当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《中国现代医生》 > 2014年第35期 > 正文
编号:12706368
锁定钢板与PFNA治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较(3)
http://www.100md.com 2014年12月15日 严越茂 李世平 肖建斌
第1页

    参见附件。

     [7] Zhang B,Dai M,Tang Y,et al. Influence of integration of fracture treatment and exercise rehabilitation on effectiveness in patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur[J]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi,2012,26(12):1453-1456.

    [8] Fitzpatrick DC,Doornink J,Madey SM,et al. Relative stability of conventional and locked plating fixation in a model of the osteoporotic femoral diaphysis[J]. Clin Biomech(Bristol,Avon),2009,24(2):203-209.

    [9] 周凯华,刘丰,郑奋,等. PFNA在股骨粗隆间骨折中的应用[J]. 当代医学,2010,16(33):82-83.

    [10] Jin YM,Chen JP,Li XL,et al. Retrospective study of comparing the different internal fixation methods in treating intertrochanteric fracture of femur[J]. Zhongguo Gu Shang,2008,21(5):329-332.

    [11] Yang YH,Wang YR,Jiang SD,et al. Proximal femoral nail antirotation and third-generation Gamma nail: Which is a better device for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures[J]. Singapore Med J,2013,54(8):446-450.

    [12] 杭如群,张建华,尹培荣. 股骨粗隆间骨折治疗进展[J]. 航空航天医学杂志,2012,23(1):47-50.

    (收稿日期:2014-09-04)

您现在查看是摘要介绍页,详见PDF附件