当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《中外医疗》 > 2018年第4期
编号:13242781
单髁与全膝关节置换术对内侧单间室膝退行性骨关节炎临床疗效分析(1)

     [摘要] 目的 比较单髁置换术(Unilateral Knee arthroplasty,UKA)与全膝关节置换术(Total knee arthroplasty,TKA)治疗膝关节内侧单间室退行性骨关节炎(Inner compartment of Knee osteoarthritis,ICKOA)的疗效。 方法 回顾性分析山东省枣庄市山亭医院2005年5月—2012年12月收治的ICKOA行手术治疗患者176例,按手术方式将患者分为UKA组与TKA组,比较2组的临床疗效。 结果 总共有83例患者完成了UKA手术,93例患者完成了TKA手术(其中5例术前准备行UKA,术中改为TKA),均获得平均19(15~24)个月随访,其中UKA 组并发症2 例(2.41%),TKA 组并发症5例(5.38%),2者比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但UKA组术中出血量(123.47±13.36)mL、术后1 d VAS评分(2.65±1.26)、首次直腿抬高时间(1.05±1.08)d、住院时间(5.35±1.18)d均显著少于TKA组[(262.63±25.18)mL、(3.14±1.42)分、(2.24±1.45)d、(7.34±1.52)d](P<0.05)。2 组术后1年HSS评分、膝关节活动度与术前比较明显提高(P<0.05),而两组术前HSS评分、膝关节活动度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 UKA 与TKA 治疗ICKOA均能够有效改善患者膝关节功能,UKA术中创伤小,更有利于患者术后的恢复,但需严格筛选病例,排除前交叉韧带功能不全患者,TKA虽有效,但应遵循膝关节炎阶梯治疗原则,避免扩大手术。

    [关键词] 全膝关节置换术;单髁置换术;内侧单间室;膝關节骨关节炎

    [中图分类号] R4 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2018)02(a)-0004-05

    Clinical Efficacy of Single Condyle and Total Knee Arthroplasty for Knee Osteoarthritis in the Medial Single Compartment

    HU Jian-ping1, LI Jun-feng2, WANG Jian-hua3, QIN Hong-yan2, YU Ji-wen4

    1.Department of Orthopedics, Section One, Shanting Hospital, Zaozhuang, Shandong Province, 277200 China; 2.Department of Orthopedics, Section Three, Shanting Hospital, Zaozhuang, Shandong Province, 277200 China; 3.Department of Orthopedics, Zaozhuang Municipal Hospital, Zaozhuang, Shandong Province, 277100 China; 4.Department of Traumatic Orthopedics, Lianyungang First People’s Hospital, Lianyungang, Jiangsu Province, 222000 China

    [Abstract] Objective This paper tries to compare the effects of Unilateral Knee arthroplasty (UKA) and Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on the treatment of intraventricular compartment osteoarthritis (ICKOA) in the medial compartment of the knee Efficacy. Methods A retrospective analysis of this hospital from May 2005 to December 2012 of ICKOA surgical treatment of 176 patients was conducted, according to surgical methods, they were divided into UKA group and TKA group, compared the clinical efficacy of the two groups. Results A total of 83 patients underwent UKA surgery and 93 patients completed TKA surgery (5 in preoperative UKA and TKA during surgery), all with an average of 19 (15~24) months of follow-up, with UKA Complication in 2 cases(2.41%), TKA group complications in 5 cases(5.38%), the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05). There was no significant difference in operative time between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the intraoperative blood loss(123.47±13.36)mL in UKA group and VAS score (1.65±1.26)points, the first straight leg time (1.05±1.08)d and hospital stay(5.35±1.18)d were significantly lower than those in the TKA group [(262.63±25.18)mL,(3.14±1.42)points,(2.24±1.45)d,(7.34±1.52)d, respectively] (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in HSS score and knee activity before surgery(P>0.05). Conclusion UKA and TKA can effectively improve the knee function of the patients in the medial interventricular unit of knee joint. However, the wound in UKA is less favorable for the postoperative recovery. TKA is more suitable for patients with anterior cruciate ligament.(胡建平 李俊峰 王建华 秦鸿雁 于吉文)
1 2 3 4下一页
    婵烇絽娲犻崜婵囧閸涱喚顩烽柛娑卞墰鏉╂棃鏌涘▎蹇撯偓浠嬪焵椤掆偓閸犳稓妲愬┑鍥┾枖鐎广儱妫涢埀顒夊灦楠炲骞囬鍛簥婵炶揪绲惧ú鎴犵不閿濆拋鍤堝Δ锔筋儥閸炴挳鏌曢崱鏇犲妽閻㈩垰缍婇幊锟犲箛椤撶偟浠愰梺鍦瑰ú銈囨閳哄懎违闁稿本绋掗悗顔剧磼閺冨倸啸濠⒀勵殜瀵爼宕橀妸褎鍓戞繛瀛樼矊妤犲摜鏁锔藉婵$偛澧界粙濠囨煛婢跺﹤鏆曟慨鐟邦樀閺佸秴鐣濋崘顭戜户闂佽鍠撻崝蹇涱敇缂佹ḿ鈻旈柣鎴烇供閸斿啴鏌¢崒姘煑缂佹顦遍埀顒冾潐缁繘锝為敃鍌氱哗閻犻缚娅g粔鍨€掑顓犫槈闁靛洤娲ㄩ埀顒傤攰濞夋盯宕㈤妶鍥ㄥ鐟滅増甯楅~澶愭偣閸ワ妇涓茬紒杈ㄧ箘閹风娀鎮滈挊澶夌病婵炲濮鹃崺鏍垂閵娾晜鍋ㄥù锝呭暟濡牓姊洪锝嗙殤闁绘搫绻濋獮瀣箣濠婂嫮鎷ㄩ梺鎸庣☉閺堫剟宕瑰⿰鍕浄妞ゆ帊鐒﹂弳顏堟煕閹哄秴宓嗛柍褜鍓氬銊╂偂閿熺姴瑙﹂幖鎼灣缁€澶娒归崗鍏肩殤闁绘繃鐩畷锟犲礃閼碱剚顔戦梺璇″枔閸斿骸鈻撻幋鐐村婵犲﹤鍟幆鍌毭归悩鎻掝劉婵犫偓閹殿喚纾鹃柟瀵稿Х瑜版煡鏌涢幒鏂库枅婵炲懎閰f俊鎾晸閿燂拷

   閻庣敻鍋婇崰鏇熺┍婵犲洤妫橀柛銉㈡櫇瑜帮拷  闂佺ǹ绻楀▍鏇㈠极閻愮儤鍎岄柣鎰靛墮椤庯拷  闁荤姴娲ょ€氼垶顢欓幋锕€绀勯柣妯诲絻缂嶏拷  闂佺懓鍚嬬划搴ㄥ磼閵娾晛鍗抽柡澶嬪焾濡拷