比较奥美拉唑与兰索拉唑治疗胃溃疡的临床疗效(1)
【摘 要】目的:探讨奥美拉唑与兰索拉唑治疗胃溃疡的临床疗效。方法:选择2015年1月-2017年12月胃溃疡患者100例根据治疗方法分组。对照组给予奥美拉唑治疗,观察组则给予兰索拉唑治疗。比较两组疾病治疗有效率;胃溃疡愈合时间、腹痛消失时间、腹胀消失时间;治疗前后患者生活质量水平。结果:观察组疾病治疗有效率高于对照组,P<0.05;观察组胃溃疡愈合时间、腹痛消失时间、腹胀消失时间短于对照组,P<0.05;治疗前两组生活质量水平相近,P>0.05;治疗后观察组生活质量水平优于对照组,P<0.05。结论:兰索拉唑治疗胃溃疡的应用效果确切,可有效改善血压,加速血压达标,且无严重不良反应,安全有效,值得推广应用。
【关键词】奥美拉唑;兰索拉唑;胃溃疡;临床疗效
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of omeprazole and lansoprazole in treating gastric ulcer. Methods: 100 patients with gastric ulcer in December January 2015 -2017 were selected according to the treatment group. The control group was given omeprazole treatment, the observation group was treated with lansoprazole treatment. The effective rate of disease treatment, the healing time of gastric ulcer, the time of abdominal pain disappear and the time of abdominal distension were compared between the two groups, and the quality of life of patients before and after treatment was also compared. Results: the effective rate of disease treatment in the observation group was higher than that of the control group, P < 0.05. The healing time of gastric ulcer, the disappearance time of abdominal pain and the disappearance time of abdominal distension were shorter than that of the control group, P < 0.05; the quality of life of the two groups before the treatment was similar, P > 0.05, and the quality of life of the observation group was better than that of the control group, P < 0.05. Conclusion: the effect of lansoprazole in the treatment of gastric ulcer is accurate. It can effectively improve blood pressure, accelerate blood pressure to reach the standard, and have no serious adverse reaction. It is safe and effective. It is worth popularizing.
keyword: Omeprazole; lansoprazole; gastric ulcer; clinical curative effect
【中圖分类号】R573.1 【文献标识码】B 【文章编号】1005-0019(2018)03-00-01
胃溃疡为常见多发消化系统疾病,其发生和幽门螺杆菌感染之间关系密切,因此治疗胃溃疡关键在于幽门螺杆菌的根除,以改善症状,降低复发率,加速溃疡愈合[1]。本研究分析了兰索拉唑治疗胃溃疡的应用效果,报告如下。
1 资料与方法
1.1 一般资料
选择2015年1月-2017年12月胃溃疡患者100例根据治疗方法分组。观察组男21例,女29例;年龄27-58岁,平均(38.21±4.13)岁。对照组男23例,女27例;年龄28-57岁,平均(38.66±4.12)岁。两组一般资料无统计学差异。
1.2 方法
两组均给予阿莫西林1g/次,2次/d。甲硝唑0.4g/次,餐后服用,2次/d。枸橼酸铋220mg/次,2次/d。治疗4周。在此基础上,对照组给予奥美拉唑治疗,剂量为20mg/次,2次/d。口服治疗,治疗4周。观察组则给予兰索拉唑治疗。剂量为20mg/次,2次/d。治疗4周。
1.3 观察指标 比较两组疾病治疗有效率;胃溃疡愈合时间、腹痛消失时间、腹胀消失时间;治疗前后患者生活质量水平(用胃肠疾病生活质量(GIQLI)量表评价,越低越好)。
显效:症状显著改善或消失,幽门螺杆菌根除,溃疡愈合;有效:症状改善,溃疡有所缩小;无效:达不到上述标准。疾病治疗有效率为显效、有效百分率之和[2]。
1.4 统计学方法 SPSS15.0统计,为计量资料并作t检验,%表示计数资料作检验,P<0.05显示差异显著。(艾广凤)
参见:首页 > 医疗版 > 疾病专题 > 消化内科 > 胃疾病 > 胃溃疡 濠电儑绲藉ú鐘诲礈濠靛洤顕遍柛娑卞枤椤╃兘鏌涘☉鍗炲閺夆晜妫冮弻娑樷枎韫囨挴鍋撴禒瀣劦妞ゆ巻鍋撻柛鐘崇〒濡叉劕鈹戦崶鈹炬灃閻庡箍鍎卞Λ娑㈠焵椤掑鐏︽鐐差儔楠炲洭顢旈崨顓炵哎濠电偠鎻徊鎯洪幋鐘典笉闁挎繂鎷嬮崵鍫澪旈敂绛嬪劌闁哥偞鎸抽弻鏇㈠幢閺囩姴濡介柣銏╁灠缂嶅﹪骞婇敓鐘茬疀妞ゆ挾鍋熸禒鎰版⒑閸︻厐鐟懊洪妶鍥潟闁冲搫鎳庤繚闂佺ǹ鏈粙鎺楁倵椤斿墽纾奸柡鍐ㄥ€稿暩婵犫拃鍕垫疁鐎殿喖鐖煎畷姗€濡歌閸撴垶绻涚€涙ḿ鐭婂Δ鐘叉憸閺侇噣顢曢敂钘夘€涘┑锛勫仜婢х晫绮欐繝鍥ㄧ厸濠㈣泛锕ら弳鏇熸叏閻熼偊妯€闁轰礁绉撮悾婵嬪礃椤垳鎴烽梻浣筋嚃閸犳捇宕濊箛娑辨晣缂備焦岣块埢鏃堟煟閹寸儑渚涢柛鏂垮暣閺岋繝宕掑顓犵厬缂備焦顨呴ˇ閬嶅焵椤掑喚娼愮紒顔肩箻閿濈偤鏁冮崒姘卞摋闁荤娀缂氬▍锝囩矓閸喓鈧帒顫濋鐘闂侀潧娲ゅú銊╁焵椤掑偆鏀版繛澶嬬洴瀹曘垽濡堕崶銊ヮ伕閻熸粎澧楃敮妤咃綖婢舵劖鍋i柛銉娑撹尙绱掓潏銊х畼闁归濞€閹粓鎸婃径澶岀梾濠电偛顕慨楣冨春閺嶎厼鍨傞柕濞炬櫆閸嬨劌霉閿濆懎鏆熸俊顖氱墦濮婃椽顢曢敐鍡欐闂佺粯鎼换婵嬬嵁鐎n喖绠f繝濠傚閹枫劑姊洪幐搴b槈闁哄牜鍓熷畷鐟扳堪閸曨収娴勫銈嗗笂閻掞箓寮抽鍫熺厱闁瑰搫绉村畵鍡涙煃瑜滈崜姘潩閵娾晜鍋傞柨鐔哄Т鐟欙箓骞栭幖顓炵仯缂佲偓婢跺⊕褰掑礂閸忚偐娈ら梺缁樼箖閻╊垰鐣烽敓鐘茬闁肩⒈鍓氶鎴︽⒑鐠団€虫灁闁告柨楠搁埢鎾诲箣閻愭潙顎撳┑鐘诧工閸燁垶骞嗛崒姣綊鎮╅幓鎺濆妷濠电姭鍋撻柟娈垮枤绾鹃箖鏌熺€电ǹ啸鐟滅増鐓¢弻娑㈠箳閺傚簱鏋呭┑鐐叉噹闁帮絾淇婇幘顔芥櫢闁跨噦鎷�
闁诲海鏁婚崑濠囧窗閺囩喓鈹嶅┑鐘叉搐濡﹢鏌涢妷銏℃珖鐟滃府鎷�
闂備胶枪缁绘鈻嶉弴銏犳瀬闁绘劗鍎ら崕宀勬煟閹伴潧澧い搴嫹
闂佽崵濮村ú銈団偓姘煎灦椤㈡瑩骞嬮敃鈧粈鍕煟濡绲荤紓宥忔嫹
闂備胶鎳撻崥瀣垝鎼淬劌纾奸柕濞炬櫅閸楁娊鏌℃径瀣劸婵☆垽鎷�
|