当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《世界中医药》 > 20176
编号:13617334
“病证结合”多主要终点评价法在中医药临床研究中的应用(4)
http://www.100md.com 2017年3月15日 《世界中医药》 20176
     [17]Teixeira-Pinto A,Mauri L.Statistical analysis of noncommensurate multiple outcomes[J].Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes,2011,4(6):650-656.

    [18]李景.糖尿病腎病中医药疗效综合评价体系研究[D].北京:北京中医药大学,2012.

    [19]陈磊,梁伟雄,吕志平.生脉胶囊治疗慢性充血性心力衰竭临床疗效的TOPSIS 法综合评价[J].南方医科大学学报,2010,30(4):820-822.

    [20]Freemantle N,Calvert M,Wood J,et al.Composite endpoints in randomized trials:greater precision but with greater uncertainty[J].JAMA,2003,289(19):2554-2559.

    [21]Rauch G,Jahn-Eimermacher A,Brannath W,et al.Opportunities and challenges of combined effect measures based on prioritized outcomes[J].Stat Med,2014,33(7):1104-1120.

    [22]Huang P,Woolson RF,O′Brien PC.A rank-based sample size method for multiple outcomes in clinical trials[J].Stat Med,2008,27(16):3084-3104.

    [23]O′Brien PC.Procedures for comparing samples with multiple endpoints[J].Biometrics,1984,40(4):1079-1089.

    [24]Baraniuk S,Seay R,Sinha AK,et al.Comparison of the global statistical test and composite outcome for secondary analyses of multiple coronary heart disease outcomes[J].Prog Cardiovasc Dis,2012,54(4):357-361.

    [25]Cook RJ,Farewell VT.Guidelines for monitoring effieaey and toxieity responses in clinieal trials[J].Biometrics,1994,50(4):1146-1152.

    [26]Sozu T,Sugimoto T,Hamasaki T.Sample size determination in clinical trials with multiple co-primary endpoints including mixed continuous and binary variables[J].Biom J,2012,54(5):716-729.

    [27]杨卫娇.多终点指标下两阶段适应性设计的样本量再估计[D].上海:华东师范大学,2011.

    (2017-05-10收稿 责任编辑:徐颖), 百拇医药(胡晶 刘卫红 张会娜)
上一页1 2 3 4