综合护理干预对冠心病患者生活质量的影响情况(1)
[摘要] 目的 探讨综合护理干预对冠心病患者生活质量的影响。方法 方便选取2013年7月—2016年7月间该院收治的140例冠心病住院患者，将其随机分为实验组与对照组各70例，予以对照组患者常规护理措施，予以实验组患者综合护理干预措施，对比分析护理后两组患者的生活质量。结果 经过护理干预后，实验组患者的生活质量各项评价指标分值分别为生理功能(84.5±6.7)分、精神健康(60.3±11.4)分、总体健康(61.5±11.9)分、生理职能(67.2±29.6)分、社会职能(81.6±19.5)分、躯体疼痛(83.2±14.9)分、精力(56.8±18.1)分、情感职能(73.1±21.9)分，均显著优于对照组患者，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 对冠心病患者实施综合护理干预措施可有效的提升患者的生活质量，具有较高的临床应用价值，值得对其进行推广。
[关键词] 综合护理干预；冠心病；生活质量；影响
[中图分类号] R47 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2017)07(c)-0155-03
[Abstract] Objective To study the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on the quality of life of patients with coronary heart disease. Methods 140 cases of patients with coronary heart diseases admitted and treated in our hospital from July 2013 to July 2016 were conveniently selected and randomly divided into two groups with 70 cases in each， the control group and the experimental group respectively adopted the routine nursing measures and comprehensive intervention measures， and the quality of life of the two groups was compared. Results After nursing， various evaluation indexes of quality of life in the experimental group including physical function(84.5±6.7)points， mental health (60.3±11.4)points， total health (61.5±11.9)points， physiological function (67.2±29.6)points， social function (81.6±19.5)points， somatic pains (83.2±14.9)points， energy (56.8±18.1)points and emotional function (73.1±21.9)points were obviously better than those in the control group， and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion The implementation of comprehensive nursing intervention measures of patients with coronary heart disease can effectively improve the quality of life of patients and the clinical application value is higher， and it is worth promotion in clinic.
[Key words] Comprehensive nursing intervention； Coronary heart disease； Quality of life； Effect
冠心病是臨床常见的心血管疾病，对患者的生命健康具有一定的威胁，是危害最为严重的一类疾病，当前的现代诊疗技术已逐渐控制了致死率，而临床有效的护理措施也越来越受到关注，有关研究文献指出对冠心病患者采取有效的护理措施[1]，可帮助患者快速恢复机体的正常功能，从而提高患者的生活质量。该院方便选取了2013年7月—2016年7月间共140例患者为研究对象进行了对比性实验，总结分析了综合护理干预应用于冠心病患者对其生活质量的影响，去了理想的效果，现报道如下。
1 资料与方法
1.1 一般资料
方便选取该院收治的冠心病住院患者140例，其中年龄最大的患者78岁，最小的患者54岁，平均(64.7±8.1)岁，病程为1～9年，平均病程为(6.4±0.3)年，男性患者78例，女性患者62例。140例冠心病患者的具体疾病分型为单纯性心肌梗死102例，心肌梗死陈旧期22例，心绞痛间歇期16例[2]。根据患者入院的时间顺序及征求患者本人同意后将140例患者随机分为实验组与对照组各70例，实验组患者的年龄区间为55～77岁，平均(65.3±8.3)岁，男女患者的例数分别为37例、33例；对照组患者的年龄区间为54～78岁，平均(63.5±7.6)岁，男女患者的例数分别为41例、29例。两组患者在年龄、性别以及患病类型与人数等一般资料方面的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。, 百拇医药(王珍妮)
[关键词] 综合护理干预；冠心病；生活质量；影响
[中图分类号] R47 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2017)07(c)-0155-03
[Abstract] Objective To study the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on the quality of life of patients with coronary heart disease. Methods 140 cases of patients with coronary heart diseases admitted and treated in our hospital from July 2013 to July 2016 were conveniently selected and randomly divided into two groups with 70 cases in each， the control group and the experimental group respectively adopted the routine nursing measures and comprehensive intervention measures， and the quality of life of the two groups was compared. Results After nursing， various evaluation indexes of quality of life in the experimental group including physical function(84.5±6.7)points， mental health (60.3±11.4)points， total health (61.5±11.9)points， physiological function (67.2±29.6)points， social function (81.6±19.5)points， somatic pains (83.2±14.9)points， energy (56.8±18.1)points and emotional function (73.1±21.9)points were obviously better than those in the control group， and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion The implementation of comprehensive nursing intervention measures of patients with coronary heart disease can effectively improve the quality of life of patients and the clinical application value is higher， and it is worth promotion in clinic.
[Key words] Comprehensive nursing intervention； Coronary heart disease； Quality of life； Effect
冠心病是臨床常见的心血管疾病，对患者的生命健康具有一定的威胁，是危害最为严重的一类疾病，当前的现代诊疗技术已逐渐控制了致死率，而临床有效的护理措施也越来越受到关注，有关研究文献指出对冠心病患者采取有效的护理措施[1]，可帮助患者快速恢复机体的正常功能，从而提高患者的生活质量。该院方便选取了2013年7月—2016年7月间共140例患者为研究对象进行了对比性实验，总结分析了综合护理干预应用于冠心病患者对其生活质量的影响，去了理想的效果，现报道如下。
1 资料与方法
1.1 一般资料
方便选取该院收治的冠心病住院患者140例，其中年龄最大的患者78岁，最小的患者54岁，平均(64.7±8.1)岁，病程为1～9年，平均病程为(6.4±0.3)年，男性患者78例，女性患者62例。140例冠心病患者的具体疾病分型为单纯性心肌梗死102例，心肌梗死陈旧期22例，心绞痛间歇期16例[2]。根据患者入院的时间顺序及征求患者本人同意后将140例患者随机分为实验组与对照组各70例，实验组患者的年龄区间为55～77岁，平均(65.3±8.3)岁，男女患者的例数分别为37例、33例；对照组患者的年龄区间为54～78岁，平均(63.5±7.6)岁，男女患者的例数分别为41例、29例。两组患者在年龄、性别以及患病类型与人数等一般资料方面的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。, 百拇医药(王珍妮)