婵犵妲呴崑鎾跺緤妤e啯鍋嬮柣妯款嚙杩濋梺璺ㄥ櫐閹凤拷
闂傚倷绀侀幖顐︽偋韫囨稑绐楅幖娣妼閸ㄥ倿鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘: 闂佽娴烽弫濠氬磻婵犲洤绐楅柡鍥╁枔閳瑰秴鈹戦悩鍙夋悙婵☆偅锕㈤弻娑㈠Ψ閵忊剝鐝栭悷婊冨簻閹凤拷 闂傚倷绶氬ḿ鑽ゆ嫻閻旂厧绀夐幖娣妼閸氬綊骞栧ǎ顒€鐏柍缁樻礋閺屻劑寮崹顔规寖濠电偟銆嬮幏锟� 闂備浇宕垫慨宥夊礃椤垳鐥梻浣告惈椤戝倿宕滃┑鍫㈢煓濠㈣泛澶囬崑鎾绘晲鎼粹€崇缂備椒绶ら幏锟� 闂傚倷鑳舵灙妞ゆ垵鍟村畷鏇㈡焼瀹ュ懐鐣洪悗骞垮劚椤︻垳鐥閺屾稓浠﹂悙顒傛缂備胶濯撮幏锟� 闂傚倷鑳堕、濠勭礄娴兼潙纾块梺顒€绉撮崹鍌炴煛閸愩劎澧涢柣鎺曨嚙椤法鎹勯搹鍦紘濠碉紕鍎戦幏锟� 闂傚倷鑳剁涵鍫曞疾閻愭祴鏋嶉柨婵嗩槶閳ь兛绶氬畷銊╁级閹寸媭妲洪梺鑽ゅТ濞层倕螣婵犲洤绀夐柨鐕傛嫹 婵犵數鍋為崹鍫曞箰鐠囧唽缂氭繛鍡樺灱婵娊鏌曟径鍡樻珔缂佲偓瀹€鍕仯闁搞儜鍕ㄦ灆闂佸憡妫戦幏锟� 闂傚倷娴囬崑鎰版偤閺冨牆鍨傚ù鍏兼儗閺佸棝鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂備浇顕х€涒晠宕樻繝姘挃闁告洦鍓氶崣蹇涙煥閻曞倹瀚� 婵犵數鍋為崹鍫曞箹閳哄懎鍌ㄩ柣鎾崇瘍閻熸嫈鏃堝川椤撶媭妲洪梺鑽ゅТ濞层倕螣婵犲洤绀夐柨鐕傛嫹 闂傚倷绀侀幉锟犮€冭箛娑樼;闁糕剝绋戦弸渚€鏌熼幑鎰靛殭缂佺姵鍨块弻锟犲礋椤愶絿顩伴梺鍝ュ櫐閹凤拷
婵犵數鍎戠徊钘壝洪敂鐐床闁稿本绋撻々鐑芥煥閻曞倹瀚�: 闂傚倷绀侀幖顐﹀磹閻戣棄纭€闁告劕妯婂〒濠氭煥閻曞倹瀚� 闂備浇宕垫慨鏉懨洪妶鍥e亾濮樼厧鐏︽い銏$懇閺佹捇鏁撻敓锟� 闂備浇宕甸崰鎰版偡閵夈儙娑樷槈閵忕姷锛涢梺璺ㄥ櫐閹凤拷 闂備焦鐪归崺鍕垂闁秵鍋ら柡鍥ュ灪閸庡﹪鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷鐒﹂惇褰掑磹閺囩喐娅犻柦妯侯樈濞兼牠鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷鐒﹂惇褰掑磿閸楃伝娲Ω閿旇棄寮块梺璺ㄥ櫐閹凤拷 闂傚倷鑳舵灙缂佺粯顨呴悾鐑芥偨缁嬫寧鐎梺璺ㄥ櫐閹凤拷 闂傚倷鑳堕崕鐢稿磻閹捐绀夐煫鍥ㄦ尵閺嗐倝鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷鑳堕、濠勭礄娴兼潙纾规俊銈呮噹缁犳牠鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷娴囬鏍礂濞嗘挸纾块柡灞诲劚閻ら箖鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷鑳舵灙妞ゆ垵鍟村畷鏇㈠箻椤旂瓔妫呴梺璺ㄥ櫐閹凤拷 缂傚倸鍊搁崐绋棵洪妶鍡╂闁归棿绶¢弫濠囨煥閻曞倹瀚� 婵犵數鍋為崹鍫曞箰閸洖纾归柡宥庡幖閻掑灚銇勯幒鎴敾閻庢熬鎷� 闂傚倷鑳堕崢褍顕i幆鑸汗闁告劦鍠栫粈澶愭煥閻曞倹瀚� 闂傚倷鐒﹀鍨熆娓氣偓楠炲繘鏁撻敓锟� 婵犵數濞€濞佳囧磻婵犲洤绠柨鐕傛嫹 闂傚倷鑳堕崢褎鎯斿⿰鍫濈闁跨噦鎷� 闂備浇顕х换鎰殽韫囨稑绠柨鐕傛嫹 闂傚倷鐒﹂幃鍫曞磿閼碱剛鐭欓柟杈惧瘜閺佸棝鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂備浇宕垫慨鏉懨洪埡浣烘殾闁割煈鍋呭▍鐘绘煥閻曞倹瀚� 闂傚倷绀侀幖顐⒚洪敃鈧玻鍨枎閹惧秴娲弫鎾绘晸閿燂拷
婵犵數鍋為崹鍫曞箹閳哄懎鍌ㄩ柤娴嬫櫃閻掑﹪鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘: 闂備焦鐪归崺鍕垂闁秵鍋ら柡鍥ュ灪閸庡﹪鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷娴囧銊╂倿閿曞倹鍋¢柨鏇楀亾瀹€锝呮健閺佹捇鏁撻敓锟� 闂傚倷娴囬鏍礈濮樿鲸宕查柛鈩冪☉閻掑灚銇勯幒鎴敾閻庢熬鎷� 婵犵數鍋為崹鍫曞箹閳哄懎鐭楅柍褜鍓涢埀顒冾潐閹碱偊骞忛敓锟� 闂傚倷绀侀幉锟犳偋閻愯尙鏆﹂柣銏⑶圭粻鏍煥閻曞倹瀚� 婵犵數鍋為崹鍫曞箰鐠囧唽缂氭繛鍡樺灱婵娊鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倸鍊峰ù鍥涢崟顖涘亱闁圭偓妞块弫渚€鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 濠电姵顔栭崰妤勬懌闂佹悶鍔忓▔娑滅亱闂佽法鍣﹂幏锟� 闂傚倷绀侀幖顐﹀磹缁嬫5娲Χ閸ワ絽浜剧痪鏉款槹鐎氾拷 闂傚倷鐒﹂崹婵嬫倿閿曞倸桅闁绘劗鏁哥粈濠囨煥閻曞倹瀚� 婵犲痉鏉库偓妤佹叏閹绢喖瀚夋い鎺戝閽冪喖鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷鐒﹂幃鍫曞磿閹绘帞鏆︽俊顖欒濞尖晠鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 婵犵绱曢崑娑㈩敄閸ヮ剙绐楅柟鎹愵嚙閸戠娀鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷娴囬崑鎰版偤閺冨牆鍨傞柧蹇e亝濞呯娀鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷娴囬崑鎰版偤閺冨牆鍨傛い鏍ㄧ矌缁犳棃鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷娴囬崑鎰版偤閺冨牆鍨傞柟娈垮枤閸楁岸鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷绀侀幖顐﹀磹鐟欏嫬鍨旈柦妯侯槺閺嗐倝鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷鑳堕幊鎾诲触鐎n剙鍨濋幖娣妼绾惧ジ鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷绀侀崥瀣i幒鎾变粓闁归棿绀侀崙鐘绘煥閻曞倹瀚�
当前位置: 首页 > 医学版 > 期刊论文 > 临床医学 > 微生物临床杂志 > 2005年 > 第3期 > 正文
编号:11200857
Molecular Epidemiology of Macrolide-Resistant Stre

     Institute of Medical Microbiology, National Reference Center for Streptococci, University Hospital, Aachen, Germany

    Eijkman-Winkler Institute for Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    ABSTRACT

    In many European countries, the level of pneumococcal resistance to macrolides has now passed the level of resistance to penicillin G. A total of 82 erythromycin A-resistant isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae were collected by 11 laboratories in seven European countries. All of the isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility, analyzed for clonal relatedness by multilocus sequence typing, and characterized for macrolide resistance genotypes. The prevalence of the macrolide resistance genotypes varied substantially between countries. In France (87.5% of all strains), Spain (77.3%), Switzerland (80%), and Poland (100%), strains were predominantly erm(B) positive, whereas higher levels of mef(A)-positive strains were reported from Greece (100%) and Germany (33.3%). Macrolide resistance was caused by the oligoclonal spread of some multilocus sequence types, but significant differences in clonal distribution were noted between France and Spain, countries from which high levels of macrolide resistance have been reported. Overall, sequence type 81 (Spain23F-1 clone) was by far the most widespread. The mainly erm(B)-positive serotype 14 clone (sequence type 143), first reported in Poland in the mid-1990s, is now widespread in France.

    INTRODUCTION

    Streptococcus pneumoniae continues to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in humans (17). The worldwide increase in antibiotic resistance in this species has become a serious infectious disease problem within the last 20 years (1).

    In many European countries, the rate of pneumococcal resistance to macrolides has passed the level of resistance to penicillin G. Prevalence rates of resistance to erythromycin A vary substantially among European countries. Erythromycin A resistance rates of >20% are reported from France, Spain, Poland, Greece, and Portugal, whereas significantly lower resistance rates are documented in Germany and Switzerland (5, 9).

    Macrolide resistance in S. pneumoniae is usually caused by the presence of the erm(B) or the mefE [renamed mef(A)] resistance determinants. The erm(B) protein encodes a 23S rRNA methylase, and most pneumococcal strains harboring the gene are resistant to 14-, 15-, and 16-member ring macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramin B (cMLSB phenotype). The mef(A) protein encodes an efflux pump that leads to resistance to only 14- and 15-member ring macrolides (M phenotype) (22, 31). Other mechanisms of macrolide resistance have been described in only a few clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae. Changes were clustered in a highly conserved region of domain V of 23S rRNA, which plays a key role in macrolide binding (2, 3, 28, 33), and in ribosomal proteins L4 and L22 (18, 28).

    Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) is a recently developed technique that produces unambiguous molecular typing data that can be transmitted electronically via the Internet (4, 12). The method is highly portable, as any laboratory can compare the sequences of the seven loci in their isolates with those in a central database on the World Wide Web (http://www.mlst.net) and obtain the allelic profile of each isolate.

    In the present study, this technique was used to analyze the genetic relatedness of clinical erythromycin A-resistant strains of S. pneumoniae isolated in seven European countries.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Study design. Eleven participating laboratories in seven European countries were requested to send consecutive clinical pneumococcal isolates to the Eijkman-Winkler Institute (the European reference center for the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program) using Amies charcoal medium transport swabs (Difco), together with relevant information on the isolate. Isolates were cultured on blood agar and stored at –70°C using Microbank (Mast Diagnostics, Reinfeld, Germany) until they were further tested. The study has been described in detail elsewhere (9).

    A total of 82 erythromycin A-resistant isolates of S. pneumoniae were sent to the German National Reference Centre for Streptococci, where these strains were further characterized. The strains came from the following countries: France, n = 37; Spain, n = 22; Greece, n = 4; Portugal, n = 1; Germany, n = 3; Switzerland, n = 10; and Poland, n = 5. Centers from the following countries were included in the study: France (three), Germany (one), Poland (one), Switzerland (one), Spain (three), Greece (one), and Portugal (one).

    Susceptibility testing. MIC testing was performed using the broth microdilution method as recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) (19). Microtiter plates containing penicillin G, cefotaxime, amoxicillin, erythromycin A, clarithromycin, roxithromycin, azithromycin, clindamycin, spiramycin, telithromycin, quinupristin-dalfopristin, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, teicoplanin, and vancomycin with cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (Oxoid, Wesel, Germany) plus 5% lysed horse blood (Oxoid) were used. The final inocculum was 5 x 105 CFU/ml. MICs were determined following incubation at 35°C for 24 h in ambient air. S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 was used as a control strain. Current NCCLS interpretive criteria were used to define antimicrobial resistance (19). Isolates were stored at –70°C on porous beads (Microbank; Mast Diagnostics, Rheinfeld, Germany).

    PCR experiments. PCR was performed as described previously (22, 24, 27). For the detection of erm(A) and mef(E), the primers described by Trieu-Cuot et al. (34) and by Tait-Kamradt et al. (32) with the sequences (erm) 5' CGA GTG AAA AAG TAC TCA ACC 3' (positions 362 to 382) and 5' GGC GTG TTT CAT TGC TTG ATG (positions 978 to 958) and the sequences (mef) 5' AGT ATC ATT AAT CAC TAG TGC 3'(positions 57 to 77) and 5' GTA ATA GAT GCA ATC ACA GC 3' (positions 551 to 532) were chosen.

    Serotyping. Pneumococcal strains were serotyped by Neufeld's Quellung reaction using type and factor sera provided by the Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.

    MLST. MLST of all strains (n = 82) was carried out as described previously. Briefly, internal fragments of the aroE, gdh, gki, recP, spi, xpt, and ddl genes were amplified by PCR from chromosomal DNA with the primer pairs described by Enright and Spratt (4). The alleles at each of the seven loci provide the allelic profile of each isolate and also define their sequence type (ST). Allelic profiles are shown as the alleles at each of the seven loci in the order aroE, gdh, gki, recP, spi, xpt, and ddl. The allelic profiles of the German isolates were compared with each other, as well as with other isolates in the pneumococcal MLST database, using software available at the MLST website. Additional MLST data for control strains were obtained from http://www.mlst.net.

    Phylogenetic analysis. The 82 erythromycin A-resistant strains in this study were assigned to 23 different MLS types. Nineteen of the STs were already known.

    For phylogenetic analysis, the sequence fragments of the aroE, gdh, gki, recP, spi, and xpt genes were concatenated using the concatenation tool on http://www.mlst.net. As recommended, the ddl gene was left out of the analysis, since it appears to be highly variable in penicillin-resistant isolates.

    The concatenated sequences (2,715 bp) were aligned with the multiple sequence alignment tool ClustalW. The multiple alignment was fed to the programs Distances and Grow Tree to create a phylogenetic tree, using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic means (UPGMA). All programs were from the HUSAR Program Package of the Biocomputing Service Group (http://genius.dkfz-heidelberg.de).

    In addition, the genetic relatedness of representative isolates of the present investigation (eight strains) were compared with macrolide-susceptible strains from the MLST database (four strains).

    RESULTS

    A total of 82 isolates were consecutively collected by 11 centers. The strains were isolated from the respiratory tract (n = 67; 81.7%) and from blood (n = 15; 18.3%).

    Data on antibiotic resistance are presented in Table 1. Macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae strains usually showed cross-resistance to other 14- and 15-member ring macrolides. All strains were inhibited by 0.5 μg of telithromycin/ml. The quinupristin-dalfopristin MIC for one strain was 2 μg/ml (intermediate). More than 70% of the strains were found to be nonsusceptible to penicillin G. The strains also often showed cross-resistance to tetracycline (75.6%). All strains were susceptible to glycopeptides. erm(B)-positive-strains (n = 64) were characterized by resistance to 14- and 15-member macrolides and clindamycin. Interestingly, the erythromycin A MICs for two strains (19B157 and 18B084) were relatively low (4 μg/ml). mef(A)-positive strains (n = 18) were characterized by generally lower erythromycin MICs (MIC range, 1 to 8 μg/ml), and all strains remained susceptible to clindamycin. mef(A)-positive strains were more often found to be cross-resistant to penicillin G [83.3% of strains (combined rate of penicillin intermediate and resistant) versus 75.1% in erm(B)-positive strains]. All erm(B)-positive strains were found to exhibit reduced susceptibility to tetracycline (tetracycline intermediate, 4.7% of strains; tetracycline resistant, 95.3% of strains), whereas 38.9% of the mef(A)-positive strains remained susceptible to tetracycline.

    Serotyping showed serotypes 23F and 14 (30.5% each) to be the leading serotypes among the collection of macrolide-resistant pneumococcal isolates. Macrolide resistance was also found among serotypes 6B, 19F, and 9V. Only single isolates of other serotypes were encountered (Table 2).

    In total, 64 of the 82 isolates (78.0%) were erm(B) positive and 18 (22.0) were mef(A) positive. The prevalence of the macrolide resistance genotypes varied substantially among countries. In France (87.5% of all strains), Spain (77.3%), Switzerland (80%), and Poland (100%), strains were predominantly erm(B) positive, whereas high levels of mef(A)-positive strains were reported from Greece (100%) and Germany (33.3%) (Table 3).

    Macrolide resistance was caused by the oligoclonal spread of some MLS types. Among those, sequence type 81 (Spain23F-1 serotype) was by far the most important, followed by the penicillin-resistant Polish serotype 14 clone (ST 143) and the Spain9V-3 clone (ST 156) (Table 4). The ST 81 isolates (n = 22) were found predominantly in Spain (n = 14) and France (n = 7) and in a single case in Germany. Notably, most of the strains were erm(B) positive, but only one isolate from France and five isolates from Spain were M phenotypes. With the exception of the German strain (MIC, 0.016 μg/ml), the penicillin MICs for all isolates were 1 μg/ml (Table 4).

    Significantly, differences were noted between the clonal distributions in France and Spain, countries for which relatively high levels of macrolide resistance have been reported. In Spain, >60% of macrolide resistance (14 of 22 strains) is due to the spread of a single clone (ST 81; Spain23F-1 serotype), and macrolide resistance was only rarely seen among some strains of ST 73, ST 90, and ST 620. In contrast, macrolide resistance in France is caused by a large number of clones, predominantly ST81 and ST143, but more than half of the macrolide resistance is due to the spread of other STs. Furthermore, the predominantly erm(B)-positive penicillin G-resistant Polish serotype 14 clone has spread to France but was found to carry the mef(E) gene. Notably, macrolide resistance has now spread to some serotypes, such as serotypes 3 and 38 and some serogroup 15 strains, not primarily involved in the clonal spread of resistance to date.

    In addition, seven new macrolide-resistant clones were described for the first time in this investigation, including the French serotype 14 clone (ST 658), the French-Swiss 19F clone (ST 621), a French 6B clone (ST 619), a Spanish 6B clone (ST 620), a Swiss serotype 14 clone (ST 670), a French serotype 14 clone (ST 658), and a French 23F clone (ST 657).

    A dendrogram of the 23 MLS types included in the present study, constructed from the pairwise distance matrix using UPGMA, is presented in Fig. 1. The dendrogram shows that that ST new2 is only distantly related to the other MLS types. Within the other group of strains, ST new3, ST 81, and ST 620 are closely genetically related. Figure 2 shows the MLS types from the present study and representative strains of macrolide-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci from the MLST database. Analysis of the data indicated that the macrolide-resistant pneumococci are a genetically heterogeneous group within the pneumococci.

    DISCUSSION

    Within the last 10 years, macrolide resistance in S. pneumoniae has emerged on a dramatic scale. In Europe, it is now being increasingly reported from France and Spain. The present study shows that in France (87.5%), Spain (77.3%), Switzerland (80%), and Poland (100%), strains are predominantly erm(B) positive, whereas high levels of mef(A)-positive strains are reported from Greece (100%) and Germany (33.3%), confirming the findings of other investigators (6, 7, 20, 21, 25, 26). Notably, none of the strains was found to be mef(A)- and erm(B)-negative, suggesting the absence of one of the recently described new macrolide resistance mechanisms, such as mutations in the 23S rRNA or alterations in ribosomal proteins L4 and L22. Therefore, these mechanisms may at present be less important for the spread of macrolide resistance determinants in pneumococci.

    Two serotypes (23F and 14) were identified by the present investigation as major contributors to the emergence of macrolide resistance in Europe. MLST, combined with recent developments in high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatics with established population genetics techniques, now provides a portable, reproducible, and scalable typing system that reflects the population and evolutionary biologies of bacterial pathogens (35) and permits analysis of the marked differences among pneumococcal strains belonging to one serotype. MLST has been increasingly used to analyze the clonal spread of antibiotic-resistant pneumococcal strains.

    These studies include the identification of multidrug-resistant S. pneumoniae strains isolated in Poland (29), the spread of fluoroquinolone-resistant strains in the United States (11) and England (10), the genotypic characterization of two penicillin-susceptible serotype 6B S. pneumoniae clones circulating in Italy (8), and the characterization of erythromycin-resistant clinical isolates of the four major antimicrobial-resistant Spanish clones of S. pneumoniae (Spain23F-1, Spain6B-2, Spain9V-3, and Spain14-5) (13). For analysis of the epidemiologic relevance and the relative importance of individual MLS types, the evaluation of the MLST database may not be sufficient, as entries in the database do not all include consecutive isolates and therefore may not be representative of the clonal profiles of S. pneumoniae in individual countries. The present study is an approach to applying MLST to a large collection of macrolide-resistant pneumococci isolated in an international epidemiological study. A very small number of clones have been identified as being responsible for the spread of resistance, particularly highlighted by the worldwide spread of the serotype 23F pneumococcal clone (Spain23F-1), first identified in Spain in the early 1980s (16) and resistant to penicillin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and in some cases erythromycin A, as proved by the present investigation. This successful clone has now been found in the United States, South Africa, South America, and several European countries (14). The present study underscores the relevance of this clone for the spread of macrolide resistance, mainly in Spain. Furthermore, in Spain this clone was found to carry both widespread macrolide resistance mechanisms, mef(A) and erm(B), and to be nonsusceptible to penicillin. In contrast, in Germany, a country with a low level of penicillin G resistance (23), the only isolate of this clone was found to be penicillin susceptible.

    The choice of empirical antibiotic therapy for the treatment of respiratory tract infections may have significant implications for the different frequencies of mef(A)- and erm(B)-mediated macrolide resistance in the several European countries. In France, we see the highest level of antibiotic and macrolide consumption in Europe (data available from the European Surveillance of Antibiotic Consumption [http://www.ua.ac.be/esac]). In addition, josamycin and spiramycin are widely used in France, which may contribute to the high rate of erm(B)-mediated macrolide resistance in that country. Furthermore, high macrolide consumption rates are reported from Italy and Greece. In Germany, the absolute consumption of all antibiotics is significantly lower than in Spain and France, but the consumption of macrolides is relatively high (36).

    Notably, fluoroquinolone resistance was not observed in our collection of pneumococcal strains. It has also been observed by other investigators that macrolide and beta-lactam resistance is not associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in S. pneumoniae (5). Furthermore, high levels of macrolide consumption in many European countries may cause the selective antibiotic pressure responsible for this phenomenon.

    In addition, this investigation describes some new clones, which may have the potential for further spread. Tetracycline resistance is frequently associated with erythromycin A resistance. In Europe, associations of >80% in erythromycin-resistant pneumococci isolated in Spain (30) and Italy (15) have recently been reported. This association may reflect the widespread presence in pneumococcal populations of transposons, typified by Tn1545, thought to result from the insertion over time of resistance determinants, such as erm(B) for erythromycin and aphA3 for kanamycin, into primitive gram-positive conjugative transposons carrying tet(M) and the integrase gene int-Tn, typified by Tn916.

    Phylogenetic analysis showed all but one strain to be closely genetically related. Comparison with a representative group of macrolide-susceptible strains revealed no significant diversity between these two groups of strains (Fig. 1 and 2).

    In summary, the present investigation demonstrates the genetic relatedness of macrolide-resistant strains in various European countries and underscores the high value of MLST in analyzing the genetic relatedness of antibiotic-resistant pneumococcal strains.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    We thank the Eijkman-Winkler Institute (the European reference center for the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program) for cooperation and for providing the isolates. We thank Nelli Neuberger, Maria Lemperle, and Claudia Cremer for excellent technical assistance and Susan Griesbach, Münster for copyediting.

    The study was supported in part by grant RKI-415/1369235 from the German Ministry of Health (Bundesminister für Gesundheit) and by the German Ministry for Science and Technology (BMFT) (CAP net).

    REFERENCES

    Appelbaum, P. C. 2002. Resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae: implications for drug selection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 34:1613-1620.

    Canu, A., B. Malbruny, M. Coquemont, T. A. Davies, P. C. Appelbaum, and R. Leclercq. 2002. Diversity of ribosomal mutations conferring resistance to macrolides, clindamycin, streptogramin, and telithromycin in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:125-131.

    Depardieu, F., and P. Courvalin. 2001. Mutation in 23S rRNA responsible for resistance to 16-membered macrolides and streptogramins in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:319-323.

    Enright, M. C., and B. G. Spratt. 1998. A multilocus sequence typing scheme for Streptococcus pneumoniae identification of clones associated with serious invasive disease. Microbiology 144:3049-3060.

    Felmingham, D., R. R. Reinert, Y. Hirakata, and A. Rodloff. 2002. Increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae from the PROTEKT surveillance study, and comparative in vitro activity of the ketolide, telithromycin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 50(Suppl. 1):25-37.

    Fitoussi, F., C. Doit, P. Geslin, N. Brahimi, and E. Bingen. 2001. Mechanisms of macrolide resistance in clinical pneumococcal isolates in France. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:636-638.

    Fotopoulou, N., P. T. Tassios, D. V. Beste, S. Ioannidou, A. Efstratiou, E. R. Lawrence, J. Papaparaskevas, R. C. George, and N. J. Legakis. 2003. A common clone of erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in Greece and the UK. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 9:924-929.

    Gherardi, G., M. Del Grosso, A. Scotto D'Abusco, F. D'Ambrosio, G. Dicuonzo, and A. Pantosti. 2003. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of two penicillin-susceptible serotype 6B Streptococcus pneumoniae clones circulating in Italy. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:2855-2861.

    Gordon, K. A., D. J. Biedenbach, and R. N. Jones. 2003. Comparison of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae susceptibilities from community-acquired respiratory tract infections and hospitalized patients with pneumonia: five-year results for the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 46:285-289.

    Johnson, A. P., C. L. Sheppard, S. J. Harnett, A. Birtles, T. G. Harrison, N. P. Brenwald, M. J. Gill, R. A. Walker, D. M. Livermore, and R. C. George. 2003. Emergence of a fluoroquinolone-resistant strain of Streptococcus pneumoniae in England. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 52:953-960.

    Johnson, C. N., W. H. Benjamin, Jr., S. A. Moser, S. K. Hollingshead, X. Zheng, M. J. Crain, M. H. Nahm, and K. B. Waites. 2003. Genetic relatedness of levofloxacin-nonsusceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from North America. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:2458-2464.

    Maiden, M. C., J. A. Bygraves, E. Feil, G. Morelli, J. E. Russell, R. Urwin, Q. Zhang, J. Zhou, K. Zurth, D. A. Caugant, I. M. Feavers, M. Achtman, and B. G. Spratt. 1998. Multilocus sequence typing: a portable approach to the identification of clones within populations of pathogenic microorganisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:3140-3145.

    Marimon, J. M., L. Iglesias, D. Vicente, and E. Perez-Trallero. 2003. Molecular characterization of erythromycin-resistant clinical isolates of the four major antimicrobial-resistant Spanish clones of Streptococcus pneumoniae (Spain23F-1, Spain6B-2, Spain9V-3, and Spain14-5). Microb. Drug Resist. 9:133-137.

    McGee, L., L. McDougal, J. Zhou, B. G. Spratt, F. C. Tenover, R. George, R. Hakenbeck, W. Hryniewicz, J. C. Lefevre, A. Tomasz, and K. P. Klugman. 2001. Nomenclature of major antimicrobial-resistant clones of Streptococcus pneumoniae defined by the pneumococcal molecular epidemiology network. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2565-2571.

    Montanari, M. P., M. Mingoia, I. Cochetti, and P. E. Varaldo. 2003. Phenotypes and genotypes of erythromycin-resistant pneumococci in Italy. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:428-431.

    Munoz, R., T. J. Coffey, M. Daniels, C. G. Dowson, G. Laible, J. Casal, R. Hakenbeck, M. Jacobs, J. M. Musser, and B. G. Spratt. 1991. Intercontinental spread of a multiresistant clone of serotype 23F Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Infect. Dis. 164:302-306.

    Musher, D. M. 1992. Infections caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae: clinical spectrum, pathogenesis, immunity, and treatment. Clin. Infect. Dis. 14:801-807.

    Musher, D. M., M. E. Dowell, V. D. Shortridge, R. K. Flamm, J. H. Jorgensen, P. Le Magueres, and K. L. Krause. 2002. Emergence of macrolide resistance during treatment of pneumococcal pneumonia. N. Engl. J. Med. 346:630-631.

    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2004. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Fourteenth informational supplement M100-S14. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.

    Perez-Trallero, E., C. Fernandez-Mazarrasa, C. Garcia-Rey, E. Bouza, L. Aguilar, J. Garcia-de-Lomas, and F. Baquero. 2001. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of 1,684 Streptococcus pneumoniae and 2,039 Streptococcus pyogenes isolates and their ecological relationships: results of a 1-year (1998-1999) multicenter surveillance study in Spain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:3334-3340.

    Perez-Trallero, E., J. M. Marimon, M. Montes, B. Orden, and M. de Pablos. 1999. Clonal differences among erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes in Spain. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 5:235-240.

    Reinert, R. R. 2004. Clinical efficacy of ketolides in the treatment of respiratory tract infections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 53:918-927.

    Reinert, R. R., A. Al-Lahham, M. Lemperle, C. Tenholte, C. Briefs, S. Haupts, H. H. Gerards, and R. Lütticken. 2002. Emergence of macrolide and penicillin resistance among invasive pneumococcal isolates in Germany. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 49:61-68.

    Reinert, R. R., C. Franken, M. van der Linden, R. Lutticken, M. Cil, and A. Al-Lahham. 2004. Molecular characterisation of macrolide resistance mechanisms of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes isolated in Germany, 2002-2003. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 24:43-47.

    Reinert, R. R., R. Lütticken, A. Bryskier, and A. Al-Lahham. 2003. Macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes in the pediatric population in Germany during 2000-2001. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:489-493.

    Reinert, R. R., S. Muckel, A. Al-Lahham, B. G. Spratt, A. B. Brueggemann, R. Hakenbeck, and R. Lütticken. 2003. Characterization of German penicillin non-susceptible serotype 23F pneumococci using multilocus sequence typing. J. Med. Microbiol. 52:981-987.

    Reinert, R. R., S. Simic, A. Al-Lahham, S. Reinert, M. Lemperle, and R. Lütticken. 2001. Antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae recovered from outpatients with respiratory tract infections in Germany from 1998 to 1999: results of a national surveillance study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:1187-1189.

    Reinert, R. R., A. Wild, P. Appelbaum, R. Lütticken, M. Y. Cil, and A. Al-Lahham. 2003. Ribosomal mutations conferring resistance to macrolides in Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical strains isolated in Germany. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:2319-2322.

    Sadowy, E., J. Zhou, E. Meats, M. Gniadkowski, B. G. Spratt, and W. Hryniewicz. 2003. Identification of multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae strains isolated in Poland by multilocus sequence typing. Microb. Drug Resist. 9:81-86.

    Seral, C., F. J. Castillo, M. C. Rubio-Calvo, A. Fenoll, C. Garcia, and R. Gomez-Lus. 2001. Distribution of resistance genes tet(M), aph3'-III, catpC194 and the integrase gene of Tn1545 in clinical Streptococcus pneumoniae harbouring erm(B) and mef(A) genes in Spain. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 47:863-866.

    Sutcliffe, J., A. Tait Kamradt, and L. Wondrack. 1996. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes resistant to macrolides but sensitive to clindamycin: a common resistance pattern mediated by an efflux system. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:1817-1824.

    Tait-Kamradt, A., T. Davies, P. C. Appelbaum, F. Depardieu, P. Courvalin, J. Petitpas, L. Wondrack, A. Walker, M. R. Jacobs, and J. Sutcliffe. 2000. Two new mechanisms of macrolide resistance in clinical strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae from Eastern Europe and North America. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:3395-3401.

    Tait-Kamradt, A., T. Davies, M. Cronan, M. R. Jacobs, P. C. Appelbaum, and J. Sutcliffe. 2000. Mutations in 23S rRNA and ribosomal protein L4 account for resistance in pneumococcal strains selected in vitro by macrolide passage. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:2118-2125.

    Trieu-Cuot, P., C. Poyart-Salmeron, C. Carlier, and P. Courvalin. 1990. Nucleotide sequence of the erythromycin resistance gene of the conjugative transposon Tn1545. Nucleic Acids Res. 18:3660.

    Urwin, R., and M. C. Maiden. 2003. Multi-locus sequence typing: a tool for global epidemiology. Trends Microbiol. 11:479-487.

    Vander Stichele, R. H., M. M. Elseviers, M. Ferech, S. Blot, and H. Goossens. 2004. European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC): data collection performance and methodological approach. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 58:419-428.(Ralf Rene Reinert, Adrian)
    婵犵數濮烽弫鎼佸磿閹寸姴绶ら柦妯侯棦濞差亝鍋愰悹鍥皺椤︻厼鈹戦悩缁樻锭婵炲眰鍊濋、姘舵焼瀹ュ棛鍘卞┑鐐村灥瀹曨剟寮搁妶鍡愪簻闁冲搫鍟崢鎾煛鐏炲墽鈽夐柍钘夘樀瀹曪繝鎮欏顔介獎闂備礁鎼ˇ顐﹀疾濠婂吘娑㈠礃椤旇壈鎽曞┑鐐村灦鑿ら柡瀣叄閻擃偊宕堕妸锕€鐨戦梺绋款儐閹歌崵绮嬮幒鏂哄亾閿濆簼绨介柛鏃撶畱椤啴濡堕崱妤€娼戦梺绋款儐閹瑰洭寮诲☉銏″亹鐎规洖娲㈤埀顒佸笚娣囧﹪宕f径濠傤潓闂佸疇顫夐崹鍨暦閸洖鐓橀柣鎰靛墰娴滄瑩姊虹拠鏌ヮ€楃紒鐘茬Ч瀹曟洟宕¢悙宥嗙☉閳藉濮€閻橀潧濮︽俊鐐€栫敮鎺椝囬鐐村€堕柨鏃傜摂濞堜粙鏌i幇顒佲枙闁稿孩姊归〃銉╂倷閸欏鏋犲銈冨灪濡啫鐣烽妸鈺婃晣闁绘劙娼ч幖绋库攽閻樺灚鏆╅柛瀣█楠炴捇顢旈崱妤冪瓘闂佽鍨奸悘鎰洪鍕吅闂佺粯锚閸氣偓缂佹顦靛娲箰鎼达絿鐣甸梺鐟板槻椤戝鐣烽悽绋块唶婵犮埄浜濆Λ鍐极閸屾粎椹抽悗锝庝簻婵″ジ姊绘担鍛婃喐闁稿鍋ら獮鎰板箮閽樺鎽曢梺鍝勬储閸ㄥ綊鐛姀銈嗙厸闁搞儮鏅涘瓭婵犵鈧尙鐭欓柡宀嬬秮婵偓闁宠桨鑳舵禒鈺冪磽閸屾氨孝闁挎洦浜悰顔界節閸ャ劍娅㈤梺缁樓圭亸娆撴偪閳ь剚淇婇悙顏勨偓鏍箰妤e啫纾婚柣鏂挎憸椤╃兘鏌熼幍顔碱暭闁抽攱鍨块弻娑㈡晜鐠囨彃绗岄梺鑽ゅ枑閸f潙煤椤忓嫀褔鏌涢妷顔惧帥婵炶偐鍠栧娲礃閸欏鍎撻梺鐟板暱濮橈妇鎹㈠鑸碘拻濞达絽鎳欒ぐ鎺戝珘妞ゆ帒鍊婚惌娆撴煙閻戞﹩娈曢柛濠傜仛閵囧嫰寮崹顔规寖缂佺偓鍎抽妶鎼佸蓟閿熺姴绀冮柕濞垮劗閸嬫挾绮欓幐搴㈢槑濠电姷鏁告慨顓㈠箯閸愵喖绀嬮柛顭戝亞閺夊綊鏌f惔銏╁晱闁哥姵鐗犻幃銉╂偂鎼达絾娈惧┑顔姐仜閸嬫挸鈹戦埄鍐憙妞わ附濞婇弻娑㈠箻閺夋垹浠哥紓浣虹帛缁嬫捇鍩€椤掍胶鈯曞畝锝呮健閹本绻濋崑鑺ユ閹晠宕f径瀣瀾闂備浇妗ㄧ欢锟犲闯閿濆鈧線寮撮姀鈩冩珕闂佽姤锚椤︿粙鍩€椤掍胶鈽夐柍瑙勫灴閺佸秹宕熼锛勬崟濠电姭鎷冮崨顔界彧缂備緡鍠楅悷锔炬崲濠靛鐐婇柕濞у啫绠版繝鐢靛О閸ㄧ厧鈻斿☉銏℃櫇闁靛牆顦Ч鏌ユ煛閸モ晛鏋戦柛娆忕箻閺岋綁鎮㈤悡搴濆枈濠碘槅鍨崑鎾绘⒒娴h姤銆冪紒鈧担铏圭煋闁圭虎鍠楅崑鈺傜節闂堟侗鍎忕紒鈧崘鈹夸簻妞ゆ挾鍠庨悘锝夋煙鐎电ǹ鍘存慨濠勭帛閹峰懐绮电€n亝鐣伴梻浣告憸婵敻骞戦崶褏鏆︽繝闈涳功閻も偓濠电偞鍨兼ご鎼佸疾閿濆洨纾介柛灞剧懅閸斿秴鐣濋敐鍛仴闁糕斂鍨藉顕€宕奸悢鍝勫箺闂備胶鎳撻顓㈠磿閹寸偟鐟规繛鎴欏灪閻撴洟鏌¢崒姘变虎闁哄棴缍侀弻鈥崇暆鐎n剛鐦堥悗瑙勬礃鐢帡锝炲┑瀣垫晣闁绘﹢娼ч獮鈧紓鍌氬€搁崐鐑芥倿閿曞倶鈧啴宕ㄥ銈呮喘閺屽棗顓奸崨顖氬Е婵$偑鍊栫敮鎺楀窗濮橆兗缂氶柟閭﹀枤绾惧吋銇勯弮鍥т汗缂佺姴顭烽弻銊モ攽閸繀妲愰梺杞扮閸熸潙鐣烽幒鎴僵闁告鍋為幉銏ゆ⒒娴h棄鍚瑰┑鐐╁亾缂傚倸鍊归懝楣冨煝瀹ュ鏅查柛銉㈡櫇閻撳姊洪崜鑼帥闁哥姵鎹囬崺鈧い鎺嶇缁楁帗銇勯锝囩疄妞ゃ垺锕㈤幃鈺咁敃閿濆孩缍岄梻鍌氬€风欢姘缚瑜嶇叅闁靛牆鎮垮ú顏勎╅柍杞拌兌閸旓箑顪冮妶鍡楃瑨闁稿妫濆銊╂偋閸垻顔曟繝銏f硾椤戝洤煤鐎电硶鍋撶憴鍕8闁搞劏濮ゆ穱濠囧醇閺囩偟鍊為梺闈浨归崕鐑樺閺囥垺鐓熼柣鏂挎憸閻苯顭胯椤ㄥ牓寮鍢夋棃宕崘顏嗏棨濠电姰鍨奸崺鏍礉閺嶎厼纾婚柨婵嗩槹閻撴洟鏌曟径妯虹仩妞も晩鍓欓埥澶愬箻閻熸壆姣㈢紓浣介哺鐢岣胯箛娑樜╃憸蹇涙偩婵傚憡鈷戠憸鐗堝俯濡垵鈹戦悙鈺佷壕闂備浇顕栭崰妤冨垝閹捐绠板┑鐘插暙缁剁偛顭跨捄铏圭伇婵﹦鍋撶换婵嬫偨闂堟稐绮跺銈嗘处閸樹粙骞堥妸锔哄亝闁告劑鍔嶅Σ顒勬⒑閸濆嫮鈻夐柛妯恒偢瀹曞綊宕掗悙瀵稿帾婵犵數鍋熼崑鎾斥枍閸℃稒鐓曢悗锝冨妼婵″ジ妫佹径鎰叆婵犻潧妫欓崳褰掓煛閸℃瑥鏋戝ǎ鍥э躬椤㈡稑顫濋崡鐐╁徍婵犳鍠栭敃銉ヮ渻娴犲鈧線寮撮姀鈩冩珳闂佺硶鍓濋悷锕傤敇婵犳碍鈷掑ù锝堟鐢盯鏌熺喊鍗炰簽闁瑰箍鍨归埞鎴犫偓锝庡墮缁侊箓鏌f惔顖滅У闁哥姵鐗滅划濠氭晲閸℃瑧鐦堟繝鐢靛Т閸婃悂顢旈锔界厵闁哄鍋勬慨鍌涙叏婵犲啯銇濇鐐村姈閹棃鏁愰崒娑辨綌闂傚倷绀侀幖顐︽偋濠婂牆绀堥柣鏃堫棑閺嗭箓鏌i悢绋款棎闁割偒浜弻娑㈠即閵娿儱瀛e┑鐐存綑鐎氼剟鈥旈崘顔嘉ч柛鈩冾殘閻熸劙姊虹紒妯洪嚋缂佺姵鎸搁锝夊箮缁涘鏅滈梺鍓插亞閸犳捇宕㈤柆宥嗏拺闁荤喓澧楅幆鍫㈢磼婢跺缍戦柣锝囨暬瀹曞崬鈽夊▎鎴濆笚闁荤喐绮嶇划鎾崇暦濠婂喚娼╂い鎺戭槹閸嶇敻姊洪棃娴ュ牓寮插⿰鍫濈;闁稿瞼鍋為悡銉╂煟閺傛寧鎯堢€涙繈鏌i悢鍝ユ嚂缂佺姵鎹囬悰顕€寮介鐐殿啇濡炪倖鎸鹃崑鐔哥椤栨粎纾藉ù锝嗗絻娴滅偓绻濋姀锝嗙【闁愁垱娲濋妵鎰板箳閹寸媭妲梻浣呵圭换妤呭磻閹邦兘鏋旈柕鍫濐槹閳锋垹绱撴担璐細缂佺姵鐗犻弻锝夊煛婵犲倻浠╅梺浼欑悼閸忔﹢寮幘缁樺亹闁肩⒈鍓﹀Σ浼存⒒娴h棄浜归柍宄扮墦瀹曟粌顫濇0婵囨櫓闂佺鎻梽鍕煕閹达附鍋i柛銉岛閸嬫捇鎼归銈勭按闂傚倷绀侀幉锟犲蓟閵婏富娈介柟闂寸閻撴繈鏌熼幑鎰靛殭缂佺媴缍侀弻锝夊箛椤撶喓绋囧銈呭閹告悂鍩為幋锔藉亹閻犲泧鍐х矗闂備礁鎽滈崳銉╁垂閸洜宓侀柛鈩冪☉绾惧吋鎱ㄩ敐搴″箹缂傚秴锕獮鍐煛閸涱厾顔岄梺鍦劋缁诲倹淇婇柨瀣瘈闁汇垽娼цⅴ闂佺ǹ顑嗛幑鍥蓟閻斿皝鏋旈柛顭戝枟閻忔挾绱掓ィ鍐暫缂佺姵鐗犲濠氭偄鐞涒€充壕闁汇垻娅ラ悷鐗堟瘎闂佽崵鍠愮划搴㈡櫠濡ゅ懏鍋傞柨鐔哄Т閽冪喐绻涢幋娆忕仼缂佺姵濞婇弻锟犲磼濮樿鲸鐨戦梺鍝勵儏閹冲酣鍩為幋锔藉€烽柛娆忣槸濞咃綁姊绘担绋跨盎缂佽尙鍋撶粚杈ㄧ節閸パ咁啋濡炪倖妫佹慨銈呪枍閵忋倖鈷戦悹鎭掑妼濞呮劙鏌熼崙銈嗗

   闂傚倷娴囬褍霉閻戣棄鏋佸┑鐘宠壘绾捐鈹戦悩鍙夋悙缂佹劖顨婇弻锟犲炊閳轰焦鐏侀梺宕囨嚀缁夋挳鍩為幋锔藉亹闁告瑥顦伴幃娆忊攽閳藉棗浜濋柨鏇樺灲瀵鈽夐姀鐘栥劑鏌曡箛濠傚⒉闁绘繃鐗犻幃宄扳堪閸愩劎鐩庨梺鐟板殩閹凤拷  闂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥嚄閼哥數浠氱紓鍌欒兌缁垶銆冮崨鏉戠厺鐎广儱顦崡鎶芥煏韫囨洖校闁诲寒鍓熷铏圭磼濡搫顫庨梺绋跨昂閸婃繂鐣烽弴鐐垫殕闁告洦鍓涢崢浠嬫⒑闁稑宓嗘繛浣冲嫭娅犳い鏂款潟娴滄粓骞栭幖顓炵仭閻庢熬鎷�  闂傚倸鍊峰ù鍥х暦閸偅鍙忛柡澶嬪殮濞差亜围闁搞儻绲芥禍鐐叏濡厧甯堕柣蹇ラ檮閵囧嫰濮€閿涘嫭鍣板Δ鐘靛仜椤戝寮崘顔肩劦妞ゆ帒鍊婚惌鍡涙煕閺囥劌鐏¢柣鎾跺枑娣囧﹪顢涘┑鎰缂備浇灏畷鐢垫閹炬剚鍚嬮煫鍥ㄦ煥椤忥拷  闂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥嚄閸洖绠犻柟鎹愵嚙鐟欙箓鎮楅敐搴″闁搞劍绻堥獮鏍庨鈧俊鑲╃棯閹佸仮闁哄本娲樼换娑㈡倷椤掍胶褰呴梻浣告啞椤ㄥ棙绻涙繝鍥ц摕闁斥晛鍟欢鐐烘倵閿濆簼绨介柛鏃偳归埞鎴﹀煡閸℃浼堥梺鐟板殩閹凤拷   闂傚倸鍊搁崐宄懊归崶顒婄稏濠㈣泛顑囬々鎻捗归悩宸剰缂佲偓婢跺备鍋撻崗澶婁壕闂佸憡娲﹂崜娆愮闁秵鈷戦梻鍫熶腹濞戙垹宸濇い鏍ュ€楁惔濠傗攽閻樺灚鏆╅柛瀣☉铻炴繛鍡樻尭缁€澶愭煛瀹ュ骸浜炲☉鎾崇У缁绘盯宕卞Ο璇查瀺闂佺粯鎸诲ú妯兼崲濞戙垹骞㈡俊顖氬悑閸n參鏌f惔銏㈠暡闁瑰嚖鎷�   闂傚倸鍊搁崐椋庣矆娓氣偓楠炲鍨鹃幇浣圭稁缂傚倷鐒﹁摫闁告瑥绻橀弻鐔虹磼閵忕姵鐏堥梺娲诲幗椤ㄥ﹪寮诲☉銏犵労闁告劦浜栧Σ鍫㈢磽閸屾瑨顔夐柡鍛█瀵鎮㈢喊杈ㄦ櫖濠电姴锕ら崰姘跺汲椤撶儐娓婚柕鍫濆暙閸旂敻鏌熼崙銈嗗