偏向句子语境中不同类型歧义词的歧义消解(3)
5 Kintsch W M. Context effects in word identification. Journal of Memory and Language, 1985, 24: 336~349
6 Rayner K, Frazier L. Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words. Journal of Experiment psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 1989, 15: 779~790
7 Duffy S A, Morris R K. Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 1988, 27: 429~446
8 周晓林, 张亚旭, 舒华, 张厚粲. 话语参照语境条件下汉语歧义短语的加工. 心理学报, 2002, 34(2): 126~130
9 白学军, 周源源. 语境因素对阅读时眼动控制的影响：来自汉语句子语境的证据. 心理与行为研究, 2005, 3(3): 165~168
10 张亚旭, 舒华, 张厚粲. 汉语句子理解中同形异义词意义通达的时间进程. 黄昌宁, 董振东主编. 计算语言学文集. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 1999: 81~88
11 周治金, 陈永明, 杨丽霞, 陈烜之. 汉语同形歧义词歧义消解的过程. 心理科学, 2003, 26(2): 204~207
AMBIGUITIES′ RESOLUTION OF DIFFERENT KINDS LEXICALLY
AMBIGUOUS WORDS IN BIASED CONTEXT
Yu Ze1, Han Yuchang1, Ren Guiqin2
(1 Department of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian116029; 2 Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing100101)
Abstract
The present study was designed to investigate the difference of ambiguities′ resolution processing of different kinds of lexically ambiguous words in the biased context. A self-paced, line-by-line, reading paradigm was used, in which participants read sentences by pressing a key each time they wanted a new one to appear. The result showed: The relative frequency of ambiguities′meaning influenced the processing of disambiguity information from different kinds of ambiguity. When the context biased to the dominant meaning, the processing of homographs same in phone present shorter latency than did the homographs different in phone. While the context biased to the subordinate meaning, the processing of homographs same in phone present longer latency than did the homographs different in phone. Regardardless the context biased to the dominant or subordinate meaning of ambiguities, the participants must fixate for more information from the context to get the disambiguity. The result suggest that homographs same in phone and homographs different in phone had different process of the disambiguity in the tending context.
Key wordsambiguity resolution, eye movement, homographs same in phone, homographs different in phone., 百拇医药(于 泽 韩玉昌 任桂琴)
6 Rayner K, Frazier L. Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words. Journal of Experiment psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 1989, 15: 779~790
7 Duffy S A, Morris R K. Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 1988, 27: 429~446
8 周晓林, 张亚旭, 舒华, 张厚粲. 话语参照语境条件下汉语歧义短语的加工. 心理学报, 2002, 34(2): 126~130
9 白学军, 周源源. 语境因素对阅读时眼动控制的影响：来自汉语句子语境的证据. 心理与行为研究, 2005, 3(3): 165~168
10 张亚旭, 舒华, 张厚粲. 汉语句子理解中同形异义词意义通达的时间进程. 黄昌宁, 董振东主编. 计算语言学文集. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 1999: 81~88
11 周治金, 陈永明, 杨丽霞, 陈烜之. 汉语同形歧义词歧义消解的过程. 心理科学, 2003, 26(2): 204~207
AMBIGUITIES′ RESOLUTION OF DIFFERENT KINDS LEXICALLY
AMBIGUOUS WORDS IN BIASED CONTEXT
Yu Ze1, Han Yuchang1, Ren Guiqin2
(1 Department of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian116029; 2 Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing100101)
Abstract
The present study was designed to investigate the difference of ambiguities′ resolution processing of different kinds of lexically ambiguous words in the biased context. A self-paced, line-by-line, reading paradigm was used, in which participants read sentences by pressing a key each time they wanted a new one to appear. The result showed: The relative frequency of ambiguities′meaning influenced the processing of disambiguity information from different kinds of ambiguity. When the context biased to the dominant meaning, the processing of homographs same in phone present shorter latency than did the homographs different in phone. While the context biased to the subordinate meaning, the processing of homographs same in phone present longer latency than did the homographs different in phone. Regardardless the context biased to the dominant or subordinate meaning of ambiguities, the participants must fixate for more information from the context to get the disambiguity. The result suggest that homographs same in phone and homographs different in phone had different process of the disambiguity in the tending context.
Key wordsambiguity resolution, eye movement, homographs same in phone, homographs different in phone., 百拇医药(于 泽 韩玉昌 任桂琴)