当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《医学信息》 > 201416
编号:13688379
腹股沟疝传统修补术与无张力修补术的疗效对比分析
http://www.100md.com 2014年4月23日 李先泰
第1页

    参见附件。

     摘要:目的 探讨腹股沟疝传统修补术与无张力修补术在治疗腹股沟疝存在的差异,并对其治疗效果进行对比分析。方法 回顾性分析我院2011年1月~2013年1月接受治疗的90例腹股沟疝患者临床资料,随机将患者分为观察组和对照组两组各45例,其中观察组采用无张力修补术,对照组采用腹股沟疝传统修补术,然后将其临床治疗效果进行分析。结果 无张力修补术在并发症、恢复活动时间、住院天数以及复发率的治疗指标上都要远远优于传统修补术(P<0.05)。结论 无张力修补术在腹股沟疝的治疗上具有较好的临床效果,能够达到患者及其家属的治疗期望,减少患者的治疗痛苦。

    关键词:腹股沟疝;传统修补术;无张力修补术;对比分析

    Compared with the Effect of Tension Free Repair of Inguinal Hernioplasty

    LI Xian-tai

    (Department of Surgical ,The First People's Hospital of Jintang County,Chengdu 610400,Sichuan,China)

    Abstract:ObjectiveTo investigate the inguinal hernioplasty with tension free repair of inguinal hernia in differences in treatment, and the treatment effect were analyzed. MethodsRetrospective analysis of our hospital from 2011 January to 2013 January treated 90 cases of inguinal hernia in patients with clinical data, the patients were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group two group with 45 cases in each group, patients in observation group were treated by tension free repair, the control group using traditional inguinal hernia repair, and then analyze its clinical effect ......

您现在查看是摘要介绍页,详见PDF附件