当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《医学信息》 > 2018年第22期
编号:13339406
虚拟现实技术在骨科临床带教中的应用(1)
http://www.100md.com 2018年6月4日 《医学信息》 2018年第22期
     摘 要:目的 對虚拟现实技术在骨科临床带教中的作用进行评估,探讨其应用前景及可能存在的问题。方法 2016年4月~2018年4月随机抽查第二军医大学本科实习生共70人,随机分为试验组和对照组,每组35人。对照组使用常规的教学方法,试验组在此基础上进行观看VR手术视频的辅助教学。对比两组学员的经管患者数、出科考理论成绩及对教学满意度进行对比。结果 试验组平均经管患者数为(3.12±0.21)例,对照组为(3.24±0.13)例,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。试验组出科考理论成绩为(78.14±11.62)分,高于对照组的(62.28±10.67)分,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组平均教学满意度评分为(98.78±2.71)分,对照组为(97.88±3.51)分,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 VR虚拟现实技术结合传统教学较单纯传统教学方法效果更佳,有良好的应用前景。但有部分学员对VR设备感到不适,需工程人员进一步改进以提高教学体验。

    关键词:虚拟现实;骨科;教学;视频;辅助教学
, 百拇医药
    中图分类号:G642 文献标识码:B DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.22.006

    文章编号:1006-1959(2018)22-0017-03

    Application of Visual Reality Technology in the Clinical Teaching of Orthopedics Interns

    MENG De-peng,ZHAO Liang-yu,OUYANG Yue-ping,LIN Hao-dong,CHEN Hui-hao

    (Department of Orthopedics,Changzheng Hospital of Second Military Medical University,Shanghai,200003,China)
, 百拇医药
    Abstract:Objective To evaluate the role of virtual reality technology in clinical teaching of orthopedics, and to explore its application prospects and possible problems.Methods From April 2016 to April 2018, a total of 70 undergraduate interns from the Second Military Medical University were randomly selected.They were randomly divided into experimental group and control group with 35 person in each group.The control group used a conventional teaching method, and the experimental group conducted an auxiliary teaching of watching VR surgery video on this basis. Compare the basic situation of the students, the number of patients under management, the theoretical results of the examinations and the satisfaction of teaching.Results The average number of patients in the experimental group was (3.12±0.21), and the control group was (3.24±0.13),there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The theoretical scores of the experimental group were (78.14±11.62), which was higher than that of the control group (62.28±10.67),the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The average teaching satisfaction score of the experimental group was (98.78±2.71), the control group was (97.88±3.51),the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05).Conclusion VR virtual reality technology combined with traditional teaching is better than traditional teaching methods and has a good application prospect. However, some students feel uncomfortable with VR equipment and need further improvement by engineers to improve the teaching experience.

    Key words:Visual reality;Orthopedics;Teaching;Video;Auxiliary teaching, 百拇医药(蒙德鹏 赵良瑜 欧阳跃平)
1 2 3下一页