当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《世界华人消化杂志》 > 2007年第4期
编号:11358063
H2受体阻滞剂联合多潘立酮对肝硬化患者门脉血流的影响
http://www.100md.com 达 炜, 陈金联, 朱金水, 陈尼维, 孙 群, 陈维雄
肝硬化;门脉系统;H2受体阻滞剂;多潘立酮;多普勒超声达炜,陈金联,朱金水,陈尼维,孙群,陈维雄.H2受体阻滞剂联合多潘立酮对肝硬化患者门脉血流的影响. 世界华人消化杂志2007;15(4)408-411,达炜,陈金联,朱金水,陈尼维
第1页

    参见附件(963KB,4页)。

     达炜, 陈金联, 朱金水, 陈尼维, 孙群, 陈维雄, 上海交通大学附属第六人民医院消化内科 上海市 200233

    通讯作者:
达炜, 200233, 上海市宜山路600号, 上海交通大学附属第六人民医院消化内科. daqdong@online.sh.cn

    电话:
021-64369181-8969 传真: 021-64837019

    收稿日期:
2006-11-04 接受日期: 2006-12-01

    Effect of H2-receptor blocker combined with domperidone on the blood flow of portal venous system in patients with liver cirrhosis

    Wei Da, Jin-Lian Chen, Jin-Shui Zhu, Ni-Wei Chen, Sun Qun, Wei-Xiong Chen

    

    Wei Da, Jin-Lian Chen, Jin-Shui Zhu, Ni-Wei Chen, Sun Qun, Wei-Xiong Chen,
Department of Gastroenterology, the Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200233, China

    Correspondence to:
Wei Da, Department of Gastroenterology, the Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai 200233, China. daqdong@online.sh.cn

    Received:
2006-11-04 Accepted:2006-12-01

    

    Abstract
AIM: To explore the effect of H2-receptor blocker combined with domperidone on the blood flow of portal venous system in patients with liver cirrhosis.

    METHODS: A total of 60 patients with liver cirrhosis were randomly and averagely divided into group A, B, and C, treated with H2-receptor blocker, domperidone, and their combination, respectively. Twenty healthy subjects served as normal controls. Portal venous flow (PVF, mL/min), splenic venous flow (SVF, mL/min) and superior mesenteric venous flow (SMVF, mL/min) were determined using Doppler ultrasonography before and after treatment.

    RESULTS: After treatment, PVF was significantly higher than that before treatment (850.23 ± 140.78 vs 695.22 ± 221.44, P < 0.01), while SVF and SMVF were lower (both P > 0.05) in group A. PVF was increased as compared with that before treatment in group B, but there was no significant difference (P > 0.05). However, SVF and SMVF were markedly decreased as compared with those before treatment in group B (SVF: 598 ......

您现在查看是摘要介绍页,详见PDF附件(963KB,4页)