当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《医学信息》 > 20146
编号:13698995
腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术疗效比较(2)
http://www.100md.com 2014年2月12日 《医学信息》 20146
     [6]Zia Z, Thurley P D, Pollock J G, et al. The diagnosis and endovascular management of superior mesenteric artery (SMA) branch pseudoaneurysms after appendicectomy[J]. Vascular and endovascular surgery, 2012, 46(1): 54-57.

    [7]Wilson D G G, Bond A K, Ladwa N, et al. Intra-abdominal collections following laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: an experience of 516 consecutive cases at a district general hospital[J]. Surgical endoscopy, 2013: 1-6.

    [8]Patel N, Brown A, Ghisel M, et al. Prospective audit of surgical and patient outcomes after emergency appendicectomy in a large university teaching hospital[C]BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY. 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 2013, 100: 82-83.

    [9]Corbett D F, Jawaid W, Losty P D. Interval appendicectomy in children-clinical outcomes, financial costs and patient benefits[C]//BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY. 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 2013, 100: 141-142.

    编辑/张燕, 百拇医药(王刚 姜志新)
上一页1 2