微型种植体支抗和非种植体支抗在青少年口腔正畸治疗中的效果对比(1)
[摘要] 目的 比较微型种植体支抗和非种植体支抗在青少年口腔正畸治疗中的效果。方法 选取该院于2012年9月—2015年8月收治的青少年错牙合 畸形患者260例,将其随机分成观察组与对照组,每组130例,观察组患者采用微型种植体支抗治疗,对照组患者采用非种植体支抗治疗。治疗后,对两组的治疗效果与不良反应进行对比分析。结果治疗后,观察组上中切牙凸距差为(4.1±1.3)mm,对照组上中切牙凸距差为(2.2±0.9)mm,观察组的磨牙位移(3.7±0.3)mm,观察组的磨牙位移(6.1±0.6)mm,两组结果比较其差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组与对照组错牙合畸形正畸治疗术后的不良反应相比较,其差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 对于青少年口腔正畸治疗采用微型种植体支抗的效果显著好于非种植体支抗,且不会增加不良反应,值得临床应用与推广。
[关键词] 微型种植体支抗;非种植体支抗;青少年;口腔正畸
[中图分类号] R783.5 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2016)03(b)-0090-03
[Abstract] Objective To compare the effect of micro-implant anchorage and non-implant anchorage in the teenager orthodontics treatment. Methods 260 cases of teenagers with patho-occlusion admitted and treated in our hospital from September 2012 to August 2015 were selected and randomly divided into two groups with 130 cases in each ......
您现在查看是摘要页,全文长 4037 字符。
[关键词] 微型种植体支抗;非种植体支抗;青少年;口腔正畸
[中图分类号] R783.5 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2016)03(b)-0090-03
[Abstract] Objective To compare the effect of micro-implant anchorage and non-implant anchorage in the teenager orthodontics treatment. Methods 260 cases of teenagers with patho-occlusion admitted and treated in our hospital from September 2012 to August 2015 were selected and randomly divided into two groups with 130 cases in each ......
您现在查看是摘要页,全文长 4037 字符。