当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《英国医学杂志》 > 2005年第1期
编号:11304230
Delayed hypersensitivity due to epidural block with ropivacaine

     1 Hashima City Hospital, 3-246 Shinseicho, Hashima City 501-6206, Japan

    Ropivacaine, introduced in 1995, is an amide-type local anaesthetic. It consists of pure optical S-(-)-isomers and has a low cardiotoxicity. We report delayed hypersensitivity reactions to ropivacaine.

    A 74 year old man with postherpetic neuralgia started taking amitriptyline, alprazolam, and loxoprofen and underwent an epidural block with 0.2% ropivacaine hydrochloride without preservatives (48 ml or 96 ml daily). He had no history of allergy to any local anaesthetics. Two weeks later, purpuric rash appeared on his legs, and two days afterwards he developed a widespread blotchy erythema on his trunk and arms (figure). Laboratory examination showed normal white cell and platelet counts and slight eosinophilia (640/mm3). The epidural block and the drugs were stopped, and the eruptions completely resolved within seven days. We did an intradermal test with 0.2% ropivacaine from a plastic ampoule without a rubber stopper. Erythema (maximum size was 23 mmx13 mm) appeared 8-72 hours after the injection. We did the test again and took a specimen for biopsy. Histology showed perivascular infiltrates of lymphocytes and eosinophils in the dermis. Patch testing with amitriptyline, alprazolam, and loxoprofen induced no eruptions, nor did restarting the drugs.

    Purpuric rash on the leg (left) and back (right)

    Eleven cases of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions have been reported, caused by local injections of amides such as lignocaine, mepivacaine, and prilocaine.1-5 The symptoms were erythema, papules, vesicles, and swelling, but they did not include purpuric rash. No cases related to an epidural block or ropivacaine have been reported. Ropivacaine may cause allergic reactions characterised by signs such as urticaria, angioneurotic oedema, tachycardia, and vomiting, but delayed hypersensitivity reactions are not referred to in the Physicians' Desk Reference. The manufacturer also has had no similar reports.

    Contributors: MB wrote the paper, searched the literature, and is guarantor. MH accessed the manufacturer and elaborated on the paper.

    Funding: None.

    References

    Hofmann H, Maibach HI, Prout E. Presumed generalized exfoliative dermatitis to lidocaine. Arch Dermatol 1975;111: 266.

    Suhonen R, Kanerva L. Contact allergy and cross-reactions caused by prilocaine. Am J Contact Dermat 1997;8: 231-5.

    Evans LA, Pointing J, Wills EJ, Michalopoulos J, Adelstein S. Recurrent facial swelling following dental procedures. Med J Aust 2002;177: 522.

    Kaufmann JM, Hale EK, Ashinoff RA, Cohen DE. Cutaneous lidocaine allergy confirmed by patch testing. Drugs Dermatol 2002;1: 192-4.

    Mackley CL, Marks JG Jr, Anderson BE. Delayed-type hypersensitivity to lidocaine. Arch Dermatol 2003;139: 343-6.(Masanori Ban, chief, Masa)
    信息仅供参考,不构成任何之建议、推荐或指引。文章版权属于原著作权人,若您认为此文不宜被收录供大家免费阅读,请邮件或电话通知我们,我们收到通知后,会立即将您的作品从本网站删除。

   微信文章  关注百拇  评论几句  搜索更多