濠电姷顣藉Σ鍛村磻閹捐泛绶ゅΔ锝呭暞閸嬪鏌eΟ娆惧殭鏉╂繈姊虹捄銊ユ珢闁瑰嚖鎷�
闂傚倸鍊风粈渚€骞栭锔藉亱闊洦绋戠粣妤呭箹濞n剙濡奸柛銊ュ€块弻銊╂偆閸屾稑顏�: 闂備浇顕уù鐑藉极婵犳艾纾诲┑鐘叉搐缁愭鏌¢崶鈺佹灁闁崇懓绉撮埞鎴︽偐閸欏鎮欏┑鈽嗗亝閿曘垽寮诲☉銏犖ㄩ柕蹇婂墲閻濇牠鎮峰⿰鍐ㄧ盎闁瑰嚖鎷� 闂傚倸鍊风欢姘缚閼姐倖瀚婚柣鏃傚帶缁€澶愬箹濞n剙濡奸柛姘秺楠炴牕菐椤掆偓閻忣噣鏌嶇紒妯荤闁哄被鍔戝顒勫垂椤旇瀵栨繝鐢靛仧閵嗗骞忛敓锟� 闂傚倷娴囧畷鍨叏瀹ュ绀冩い顓熷灣閻ヮ亪姊绘担鍛婃儓妞ゆ垵鍊垮畷婊冣攽閸垻鐓撴繝銏f硾婢跺洭宕戦幘缁樻櫜閹肩补鈧磭顔戠紓鍌欐缁躲倝骞忛敓锟� 闂傚倸鍊烽懗鑸电仚濡炪倖鍨甸崯鏉戠暦閺囥垺鐒肩€广儱鎳愰悾娲倵楠炲灝鍔氭い锔诲灣閻ヮ亣顦归柡灞剧〒娴狅箓鎮欓鍌涱吇缂傚倷鑳舵刊鎾箯閿燂拷 闂傚倸鍊烽懗鍫曘€佹繝鍕濞村吋娼欑壕鍧楁⒑椤掆偓缁夋挳宕归崒鐐寸厸闁告劑鍔庢晶娑㈡煟閹烘洦鍤欐い顓℃硶閹瑰嫰鎼归崷顓濈礃婵犵绱曢崕鎴﹀箯閿燂拷 闂傚倸鍊烽懗鍓佹兜閸洖鐤鹃柣鎰ゴ閺嬪秹鏌ㄥ┑鍡╂Ф闁逞屽厸缁舵艾鐣烽妸鈺佺骇闁瑰濯Σ娲⒑閼姐倕孝婵炲眰鍊曡灒濠电姴娲ょ粈澶愭煥閻曞倹瀚� 濠电姷鏁搁崑鐐哄垂閸洖绠伴悹鍥у斀缂傛碍绻涢崱妯虹伇濠殿喗濞婇弻鏇熷緞閸℃ɑ鐝旂紓浣插亾鐎光偓閸曨剙浠梺鎼炲劀閸曘劍鐏嗛梻浣告啞濡垿骞忛敓锟� 闂傚倸鍊峰ù鍥磻閹扮増鍋ら柡鍐ㄧ墕閸ㄥ倸霉閸忓吋鍎楅柡浣告閺屻劑鎮ら崒娑橆伓 闂傚倷娴囬褏鈧稈鏅犲畷妯荤節濮橆厸鎸冮梺鍛婃处閸撴岸宕h箛娑欑叆闁绘洖鍊圭€氾拷 濠电姷鏁搁崑鐐哄垂閸洖绠归柍鍝勬噹閸屻劑鏌i幘宕囩槏闁荤喐瀚堥弮鍫濆窛妞ゆ挾濯Σ娲⒑閼姐倕孝婵炲眰鍊曡灒濠电姴娲ょ粈澶愭煥閻曞倹瀚� 闂傚倸鍊风粈渚€骞夐敓鐘偓鍐疀濞戞ḿ锛涢梺绯曞墲缁嬫垿寮告笟鈧弻鐔煎箲閹伴潧娈紓浣哄У閸ㄥ潡寮婚敓鐘茬妞ゆ劧绲块々浼存⒑閸濄儱娅愰柟鍑ゆ嫹
濠电姷鏁搁崕鎴犲緤閽樺娲晜閻愵剙搴婇梺绋挎湰缁嬫捇銆呴悜鑺ョ叆闁绘洖鍊圭€氾拷: 闂傚倸鍊风粈渚€骞栭锕€纾归柣鎴f绾偓闂佸憡鍔曞Ο濠傘€掓繝姘叆闁绘洖鍊圭€氾拷 闂傚倷娴囧畷鍨叏閺夋嚚娲Χ閸ワ絽浜炬慨妯煎帶閻忥附銇勯姀锛勬噰闁轰焦鎹囬弫鎾绘晸閿燂拷 闂傚倷娴囧畷鐢稿窗閹扮増鍋¢柕澶堝剻濞戞ǚ妲堥柕蹇曞Х閿涙盯姊虹捄銊ユ珢闁瑰嚖鎷� 闂傚倷鐒﹂惇褰掑春閸曨垰鍨傞梺顒€绉甸崑銈夋煛閸ャ儱鐏柛搴★躬閺屻劑鎮ら崒娑橆伓 闂傚倸鍊烽悞锕傛儑瑜版帒纾归柡鍥╁枑濞呯娀鏌﹀Ο渚▓婵炲吋鐗犻弻銊╂偆閸屾稑顏� 闂傚倸鍊烽悞锕傛儑瑜版帒纾块柛妤冧紳濞差亜惟闁挎棁妫勫鍧楁⒑鐠恒劌娅愰柟鍑ゆ嫹 闂傚倸鍊烽懗鑸电仚缂備胶绮〃鍛存偩閻戣姤鍋ㄧ紒瀣閻庮剟姊虹捄銊ユ珢闁瑰嚖鎷� 闂傚倸鍊烽懗鍫曞磿閻㈢ǹ纾婚柟鎹愵嚙缁€澶愮叓閸ャ劍灏甸柡鍡愬€濋弻銊╂偆閸屾稑顏� 闂傚倸鍊烽懗鍫曘€佹繝鍕濞村吋娼欑壕瑙勪繆閵堝懏鍣圭紒鐘崇墵閺屻劑鎮ら崒娑橆伓 闂傚倸鍊峰ù鍥敋閺嶎厼绀傛繛鍡樻尭绾惧潡鏌$仦璇插姎闁汇倝绠栭弻銊╂偆閸屾稑顏� 闂傚倸鍊烽懗鑸电仚濡炪倖鍨甸崯鏉戠暦閺囥垹绠绘い鏃傜摂濡懘姊虹捄銊ユ珢闁瑰嚖鎷� 缂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹缁嬫5娲Χ閸♀晜顔旈梺褰掓?缁讹繝寮繝鍥ㄧ叆闁绘洖鍊圭€氾拷 濠电姷鏁搁崑鐐哄垂閸洖绠伴柛顐f礀绾惧綊鏌″搴″箹闁绘帒鐏氶妵鍕箳閹搭垱鏁鹃柣搴㈢啲閹凤拷 闂傚倸鍊烽懗鍫曞储瑜嶉锝夊箚閼割兛姹楅梺鍛婂姦閸犳牜绮堟径鎰叆闁绘洖鍊圭€氾拷 闂傚倸鍊烽悞锕€顪冮崹顕呯唵濞撴埃鍋撴鐐茬箻閺佹捇鏁撻敓锟� 濠电姷鏁告繛鈧繛浣冲洤纾诲┑鐘叉搐缁狀垶鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倸鍊烽懗鍫曞储瑜庨幆鏂库堪閸繄顔嗛梺璺ㄥ櫐閹凤拷 闂傚倷娴囬褏鎹㈤幇顓ф闊洦绋戠粻顖炴煥閻曞倹瀚� 闂傚倸鍊烽悞锕傚箖閸洖纾块柤纰卞墰閻瑩鏌熸潏鎯х槣闁轰礁妫濋弻銊╂偆閸屾稑顏� 闂傚倷娴囧畷鍨叏閺夋嚚娲煛娴g儤娈鹃梺鍓茬厛閸嬪懎鈻嶉悩缁樼叆闁绘洖鍊圭€氾拷 闂傚倸鍊风粈渚€骞栭鈷氭椽鏁冮埀顒€鐜婚崹顔规瀻闁规儳绉村ú顓㈠极閹剧粯鏅搁柨鐕傛嫹
濠电姷鏁搁崑鐐哄垂閸洖绠归柍鍝勬噹閸屻劑鏌ゅù瀣珒闁绘帒锕弻銊╂偆閸屾稑顏�: 闂傚倷鐒﹂惇褰掑春閸曨垰鍨傞梺顒€绉甸崑銈夋煛閸ャ儱鐏柛搴★躬閺屻劑鎮ら崒娑橆伓 闂傚倸鍊峰ù鍥ь浖閵娾晜鍊块柨鏇炲€归崑锟犳煥閺囨浜剧€光偓閿濆懏鍋ラ柡浣规崌閺佹捇鏁撻敓锟� 闂傚倸鍊峰ù鍥敋閺嶎厼绀堟慨妯块哺瀹曟煡鏌涢埄鍐槈闁绘帒鐏氶妵鍕箳閹搭垱鏁鹃柣搴㈢啲閹凤拷 濠电姷鏁搁崑鐐哄垂閸洖绠归柍鍝勬噹閻鏌嶈閸撴盯鍩€椤掑喚娼愰柟纰卞亰楠炲繘鏁撻敓锟� 闂傚倸鍊风粈渚€骞夐敓鐘冲亱闁绘劘灏欓弳锕傛煟閵忊懚鍦不閺嶎厽鐓ラ柣鏇炲€圭€氾拷 濠电姷鏁搁崑鐐哄垂閸洖绠伴悹鍥у斀缂傛碍绻涢崱妯虹伇濠殿喗濞婇弻銊╂偆閸屾稑顏� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐宄懊归崶顬盯宕熼娑樹罕闂佸湱鍋撳鍧楀极娓氣偓閺屻劑鎮ら崒娑橆伓 婵犵數濮甸鏍窗濡ゅ嫭鎳岄梻浣规偠閸斿繐鈻斿☉婊呬罕闂備浇娉曢崳锕傚箯閿燂拷 闂傚倸鍊风粈渚€骞栭锕€纾圭紒瀣紩濞差亜围闁搞儻绲芥禍鍓х棯閺夋妲归悗姘炬嫹 闂傚倸鍊烽悞锕傚垂濠靛鍊块柨鏇炲€告闂佺粯鍔楅弫鍝ョ矆婵犲洦鐓ラ柣鏇炲€圭€氾拷 濠电姴鐥夐弶搴撳亾濡や焦鍙忛柟缁㈠枛鐎氬銇勯幒鎴濐仼闁藉啰鍠栭弻銊╂偆閸屾稑顏� 闂傚倸鍊烽悞锕傚箖閸洖纾块柟缁樺笧閺嗭附淇婇娆掝劅婵炲皷鏅犻弻銊╂偆閸屾稑顏� 濠电姷顣槐鏇㈠磻濞戙埄鏁勯柛銉墮缁愭鏌熼幑鎰靛殭闁告垹濞€閺屻劑鎮ら崒娑橆伓 闂傚倸鍊峰ù鍥磻閹扮増鍋ら柡鍐ㄧ墕閸ㄥ倿鏌ц箛锝呬簼婵炲懐濞€閺屻劑鎮ら崒娑橆伓 闂傚倸鍊峰ù鍥磻閹扮増鍋ら柡鍐ㄧ墕閸ㄥ倹銇勯弽銊х煂缂佺姵妫冮弻銊╂偆閸屾稑顏� 闂傚倸鍊峰ù鍥磻閹扮増鍋ら柡鍐ㄧ墕閸ㄥ倿鏌熷▓鍨灓闁告宀搁弻銊╂偆閸屾稑顏� 闂傚倸鍊风粈渚€骞栭锕€纾归悷娆忓閸ㄦ棃鏌﹀Ο渚Ш闁哄棎鍊濋弻銊╂偆閸屾稑顏� 闂傚倸鍊烽懗鍫曞箠閹捐瑙﹂悗锝庡墮閸ㄦ繈骞栧ǎ顒€濡肩痪鎯с偢閺屻劑鎮ら崒娑橆伓 闂傚倸鍊风粈渚€宕ョ€n€綁骞掗幘鍙樼矒闂佸綊妫跨粈渚€宕欓悩缁樼叆闁绘洖鍊圭€氾拷
当前位置: 首页 > 医学版 > 期刊论文 > 临床医学 > 微生物临床杂志 > 2005年 > 第3期 > 正文
编号:11200852
Vi Antigen Expression in Salmonella enterica Serov

     Investigative Sciences, Centre for Molecular Microbiology and Infection, Imperial College, London

    The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, The Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge

    Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan

    ABSTRACT

    The accurate identification of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhi variants that fail to express the capsular polysaccharide, Vi, is an important and much discussed issue for medical microbiology. We have tested a multiplex PCR method which shows the presence or absence of the genetic locus required for Vi expression. Of 2,222 Salmonella serovar Typhi clinical isolates collected from patients' blood over a 4-year period in a region of Pakistan where typhoid is endemic, 12 tested negative for Vi expression by serological agglutination. However, only 1 of these 12 was Vi negative by the multiplex PCR method. This result was confirmed by immunofluorescence, the most sensitive method for Vi characterization in Salmonella serovar Typhi. The multiplex PCR described therefore represents a simple and accurate method for surveillance for Vi-negative variants of Salmonella serovar Typhi in Pakistan. Testing of clinical isolates of Salmonella serovar Typhi, before subculture, from other regions where Vi-negative Salmonella serovar Typhi has been described should be carried out so that the impact of vaccination with purified Vi antigen on the levels of Vi-negative Salmonella serovar Typhi in bacterial populations can be assessed.

    INTRODUCTION

    The causative organism of human typhoid fever, Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhi, unlike most of the other serovars of Salmonella, expresses a capsular polysaccharide antigen known as Vi. In vitro studies have shown that Vi is antiopsonic and antiphagocytic (20), reduces the level of secretion of Salmonella serovar Typhi-induced tumor necrosis factor alpha (a marker of activation) by human macrophages (10), and increases the level of resistance of the organism to oxidative killing (20). The presence of the Vi antigen also increases the infectivity (11) of Salmonella serovar Typhi and the severity of disease (13) in volunteers. The Vi capsule is, however, not essential for infection, as Vi-negative mutants of Salmonella serovar Typhi are able to establish infection and cause a typhoid fever-like illness in human volunteers (11, 13). Furthermore, there have been reports of outbreaks of typhoid fever caused by Vi-negative Salmonella serovar Typhi (5).

    The reliance of serological (agglutination) testing for Vi expression has some limitations. The level of Vi expression on Salmonella serovar Typhi varies in response to changes in culture conditions and is associated with regulation by the OmpR and EnvZ two-component regulatory system, which is influenced by factors such as osmolarity (26). Also, Vi-negative mutants of Salmonella serovar Typhi are known to accumulate from previously Vi-positive Salmonella serovar Typhi isolates following laboratory passage. Fortunately, the genetic control of Vi expression is now relatively well understood, and so determination of the genetic conformation of truly Vi-negative Salmonella serovar Typhi is now possible. The Vi biosynthetic and export proteins are encoded within the viaB locus (9), a region of DNA located within the acquired DNA island known as Salmonella pathogenicity island 7 (SPI-7) (25, 27). Insertion and deletion mutations in the tviA gene, encoded within the viaB locus, that can lead to the loss of Vi expression and an increase in invasive properties have been reported (30). Furthermore, spontaneous loss of the whole of SPI-7 in Vi-negative mutants has been reported in stored isolates (23), and precise excision of SPI-7 has been demonstrated (6). Thus, Vi antigen expression is encoded on an unstable and possibly mobile region of the Salmonella serovar Typhi genome, which has been well described (27).

    An effective vaccine based on purified Vi antigen has been developed and licensed for use as a parenteral vaccine against typhoid fever in humans. A single dose of the antigen induces a protective immune response against Salmonella serovar Typhi in adults and older children (7), and when it is conjugated to a protein carrier the vaccine is also effective in young children (19). Purified Vi antigen has been used in regions where typhoid is endemic (1, 5, 18), and there is a long-running debate concerning its efficacy in the presence of Vi-negative isolates (3, 4, 16, 22, 28). Experience with Streptococcus pneumoniae vaccines based on combination capsular antigens has indicated that the immunization of populations with such vaccines may favor the emergence of capsular types not present in the vaccine (21, 24). There is potential selective pressure in favor of Vi-negative Salmonella serovar Typhi from the extended use of Vi-based vaccines, and there is a paucity of surveillance data based on molecular biology-based tests. We have therefore developed and characterized tools which allow us to monitor the prevalence of Vi-negative Salmonella serovar Typhi in regions where the Vi vaccine is being introduced. Here we show that Vi-negative Salmonella serovar Typhi was very rare in a region of Pakistan where typhoid was highly endemic before vaccination with purified Vi antigen was introduced.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Bacterial isolates. All Salmonella serovar Typhi isolates investigated were isolated from blood in the Microbiology Laboratory of the Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan, between 1999 and 2002. Control strains SARB63 and SARB64 (Salmonella Reference Collection, Calgary, Alberta, Canada), CT18 (25), and Ty2 (a gift from M. Popoff, Pasteur Institute, Paris, France) were used as negative and positive controls, as described for each method. Primary isolation of the organism from blood was carried out with commercial blood culture bottles (BACTEC 9240; Becton Dickinson, Oxford, United Kingdom) and a single round of growth on sheep blood agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom). Identification and Vi agglutination (Murex, Dartford, United Kingdom) were carried out with isolates obtained directly from the blood agar. Isolates were identified as Salmonella serovar Typhi by identification of the following characteristics: glucose positive without gas formation, lactose negative and H2S positive on a Kliglar iron agar slant (Oxoid), citrate (Oxoid) negative, indole (Oxoid) negative, and positive serology with both O9 and Hd antigens (Murex, Dartford, United Kingdom). If an isolate was Vi positive but negative for O9, the organism was boiled for 10 min and the agglutination test was repeated. Agglutination was carried out according to the instructions of the manufacturer. API 20E strips (bioMerieux, Basingstoke, United Kingdom) and DNA sequencing of a variable region (the phoN-pheU intergenic region) and a conserved region (aroC) of the genome were used to confirm the identities of unusual organisms.

    PCR amplification for presence of Vi genes. A multiplex PCR was developed to detect the deletion of the genes encoding Vi, including tviB. Three sets of primers were designed (Table 1) to specifically amplify (i) an internal region of the tviB gene in the viaB locus, a gene essential for the production of Vi capsular antigen (primers tviB-F and tviB-R); (ii) an intergenic region of 1,275 bp between the pheU (phenylalanine tRNA) and phoN genes, which produces a product only in the absence of SPI-7 (primers DE0032-F and DE0083-R); and (iii) a chromosomal gene, aroC, which acts as an internal PCR control (primers aroC-F and aroC-R) (Fig. 1). PCRs were performed with an Expand High Fidelity PCR kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Each reaction mixture contained 300 nM primer, 100 ng of DNA template, 200 μM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, and 2.6 U of Taq polymerase in a total volume of 50 μl of reaction buffer. PCR conditions were 95.0°C for 3 min, followed by 28 cycles of 95.0°C for 30 s, 57.0°C for 1 min, and 72.0°C for 3 min. The PCR products were visualized by ethidium bromide staining after electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel.

    Sequencing of aroC and tRNA PCR products. The PCR products were purified with DNA purification kits (Qiagen, Crawley, United Kingdom). Sequencing of the products obtained with the specific primers was performed with BigDye Chain Terminators on an ABI 3700 capillary machine. The sequence was edited and aligned by using Bioedit software (http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/BioEdit/bioedit.html). It is known that the aroC sequence varies among S. enterica isolates and is conserved within particular Salmonella serotypes (17). Consequently, the precise DNA sequence of aroC provides an accurate signature of a particular S. enterica serovar, and so this approach was used to independently confirm the identities of selected isolates. Experience with the intergenic region phoN to pheU of different Salmonella serovars (27) and aroC of Salmonella serovar Typhi (17) allowed us to use sequence data from these regions to support the identification.

    Immunofluorescence detection of Vi. All clinical isolates which were Vi negative by agglutination were investigated for Vi expression by immunofluorescence. Bacteria were grown at 37°C in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth (0.17 M NaCl) for 8 h with aeration, subcultured at a 1/100 dilution into fresh LB broth (0.17 M NaCl), and cultured for a further 16 h at 37°C without aeration. Bacteria from 500 μl of culture were harvested by centrifugation in a benchtop microcentrifuge (Eppendorf 5415D) (13,000 rpm, 2 min) and resuspended in 500 μl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The bacteria were diluted 1/100 in PBS, and a 50-μl drop was placed in the wells of a glass chamber slide (Falcon, Poole, United Kingdom). The slides were incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Excess bacteria and PBS were removed, and the slides were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. The slides were washed twice with PBS and then placed in PBS containing 20 mM ammonium chloride and stored at 4°C until they were used. Before the slides were stained, they were washed twice with PBS. Primary antibodies (goat anti-Salmonella antibody and rabbit anti-Vi antibody; Murex) diluted 1/200 in PBS containing 10% horse serum were applied to the bacteria (40 μl per well) for 30 min at room temperature in a humid atmosphere. The slides were washed twice in PBS, and secondary antibodies (donkey anti-goat antibody conjugated to Cy2 and donkey anti-rabbit antibody conjugated to Rhodamine Redex, diluted 1/200 and 1/400, respectively) in PBS containing 10% horse serum were applied to the bacteria (40 μl per well) for 30 min at room temperature in a humid atmosphere. The slides were washed twice in PBS and once in water, dried, and mounted. The bacteria were visualized by epifluorescence microscopy. The bacteria were visible on the green channel, and the Vi antigen was visible on the red channel.

    RESULTS

    Vi agglutination. In the routine diagnostic laboratory at the Aga Khan University during the period of study (1999 to 2002), 2,227 bacterial blood isolates were provisionally identified as Salmonella serovar Typhi on the basis of biochemistry test results and agglutination with O9 and Hd antisera. Of these, 2,210 (99.2%) isolates gave positive results for Vi by agglutination carried out at the same time as the identification tests. The 17 Vi agglutination-negative putative Salmonella serovar Typhi isolates identified from direct culture in this screening were subjected to a more detailed analysis after storage. Of these original 17 isolates, 5 were not Salmonella serovar Typhi. Three were positive for O9 but negative for Hd, which led to their classification as group D salmonellae but not Salmonella serovar Typhi. Interestingly these isolates gave a false-positive result for Hd agglutination when they tested by the slide agglutination format and were negative for citrate utilization when they were tested with 2.5 ml of citrate agar. Final confirmation of the identification was done with the API 20E system and sequencing of aroC. The two remaining isolates were identified as Salmonella serovar Paratyphi A, and we believe that these isolates were present as mixed cultures with Salmonella serovar Typhi on initial isolation. This is supported by the finding for one culture that contained organisms that were both SPI-7 negative, typical of Salmonella serovar Paratyphi A, and tviB positive, typical of Salmonella serovar Typhi (Fig. 2, lane 17). These classifications were subsequently confirmed by sequencing of the aroC gene of each isolate, which provided a genetic signature of the serovar (Fig. 3). Thus, although these bacteria were responsible for invasive salmonellosis in humans, they had been misclassified by standard laboratory methods. Therefore, of the 2,222 Salmonella serovar Typhi isolates recovered, 12 (0.5%) were agglutination negative for Vi on primary subculture. The reported rates of occurrence of Vi-negative Salmonella serovar Typhi by year are presented in Table 2.

    Multiplex PCR for ViaB and SPI-7. To test if the phenotypically Vi-negative Salmonella serovar Typhi strains encoded the genes for Vi production, a multiplex PCR was developed to detect either the presence of tviB within the actual ViaB (Vi capsule biosynthesis)-coding region or the absence of the whole 134-kbp SPI-7 sequence (Fig. 1). This PCR was used to amplify all initial Salmonella isolates negative for Vi by agglutination (12 Salmonella serovar Typhi isolates, 2 Salmonella serovar Paratyphi A isolates, and 3 group D Salmonella isolates). Three Salmonella serovar Typhi clinical isolates and strains SARB63, CT18, and TY2, all freshly positive for Vi agglutination, acted as positive controls. Salmonella serovar Typhi SARB64 and three clinical isolates of Salmonella serovar Paratyphi A served as negative controls. The presence of Salmonella DNA was confirmed by including Salmonella aroC-specific primers in the multiplex PCR. All positive and negative controls routinely yielded the expected results: a PCR product of 846 bp for Vi-positive isolates and a PCR product of 1,275 bp, indicating the absence of SPI-7, for the negative controls (Fig. 1 and 2). Of the 12 agglutination-negative Salmonella serovar Typhi isolates, 11 gave products of 846 bp, indicating the presence of tviB (tviB+), and 1 gave a product of 1,275 bp, suggesting that this organism did not harbor SPI-7. The PCR results therefore show that 11 of 12 of the Vi agglutination-negative Salmonella serovar Typhi isolates possessed the tviA gene required for the synthesis and expression of the Vi antigen. Significantly, over the 4-year period only one isolate of Salmonella serovar Typhi had lost the whole gene sequence for SPI-7, as shown by the presence of a product between the pheU and phoN (Fig. 4).

    Subculture on medium with low osmolarity. There is evidence that Vi expression is influenced by osmolarity and that it is enhanced by the culture medium and conditions of low osmolarity, e.g., those obtained with 0.17 M NaCl (26). At the time of isolation, all of the Vi agglutination-negative Salmonella serovar Typhi isolates were routinely subcultured onto low-osmolarity LB agar (0.17 M NaCl; Difco, Detroit, Mich.). However, none of these isolates became detectably Vi agglutination positive following subculture. However, following storage on Protect Beads (Prolabs, Poole, United Kingdom) for various periods of several months to years at –70°C and subsequent subculture on LB agar containing 0.17 M NaCl, 9 of 11 previously Vi agglutination-negative tviB+ isolates grew as cultures that were positive for Vi by agglutination. Hence, the storage conditions used apparently favored the generation of Salmonella serovar Typhi capable of surface-associated Vi production. Interestingly, there were still two Salmonella serovar Typhi isolates which had the tviB gene but which could not be shown to express Vi by agglutination after storage.

    Immunofluorescence detection of Vi. Immunofluorescence microscopy facilitates the direct detection of the Vi capsule on individual Salmonella serovar Typhi bacteria and was found to be a very sensitive method for the detection of Vi expression (our results, not shown). All of the original 11 Vi agglutination-negative Salmonella serovar Typhi isolates, which were positive for both SPI-7 and tviB, were tested for Vi expression by immunofluorescence microscopy with the same anti-Vi antiserum used for the agglutination tests. All were positive for Vi production by comparison with known negative controls. Interestingly, this included the two Salmonella serovar Typhi isolates that were negative by agglutination after storage (Fig. 5). The reason for this is likely to be the higher sensitivity of the immunofluorescence microscopy technique compared with that of agglutination.

    Thus, of 17 Salmonella serovar Typhi isolates from clinical specimens originally reported to be Vi negative, only 1 was in fact a truly Vi-negative Salmonella serovar Typhi isolate. Eleven cases of false negativity were caused by a false-negative agglutination test result when the primary isolates were tested. The results of all the investigations are summarized in Table 3.

    DISCUSSION

    We show here that more than 99% (2,221 of 2,222) of human blood isolates of Salmonella serovar Typhi in Pakistan were able to express the Vi capsular antigen. There were originally 17 non-Vi-agglutinable isolates, of which 5 were shown to be non-serovar Typhi Salmonella isolates. Of the remaining 12 isolates, 11 were shown to be capable of expressing Vi under some conditions. The one truly Vi-negative Salmonella serovar Typhi isolate had lost not only the viaB locus, which encodes proteins associated with Vi biosynthesis, but the whole of SPI-7, which contains other genes associated with virulence (25). Given the unstable nature of this region of the Salmonella serovar Typhi genome (27), we believe that this shows a remarkably high degree of conservation of Vi expression in primary isolates when they are characterized prior to storage and extensive laboratory passage. In contrast, reports from different regions of India have described both a high prevalence (22) and a low prevalence (14) of Vi-negative Salmonella serovar Typhi isolates when serovar Typhi isolates were tested.

    Given that the use of the capsular polysaccharide-based vaccines for protection against other pathogens, such as S. pneumoniae, has led to concern about an increase in the proportion of strains expressing capsular types not incorporated into the vaccine (8), the proportion of Vi-negative Salmonella serovar Typhi isolates in natural bacterial populations potentially has major implications for the use of Vi antigen-based typhoid vaccines (4, 12, 16). We therefore believe that it will be critically important to establish robust methods for the analysis of Vi expression by Salmonella serovar Typhi in areas where Vi vaccines are used and recommend a serological approach combined with genetic analysis that incorporates PCR analysis. Attempts to identify Vi-negative Salmonella serovar Typhi isolates by purely agglutination-based approaches should be viewed with caution. Vi expression by Salmonella serovar Typhi has been shown to be subject to regulation involving two-component sensors-regulators, RcsB-RcsC (2) and OmpR-EnvZ (26), which respond to changes in environmental conditions, such as osmolarity. Vi expression is thus complex and is likely to be subject to regulation by other unknown factors. It is possible that Salmonella serovar Typhi isolates reported to be Vi agglutination negative from direct cultures in clinical microbiology laboratories are actually Vi positive but demonstrate a down regulation of Vi that could occur either in the patient's blood or during culture in the laboratory. Indeed, we report this to be the case with nearly all (11 of 12) of the Vi-negative isolates whose agglutination was determined in this study.

    Vi-negative Salmonella serovar Typhi isolates accumulate at significant rates following laboratory passage of the organism, and so to investigate this, we have systematically tested all Salmonella serovar Typhi isolates recovered at the Aga Khan laboratories in Karachi over a 4-year period (1999 to 2002) for Vi expression using traditional microbiology identification techniques and then screened the Vi-negative Salmonella serovar Typhi isolates using specific immunofluorescence and genetic characterization. During primary isolation, 0.5% (12 of 2,222) of the Salmonella serovar Typhi isolates were found to be Vi agglutination negative. Eleven of these 12 Vi agglutination-negative isolates were positive for the tviB gene, which suggested that the genetic machinery required for Vi expression was present. Although none of the 11 tviB+ isolates became Vi agglutination positive after passage on low-osmolarity agar at the time of isolation, 9 of them became positive after they were frozen and recultured in low-osmolarity broth. This illustrates the difficulties in attempting to determine the Vi types of Salmonella serovar Typhi isolates purely by serological methods. By immunofluorescence, all 11 isolates were shown to be capable of expressing Vi after storage (Fig. 5). Of importance to this study is that all of the Salmonella serovar Typhi isolates which possessed tviB were able to express the Vi antigen, as shown by immunofluorescence, suggesting that the PCR used here for the detection of tviB has application for the detection of Vi-negative Salmonella serovar Typhi on primary culture. Further characterization of the relationship between the presence of tviB and the expression of Vi is needed, however, as an IS1 insertion sequence is present in this region in CT18, and the effects of this on Vi expression are unknown. Although we (27) and others (23) have shown the presence of SPI-7-negative Salmonella serovar Typhi strains in culture collections, these may accumulate because of the culture or storage conditions used. It is therefore important to test Salmonella serovar Typhi isolates for the presence of the Vi genes on primary isolation with as little subculturing as possible. It is possible that the particular strains of Salmonella serovar Typhi or the culture and isolation conditions used in Pakistan may favor the retention of the SPI-7 island and that the conditions and/or the strains encountered elsewhere may favor the loss of SPI-7 or Vi expression. Thus, it will be important to perform studies similar to ours in different geographical locations in laboratories that use different isolation techniques.

    The genetics of Vi are well understood. In addition to regulatory genes that influence the levels of Vi expression, 11 genes within the ViaB operon are involved in Vi biosynthesis (9). Furthermore, ViaB is encoded on a potentially mobile pathogenicity island, SPI-7, which contains 134 kbp of DNA (Fig. 1). From sequence analysis it is predicted that SPI-7 is capable of excision from the Salmonella serovar Typhi chromosome (6, 27). The question remains whether the genes for Vi expression could be lost under the potentially overwhelming selective pressure against this capsule from Vi vaccination programs. The licensed parenteral typhoid vaccines are based on purified Vi antigen alone, and new vaccines in which the antibody response to this antigen is enhanced by conjugation of the antigen to carrier proteins are being developed (19). These vaccines will not provide protection against other Salmonella serovars, such as Salmonella serovar Paratyphi and nontyphoidal group D salmonellae, which may thus emerge as important causes of systemic salmonellosis. Furthermore, live oral typhoid vaccines which constitutively express Vi are also being developed and may have similar effects (29). Vi-negative Salmonella serovar Typhi can become clinically important only if the capsule is not essential for pathogenesis or transmission. At present, the Vi antigen is considered important in the pathogenesis of typhoid fever and possibly protects the bacterium from complement-mediated killing and phagocytosis. However, Vi-negative Salmonella serovar Typhi can cause a typhoid fever-like illness, as can Salmonella serovar Paratyphi A, which does not typically express the Vi antigen (15). Our data suggest that Vi may have a vital role in typhoid fever, but further study of the molecular epidemiology of the bacteria which cause invasive salmonellosis, particularly in regions where Vi vaccination is extensive, is imperative. The multiplex PCR and immunofluorescence assay developed for this study should prove invaluable for screening for Vi-negative Salmonella serovar Typhi postvaccination.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    We acknowledge the work of the technical staff at the Aga Kahn University Microbiology Laboratory and thank Kate Unsworth at Imperial College and Ken Sanderson at University of Calgary for useful discussions.

    G.D. was supported by funding from The Wellcome Trust, and C.K. was supported by a Wellcome Trust Ph.D. studentship. This project was funded by the Wellcome Trust of the United Kingdom and Aga Khan University.

    Present address: Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

    REFERENCES

    Acharya, I. L., C. U. Lowe, R. Thapa, V. L. Gurubacharya, M. B. Shrestha, M. Cadoz, D. Schulz, J. Armand, D. A. Bryla, B. Trollfors, et al. 1987. Prevention of typhoid fever in Nepal with the Vi capsular polysaccharide of Salmonella typhi. A preliminary report. N. Engl. J. Med. 317:1101-1104.

    Arricau, N., D. Hermant, H. Waxin, C. Ecobichon, P. S. Duffey, and M. Y. Popoff. 1998. The RcsB-RcsC regulatory system of Salmonella typhi differentially modulates the expression of invasion proteins, flagellin and Vi antigen in response to osmolarity. Mol. Microbiol. 29:835-850.

    Arya, S. C. 1997. Efficacy of Salmonella typhi Vi capsular polysaccharide vaccine in South Africa. Vaccine 15:244. (Letter.)

    Arya, S. C. 1999. Efficacy of Vi polysaccharide vaccine against Salmonella typhi. Vaccine 17:1015-1016. (Letter.)

    Arya, S. C. 2002. Field effectiveness of Vi polysaccharide typhoid vaccine in the People's Republic of China. J. Infect. Dis. 185:845. (Author's reply, 185:845-846.)

    Bueno, S. M., C. A. Santiviago, A. A. Murillo, J. A. Fuentes, A. N. Trombert, P. I. Rodas, P. Youderian, and G. C. Mora. 2004. Precise excision of the large pathogenicity island, SPI7, in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi. J. Bacteriol. 186:3202-3213.

    Engels, E. A., M. E. Falagas, J. Lau, and M. L. Bennish. 1998. Typhoid fever vaccines: a meta-analysis of studies on efficacy and toxicity. BMJ Clin. Res. Ed. 316:110-116.

    Feikin, D. R., and K. P. Klugman. 2002. Historical changes in pneumococcal serogroup distribution: implications for the era of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines. Clin. Infect. Dis. 35:547-555.

    Hashimoto, Y., T. Ezaki, N. Li, and H. Yamamoto. 1991. Molecular cloning of the ViaB region of Salmonella typhi. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 69:53-56.

    Hirose, K., T. Ezaki, M. Miyake, T. Li, A. Q. Khan, Y. Kawamura, H. Yokoyama, and T. Takami. 1997. Survival of Vi-capsulated and Vi-deleted Salmonella typhi strains in cultured macrophage expressing different levels of CD14 antigen. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 147:259-265.

    Hone, D. M., S. R. Attridge, B. Forrest, R. Morona, D. Daniels, J. T. LaBrooy, R. C. Bartholomeusz, D. J. Shearman, and J. Hackett. 1988. A galE via (Vi antigen-negative) mutant of Salmonella typhi Ty2 retains virulence in humans. Infect. Immun. 56:1326-1333.

    Hormaeche, C. 1999. Letter to the editor. Vaccine 17:1016.

    Hornick, R. B., S. E. Greisman, T. E. Woodward, H. L. DuPont, A. T. Dawkins, and M. J. Snyder. 1970. Typhoid fever: pathogenesis and immunologic control. Second of two parts. N. Engl. J. Med. 283:739-746.

    Jesudason, M. V., G. Sridharan, S. Mukundan, and T. J. John. 1994. Vi-specific latex agglutination for early and rapid detection of Salmonella serotype typhi in blood cultures. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 18:75-78.

    Kapil, A., S. Sood, V. Reddaiah, B. Das, and P. Seth. 1997. Paratyphoid fever due to Salmonella eneterica serotype Paratyphi A. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 3:407.

    Keddy, K. H., K. P. Klugman, and J. B. Robbins. 1998. Efficacy of Vi polysaccharide vaccine against strains of Salmonella typhi: reply. Vaccine 16:871-872. (Letter.)

    Kidgell, C., U. Reichard, J. Wain, B. Linz, M. Torpdahl, G. Dougan, and M. Achtman. 2002. Salmonella typhi, the causative agent of typhoid fever, is approximately 50,000 years old. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2:39-45.

    Klugman, K. P., I. T. Gilbertson, H. J. Koornhof, J. B. Robbins, R. Schneerson, D. Schulz, M. Cadoz, and J. Armand. 1987. Protective activity of Vi capsular polysaccharide vaccine against typhoid fever. Lancet ii:1165-1169.

    Lin, F. Y., V. A. Ho, H. B. Khiem, D. D. Trach, P. V. Bay, T. C. Thanh, Z. Kossaczka, D. A. Bryla, J. Shiloach, J. B. Robbins, R. Schneerson, S. C. Szu, M. N. Lanh, S. Hunt, L. Trinh, and J. B. Kaufman. 2001. The efficacy of a Salmonella typhi Vi conjugate vaccine in two-to-five-year-old children. N. Engl. J. Med. 344:1263-1269.

    Looney, R. J., and R. T. Steigbigel. 1986. Role of the Vi antigen of Salmonella typhi in resistance to host defense in vitro. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 108:506-516.

    Mbelle, N., R. E. Huebner, A. D. Wasas, A. Kimura, I. Chang, and K. P. Klugman. 1999. Immunogenicity and impact on nasopharyngeal carriage of a nonavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. J. Infect. Dis. 180:1171-1176.

    Mehta, G., and S. C. Arya. 2002. Capsular Vi polysaccharide antigen in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1127-1128.

    Nair, S., S. Alokam, S. Kothapalli, S. Porwollik, E. Proctor, C. Choy, M. McClelland, S. L. Liu, and K. E. Sanderson. 2004. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi strains from which SPI7, a 134-kilobase island with genes for Vi exopolysaccharide and other functions, has been deleted. J. Bacteriol. 186:3214-3223.

    Obaro, S. K., R. A. Adegbola, W. A. Banya, and B. M. Greenwood. 1996. Carriage of pneumococci after pneumococcal vaccination. Lancet 348:271-272.

    Parkhill, J., G. Dougan, K. D. James, N. R. Thomson, D. Pickard, J. Wain, C. Churcher, K. L. Mungall, S. D. Bentley, M. T. Holden, M. Sebaihia, S. Baker, D. Basham, K. Brooks, T. Chillingworth, P. Connerton, A. Cronin, P. Davis, R. M. Davies, L. Dowd, N. White, J. Farrar, T. Feltwell, N. Hamlin, A. Haque, T. T. Hien, S. Holroyd, K. Jagels, A. Krogh, T. S. Larsen, S. Leather, S. Moule, P. O'Gaora, C. Parry, M. Quail, K. Rutherford, M. Simmonds, J. Skelton, K. Stevens, S. Whitehead, and B. G. Barrell. 2001. Complete genome sequence of a multiple drug resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi CT18. Nature 413:848-852.

    Pickard, D., J. Li, M. Roberts, D. Maskell, D. Hone, M. Levine, G. Dougan, and S. Chatfield. 1994. Characterization of defined ompR mutants of Salmonella typhi: ompR is involved in the regulation of Vi polysaccharide expression. Infect. Immun. 62:3984-3993.

    Pickard, D., J. Wain, S. Baker, A. Line, S. Chohan, M. Fookes, A. Barron, P. O. Gaora, J. A. Chabalgoity, N. Thanky, C. Scholes, N. Thomson, M. Quail, J. Parkhill, and G. Dougan. 2003. Composition, acquisition, and distribution of the Vi exopolysaccharide-encoding Salmonella enterica pathogenicity island SPI-7. J. Bacteriol. 185:5055-5065.

    Robbins, J. D., and J. B. Robbins. 1984. Reexamination of the protective role of the capsular polysaccharide (Vi antigen) of Salmonella typhi. J. Infect. Dis. 150:436-449.

    Wang, J. Y., F. R. Noriega, J. E. Galen, E. Barry, and M. M. Levine. 2000. Constitutive expression of the Vi polysaccharide capsular antigen in attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi oral vaccine strain CVD 909. Infect. Immun. 68:4647-4652.

    Zhao, L., T. Ezak, Z. Y. Li, Y. Kawamura, K. Hirose, and H. Watanabe. 2001. Vi-suppressed wild strain Salmonella typhi cultured in high osmolarity is hyperinvasive toward epithelial cells and destructive of Peyer's patches. Microbiol. Immunol. 45:149-158.(John Wain, Deborah House,)
    濠电姷鏁告慨鐑藉极閹间礁纾块柟瀵稿Т缁躲倝鏌﹀Ο渚&婵炲樊浜濋崑鎰版偣閸ヮ亜鐨烘い锔诲幖閳规垿鎮╃紒妯婚敪濠电偛鐪伴崐婵嬨€佸鑸电劶鐎广儱妫涢崢鍗炩攽閻愭潙鐏ョ€规洦鍓熷鎼佸Χ閸℃劒绨婚梺鍐叉惈閸燁偊宕㈤幘顔界厸閻忕偛澧介埥澶愭煃閽樺妯€鐎规洩绻濋幃娆忣啅椤斾粙鐛庨梻鍌欑閹碱偊藝椤愶箑鐤炬繝濠傚悩濞戙垹绀冩い鏃囧閹芥洖鈹戦悙鏉戠仸閼裤倝鏌$€n亪鍙勯柣鎿冨亰瀹曞爼濡搁敃鈧惃鎴︽⒑缁嬫鍎愰柟姝屽吹缁骞掗弬鍝勪壕闁挎繂绨肩花浠嬫煕閺冩挾鐣辨い顏勫暣婵″爼宕卞Δ鈧ḿ鎴︽⒑缁嬫鍎愰柟鐟版喘瀵鈽夐姀鈥充汗閻庤娲栧ú銏ゅ焵椤掍礁绗氬ǎ鍥э躬瀹曪絾寰勬繝鍌ゆ綋闂備礁鐤囬~澶愬垂閸喚鏆﹂柛顐f礀閻撴﹢鏌i幇闈涘濞存粍鐟╁铏规嫚閺屻儺鈧绱掗悩鑼х€规洘娲熷畷锟犳倷瀹ュ棛鈽夐柍钘夘樀婵偓闁绘﹢娼ф慨锔戒繆閻愵亜鈧牜鏁幒妞濆洭顢涢悙鏉戔偓鍫曟煥閺冨倻鎽傛繛鍫滅矙閺岋綁骞囬浣叉灆闂佺ǹ瀛╁褰掋€冮妷鈺傚€烽柛娆忣槸閺嬬姴顪冮妶鍐ㄧ仾婵☆偄鍟悾鐑藉Ω閳哄﹥鏅i梺缁樺姍濞佳囧箹缁嬪簱鏀介柣妯虹仛閺嗏晠鏌涚€n剙鈻堟鐐存崌椤㈡棃宕卞Δ鍐摌闂備浇顕栭崹濂告倶閹邦優娲敂閸曨収鍚呴梻浣虹帛閿氶柛姘e亾缂備焦顨呴ˇ闈涱潖濞差亜绠伴幖杈剧悼閻g敻姊洪悷鏉挎Щ妞ゆ垵顦悾鐑芥偨缁嬪潡鍞跺┑鐘焺娴滄繂螞閸愵喖鏋侀柛灞剧矌妞规娊鎮楅敐搴濈盎濠碘€炽偢濮婄粯鎷呴崨濠冨枑闂佺ǹ顑囬崑銈夌嵁閹版澘绠柦妯侯槼閹芥洟姊洪崫鍕偍闁搞劌缍婇悰顕€濮€閵堝棛鍘搁梺鎼炲劗閺呮稑鐡┑鐘殿暯閳ь剝灏欓惌娆撴煛瀹€瀣М濠殿喒鍋撻梺瀹犳〃閼宠埖绂掗埡鍐=闁稿本姘ㄥ瓭闂佹寧娲︽禍顏堟偘椤旂晫绡€闁搞儯鍔嶅▍銏ゆ⒑缂佹〒鍦焊濞嗘挻鍋柍褜鍓氭穱濠囨倷椤忓嫧鍋撻弽顓炵濡わ絽鍟壕濠氭煟閺傛寧鎲告い鈺冨厴閺岀喖骞嶉纰辨毉闂佹娊鏀遍崹鍧楀蓟濞戙垺鏅滈悹鍥ㄥ絻缁楀矂姊洪懡銈呮瀾闁革絾娼欑叅妞ゅ繐瀚€瑜旈弻娑㈠Ψ椤旀儳甯ュ┑鐐跺亹閸犳牕顫忓ú顏勭闁告瑥顦伴崕鎾绘⒑閻熸澘鏆辨慨姗堝閹广垹顫濋懜纰樻嫽婵炶揪绲介幊娆掋亹閹烘垵鐝樺銈嗗笒閸婂鎯屽▎鎾寸厵闁绘垶锕╁▓鏇㈡煕婵犲倻浠涢柕鍥у瀵剟宕归瑙勫瘱缂備胶鍋撻崕鎶藉Χ閹间礁钃熼柨鐔哄Т缁€鍐煏婵炲灝鍔楅柛瀣尵缁瑩骞愭惔銏㈡婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏椤撱垹绠柛鎰靛枛缁€瀣煕椤垵浜為柡澶婄秺閺岋絾鎯旈姀鈺佹櫛闂佸摜濮甸悧鐘诲箖閵夆晜鍋傞幖杈剧稻濞堟儳鈹戦濮愪粶闁稿鎸搁埞鎴﹀焺閸愵亝鎲欏銈忛檮婵炲﹪寮诲☉銏犵闁哄鍨规禒鍝ョ磽娴h櫣甯涚紒瀣崌閸┾偓妞ゆ帊鑳堕埊鏇炵暆閿濆懏鍋ラ柟顖氭湰缁绘繈宕戦懞銉︻棃闁诡喒鏅犲畷锝嗗緞鐎n亝鐎鹃梻鍌欐祰濡椼劎娆㈤敓鐘查棷闁挎繂顦埀顑跨窔瀵挳濮€閳╁啯鐝曢梻浣藉Г閿氭い锔跨矙閸┾偓妞ゆ帊鑳堕埥澶愭煃鐟欏嫬鐏撮柡浣哥Ч瀹曠喖顢曢敍鍕礋婵犵數濮幏鍐川椤旂晫褰х紓鍌欑贰閸犳鎮烽敂鐐床婵犻潧顑呴悙濠囨煏婵炑冨暙缁犵増绻濋悽闈浶為柛銊у帶閳绘柨鈽夐姀鈩冩珖闂侀潧鐗嗛ˇ顖毿ч弻銉︾厸闁搞儮鏅涢弸鎴︽煕濞嗗繒绠婚柡宀嬬秮閹垽鎮℃惔婵嗘瀳婵犵妲呴崹顏堝磻閹剧粯鈷掑ù锝堝Г閵嗗啰绱掗埀顒佹媴閾忓湱鐓嬮梺鍦檸閸犳宕戦埡鍌滅瘈闂傚牊渚楅崕蹇曠磼閳ь剟宕橀埞澶哥盎濡炪倖鎸鹃崰搴ㄦ倶閿濆鐓欓悗鐢登归崢瀛樻叏婵犲嫮甯涢柟宄版噽缁數鈧綆浜濋悾浼存⒒娴e憡鎲稿┑顔炬暬楠炴垿宕惰閺嗭附绻濋棃娑冲姛闁汇倐鍋撴繝鐢靛仦閸ㄥ吋銇旈幖浣哥柧闁挎繂娲ㄧ壕浠嬫煕鐏炲墽鎳呴柛鏂跨Т閻f繈鏁愰崨顔间淮闂佺硶鏂傞崹钘夘嚕椤曗偓瀹曞ジ鎮㈤崫鍕闂傚倷鑳堕幊鎾活敋椤撱垹纾块柟瀵稿仧閻熻绻涢幋娆忕仾闁绘挻娲熼弻锟犲磼濮樺彉铏庨梺鍝勬4缂嶄線寮婚垾宕囨殕閻庯綆鍓涢惁鍫ユ倵鐟欏嫭绀冮悽顖涘浮閿濈偛鈹戠€e灚鏅i梺缁橈耿濞佳囩嵁閳ь剛绱撻崒姘偓鎼佸磹閻戣姤鍊块柨鏇炲€堕埀顒€鍟村畷銊ヮ潰閵堝懏鍠橀柡灞芥椤撳ジ宕ㄩ姘曞┑锛勫亼閸婃牜鏁幒妤€绐楁慨姗嗗厳缂傛岸鏌熼柇锕€鏋ょ痪鎯у悑閵囧嫰寮崶褌姹楃紓浣哄Т椤兘寮婚妸銉㈡斀闁割偅绻€濡叉劙姊烘潪鎵槮闁哥喐娼欓悾鐑藉箳閹搭厽鍍甸梺鍛婎殘閸嬬偤骞夐姀銈嗏拻濞达綀妫勯崥鐟扳攽閻愨晛浜剧紓鍌氬€搁崐褰掓嚌妤e啫鐓濈€广儱顦伴弲鏌ユ煕閵夈垺娅囬柣鎾愁儔濮婃椽宕滈懠顒€甯ラ梺鍝ュУ閹瑰洭宕洪埀顒併亜閹哄秶顦︾紒妤佸笚閵囧嫰顢曢敐鍥╃杽濡炪們鍨洪敃銏ゅ箖閳哄拋鏁冮柨婵嗗缂嶅矂姊婚崒姘偓椋庢濮橆兗缂氱憸宥囧弲闂侀潧鐗嗛幃鍨洪鍕庘晠鏌嶆潪鎷屽厡闁告棑绠戦—鍐Χ閸℃鐟ㄩ梺绋款儏濡繂顕i妸鈺傚亱闁割偁鍨婚鏇熺節閵忥絾纭炬い鎴濇搐鐓ら悗鐢电《閸嬫挾鎲撮崟顒傦紭闂佹悶鍔忔慨銈嗙┍婵犲洤閱囬柡鍥╁仧閸婄偤姊洪棃娴ㄥ綊宕曢悜妯侯嚤闁哄洢鍨洪悡鐔兼煟閺傛寧鎲搁柣顓炶嫰椤儻顦虫い銊ョ墦瀵偊顢欓崲澶嬫瀹曨亪宕橀鍡忔(婵犵數濮伴崹濂稿春閺嶎厼绀夐柡宥庡幖绾惧鏌ㄥ┑鍡╂Ч闁绘挻娲熼弻鏇熷緞濡櫣浠╁銈傛櫓閸撴瑩鍩ユ径鎰闁荤喐澹嗗В銏㈢磽娴d粙鍝洪悽顖涱殔宀h儻绠涘☉妯溾晝鎲歌箛娑欏仼濠靛倸鎲¢埛鎴犳喐閻楀牆淇俊顐e灥閳规垿鎮欓埡浣峰闂傚倷娴囬鏍窗濡ゅ啫鍨濋柟鎹愵嚙缁犳澘鈹戦悩鎻掓殭缂佸墎鍋涢…璺ㄦ崉閾忓湱浼囧┑顔硷功閸嬫挾鎹㈠┑瀣仺闂傚牊绋愮划璺侯渻閵堝棙澶勯柛妯圭矙楠炲牓濡搁敂鍝勪簼闂佸憡鍔戦崝宥呂i鍕拺闁告繂瀚埢澶愭煕濡亽鍋㈢€规洖缍婂畷鎺楁倷鐎电ǹ甯惧┑鐘垫暩閸嬬喖宕戦幘鏂ユ瀺闁糕剝绋掗悡鏇㈡倵閿濆啫濡煎┑鈥炽偢濡焦寰勯幇顓犲弳濠电娀娼уΛ娆撳闯瑜版帗鐓涢柛鈩冪懃閺嬫垵菐閸パ嶈含妞ゃ垺绋戦~婵嬪础閻愨晛寰嶅┑鐘愁問閸犳牠鏁冮妷銉富濞寸姴顑冮埀顑跨窔瀵挳濮€閳╁啯鐝抽梻浣虹《閸撴繈鎮烽敃鍌ゆ晣濠电姵纰嶉埛鎺懨归敐鍫燁仩閻㈩垱鐩弻鐔哄枈閸楃偘绨介梺鐟扮畭閸ㄥ綊鍩為幋鐘亾閿濆骸澧紒渚婄畵閺岋絾鎯旈婊呅i梺鍝ュУ閻楁粎鍒掓繝姘櫜闁糕剝鐟ч惁鍫熺節閻㈤潧孝闁稿﹥鎮傞、鏃堫敃閿旂晫鍘甸梺鍝勵儛閸嬪嫭鎱ㄩ崒娑欏弿濠电姴鍟妵婵囶殽閻愭潙濮堥柟顖涙閺佹劙宕掑☉杈ㄧ秾闂傚倸鍊风粈渚€骞栭锔藉亱婵犲﹤鐗嗙粈鍫ユ煟閺冨牜妫戦柡鍡畵閺岋綁鎮㈢粙娆炬闂佸壊鍋掓禍顏堝蓟濞戙垹鍗抽柕濞垮劚鐎涳絽鈹戦悙瀛樼稇閻庢凹鍓熼垾鏃堝礃椤斿槈褔鏌涢埄鍐炬畼闁荤喐鍔欏铏圭磼濡椽鍤嬬紓浣哄У閹告悂顢氶敐澶婄缂佹稑顑嗛弲婊堟⒑閸撴彃浜為柛鐘虫崌瀹曘垽鏌嗗鍡忔嫼闂佽崵鍠撴晶妤呭箚閸垻纾煎璺侯儐缂嶆垿鏌i敐鍥ㄦ毈鐎规洖宕埥澶娾枎閹存繂绗氶梺鑽ゅ枑缁秶鍒掗幘宕囨殾婵犲﹤鍠氬ḿ鈺傘亜閹烘埈妲归柛宥囨暬濮婃椽妫冨ù銉ョ墦瀵彃饪伴崼婵堬紱闂佺ǹ鐬奸崑鐐烘偂閵夆晜鐓熼柡鍌涘閹牏鈧稒绻堥弻锝夋偄閸濄儲鍤傜紓浣哄У閹瑰洭鎮伴鈧浠嬵敇閻愭鍟囨俊鐐€栭幐楣冨磻閻斿摜顩锋い鏍ㄧ矌绾捐棄霉閿濆棗绲诲ù婊呭亾缁绘繈濮€閿濆棛銆愰梺鎰佸灡濞叉繈濡甸幇鏉跨闁瑰濯Σ顖炴⒒娴e懙鍦崲濡ゅ懎纾婚柟閭﹀厴閺嬫棃鏌曢崼婵愭Ч闁抽攱鍨圭槐鎾存媴鐠愵垳绱扮紓浣哄У閻楃娀寮婚敐澶婄厸濠电姴鍊绘禒鈺呮⒑娴兼瑧鎮奸柛蹇旓耿瀵偊骞樼紒妯轰汗闂佽偐鈷堥崜锕€危娴煎瓨鈷掑ù锝堟娴滃綊鏌嶅畡鎵ⅵ鐎规洘绮岄~婵囷紣濠靛洦娅撻梻浣侯攰閹活亪姊介崟顖氱厱闁硅揪闄勯崑锝夋煕閵夘垳宀涢柛瀣崌閹煎綊顢曢妶鍕寜闂傚倸鍊风粈渚€骞夐敓鐘茶摕闁靛⿵瀵屽▓浠嬫煙闂傚顦﹂柣鎾寸箞閺岀喖骞戦幇闈涙缂備胶濯寸紞渚€寮婚敐澶婄疀妞ゆ挾鍠撶粙鍥ь渻閵堝懎顒㈤柟鍛婃倐閸╃偤骞嬮敂钘変汗闁荤姴娉ч崘褏鐭楅梻鍌欑閹芥粓宕抽妷鈺佸瀭闁割偅娲滃畵渚€鏌涢埄鍐槈缁炬儳鍚嬮幈銊╂晲鎼粹€崇缂傚倸绉撮敃顏堢嵁閸愵喖鐓涢柛娑卞幘椤斿矂姊洪崷顓炲妺缂佽鍊规穱濠囨煥鐎n剛鐦堥梺姹囧灲濞佳嗏叴闂備胶枪椤戝棝骞戦崶顒€钃熼柣鏂跨殱閺嬫棃鏌涢…鎴濇灍闁诲繑鎸剧槐鎺撱偅閸愵亞鏆紓浣哄У閻楃姴顕f繝姘亜閻炴稈鈧厖澹曢梺姹囧灮濞呫儵鎮烽悧鍫熺槑闂備浇宕甸崰鎰垝鎼淬垺娅犳俊銈呮噺閸嬪倿鏌ㄩ悢鍝勑㈤柦鍐枑缁绘盯骞嬪▎蹇曚患缂備胶濮垫繛濠囧蓟閿熺姴纾兼慨妯块哺閻ㄦ垿姊洪崫鍕靛剰闁瑰啿閰i崺鐐哄箣閿旇棄鈧兘鏌涘▎蹇fЦ婵炲拑缍佸缁樻媴缁嬭法鐩庣紓浣藉皺閸嬫挾绮氭潏銊х瘈闁搞儜鍜佸晪婵$偑鍊栧Λ浣规叏閵堝應鏋嶉柕蹇嬪€栭埛鎴︽偣閹帒濡兼繛鍛姍閺岀喖宕欓妶鍡楊伓

   闂傚倸鍊峰ù鍥敋瑜嶉湁闁绘垼妫勯弸浣糕攽閻樺疇澹樼痪鎹愵嚙閳规垿鎮╅崣澶嬫倷缂備焦鍔栭〃濠囧蓟閿熺姴鐐婇柍杞扮劍閻忎線姊哄畷鍥ㄥ殌缂佸鎸抽崺鐐哄箣閿旇棄浜归梺鍛婄懃椤︿即骞冨▎蹇婃斀闁宠棄妫楁禍婵嬫煥閺囨ê鐏茬€殿喛顕ч埥澶愬閻樻牓鍔戦弻鏇$疀婵犲倸鈷夐梺缁樼箖閻楃娀骞冨畡鎵冲牚闁告劑鍔庨惄搴ㄦ⒑閻熸澘娈╅柟鍑ゆ嫹  闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閻戣姤鍤勯柤鍝ユ暩娴犳氨绱撻崒娆掑厡缂侇噮鍨堕妴鍐川閺夋垹鍘洪悗骞垮劚椤︻垶宕¢幎鑺ョ厪闊洦娲栨牎闂佽瀵掗崜鐔奉潖閾忓湱纾兼俊顖氭惈椤酣姊虹粙璺ㄦ槀闁稿﹥绻傞悾鐑藉即閻愬灚娈曢梺鍛婃处閸撴盯宕㈡禒瀣拺闂侇偅绋戝畵鍡樼箾娴e啿瀚▍鐘炽亜閺傛娼熷ù婊勭矒楠炴牠骞栭鐐典画闁诲孩鐔幏锟�  闂傚倸鍊搁崐宄懊归崶褏鏆﹂柛顭戝亝閸欏繘鏌℃径瀣婵炲樊浜滃洿闂佹悶鍎荤徊鑺ョ閻愵剚鍙忔俊顖滃帶鐢爼鏌h箛銉╂闁靛洤瀚版慨鈧柨娑樺閸f澘螖閻橀潧浠滄い鎴濐樀瀵偊宕橀鑲╁姦濡炪倖甯掗崐濠氭儗閸℃稒鐓曢柡鍥ュ妼閻忥繝鏌i幘璺烘瀾濞e洤锕、娑樷攽閹邦剚顔勭紓鍌欐祰鐏忣亜鐣烽悽鍨潟闁圭偓鍓氶崥瀣叓閸ャ劍鐓ユい蹇ユ嫹  闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閻戣姤鍤勯柛顐f礀缁犵娀鏌熼幑鎰靛殭閻熸瑱绠撻幃妤呮晲鎼粹€愁潻闂佹悶鍔嶇换鍫ョ嵁閺嶎灔搴敆閳ь剚淇婇懖鈺冩/闁诡垎浣镐划闂佸搫鏈ú妯兼崲濞戙垺鍊锋い鎺嶈兌瑜板懘姊绘担鍛婂暈妞ゃ劌妫欑换娑欑節閸パ嗘憰闂佹枼鏅涢崯顐ゆ閻愮儤鍊甸柨婵嗙凹缁ㄤ粙鏌涢弮鍋冲綊鍩為幋锕€鐓¢柛鈩冾殘娴煎牓姊洪悷鏉挎闁瑰嚖鎷�   闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹瀹勬噴褰掑炊椤掑﹦绋忔繝銏f硾椤戝洭銆呴幓鎹楀綊鎮╁顔煎壈缂備讲鍋撳璺哄閸嬫捇宕楁径濠佸闂備礁鎲″ú锕傚礈濞嗘劗顩烽梺顒€绉甸埛鎴︽⒒閸喍鑵规繛鎴欏灩瀹告繃銇勯弽銉モ偓妤佹償婵犲倵鏀介柣妯虹仛閺嗏晠鏌涚€n偆鈽夐摶鐐寸箾閸℃ɑ灏紒鈧径鎰厸鐎广儱楠告禍鐐测槈閹惧磭校缂佺粯鐩畷鍗炍熺拠鏌ョ€洪梻浣虹帛閹歌煤濡吋宕叉繛鎴欏灩楠炪垺淇婇姘倯闁革綆鍙冮弻锝嗘償閵忋垹鏆¢梺鐟板殩閹凤拷   闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹妞嬪海鐭嗗〒姘e亾妤犵偛顦甸崹楣冨箛娴e湱绋佺紓鍌氬€烽悞锕佹懌闂佸憡鐟ョ换姗€寮婚悢铏圭<闁靛繒濮甸悘鍫ユ⒑濞茶骞楁い銊ワ躬瀵鈽夐姀鐘靛姶闂佸憡鍔︽禍鏍i崼銏㈢=闁稿本鐟ㄩ澶愭煛閸涱垰鈻堢€殿喖顭烽幃銏㈠枈鏉堛劍娅栨繝鐢靛Т閿曘倝宕板璺烘辈妞ゆ挾鍎愬〒濠氭煏閸繂鏆欓柛鏃傛暬閺岀喖宕欓妶鍡楊伓