当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《中国矫形外科杂志》 > 2006年第6期
编号:11007502
高龄股骨粗隆间不稳定型骨折不同手术方式比较
http://www.100md.com 《中国矫形外科杂志》 2006年第6期
骨折固定,,高龄;,股骨粗隆间骨折;,骨折固定;,人工关节,1临床资料,2讨论,参考文献:
     摘 要:[目的]通过分析动力髋螺钉(DHS)及人工股骨头置换术治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的手术效果,评价不同的手术方案治疗高龄患者股骨粗隆间骨折的临床效果。[方法]本组40例,男22例,女18例;年龄75~90岁,平均82岁。其中22例应用DHS手术内固定治疗;18例采用人工股骨头置换术治疗。[结果]平均随访15 a,应用DHS及人工股骨头置换术患者,卧床时间分别为3周和1周,完全负重时间分别为10周和6周。无感染及骨折不愈合发生。2例DHS内固定的患者出现螺纹钉穿出股骨头,4例出现髋内翻,2例出现肺部感染。仅30%年龄>70岁的患者恢复至术前的活动水平。[结论]人工股骨头置换术是老年人股骨粗隆间骨折较为理想的内固定方法,可大大减少并发症。

    关键词:高龄; 股骨粗隆间骨折; 骨折固定; 人工关节

    Comparative study of the different surgical technique for intertrochanteric fractue in elderly∥CHEN Dexi,WAN Xiuyang,LANG Jixiao,et al. Orthopedic Department, Qingdao Traditional Medical Hospital, Qingdao 266033

    Abstract:[Objective]To evaluate and compare the of the ideals surgical technique for intertrochanteric fractue between DHS and arthroplasty.[Method]A total of 40 gerontal patients with the different surgical treatment from January 1999 to May 2004 were chosen. The mean age of the patients was 82 (75~90).Among the patients, 23 patients by DHS,17 by arthroplasty.[Result]The duration of followup averaged 1.5 years.The time in bed were 3 and 1 weeks due to DHS and arthroplasty, the full weightbearing time were 10 and 6 weeks.[Conclusion]arthroplasty is ideal choice for the unstable intertrochanteric fractue. ......

您现在查看是摘要页,全文长 8123 字符