当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《中国循环杂志》 > 1999年第0期
编号:10239060
冠状动脉内超声与冠状动脉造影引导支架置入预后的比较

     作者:韩 丁 朱文玲 黄超联

    单位:

    关键词:

    目的 目的:评价有引起冠状动脉微血管病变疾病基础和无引起冠状动脉微血管病变基础,但冠状动脉造影正常患者的冠状动脉血流储备功能的差别。

    方法:冠状动脉造影正常患者27例,男18例,女9例,平均年龄56.89±9.20岁。采用冠状动脉内多普勒导丝检查技术测定65支冠状动脉的近、远端平均峰速(APV)、舒张期与收缩期流速比(DSVR)、冠状动脉血流储备(CFR)和近端与远端流速比(P/DVR)。研究分为两组,A组为有冠状动脉微血管病变基础者,包括高血压和(或)糖尿病和心肌病患者,共20例,48支冠状动脉(前降支17支,回旋支16支,右冠状动脉15支)。B组为无冠状动脉微血管病变基础者(正常对照),共7例,17支冠状动脉(包括前降支7支,回旋支3支,右冠状动脉7支)。

    结果:A组CFR明显较B组小(2.48±0.69比3.19±0.65)(P<0.001),A组近、远端APV较B组增高(20.14±6.39 cm/s比16.33±4.75 cm/s和19.05±6.46 cm/s比15.39±6.29 cm/s,P<0.05),DSVR及P/DVR两组间无显著差别(P>0.05)。以CFR>2.0为正常标准值,则A组中37/48支冠状动脉(77%)CFR正常(A1组),11/48支冠状动脉(23%)CFR异常(A2组),而B组17支冠状动脉的CFR均大于2.0。A1与A2两组比较,除A2组充血相APV增加明显小外(36.11±15.56 cm/s比47.51±13.39 cm/s,P<0.05),其它指标间未见有意义的差别(P>0.05)。B、A1及A2 3组比较,CFR依次降低,差别显著,分别为3.19±0.65,2.63±0.58,1.16±0.47(P均<0.05);远端基础APV分别为15.39±6.29 cm/s,18.14±5.43 cm/s,22.10±8.59 cm/s,B组明显低于A1及A2组(P<0.05);充血相APV分别为46.32±14.08 cm/s,47.51±13.39 cm/s,36.11±15.56 cm/s,A2组明显低于其他两组(P<0.05)。

    结论:有冠状动脉微血管病基础的患者,尽管冠状动脉造影正常,其CFR明显低于无冠状动脉微血管病变基础的患者;有冠状动脉微血管病变基础的冠状动脉中,232%检出CFR的异常(<2.0),CFR降低的原因可能与冠状动脉充血反应能力下降和(或)基础AVP增加有关。

    Coronary Flow Reserve Evaluated with Doppler Flow Wire in Patients

    with Normal Coronary Angiogram (Abstract)

    Department of Cardiology, Zhong Shan Hospital of Shanghai Medical University

    and Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai (200032)

    Wei Meng, Shao Zhili, Shen Xuedong, et al.

    Objective: To evaluate coronary flow reserve (CFR) in patients with normal coronary angiogram with Doppler flow wire, comparing the CFR in patients who have microcornary artery disease basis (e.g. underlying hypertension and/or diabetes and cardiomyopathy with that in patients who have not.

    Methods: Twenty-seven patients (18 males, 9 females, mean age 56.89±9.20 years) with normal coronary angiogram were studied. 65 coronary arteries (LAD 24, LCX 19 and RCA 22) were examined with Doppler flow wire. The patients were divided into two groups: group A had 20 patients (48 arteries, including LAD 17, LCX 16, RCA 15) with hypertension and/or diabetes and cardiomyopathy; group B had 7 patients (17 arteries, including LAD 7, LCX 3, RCA 7) without underlying diseases of microcoronary artery as normal controls. The measurements included proximal and distal average peak velocity (APV), diastolic and systolic velocity ratio (DSVR), coronary flow reserve (CFR) and proximal and distal velocity ratio (P/DVR).

    Results: CFR in group A was significantly lower than it in group B (2.48±0.69 vs. 3.19±0.65, p<0.001). The basic proximal and distal APV in group A were significantly higher than it in group B (20.14±6.39 cm/s vs. 16.33±4.75 cm/s and 19.05±6.46 cm/s vs. 15.39±6.29 cm/s respectively, all p<0.05). Differences in DSVR and P/DVR between the two groups were insignificant (all (p>0.05). While the normal value of CFR was assigned as >2.0, CFR in 37 of 48 arteries (77%) in group A were normal (group A1), and in 11 of 48 arteries (23%) were abnormal (group A2), however CFR in group B were all greater than 2.0. All parameters between group A1 and A2 had no significant difference (p>0.05) except hyperemic APV which showed remarkably lower in group A2 than in group A1 (36.11±15.56 cm/s vs. 48.06±13.42 cm/s, p<0.05). CFRs in group B, A1 and A2 were 3.19±0.65, 2.63±0.58 and 1.16±0.47 respectively, there were significant differences among the three groups (p<0.05); basic APVs in group B, A1 and A2 were 15.39±6.29 cm/s, 18.14±5.43 cm/s and 22.10±8.59 cm/s respectively, it in group B was significantly lower than it in the other groups (p<0.05); hyperemic APVs in group B, A1 and A2 were 46.32±14.08 cm/s, 47.51±13.39 cm/s, 36.11±15.56 cm/s, respectively, it in group A2 was significantly lower than it in the other groups (p<0.05).

    Conclusion: CFR in patients with normal coronary angiograms, as well as with basis of microcoronary artery disease was remarkably lower than it in those without basis of microcoronary artery disease. Seriously impaired CFR (<2.0) was found in 23% of coronary arteries in patients with basis of microcoronary artery disease, decreased CFR may be caused by impaired microcoronary artery dilatation response and/or accelerated basic APV.
    濠电姷鏁搁崕鎴犲緤閽樺娲偐鐠囪尙顦┑鐘绘涧濞层倝顢氶柆宥嗙厱婵炴垵宕弸銈嗐亜閳哄啫鍘撮柡灞剧☉閳藉宕¢悙宸骄闂佸搫顦弲婊兾涢崘顔艰摕婵炴垶菤閺嬪酣鐓崶銊﹀皑闁稿鎸荤粋鎺斺偓锝庝簽閸旓箑顪冮妶鍡楀潑闁稿鎹囬弻娑㈡偐瀹曞洢鈧帗淇婇崣澶婂闁宠鍨垮畷鍫曞煘閻愵剛浜欓梺璇查缁犲秹宕曢崡鐐嶆稑鈽夐姀鐘靛姦濡炪倖甯掗ˇ顖炴倶閿旂瓔娈介柣鎰▕閸庢梹顨ラ悙鍙夊枠妞ゃ垺妫冨畷銊╊敇閻愰潧鎼稿┑鐘垫暩閸嬬娀骞撻鍡楃筏闁诡垼鐏愬ú顏勭闁绘ê鍚€缁楀姊洪幐搴g畵闁瑰嘲顑夊畷鐢稿醇濠㈩亝妫冮弫鍌滅驳鐎n亜濡奸梻浣告憸閸嬬偤骞愰幎钘夎摕闁哄洢鍨归獮銏ゆ煛閸モ晛孝濠碘€茬矙閺岋綁濮€閳轰胶浠╃紓鍌氱Т閿曨亪鐛繝鍥ㄦ櫢闁绘ǹ灏欓悿鈧俊鐐€栭幐楣冨磻閻斿摜顩烽柟鎵閳锋垿鏌涢敂璇插笌闁荤喐鍣村ú顏勎ч柛銉厛濞肩喖姊洪崘鍙夋儓闁瑰啿姘︾换姘舵⒒娴e懙褰掑嫉椤掑倻鐭欓柟鐑橆殕閸婂灚銇勯弬鍨挃缁炬儳銈搁弻锟犲礃閵娿儮鍋撶粙鎸庢瘎婵犵數濮幏鍐礋閸偆鏉归柣搴㈩問閸犳牠鎮ラ悡搴f殾婵せ鍋撳┑鈩冪摃椤︽娊鏌涢幘鏉戠仸缂佺粯绋撻埀顒佺⊕宀e潡鎯屾繝鍋芥棃鎮╅崣澶嬪枑闂佽桨绶¢崳锝夈€侀弴銏℃櫆闁芥ê顦介埀顒佺☉閳规垿鏁嶉崟顐$捕婵犫拃鍛珪缂侇喗鐟︾换婵嬪炊閵娧冨箰濠电姰鍨煎▔娑㈡晝閵堝姹查柡鍥╁枑閸欏繘鏌i悢鐓庝喊婵☆垪鍋撻梻浣芥〃缁€浣虹矓閹绢喗鍋╂繝闈涱儏缁€鍐┿亜椤撶喎鐏i柟瀵稿厴濮婄粯鎷呯粵瀣異闂佸摜濮甸幑鍥х暦濠靛﹦鐤€婵炴垼椴搁弲锝囩磽閸屾瑧鍔嶅畝锝呮健閸┿垽寮崼鐔哄幗闂佺懓顕崕鎴炵瑹濞戙垺鐓曢柡鍌氱仢閺嗭綁鏌″畝瀣瘈鐎规洘甯掗~婵嬵敇閻橀潧骞€缂傚倸鍊烽悞锕傘€冮崨姝ゅ洭鏌嗗鍛姦濡炪倖甯掗崰姘缚閹邦喚纾兼い鏃囧亹缁犲鏌ㄥ┑鍫濅槐闁轰礁鍟村畷鎺戭潩閸楃偞鎲㈤梻浣藉吹婵炩偓缂傚倹鑹鹃埢宥夋晲閸モ晝鐓嬮梺鍓茬厛閸犳捇鍩€椤掍礁绗掓い顐g箞椤㈡﹢鎮╅锝庢綌闂傚倷绶氬ḿ褍煤閵堝悿娲Ω閳轰胶鍔﹀銈嗗笒閸嬪棝寮ㄩ悧鍫㈢濠㈣泛顑囧ú瀵糕偓瑙勬磸閸ㄨ姤淇婇崼鏇炵倞闁靛ǹ鍎烘导鏇㈡煟閻斿摜鐭屽褎顨堥弫顔嘉旈崪鍐◤婵犮垼鍩栭崝鏍磻閿濆鐓曢柕澶樺灠椤╊剙鈽夐幘鐟扮毢缂佽鲸甯楀ḿ蹇涘Ω瑜忛悾濂告⒑瑜版帩妫戝┑鐐╁亾闂佽鍠楃划鎾诲箰婵犲啫绶炲璺虹灱濮婄偓绻濋悽闈涗粶妞ゆ洦鍘介幈銊︺偅閸愩劍妲梺鍝勭▉閸樺ジ宕归崒鐐寸厪濠电偟鍋撳▍鍡涙煕鐎c劌濡奸棁澶愭煥濠靛棙鍣归柡鍡欏枑娣囧﹪顢涘鍗炩叺濠殿喖锕ュ浠嬨€侀弴銏℃櫜闁糕剝鐟﹂濠氭⒒娴h櫣甯涢柟纰卞亞閹广垹鈹戠€n剙绁﹂柣搴秵閸犳牜绮婚敐鍡欑瘈濠电姴鍊搁顐︽煙閺嬵偄濮傛慨濠冩そ楠炴劖鎯旈敐鍌涱潔闂備礁鎼悧婊堝礈閻旈鏆﹂柣鐔稿閸亪鏌涢弴銊ュ季婵炴潙瀚—鍐Χ閸℃鐟愰梺缁樺釜缁犳挸顕i幎绛嬫晜闁割偆鍠撻崢閬嶆⒑閻熺増鎯堢紒澶嬫綑閻g敻宕卞☉娆戝帗閻熸粍绮撳畷婊冾潩椤掑鍍甸梺闈浥堥弲婊堝磻閸岀偞鐓ラ柣鏂挎惈瀛濋柣鐔哥懕缁犳捇鐛弽顓炵妞ゆ挾鍋熸禒顖滅磽娴f彃浜炬繝銏f硾閳洝銇愰幒鎴狀槯闂佺ǹ绻楅崑鎰枔閵堝鈷戠紓浣贯缚缁犳牠鏌i埡濠傜仩闁伙絿鍏橀弫鎾绘偐閼碱剦妲伴梻浣藉亹閳峰牓宕滃棰濇晩闁硅揪闄勯埛鎴︽偣閸ワ絺鍋撻搹顐や簴闂備礁鎲¢弻銊︻殽閹间礁鐓濋柟鎹愵嚙缁狅綁鏌i幇顓熺稇妞ゅ孩鎸搁埞鎴︽偐鐠囇冧紣闂佸摜鍣ラ崹鍫曠嵁閸℃稑纾兼慨锝庡幖缂嶅﹪骞冮埡鍛闁圭儤绻傛俊閿嬬節閻㈤潧袥闁稿鎹囬弻鐔封枔閸喗鐏撶紒楣冪畺缁犳牠寮婚悢琛″亾閻㈢櫥鐟版毄闁荤喐绮庢晶妤呮偂閿熺姴钃熸繛鎴欏灩缁犳娊鏌¢崒姘辨皑闁哄鎳庨埞鎴︽倷閸欏娅i梻浣稿簻缁茬偓绌辨繝鍥х妞ゆ棁濮ゅ▍銏ゆ⒑鐠恒劌娅愰柟鍑ゆ嫹

   闂備浇顕уù鐑藉极婵犳艾纾诲┑鐘叉搐缁愭鏌¢崶鈺佹灁闁崇懓绉撮埞鎴︽偐閸欏鎮欏┑鈽嗗亝閿曘垽寮诲☉銏犖ㄩ柕蹇婂墲閻濇牠鎮峰⿰鍐ㄧ盎闁瑰嚖鎷�  闂傚倸鍊烽懗鑸电仚缂備胶绮〃鍛村煝瀹ュ鍗抽柕蹇曞У閻庮剟姊虹紒妯哄闁稿簺鍊濆畷鏇炵暆閸曨剛鍘介梺閫涘嵆濞佳勬櫠椤斿浜滈幖鎼灡鐎氾拷  闂傚倷娴囧畷鍨叏閺夋嚚娲Χ閸ワ絽浜炬慨妯煎帶閻忥附銇勯姀锛勬噰妤犵偛顑夐弫鍐焵椤掑倻鐭嗛柛鏇ㄥ灡閻撶喐淇婇婵愬殭缂佽尪宕电槐鎾愁吋韫囨柨顏�  闂傚倸鍊烽懗鍫曞箠閹捐瑙﹂悗锝庡墮閸ㄦ繈骞栧ǎ顒€濡肩痪鎯с偢閺屾洘绻涢悙顒佺彅闂佸憡顨嗘繛濠囧蓟閳╁啫绶為悗锝庝簽閸旂ǹ鈹戦埥鍡楃伈闁瑰嚖鎷�