当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《医学美学美容》 > 2024年第18期
编号:2201337
微创超薄贴面与全瓷贴面修复前牙间隙的美学效果比较
http://www.100md.com 2024年10月21日 医学美学美容 2024年第18期
1资料与方法,2结果,3讨论,参考文献
     [摘 要]目的 比较微创超薄贴面与全瓷贴面修复前牙间隙的美学效果。方法 选择2022年1月-2023年1月于本院进行前牙间隙修复的60例患者为研究对象,采取随机数字表法分为对照组(n=30,患牙50颗)和观察组(n=30,患牙54颗)。对照组采用全瓷贴面修复,观察组采用微创超薄贴面修复,比较两组修复效果、牙体美观度评分及患牙并发症发生情况。结果 观察组修复效果A级占比高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组修复1年后牙体质地、颜色、唇侧龈缘水平、软组织形态、牙槽外形美观度评分高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组患牙并发症发生率为9.26%,低于对照组的28.00%(P<0.05)。结论 微创超薄贴面在前牙间隙修复中的修复效果和美学效果均优于全瓷贴面,且并发症发生率更低,值得临床应用。

    [关键词] 微创超薄贴面;全瓷贴面;前牙间隙

    [中图分类号] R783.4 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1004-4949(2024)18-0001-04

    Comparison of Aesthetic Effects Between Minimally Invasive Ultra-thin Veneer and All-ceramic Veneer in Repairing Hag Teeth

    DONG Huatuo, GENG Qi

    (Huai’an Yakang Dental Clinic, Huai’an 223300, Jiangsu, China)

    [Abstract]Objective To compare the aesthetic effects of minimally invasive ultra-thin veneer and all-ceramic veneer in repairing hag teeth. Methods Sixty patients who underwent hag teeth repair in our hospital from January 2022 to January 2023 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group (n=30, 50 affected teeth) and observation group (n=30, 54 affected teeth) by random number table method. The control group was treated with all-ceramic veneer ......

您现在查看是摘要页,全文长 12398 字符