当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《中华现代妇产科学杂志》 > 2004年第3期
编号:10582955
输卵管结扎术8137例临床分析
http://www.100md.com 《中华现代妇产科学杂志》 2004年第3期
1资料与方法,2结果,3讨论,参考文献
     【摘要】 目的 采用经腹输卵管结扎、切断术阻塞输卵管通道。方法 将输卵管卷曲结扎术、输卵管卷曲结扎切断术称为传统法即A组;输卵管抽蕊包埋术、改良输卵管卷曲结扎切断术称为改良法即B组。两组分别进行女性绝育。结果 传统法(A组)与改良法(B组)均行χ 2 检验,P<0.05,差异有显著性。结论 改良法输卵管结扎,操作方便,痛苦小,并发症少,成功率高。

    Guo Xingchun,Zhao Hong,Zhao Shuying

    Family Planning Clinic of Fugu County,Shanxi719000.

    【Abstract】 Objective using abdominal ligation and fallotomy of oviduct to obstruct fallopian tube Methods Madlener’s method of tubo-sterilization and Pomeroy’s method of tubo-sterilization is called tradition method(group A),Iring method of tubo-sterilization and modified Pomeroy’s method of tubo-sterilization is called modification method(group B).The two methods above are used to perform tubosterilization in the two groups respectively.Results There is significant difference between group A and group B ......

您现在查看是摘要页,全文长 5288 字符