinology 118:2483–24871i, 百拇医药
Cameron JL, Nosbisch C 1991 Suppression of pulsatile luteinizing hormone and testosterone secretion during short term food restriction in the adult male rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Endocrinology 128:1532–15401i, 百拇医药
I’Anson H, Manning JM, Herbosa CG, Pelt J, Friedman CR, Wood RI, Bucholtz DC, Foster DL 2000 Central inhibition of gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion in the growth-restricted hypogonadotropic female sheep. Endocrinology 141:520–5271i, 百拇医药
Veney SL, Rissman EF 2000 Steroid implants in the medial preoptic area or ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus activate female sexual behavior in the musk shrew. J Neuroendocrinol 12:1124–1132
Temple JL, Rissman EF 2002 Nutrition, GnRH, and behavior. Prog Brain Res 141:305–316.., 百拇医药
Illing N, Troskie BE, Nahorniak CS, Hapgood JP, Peter RE, Millar RP 1999) Two gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor subtypes with distinct ligand selectivity and differential distribution in brain and pituitary in the goldfish (Carassius auratus). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:2526–25231.., 百拇医药
Sharp PJ, Talbot RT, Main GM, Dunn IC, Fraser HM, Huskisson NS 1990 Physiological roles of chicken LHRH-I and -II in the control of gonadotrophin release in the domestic chicken. J Endocrinol 124:291–299.., 百拇医药
Barbehenn KR 1974 Recent invasions of Micronesia by small mammals. Micronesica 10:41–50.., 百拇医药
Marshall JD, Quy DV, Gibson FL, Dung TC, Cavanaugh DC 1967 Ecology of plague in Vietnam I. Role of Suncus murinus. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 124:1083–1086(Jennifer L. Temple, Robert P. Millar and Emilie F. Rissman)
Abstract2q, http://www.100md.com
Top2q, http://www.100md.com
Abstract2q, http://www.100md.com
Introduction2q, http://www.100md.com
Materials and Methods2q, http://www.100md.com
Results2q, http://www.100md.com
Discussion2q, http://www.100md.com
References2q, http://www.100md.com
GnRH is the master neuropeptide that coordinates and regulates reproduction in all vertebrates and in some nonvertebrate species. Sixteen forms of GnRH have been isolated in brain. In the vast majority of species, two or more forms occur in anatomically and developmental distinct neuronal populations. In mammalian brain, two GnRH forms, mammalian (GnRH-I) and chicken-II (GnRH-II), exist. The distribution and functions of GnRH-I have been well characterized and intensively studied. However, the function of GnRH-II, which is the most evolutionarily conserved form of GnRH, has been elusive. Here we demonstrate that in a primitive mammal, the musk shrew (Suncus murinus), GnRH-II activates mating behavior in nutritionally challenged females within a few minutes after administration. In addition GnRH-II immunoreactive cell numbers and fibers increase in food-restricted females. Furthermore, GnRH type II receptor immunoreactivity was detected in musk shrew brain in regions associated with mating behavior. Our results lead us to hypothesize that the role of the evolutionarily conserved GnRH-II peptide is to coordinate reproductive behavior as appropriate to the organism’s energetic condition.
Introductionwdc, 百拇医药
Topwdc, 百拇医药
Abstractwdc, 百拇医药
Introductionwdc, 百拇医药
Materials and Methodswdc, 百拇医药
Resultswdc, 百拇医药
Discussionwdc, 百拇医药
Referenceswdc, 百拇医药
GnRH is present in all vertebrate and some nonvertebrate brains, where it acts to regulate reproduction in both males and females. There are 16 different forms of GnRH, each named for the species in which it was first isolated (1, 2, 3, 4). In mammals, the form of GnRH (so called mammalian or GnRH-I) that has been best characterized is produced by a loose continuum of neurons in the anterior portion of the medial ventral forebrain that project to the portal system connecting the brain to the pituitary where its pulsatile secretion stimulates gonadotropin release (5). Most vertebrates have two forms of GnRH in brain (6, 7, 8). One of these, first isolated from chicken brain (chicken GnRH-II), is evolutionarily conserved from bony fish to man. This form has been recently designated GnRH-II (9). GnRH-II is present in an anatomically distinct cell population residing in the midbrain. These cells project to many anterior and posterior locations. In addition to multiple forms of GnRH peptide in brain, two distinct receptors for GnRH exist (termed type I and type II) and both are present in mammal brain (2, 10, 11). Receptor binding assays revealed that the type II GnRH receptor has a higher selectivity for GnRH-II relative to GnRH-I (2). Despite this descriptive information, the function of GnRH-II has not been established but has been proposed to be a neuromodulator affecting reproductive behavior (1, 2, 12).
Almost 10 yr ago, GnRH-II was discovered in musk shrew (Suncus murinus) brain making this species the first placental mammal shown to have two forms of GnRH including GnRH-I and GnRH-II (13). Since that time, several other primitive mammals (tree shrews and golden moles), as well as several primates (humans, rhesus monkeys, and marmosets), have been examined either by in situ hybridization, HPLC, or immunocytochemistry, and GnRH-II has been located in brain tissues (1, 8, 14, 15, 16, 17). Although early studies indicated that GnRH-II was not present in rodent brain (18), recently it has been isolated in the midbrain of capybara and mouse (19, 20). These data remain controversial, however, as the GnRH-II peptide gene is not present in the completed mouse genome. When GnRH-II was first discovered, there was some speculation that this form of the peptide could have specific gonadotropin-releasing characteristics. However, few data support a primarily physiological role of GnRH-II in release of either FSH or LH (21). Once the anatomy of the neurons and their projections were defined, it was hypothesized that GnRH-II may be involved in regulation of behavior (1, 2, 12, 22). In several species of birds, sexual behavior in females is enhanced, to a modest degree, by infusion of GnRH-II (1, 23). In female musk shrews, however, intraventricular infusion of GnRH-II has no facilitatory effect on sexual receptivity (24).
In previous studies, we have shown that a mild 48-h food restriction blocks sexual receptivity in female musk shrews. However, 90 min of ad libitum (AL) food reinstates sexual behavior (25). Several lines of evidence lead us to hypothesize that this behavioral activation may be caused by one of the two GnRH peptides. Notably, others have shown that GnRH-I can stimulate sexual behavior in a variety of species from newts to rats (26, 27, 28, 29). To investigate this hypothesis, we administered saline, or GnRH-II to AL-fed and foodrestricted (FR) females. Next we asked whether the reinstatement of sexual receptivity we noted in FR females treated with GnRH-II was specific by repeating the study and administering GnRH-I, GnRH-II, or saline to FR females only. We found again that GnRH-II had a facilitatory effect, and GnRH-I had no effect on mating behavior. To ask whether endogenous concentrations of GnRH-II vary with nutritional condition, we used immunocytochemistry and analyzed both fiber density and cell numbers in brains of AL-fed and FR females. Finally, we used immunocytochemistry to determine whether the specific type II GnRH receptor was present in musk shrew brain. Our data show that GnRH-II, but not GnRH-I, activates mating in energetically challenged musk shrews, that immunoreactivity for GnRH-II cell bodies and fibers varies with nutritional status, and that this species has the GnRH-II selective type II GnRH receptors in brain.
Materials and Methods93, 百拇医药
Top93, 百拇医药
Abstract93, 百拇医药
Introduction93, 百拇医药
Materials and Methods93, 百拇医药
Results93, 百拇医药
Discussion93, 百拇医药
References93, 百拇医药
Musk shrews93, 百拇医药
All subjects were adult, sexually naive female musk shrews (S. murinus) that were born in our colony at the University of Virginia. Female musk shrews attain reproductive maturity by 25 d of age, as defined by their ability to become pregnant and give birth to offspring (Rissman, E. F., unpublished observations). After weaning, at 21 d of age, females were housed individually in cages (28 x 17 x 12 cm) containing pine wood shavings and paper towels for bedding. The room was kept on a 14-h light, 10-h dark cycle (lights on at 0700 h Eastern standard time) and only contained other females. The room temperature was 23 ± 1 C. All animals were fed Purina Cat Chow (Ralston-Purina, St. Louis, MO) and provided water AL.
Food restrictiond^+*{0, http://www.100md.com
Between the ages of 30 and 50 d, females with average body weights (between 19 and 27 g) were monitored for food intake daily for 4 d. To monitor food intake, the shrews received preweighed cat chow in clean small food cups between 1200 and 1400 h, at the same time body weights were recorded. Twenty-four hours later, the residual food was retrieved from the bowl as well as from the bedding on the floor of the cage and weighed. The average daily intake over the 4-d period was determined for each animal. Females were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The animals in the FR group received 60% of their average AL intake for the next 48 h. Females in the AL group continued to be fed as described above. These methods have been described previously (25). The University of Virginia Committee on Animal Care and use has approved all procedures in these experiments.d^+*{0, http://www.100md.com
Surgical proceduresd^+*{0, http://www.100md.com
To implant intraventricular cannula, females between 35 and 55 d of age were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (4.5 mg/kg; 0.1 ml/10 g body weight). The animal was placed into the stereotaxic apparatus (Kopf Instruments, Tujunga, CA). The guide cannulae (33 gauge, 2.2 mm; Plastics One, Roanoke, VA) were aimed at the lateral ventricle by centering on the intersection of the sagittal suture and the most caudal portion of the olfactory bulb and moving -4.5 rostral-caudal and -1.0 medial-lateral. A hole was drilled and a cannula was lowered to a depth of 2.2 mm, aimed at the lateral ventricle. When the guide cannula was secure, a cannula insert was placed inside. For sham-operated animals, all procedures were the same as described above with the exception of the insertion of the guide cannulae.
The day after surgery, females were assigned to either the AL or FR feeding condition (described above). For 2 d, they were maintained on this feeding regimen. On the third day, each female was tested a single time for sexual behavior. All testing took place between 0800 and 1100 h. Before testing, females were briefly anesthetized with halothane and infused with saline (0.09%), GnRH-I (1 µg), or GnRH-II (1 µg), all peptides were dissolved in saline and given in a volume of 30 µl. The infusions were delivered by removing the cannula insert and replacing it with a longer cannulae that projected 0.1 mm further into the brain than the guide. Infusion was conducted by hand-delivery slowly over the course of 20–30 sec. Thirty seconds after the infusion, the temporary cannulae was removed, the insert replaced and the female was returned to her home cage. Fifteen to twenty minutes later, females were placed into a clean, clear Plexiglas test box with a sexually experienced male. Behavior was observed for 30 min in experiment 1 and 45 min in experiment 2 or until the male achieved ejaculation, whichever occurred first.
Experimental designs%hrsqwf, http://www.100md.com
In the first experiment, AL and FR females were infused with either saline (0.09%; AL, n = 10; FR, n = 11) or GnRH-II (1 µg; AL, n = 11, FR, n = 8). Doses for GnRH-I and -II were based on previous work done in our laboratory (24). Sham-operated females (AL, n = 8; FR, n = 9) did not receive infusions. In the second study, all the females were food restricted and each received saline (n = 8), GnRH-I (1 µg; n = 8) or GnRH-II (1 µg; n = 8). For GnRH-II immunocytochemistry, animals were maintained for 2 d in either the FR (n = 10) or the AL (n = 7) condition then killed and brains collected as described below. To validate the presence of the type II GnRH receptor in musk shrew brain, five AL females were used.%hrsqwf, http://www.100md.com
Behavioral testing%hrsqwf, http://www.100md.com
One notable aspect of sexual behavior in female musk shrews is the absence of a behavioral, vaginal, or ovarian estrous cycle (30). Thus, we can select females on any day and mating behavior ensures within a few minutes after introduction to the male. During a mating bout, sexually naive females are initially aggressive toward males. Sexual receptivity is marked by a significant reduction of aggression and the onset of rump presentations and tail wagging (31). At this time, the male begins to mount and intromit. Because female musk shrews do not have a reflexive posture such as lordosis, it is often difficult for the male to achieve a placed intromission (one in which the penis enters the vagina). Therefore, we score both missed and placed intromissions. Typically, a male will ejaculate after four to seven placed intromissions. During these tests, latencies for the female to rump present, tail wag, receive mounts, receive missed intromissions, receive placed intromissions, and receive five placed intromissions or an ejaculation were recorded by an experimenter blind to the treatment of the animals.
Confirmation of cannula placement and ovulation43mruk, 百拇医药
Twenty to 24 h after behavioral testing, females were overdosed with halothane inhalant. India ink was injected into the cannulae and placement of the cannula was considered correct if the ventricles were filled with ink. Ovaries were examined for ovulation, which was scored if a corpus luteum was visible and at least one ovum was present in the oviduct. Female musk shrews exhibit mating-induced ovulation; however, typically few females ovulate after the first virgin mating (30).43mruk, 百拇医药
Immunocytochemistry43mruk, 百拇医药
Females were deeply anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (10 mg/kg, ip) before perfusion between 0800 and 1200 h. Females were perfused with heparinized saline (100 U heparin/1 ml of 0.9% saline) followed immediately by Zamboni’s fixative (4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 15% saturated picric acid). Brains were removed, cryoprotected overnight in 30% sucrose at 4 C, and quickly frozen in chilled 2-methyl butane. Brains were stored at -70 C until they were sectioned.
Brains were sectioned coronally at 30 µm and collected in a series of four wells. One well of tissue (one-quarter of the sections collected) was processed for immunocytochemistry using an antibody to GnRH-II (diluted 1:1000; antibody no. 741). This antiserum has no cross-reactivity with GnRH-I and has been previously validated for use in the musk shrew (32, 33). A subset of this same tissue was processed for type II GnRH receptor using an antibody made to the highly specific extracellular loop three domain of the human type II GnRH receptor (2). Because this antibody had not been tested in musk shrew, we also examined brain sections that were processed without primary antibody or secondary antibody. Immunoreactivity was visualized using the Vector Elite ABC method (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA). All rinses and solutions were made in 0.02 M Tris-buffered saline (pH 7.8). Sections were pretreated in 1% sodium borohydride to remove residual aldehydes. Tissue was incubated in avidin and biotin blocking solutions (Vector Blocking Kit) to block endogenous biotin. Next, the tissue was incubated in the primary antiserum (a rabbit polyclonal used at a dilution of 1:1000) for 48 h at 4 C. After rinses, tissue was incubated in secondary antiserum (biotinylated goat antirabbit IgG from Vector Laboratories, Inc., 1:500) for 1 h. After incubation in secondary antiserum, the tissue was treated with avidin-biotin complex. Immunoreactivity was visualized with nickel intensified diaminobenzidine solution (0.25% nickel ammonium sulfate and 0.05% diaminobenzidine) and activated by 0.001% hydrogen peroxide. All tissue was processed at the same time for each study to eliminate inter-run variability and incubation and development times remained constant.
Quantification of GnRH-II-immunoreactive (ir) cell number and fiber densityh0w}, 百拇医药
Brains were processed as described and images were analyzed using the Metamorph Image analysis program for fiber density, cell bodies were counted manually. The majority of GnRH-II cell bodies are located in the midbrain just ventral to the periaqueductal gray. They form a cluster of cells that extend approximately 700–800 µm rostral to caudal. Cell bodies were counted throughout the extent of the midbrain. The midbrain was divided into anterior and posterior portions based on the presence or absence of the brachium pontis. The GnRH-II-ir fibers project to a number of areas, but the majority reside in the medial habenula (33). Immunoreactive fiber area was quantified in the preoptic area (POA), the medial habenula, and the median eminence. The habenula is a large structure and representative sections from the anterior, medial, and posterior portion of this nucleus were scored. The observer was blind to the feeding condition of the animals.
Statistical analysess, 百拇医药
In the first experiment, latencies to perform various behaviors were analyzed using two-way ANOVA with feeding condition and drug treatment as the factors. In the second experiment, the effect of drug treatment was analyzed within each feeding condition using a one-way ANOVA. The numbers of females in each feeding/drug group displaying tail wagging and receiving mounts were analyzed using 2 and Fisher’s exact tests. For ANOVA, all post hoc comparisons were made using Bonferroni’s multiple comparison tests. The number of GnRH-II cell bodies and fiber density were analyzed using a Student’s t test. Data were considered significantly different if P < 0.05.s, 百拇医药
Resultss, 百拇医药
Tops, 百拇医药
Abstracts, 百拇医药
Introductions, 百拇医药
Materials and Methodss, 百拇医药
Resultss, 百拇医药
Discussions, 百拇医药
Referencesw, 百拇医药
GnRH-II activates mating behaviors in FR femalesw, 百拇医药
A two-way ANOVA was conducted for each behavioral latency measure: the two factors were food condition and drug treatment. For rump present, tail wag, mount, placed intromission, and ejaculation an effect of drug treatment was noted [F(2,58) = 3.42, 3.52, 3.58, 6.43, and 9.43, respectively, P < 0.04]. For rump present, tail wag, and mount latency, differences were noted between GnRH-II and saline infused animals. Latencies to display behaviors were always shorter for females receiving GnRH-II (P < 0.05). Differences between saline and sham surgery animals were noted in the case of latencies for males to begin to intromit and ejaculate, with males performing faster when paired with sham-operated females as compared with saline-infused test partners (P < 0.05). Effects of food condition were noted for two measures, rump presentation and intromission [F(1,58) = 10.63, 5.75 respectively, P < 0.02 at least]. In both cases, AL-fed females were faster to engage in these behaviors than were FR animals (P < 0.05). Finally an interaction between drug treatment and food was evident for one behavior, rump presentation [F(2,58) = 5.14, P < 0.01, Fig. 1A]. Paired comparisons reveal that sham operated females took longer to rump present if they had been FR as opposed to fed AL (P < 0.05). Even more interestingly, FR females treated with GnRH-II were faster to perform the behavior than FR saline treated or sham operated females (P < 0.05).
fig.ommitteed'm+g61g, 百拇医药
Figure 1. Effect of GnRH-II administration on female musk shrew sexual behavior. A, Mean ± SEM latency to display rump presentations in AL-fed and FR females. The open bars represent females that underwent a sham surgery; the hatched bars show data from females that received intracerebroventricular treatment with saline, and the black bars represent data from females infused intracerebroventricular with GnRH-II (1 µg). A two-way ANOVA revealed a significant interaction between food condition and drug treatment (P < 0.01). Planned comparisons showed two significant (P < 0.05) effects. *, Significantly different from both other FR groups; **, significantly different from FR sham females. B, The percentage of females in each condition that received mounts. *, Significantly different from both of the FR groups.'m+g61g, 百拇医药
To make comparisons between the total numbers of animals in each group that displayed or did not display a particular behavior, we conducted 2 and Fisher exact tests. The numbers of FR females in each of the treatment groups that displayed tail wagging or received mounts from males did not differ [2(2) = 2.83, 4.71, respectively]. However, more selective Fisher exact tests between saline and GnRH-II-treated females revealed a trend whereby more GnRH-II-treated females performed tail wagging (P = 0.051) and a significant difference between numbers of saline vs. GnRH-II-treated females receiving mounts (P = 0.01; Fig. 1B).
Females treated with GnRH-II ovulated, and the numbers doing so did not vary with food condition (82% in the AL and 63% in the FR groups). In addition, one saline-treated animal that received an ejaculation ovulated.2e, 百拇医药
GnRH-I has no effect on sexual receptivity in FR females2e, 百拇医药
A one-way ANOVA performed on behavioral latency measures revealed a significant effect for tail wag, mounts and missed intromissions [F(2,24) = 7.14, 7.57, and 4.37 respectively; P < 0.026 at least; Fig. 2A]. Specifically for tail wag and mounts, administration of GnRH-II resulted in faster latencies than infusion of saline or GnRH-I (P < 0.05). The onset for males to perform a missed intromission was faster when test partners were GnRH-II-infused females as compared with GnRH-I-treated females (P < 0.05).2e, 百拇医药
fig.ommitteed2e, 百拇医药
Figure 2. Effect of saline GnRH-I or GnRH-II administration on sexual behavior in FR females. A, Mean ± SEM latency to display tail wagging behavior. B, The percentage of females in each condition that received mounts. *, Significantly different from females in GnRH-I treatment group (P < 0.05). When GnRH-II- and saline-treated females are compared a trend (P < 0.055) was noted.
The numbers of FR females in each of the treatment groups that displayed tail wagging or received mounts from males was significantly different [2(2) = 6.39, P < 0.05]. More GnRH-II-treated females displayed each behavior as compared with GnRH-I-infused females (P = 0.005, Fig. 2B). A trend was noted when saline and GnRH-II-treated females were compared (P = 0.055).a|, http://www.100md.com
Both GnRH treatments promoted ovulation; 88% of the GnRH-II- and 76% of the GnRH-I-treated females ovulated as compared with none of the saline-treated females.a|, http://www.100md.com
Food restriction significantly decreases the number of GnRH-II-ir cellsa|, http://www.100md.com
Food status had no effect on total numbers of GnRH-II-ir cell bodies [t(13) = 1.29]. When the anterior and posterior regions were analyzed separately, we did note a significant change in cell numbers in the anterior midbrain [t(13) = 1.88, P < 0.04; Fig. 3A] but not the posterior area [t(13) = 0.99]. More GnRH-II-ir cells were observed in brains of FR as compared with AL-fed females.
fig.ommitteedf:22, http://www.100md.com
Figure 3. GnRH-II-ir cell numbers and fibers. A, Mean ± SEM. GnRH-II cell bodies counted in the anterior midbrain in brains of females that were fed AL or food restricted. B, Mean ± SEM. GnRH-II-ir fiber area (µm2) in the median eminence from females that were fed AL or FR. *, Significantly different from AL-fed females (P < 0.05).f:22, http://www.100md.com
Immunoreactive fiber density was examined in three areas, and in one of these a significant difference was noted. In the median eminence, immunoreactive fibers filled a greater area in FR than in AL-fed female brains [t(15) = 2.01, P < 0.033; Fig. 3B]. There were no differences in fiber density among females in the two feeding conditions in the habenula [t(15) = 1.26] or the POA [t(15) = 0.11].f:22, http://www.100md.com
Type II GnRH receptor distribution in musk shrew brainf:22, http://www.100md.com
Type II GnRH receptor staining was present in many areas of the brain, including POA, cingulate cortex, arcuate nucleus, habenula, and infundibular stalk (Fig. 4A). The immunoreactivity was isolated to the membrane, which is similar to previously published results from other species (Ref. 2 ; Fig. 4B). No positive staining was observed in control tissue run without primary or secondary antibody (data not shown).
fig.ommitteed^/p$, 百拇医药
Figure 4. A, Camera lucida drawings of four coronal sections from the musk shrew brain where type II GnRH receptor immunoreactivity was observed. The black squares represent immunoreactive areas containing neurons with putative membrane staining indicative of membrane receptors. 3v, Third ventricle; ac, anterior commissure; ARC, arcuate nucleus; ca, cerebral aqueduct; cc, corpus callosum; CCtx, cingulate cortex; INF, infundibular stalk; lv, lateral ventricle; MH, medial habenula. B, Photomicrograph of type II GnRH receptor immunoreactivity in the female musk shrew POA. The immunoreactivity appears as outlines of neurons, suggesting cell membrane staining. Scale bar, 10 µm.^/p$, 百拇医药
Discussion^/p$, 百拇医药
Top^/p$, 百拇医药
Abstract^/p$, 百拇医药
Introduction^/p$, 百拇医药
Materials and Methods^/p$, 百拇医药
Results^/p$, 百拇医药
Discussion^/p$, 百拇医药
References^/p$, 百拇医药
GnRH-II mRNA or peptide has been detected in brains of several mammalian species, yet, until now its function has remained elusive. Here we demonstrate that GnRH-II facilitates sexual receptivity in females, and this effect is only displayed by animals that are energetically challenged by food restriction, and not by AL-fed controls. Intracerebroventricular infusion iv of GnRH-I did not induce mating behavior in nutritionally challenged animals. Thus, the actions of GnRH-II on behavior are selective and likely via the type II GnRH receptor.
It has been well documented that both peptide content and pulsatile release of GnRH-I is responsive to nutritional status. Food restriction inhibits LH and GnRH-I pulsatility, GnRH-I immunoreactivity, and GnRH-I content in brain (34, 35, 36, 37, 38). However, the effects of nutritional status on GnRH-II-ir cell number and fiber density reported here have not been observed previously. Thus, our data are consistent with data from other species showing, both directly and indirectly, that food restriction inhibits the release of GnRH peptide. However, our findings are novel because we have focused on the evolutionarily conserved GnRH-II, and we have revealed a direct relationship between food, mating behavior, and GnRH-II. The increased number of immunoreactive cell bodies and fiber dense area after food restriction suggests that an individual’s nutritional status affects either the production and/or the release of GnRH-II peptide. Furthermore, because administration of GnRH-II to FR females reinstates mating behavior, we hypothesize that food restriction inhibits release of GnRH-II, thus causing accumulation of the peptide in cell bodies and their terminals.
In addition to having different projection sites, GnRH-I and GnRH-II bind to different GnRH receptor subtypes with different affinities (2). GnRH-II has a 24-fold higher affinity for the type II, compared with the type I receptor, and GnRH-II has only 9–10% of the activity of GnRH-I at the type I receptor (2). Here we have mapped the distribution of immunoreactive type II GnRH receptors in the female musk shrew brain. The extracellular loop three antibody used for these studies has also been used in human, monkey, sheep, and mouse brains and in all cases membrane-like immunoreactivity was noted. In musk shrew, specific membrane-like staining was present in several brain regions including; olfactory forebrain, cingulate cortex, POA, arcuate nucleus, ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus (VMN), and medial habenula. This distribution overlaps with that reported in other species, with the exception of the cingulate cortex (2). In brains of AL-fed musk shrews, fibers immunoreactive for GnRH-II are located in all these regions. Of those regions mentioned above and assayed for GnRH-II peptide, we have noted its presence in POA, hypothalamus (that includes arcuate nucleus and VMN), and in the medial habenula (33). In fact, in musk shrew brain the highest concentration of GnRH-II peptide, outside of the region containing its cell bodies, is the medial habenula and electron microscopy reveals GnRH-II in presynaptic vesicles in this area (33). Because type II GnRH receptors are located in regions associated with mating behavior in the musk shrew, namely, POA and VMN (39), and we saw no behavioral effect with administration of GnRH-I, it is likely that the effects that we observed are mediated by actions of GnRH-II via the type II GnRH receptors in one or both locations.
Administration of GnRH-I can facilitate sexual receptivity in gonadectomized female rats (26, 27, 28). Work done on fragments of the GnRH-I peptide illustrate that specifically amino acids 5–10 are responsible for the behavioral actions of GnRH-I (28). Interestingly, only 3 of these 6 amino acids overlap with the GnRH-II peptide. More recently, a few studies suggest that GnRH-II is involved in the regulation of sexual behavior in birds. Administration of GnRH-II, but not chicken GnRH-I, to female sparrows facilitated solicitation behavior in response to male song (23). In addition, GnRH-II initiates courtship in female ring doves (1). To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first study showing any effect of GnRH-II on any behavior in a mammalian species.a\, http://www.100md.com
The fact that the behavioral effect is only seen in energetically challenged females raises the possibility that GnRH-II evolved specifically to coordinate changes in nutrition with reproductive status. In the musk shrew, food restriction for 48 h inhibits mating behavior, and 90 min of refeeding reverses this effect (25). This rapid behavioral transition is not accompanied by changes in endogenous cortisol or testosterone concentrations in plasma (25). Estradiol levels are extremely low in plasma of mating females, and we have shown that estradiol is likely produced neurally for local actions at estrogen receptors which are essential for display of female sexual behavior in this species (39). Yet, we have also examined steroid receptors in brains of AL, FR, and refed females and found no differences in the POA or VMN in the numbers of cells expressing immunoreactive estrogen or androgen receptors (40). These results lead us to hypothesize that a neuropeptide was responsible for mediating these rapid behavioral effects.
Based on the current data, we hypothesize that GnRH-II acting at the type II GnRH receptor is responsible for rapid behavioral recovery in FR females after refeeding. The type II receptor has a carboxyl-terminal tail that the type I receptor lacks (2). This C-terminal tail in the GnRH-II receptor is implicated in rapid desensitization of G protein-coupled signaling and is present in all nonmammalian vertebrates (41). Because of the wide distribution of type II receptors, it has been hypothesized that GnRH-II may be involved in the regulation behavior including sexual arousal (2). In addition, because there is a high colocalization of type I and type II receptors in pituitary gonadotrophs (2), it is also possible that GnRH-II and GnRH-I operate in concert to control the release of FSH and LH. In birds, administration of either GnRH-II or chicken GnRH-I triggers the release of FSH and LH (42). Similarly, administration of either GnRH-I or GnRH-II in musk shrews stimulates ovulation (33). Considering that the hypothesis of specific roles for GnRH-I and GnRH-II have not been tested in FR animals, it may be the case that the function of GnRH-II has been somewhat masked.
Musk shrews live in tropical and semitropical geographical regions (43, 44) and, like early mammals that evolved in the tropics, their reproductive success depends on assessment of unpredictable nutritional resources. Under these conditions, a fast-acting peptide, such as GnRH-II, would be an ideal candidate to synchronize nutritional status and mating behavior. Our findings support much speculation that the conserved GnRH-II regulates behavioral aspects of reproduction, whereas the GnRH-I controls gonadotropin secretion. These two GnRH systems likely evolved together and act at present in a synergistic manner. In fact, in the musk shrew both GnRH systems are impacted by nutritional status (34). Nutrition and reproduction are inextricably linked, and we propose that over the course of evolution first the ancient GnRH (GnRH-II) served all functions that coordinated energy and reproduction. At some later point during evolution, a second gene evolved and usurped many of the nonbehavioral functions of the GnRH-II peptide. In mammals, this more recently evolved GnRH, GnRH-I, controls the interactions between the pituitary and gonads. Most studies of the HPG axis are conducted in domesticated, well-fed laboratory mammals, which may or may not even produce GnRH-II. Thus, the choice of animal models, up until now, may have hindered our ability to discover the behavioral role of GnRH-II. By manipulating nutritional status in musk shrews, we have uncovered one of the roles of GnRH-II and expect that this discovery will lead to more informed investigations of the function of this neuropeptide in other species.
Referencesqly, 百拇医药
Topqly, 百拇医药
Abstractqly, 百拇医药
Introductionqly, 百拇医药
Materials and Methodsqly, 百拇医药
Resultsqly, 百拇医药
Discussionqly, 百拇医药
Referencesqly, 百拇医药
King JA, Millar RP 1997 Coordinated evolution of GnRHs and their receptors. In: Parhar I, Sakuma Y, eds. GnRH neurones: gene to behavior. Tokyo: Brain Shuppan; 51–77qly, 百拇医药
Millar R, Lowe S, Conklin D, Pawson A, Maudsley S, Troskie B, Ott T, Millar M, Lincoln G, Sellar R, Faurholm B, Scobie G, Kuestner R, Terasawa E, Katz A 2001 A novel mammalian receptor for the evolutionarily conserved type II GnRH. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:9636–9641qly, 百拇医药
Iwakoshi E, Takuwa-Kuroda K, Fujisawa Y, Hisada M, Ukena K, Tsutsui K, Minakata H 2002 Isolation and characterization of a GnRH-like peptide from Octopus vulgaris. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 291:1187–1193qly, 百拇医药
Grove-Strawser D, Sower SA, Ronsheim PM, Connolly JB, Bourn CG, Rubin BS 2002 Guinea pig GnRH: localization and physiological activity reveal that it, not mammalian GnRH, is the major neuroendocrine form in guinea pigs. Endocrinology 143:1602–1612
Silverman AJ, Livne I, Witkin JW 1993 The gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neuronal systems: immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization. In: Knobil E, Neill JD, eds. The physiology and reproduction. New York: Raven Press; 1683–1710mw], 百拇医药
Yu K, Sherwood N, Peter R 1988 Differential distribution of two molecular forms of gonadotropin-releasing hormone in discrete brain areas of the goldfish (Carassius auratus). Peptides 9:625–630mw], 百拇医药
Amano M, Oka Y, Aida K, Okumoto N, Kawashima S, Hasegawa Y 1991 Immunocytochemical demonstration of salmon GnRH and chicken GnRH-II in the brain of masu salmon (Oncorhynchus masou). Comp Endocrinol 314:587–597mw], 百拇医药
Sherwood N, Eiden L, Brownstein M, Spiess J, Rivier J, Vale W 1993 Gonadotropin-releasing hormones, including a novel form, in snook (Centroppomus undecimalis), in comparison with forms in black sea bass (Centropristis striata). Regul Pept 46:523–534mw], 百拇医药
Millar R, Conklin D, Lofton-Day C, Hutchinson E, Troskie B, Illing N, Sealfon SC, Hapgood J 1999 A novel human GnRH receptor homolog gene: abundant and wide tissue distribution of the antisense transcript. J Endocrinol 162:117–126
Neill JD, Duck LW, Sellers JC, Musgrove LC 2001 A gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor specific for GnRH II in primates. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 282:1012–10187f@-, 百拇医药
Sun YM, Flanagan CA, Illing N, Ott TR, Sellar R, Fromme BJ, Hapgood J, Sharp P, Sealfon SC, Millar RP 2001 A chicken gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor that confers agonist activity to mammalian antagonists. J Biol Chem 276:7754–77617f@-, 百拇医药
Muske L 1993 Evolution of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neuronal systems. Brain Behav Evol 42:215–2307f@-, 百拇医药
Dellovade T, King J, Millar R, Rissman EF 1993 Presence and differential distribution of distinct forms of immunoreactive gonadotropin-releasing hormone in the musk shrew brain. Neuroendocrinology 58:166–1777f@-, 百拇医药
King J, Hinds L, Mehl A, Saunders N, Millar R 1990 Chicken GnRH II occurs together with mammalian GnRH in South American species of marsupial (Monodelphis domestica). Peptides 11:521–5257f@-, 百拇医药
Kasten TL, White SA, Norton TT, Bond CT, Adelman JP, Fernald RD 1996 Characterization of two new preproGnRH mRNAs in the tree shrew: first direct evidence for mesencephalic GnRH gene expression in a placental mammal. Gen Comp Endocrinol 104:7–19
White RB, Eisen JA, Kasten TL, Fernald RD 1998 Second gene for gondaotropin-releasing hormone in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:305–3095, http://www.100md.com
King JA, Steneveld AA, Curlewis JD, Rissman EF, Millar RP1994 Identification of chicken GnRH II in brains of metatherian and early-evolved eutherian species of mammals. Regul Pept 54:467–4775, http://www.100md.com
Kelsall R, Coe IR, Sherwood NM 1990 Phylogeny and ontogeny of gonadotropin-releasing hormone: comparison of guinea pig, rat, and a protochordate. Gen Comp Endocrinol 78:479–4945, http://www.100md.com
Montaner AD, Affanni JM, King JA, Bianchini JJ, Tonarelli G, Somoza GM 1999 Differential distribution of gonadotropin-releasing hormone variants in the brain of Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris (Mammalia, Rodentia). Cell Mol Neurobiol 19:635–6515, http://www.100md.com
Chen A, Yahalom D, Ben-Aroya N, Kaganovsky E, Okon E, Koch Y 1998 A second isoform of gonadotropin-releasing hormone is present in he brain of human and rodents. FEBS Lett 435:199–2035, http://www.100md.com
McCann SM, Karanth S, Mastronardi CA, Dees WL, Childs G, Millar B, Sower S, Yu WH 2001 Control of gonadotropin secretion by follicle-stimulating hormone-releasing factor, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone, and leptin. Arch Med Res 32:476–485
Volkoff H, Peter RE 1999 Actions of two forms of gonadotropin releasing hormone and a GnRH antagonist on spawning behavior of the goldfish Carassius auratus. Gen Comp Endocrinol 116:347–35508s[}g4, http://www.100md.com
Maney DL, Richardson RD, Wingfield JC 1997 Central administration of chicken gonadotropin-releasing hormone-II enhances courtship behavior in a female sparrow. Horm Behav 32:11–1808s[}g4, http://www.100md.com
Schiml PA, Rissman EF 2000 Effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormones, corticotropin-releasing hormone, and vasopressin on female sexual behavior. Horm Behav 37:212–22008s[}g4, http://www.100md.com
Temple JL, Rissman EF 2000 Brief re-feeding restores reproductive readiness in food restricted female musk shrews. Horm Behav 38:21–2808s[}g4, http://www.100md.com
Moss RL, McCann SM 1973 Induction of mating behavior in rats by luteinizing hormone releasing factor. Science 181:177–17908s[}g4, http://www.100md.com
Pfaff DW 1973 Luteinizing hormone-releasing factor potentiates lordosis behavior in hypophysectomized ovariectomized female rats. Science 182:1148–114908s[}g4, http://www.100md.com
Dudley CA, Moss RL 1991 Facilitation of sexual receptivity in the female rat by C-terminal fragments of LHRH. Physiol Behav 50:1205–12080!xd, 百拇医药
Moore FL, Miller LJ, Spielvogel SP, Kubiak T, Folkers K 1982 Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone involvement in the reproductive behavior of a male amphibian. Neuroendocrinology 35:212–2160!xd, 百拇医药
Rissman EF 1992 Mating induces puberty in the female musk shrew. Biol Reprod 47:1–50!xd, 百拇医药
Schiml PA, Douris N, Isaac AC, Rissman EF 1999 Temporal aspects of female musk shrew (Suncus murinus) sexual behavior. J Comp Psychol 113:85–900!xd, 百拇医药
Rissman EF, Li X 1998 Sex differences in mammalian and chicken-II gonadotropin-releasing hormone immunoreactivity in musk shrew brain. Gen Comp Endocrinol 112:346–3550!xd, 百拇医药
Rissman EF, Alones V, Craig-Veit CB, Millam JR 1995 Distribution of chicken-II gonadotropin-releasing hormone in mammalian brain. J Comp Neurol 357:524–5310!xd, 百拇医药
Temple JL, Rissman EF 2000 Acute re-feeding reverses food restriction-induced hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis deficits. Biol Reprod 63:1721–1726
Kriegsfeld LJ, Ranalli NJ, Trasy AG, Nelson RJ 2001 Food restriction affects the gonadotropin releasing hormone neuronal system of male prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). J Neuroendocrinol 13:791–7981i, 百拇医药
Bronson FH 1986 Food-restricted, prepubertal, female rats: rapid recovery of luteinizing hormone pulsing with excess food, and full recovery of pubertal development with gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Endocrinology 118:2483–24871i, 百拇医药
Cameron JL, Nosbisch C 1991 Suppression of pulsatile luteinizing hormone and testosterone secretion during short term food restriction in the adult male rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Endocrinology 128:1532–15401i, 百拇医药
I’Anson H, Manning JM, Herbosa CG, Pelt J, Friedman CR, Wood RI, Bucholtz DC, Foster DL 2000 Central inhibition of gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion in the growth-restricted hypogonadotropic female sheep. Endocrinology 141:520–5271i, 百拇医药
Veney SL, Rissman EF 2000 Steroid implants in the medial preoptic area or ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus activate female sexual behavior in the musk shrew. J Neuroendocrinol 12:1124–1132
Temple JL, Rissman EF 2002 Nutrition, GnRH, and behavior. Prog Brain Res 141:305–316.., 百拇医药
Illing N, Troskie BE, Nahorniak CS, Hapgood JP, Peter RE, Millar RP 1999) Two gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor subtypes with distinct ligand selectivity and differential distribution in brain and pituitary in the goldfish (Carassius auratus). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:2526–25231.., 百拇医药
Sharp PJ, Talbot RT, Main GM, Dunn IC, Fraser HM, Huskisson NS 1990 Physiological roles of chicken LHRH-I and -II in the control of gonadotrophin release in the domestic chicken. J Endocrinol 124:291–299.., 百拇医药
Barbehenn KR 1974 Recent invasions of Micronesia by small mammals. Micronesica 10:41–50.., 百拇医药
Marshall JD, Quy DV, Gibson FL, Dung TC, Cavanaugh DC 1967 Ecology of plague in Vietnam I. Role of Suncus murinus. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 124:1083–1086(Jennifer L. Temple, Robert P. Millar and Emilie F. Rissman)