即刻种植牙法与常规延迟种植牙法治疗牙齿缺失的临床效果比较
1资料与方法,2结果,3讨论,参考文献
[摘 要]目的 分析在牙齿缺失患者中应用即刻种植牙法与常规延迟种植牙法治疗的效果差异。方法 选取2023年1月-2024年1月我院收治的62例牙齿缺失患者为研究对象,随机分为对照组(n=31)和观察组(n=31)。对照组采用常规延迟种植牙法,观察组采用即刻种植牙法,比较两组临床疗效、种植体稳定值与红色美学评分、修复效果。结果 观察组治疗总有效率为96.77%,高于对照组的80.65%(P<0.05);观察组治疗后1、3、6个月种植体稳定值均高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组治疗后1、3、6个月红色美学评分均高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组美观性、舒适性、色泽、牙龈边缘、形态、个性化特征评分均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 即刻种植牙法治疗牙齿缺失的临床效果优于常规延迟种植牙法,治疗后种植体稳定值更高,牙齿美观性更佳,口腔修复效果较为理想,值得临床应用。[关键词] 牙齿缺失;即刻种植牙法;常规延迟种植牙法
[中图分类号] R783 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1004-4949(2024)18-0148-04
Comparison of Clinical Effects of Immediate Implant Placements and Conventional Delayed Implant Placements in the Treatment of Tooth Loss
WANG Yanhua1, ZHANG Shaoshan2
(1.Xi’an Yanta Wang Yanhua Stomatological Clinic, Xi’an 710006, Shaanxi, China; 2.Xi’an Yanta Zhang Shaoshan Stomatological Clinic, Xi’an 710000, Shaanxi, China)
[Abstract]Objective To analyze the difference in the effect of immediate implant placements and conventional delayed implant placements in patients with tooth loss. Methods A total of 62 patients with tooth loss admitted to our hospital from January 2023 to January 2024 were randomly divided into control group (n=31) and observation group (n=31). The control group was treated with conventional delayed implant placements ......
您现在查看是摘要页,全文长 11577 字符。