妫f牠銆�
閺堢喎鍨�: 瀵邦喕淇婇弬鍥╃彿 閸︺劎鍤庢稊锔剧潉 鐠у嫭鏋℃稉瀣祰 閸嬨儱鎮嶉弶鍌氱箶 閹躲儱鍨旈柅澶岀椽 閸╄櫣顢呴崠璇差劅 娑撴潙绨ラ崠璇差劅 閼筋垰顒� 鐎涳附濮� 娑擃厼娴楅崠璇差劅 閸楊偆鏁撻幀鏄忣啈
娣囨繂浠�: 閺備即妞� 鐠囧嫯顔� 鐟欏棛鍋� 鐢瓕鐦� 閻ゅ墽姊� 閻ュ洨濮� 閸忚崵鏁� 閻€劏宓� 閹躲倗鎮� 閹儲鏅� 閸嬨儴闊� 缂囧骸顔� 娑撱倖鈧拷 閼叉彃鍔� 閻拷 婵傦拷 閼帮拷 鐏忥拷 閸ユ稑顒� 鐠囪崵澧� 閺囨潙顦�
娑擃厼灏�: 鐢瓕鐦� 閺佹瑦娼� 閹繆鈧拷 娑擃叀宓� 閸栬崵鎮� 娑撴潙绨� 闁藉牓顎� 濮樻垶妫� 閺傚洤瀵� 閽佹ぞ缍� 妤犲本鏌� 閸ユ崘姘� 妞嬬喓鏋� 閼筋垳澧� 閼筋垯绗� 閼筋垰绔� 閺傛媽宓� 閹兼粎鍌� 閼昏鲸鏋�
当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《家庭医学史册》 > 2006年第3期 > 正文
编号:11024529
On TRACK: Comorbidity and External Validity, Exemplary Practice, Postpartum Support
http://www.100md.com 《家庭医学史册》

     COMORBIDITY AND EXTERNAL VALIDITY

    The online discussion advances understanding of the effect of comorbidity on the interpretation and application of clinical trial findings.1–6 The discussion supports recent calls for greater focus on documenting and presenting the information needed to assess external validity in clinical trials.7,8 In addition, guidelines based on clinical trials that don’t adequately consider comorbidity can result in polypharmacy1 and impractical recommendations.5,6 Bayliss proposes classifying comorbidity on the basis of the effect of comorbid conditions on the "condition of interest."3 Her 3 categories of comorbidities have different implications for understanding and applying clinical trial data to the care of patients with complex conditions. These categories are (1) pathophysiologically related conditions that require congruent treatment plans, (2) conditions that have discordant and potentially competing treatments, and (3) conditions that do not affect the primary disease or treatment.

    EXEMPLARY PRACTICE

    "Exemplary practice research gives us information and, frankly, gives us hope."9 The article by Solberg et al in the last issue of Annals not only prompted readers to define a field of research that focuses on exemplary practices, but elicited further observations of what makes a practice exemplary.10 These features include shared understanding of mission, vision, and values; consistent leadership; an egalitarian spirit; openness to conversations about change; and a culture of caring.9 A related set of features is leadership that focuses on a mission which encompasses both business and clinical activities, supporting but not micromanaging leaders of practice components, 2-way communication at all levels of the practice, a team model, and focusing on practice-patient relationships.11

    Other online discussions relate pearls for minimizing unintended consequences of the electronic health record on relationship-centered care12,13 and for developing skills and systems to integrate care of addicted patients into primary care.14,15

    The essay on facilitating collaboration among the generalist disciplines elicited calls for leadership that moves beyond competition to bring the disciplines together to solve important problems.16–19

     POSTPARTUM SUPPORT

    The study by McGovern et al in the last issue of Annals stimulated reporting of new data and recommendations on postpartum needs.20–22 The discussion also related important contextual information on public and work-place policies in different countries.23–26 "In cultures that care for mothers after birth, mothers are allowed adequate rest, they have ongoing breastfeeding support from their care providers and family members, and their transition to motherhood is honored with rituals that celebrate this major life change."26

    REFERENCES

    van den Akker M. Invited commentary: Comorbidity and multimorbidity in family medicine: also relevant for research .

    Beasley J. Bravo for raising the issue.

    Bayliss E. A methodological suggestion for the management of comorbidities in randomized controlled trials.

    Hogg WE. Randomized controlled trials: do they have external validity for patients with multiple comorbidity.

    Wright NMJ. Randomised controlled trials: do they have external validity for patients with multiple comorbidities? Invited commentary .

    Soubhi H. Too tall for the bed.

    Glasgow RE, Green LW, Klesges LM, et al. External validity: we need to do more. Ann Behav Med. 2006;31:105–108.

    Green LW, Glasgow RE. Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology. Eval Health Prof. 2006;29:126–153.

    Craigie FC. Organizational culture and exemplary practices.

    Solberg LI, Hroscikoski MC, Sperl-Hillen JM, Harper PG, Crabtree BF. Transforming medical care: case study of an exemplar small medical group. Ann Fam Med. 2006;4:109–116.

    Stello B. Lessons for every practice in exemplary medical group.

    Scherger JE. Relationship centered care using the EHR .

    Haq CL. Complexity.

    Parran TV. Strong endorsement for generalists considering buprenorphine training.

    Chirayath HT. A rare perspective.

    Green LA. Next steps.

    Kuo D. CME: Low hanging fruit and a first step toward collaboration.

    Katerndahl DA. Recognize and support current multidisciplinary actions.

    Khan OA. Collaboration in primary care is not just necessary but right.

    McGovern PM, Dowd B, Gjerdingen D, et al. The postpartum health of employed mothers five weeks after childbirth. Ann Fam Med. 2006;4:159–167.

    Sakala C, et al. Let’s help women improve their chances for good postpartum health .

    McGovern PM. RE: "Glad to see this" by Dr. Marily Culp.

    Dagher RK. A wakeup call for employers.

    Harper D. Why is something so natural, so hard for society to understand.

    Yawn N. Demedicalize labor and delivery but assess the health care needs of postpartum women.

    Kendall-Tackett KA. Inadequate postpartum support for U.S. mothers.(Kurt C. Stange, MD, PhD, )
    娣団剝浼呮禒鍛返閸欏倽鈧喛绱濇稉宥嗙€幋鎰崲娴f洑绠e楦款唴閵嗕焦甯归懡鎰灗閹稿洤绱╅妴鍌涙瀮缁旂姷澧楅弶鍐ㄧ潣娴滃骸甯拋妞剧稊閺夊啩姹夐敍宀冨閹劏顓绘稉鐑橆劃閺傚洣绗夌€规粏顫﹂弨璺虹秿娓氭稑銇囩€硅泛鍘ょ拹褰掓鐠囦紮绱濈拠鐑藉仏娴犺埖鍨ㄩ悽浣冪樈闁氨鐓¢幋鎴滄粦閿涘本鍨滄禒顒佹暪閸掍即鈧氨鐓¢崥搴礉娴兼氨鐝涢崡鍐茬殺閹劎娈戞担婊冩惂娴犲孩婀扮純鎴犵彲閸掔娀娅庨妴锟�

   瀵邦喕淇婇弬鍥╃彿  閸忚櫕鏁為惂鐐  鐠囧嫯顔戦崙鐘插綖  閹兼粎鍌ㄩ弴鏉戭樋   閹恒劌鐡ㄧ紒娆愭箙閸欙拷   閸旂姴鍙嗛弨鎯版