婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戝鈧倿鎸婃竟鈺嬬秮瀹曘劑寮堕幋鐙呯幢闂備浇顫夊畷妯衡枖濞戞碍顐介柕鍫濇啒閺冨牊鏅查柛娑卞幗濞堟煡姊虹粙娆惧剰妞ゆ垵顦靛濠氭晲閸涘倻鍠庨埢搴ㄥ箚瑜庨鍕煛婢跺棙娅嗙紒璇茬墕椤繘鎼圭憴鍕/闂侀潧枪閸庢煡鎮甸姀銈嗏拺闁荤喐婢樺▓鈺呮煙閸戙倖瀚�
闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾圭€瑰嫭鍣磋ぐ鎺戠倞妞ゆ帊绀侀崜顓烆渻閵堝棗濮х紒鐘冲灴閻涱噣濮€閵堝棛鍘撻柡澶屽仦婢瑰棝宕濆鍡愪簻闁哄倸鐏濋顐ょ磼鏉堛劍宕岀€规洘甯掗~婵嬵敄閽樺澹曢梺鍛婄缚閸庢娊鎯屽▎鎾寸厱闁哄洢鍔岄悘鐘电磼閻欌偓閸ㄥ爼寮婚妸鈺傚亞闁稿本绋戦锟�/濠电姷鏁告慨鐑藉极閸涘﹥鍙忛柣鎴f閺嬩線鏌熼梻瀵割槮缁惧墽绮换娑㈠箣閺冣偓閸ゅ秹鏌涢妷顔煎⒒闁轰礁娲弻鏇$疀閺囩倫銉︺亜閿旇娅嶉柟顔筋殜瀹曟寰勬繝浣割棜闂傚倷绀侀幉鈥趁洪敃鍌氱;濠㈣埖鍔曢弰銉╂煟閹邦喖鍔嬮柍閿嬪灴閹綊骞侀幒鎴濐瀳濠电偛鎳忛崝娆撳蓟閻旂厧绀勯柕鍫濇椤忥拷/缂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾剧懓顪冪€n亝鎹i柣顓炴閵嗘帒顫濋敐鍛闂佽姤蓱缁诲倿婀侀梺缁樏Ο濠囧磿韫囨稒鐓曢柕濞垮劚閳ь剚鎮傚﹢渚€姊虹粙璺ㄧ闁告艾顑囩槐鐐哄箣閿旂晫鍘遍梺闈浨归崕閬嶅焵椤掆偓濞尖€愁嚕婵犳艾惟闁冲搫鍊告禍鐐烘⒑缁嬫寧婀扮紒瀣灴椤㈡棃鏁撻敓锟�
闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋為悧鐘汇€侀弴銏℃櫆闁芥ê顦純鏇㈡⒒婵犲骸浜滄繛璇у缁瑩骞嬮悩鐢靛箵濠德板€曢幊搴g不鐟欏嫮绠鹃柨婵嗛婢ь喖鈹戦垾鐐藉仮闁哄本鐩俊鎼佸Ψ閵夈垹浜鹃柛褎顨呴拑鐔兼煏婵炵偓娅嗛柛瀣閺屾稓浠﹂崜褉妲堝銈呴獜閹凤拷: 闂傚倸鍊搁崐宄懊归崶顒夋晪鐟滃秹婀侀梺缁樺灱濡嫰寮告担绯曟斀闁绘ê鐤囨竟妯肩棯閹规劦鍤欓柍瑙勫灴閹晠宕f径瀣€风紓鍌欑劍閸旀牠銆冩繝鍥ц摕闁跨喓濮撮悙濠囨煃鏉炴壆鍔嶉柣蹇庣窔濮婂搫鐣烽崶銊ユ畬缂備礁顦伴幐鎶藉春閻愬搫绠i柨鏃囨娴滃綊姊洪崨濠勬噧妞わ缚鍗抽獮鍐ㄢ枎韫囧﹥鏂€闂佸疇妫勫Λ妤佺濠靛鐓ラ柡鍥悘鑼偓娈垮枦椤曆囧煡婢舵劕顫呴柣妯荤墦閸旀垿寮婚弴锛勭杸濠电姴鍊搁埛澶愭⒑缂佹ḿ绠栭柣妤冨█楠炲啫鐣¢幍鍐茬墯闂佸憡鍔戦崝搴ㄦ儎鎼淬劍鈷戦柣鐔告緲濞堚晠鏌熼崙銈嗗 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣椤愯姤鎱ㄥ鍡楀幊缂傚倹宀搁弻銈嗘叏閹邦兘鍋撻弽顐熷亾濮橆剦鐓奸柡宀嬬秮瀵噣宕掑顑跨帛缂傚倷璁查崑鎾愁熆閼搁潧濮囩紒鐘侯潐缁绘盯鏁愭惔鈥愁潻婵犵鈧偨鍋㈤柡灞剧☉椤繈顢楅崒婧炪劌螖閻橀潧浠﹂柣妤佹礉瑜颁礁顪冮妶鍡楀潑闁稿鎹囬弻锝堢疀閿濆懏鐝濋梺鍝勮嫰缁夊墎妲愰幒鎳崇喖鎳¢妶搴⑿ч梻鍌欑閹碱偆鎮锕€绀夐柟瀛樼箥閸ゆ洘銇勯幒鎴濐仼闁搞劌鍊归妵鍕籍閸ヨ埖缍堥柣搴$仛閻楁鎹㈠┑瀣仺闂傚牊绋愰幋鐑芥⒑闂堟稒顥滄い鎴濐樀閻涱喛绠涘☉娆愭闂佽法鍣﹂幏锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹瀹勬噴褰掑炊瑜忛弳锕傛煕椤垵浜濋柛娆忕箳閳ь剙绠嶉崕閬嵥囬婊呯焼闁告劏鏂傛禍婊勩亜閹捐泛鏋庨柣蹇ョ秮閺岋綁濡烽濠氬仐濠殿喖锕︾划顖炲箯閸涙潙宸濆┑鐘插暙閸撳灚淇婇悙顏勨偓鏍垂閻㈢ǹ纾归柛顭戝枤閺嗭附绻濇繝鍌氭殜闁衡偓娴犲鐓曟い鎰Т閻忣噣鏌i幘瀛樺鞍缂佺粯绻堟慨鈧柨婵嗘閵嗘劖绻濋姀锝嗙【婵炲樊鍘奸悾鐑藉箣閿曗偓缁犺崵绱撴担鑲℃垵鈻嶅⿰鍫熺厵闁兼祴鏅炶棢闂侀€炲苯澧痪缁㈠弮椤㈡瑩骞嬮悩鐢碉紳闂佺ǹ鏈悷锕偹囨搴g<闂婎剚褰冮埀顒佺箞閻涱喛绠涘☉娆愭闂佽法鍣﹂幏锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸ゅ嫰鏌ら崫銉︽毄濞寸姵纰嶆穱濠囨倷椤忓嫧鍋撻弽顓炲瀭闁汇垻枪閻ゎ噣鏌℃径瀣仼闁哄棴绠撻弻锟犲炊閵夈儳浠鹃梺缁樺笩閸嬫劙鍩€椤掆偓缁犲秹宕曢柆宥呯疇闁规壆澧楅崑鈺傜箾瀹割喕绨奸柛濠傜仛椤ㄣ儵鎮欓懠顑胯檸闂佸憡姊圭喊宥夊Φ閸曨垱鏅滈悹鍥皺娴狀垶姊哄Ч鍥у姶濞存粣缍佽棟鐟滅増甯楅悡娑㈡倶閻愭彃鈷旈柕鍡樺笒闇夐柣娆忔噽閻g敻鏌熼鐣屾噰妞ゃ垺顨婂畷鎺戔槈閸楃偞鍊犵紓鍌氬€搁崐鎼佸磹閻戣姤鍤勯柤鎼佹涧閸ㄦ棃鏌熺紒銏犳灈缂佺媭鍨堕弻銊╂偆閸屾稑顏� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸ゅ嫰鏌涢锝嗙8闁逞屽厸閻掞妇鎹㈠┑瀣妞ゆ挾濯Σ鍗炩攽閻愬瓨缍戦柛姘儏宀e灝鈻庨幋婵愭闂佺鍕垫畷闁抽攱鍨堕妵鍕箳閸℃ぞ澹曠紓鍌欑椤︿即骞愰崘鑼殾鐟滅増甯掔壕濂告煟閹邦剦鍤熼柛妯绘倐濮婃椽宕ㄦ繝鍌氼潎闂佸憡鏌ㄧ€涒晠寮茬捄琛℃闁靛骏绱曢崢浠嬫⒑閸︻厼鍔嬫繛璇х畵瀹曢潧鈻庨幇鈺€绨诲銈嗘尨閸撴繄娑甸崼鏇熺厵闁荤喐婢橀顓㈡煙閻撳海绉虹€规洜鍏橀、妯衡攽閸埄妲板┑鐘垫暩婵兘銆傞鐐潟闁哄洢鍨圭壕鍧楁煙鏉堝墽鐣辩紒鐙€鍨堕弻銊╂偆閸屾稑顏� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸ゅ嫰鏌涢幘鑼妽闁稿繑绮撻弻娑㈩敃閿濆棛顦ラ梺姹囧€濈粻鏍蓟閿濆绠涙い鎾跺О閸嬬偤姊洪崫鍕靛剰缂佸缍婂濠氬Ω閵夈垺鏂€闂佺硶妾ч弲婊嗗€撮梻鍌欑窔閳ь剛鍋涢懟顖炲储閸濄儳纾奸柤闀愮祷婢规﹢鏌i敐鍥у幋濠碘剝鎮傞崺鈩冩媴濞差亞宕滈梻鍌欒兌閹虫捇顢氶鐔峰灁妞ゆ挾鍊i敐鍚ゆ椽顢旈崨顏呭闂備胶鍘ч~鏇㈠磹閺囩偟鎽ュ┑鐘垫暩閸嬫盯鎯囨导鏉戠9闁哄浄绱曟禍钘夆攽閻樺灚鏆╁┑顔芥綑鐓ら柕鍫濇川閻棗顭块懜闈涘闁绘挶鍎甸弻锝夊即閻愭祴鍋撻崷顓涘亾濮樼偓瀚� 婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柟闂寸绾惧鏌i幇顒佹儓闁搞劌鍊块弻娑㈩敃閿濆棛顦ョ紓浣哄С閸楁娊骞冭ぐ鎺戠倞鐟滃秹寮埀顒傜磽閸屾艾鈧湱鍠婂鍥ㄥ床婵炴垯鍨归獮銏′繆椤栨繃顏犲ù鐓庢处缁绘繂鈻撻崹顔界亶婵犵數鍋涢敃顏勵嚕婵犳艾鍗抽柣鏃堫棑缁愮偤姊虹化鏇炲⒉閽冮亶鏌e┑鍥ㄢ拻缂佽鲸鎸婚幏鍛村箵閹哄秴顥氶梺璇查閸樻粓宕戦幘缁樼厱闁哄洢鍔屾晶顔济归悪鈧崹璺侯潖濞差亜绠归柣鎰絻婵⊙囨⒑閸涘﹥纾搁柛鏂跨Ч閹﹢宕卞☉娆屾嫽婵炶揪绲介幉锟犲疮閻愮繝绻嗘い鎰剁到閻忓瓨顨ラ悙鑼闁轰焦鎹囬弫鎾绘晸閿燂拷 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾圭€瑰嫭鍣磋ぐ鎺戠倞妞ゆ巻鍋撶痪鎯ь煼閺岀喖骞嶉纰辨毉闂佺ǹ顑冮崐婵嬪蓟閿熺姴绀冮柕濞у喚鏆梻浣规偠閸斿矂宕愰幖浣圭畳闂備胶枪缁绘劙宕ョ€n喖纾挎俊銈呮噺閻撴稑霉閿濆懏鍟炴い銉e灲閺岋紕浠︾拠鎻掝潎闂佽鍠撻崐婵嗙暦閹烘垟妲堟慨妤€妫旂槐锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹瀹勬噴褰掑炊椤掑鏅悷婊冪箻閸┾偓妞ゆ帊鑳堕埢鎾绘煛閸涱垰孝闁伙絽鍢茶灒闁煎鍊楅惁鍫濃攽椤旀枻渚涢柛妯绘倐楠炴劙宕橀瑙f嫼闂佸憡绋戦敃銉﹀緞閸曨垱鐓曢柟鐐綑閸濊櫣鈧娲╃紞鈧紒鐘崇☉閳藉鈻庨幋婵嗘辈闂傚倷鑳剁划顖毭洪弽顓炵9闁革富鍘搁崑鎾愁潩閻愵剙顏� 婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柟闂寸绾惧鏌i幇顒佹儓闁搞劌鍊块弻娑㈩敃閿濆棛顦ョ紓浣哄Т缂嶅﹪寮诲澶婁紶闁告洦鍓欏▍锝夋⒑缁嬭儻顫﹂柛鏃€鍨垮濠氭晲婢跺﹦顔掗悗瑙勬礀濞层劌危韫囨稒鈷戦柤濮愬€曢弸鎴︽倵濮橆剛澧︾€殿噮鍣e畷鐓庘攽閸℃瑧宕哄┑锛勫亼閸婃牠骞愰悙顒€鍨旀い鎾跺€i敐鍚ゆ椽顢旈崨顏呭闂備胶鍘ч~鏇㈠磹閺囩偟鎽ュ┑鐘垫暩閸嬫盯鎯囨导鏉戠9闁哄浄绱曟禍钘夆攽閻樺灚鏆╁┑顔芥綑鐓ら柕鍫濇川閻棗顭块懜闈涘闁绘挶鍎甸弻锝夊即閻愭祴鍋撻崷顓涘亾濮樼偓瀚� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋涢ˇ鐢稿极閹剧粯鍋愭い鏃傛嚀娴滈箖鏌涢幇闈涘箻闁汇倐鍋撴繝鐢靛仦閸ㄨ泛鐜婚崸妤佹櫖婵炴垯鍨洪埛鎴犵磼椤栨稒绀€濠⒀嗗皺缁辨帞鈧綆鍋勯悘瀵糕偓娈垮枛閹诧紕绮悢鐓庣劦妞ゆ帒瀚拑鐔兼煟閺冨倸甯剁紒鐘崇叀閺岀喐瀵肩€涙ɑ閿┑鐐茬墱閸樺墽妲愰幘瀛樺闁告繂瀚呴敐澶嬬厱闁靛ǹ鍎查崑銉р偓娈垮枛椤兘寮幘缁樺亹闁肩⒈鍓﹀Σ瑙勪繆閻愵亜鈧牠宕濊瀵板﹪宕稿灏栧亾閸涱喖顕遍悗娑櫱氶幏娲⒑閸涘﹦缂氶柛搴″船閳诲秹骞囬悧鍫㈠幍闂佸憡鍨崐鏍偓姘炬嫹
婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柟闂寸绾惧潡鏌熺€电ǹ孝缂佽翰鍊濋弻锕€螣娓氼垱锛嗗┑鐐叉▕娴滄繈寮插⿰鍫熺厽闁逛即娼ф晶顕€骞栭弶鎴含婵﹨娅g划娆撳箰鎼淬垺瀚崇紓鍌欑椤戝棝骞戦崶顒€违闁告稑鐡ㄩ崐濠氭煠閹帒鍔ら柛娆忔濮婅櫣绱掑Ο鑽ゎ槬闂佺ǹ锕ゅ﹢閬嶅焵椤掍胶鍟查柟鍑ゆ嫹: 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋為悧鐘汇€侀弴銏℃櫇闁逞屽墰婢规洝銇愰幒鎾跺幗闂佺鎻徊楣兯夋径宀€妫い鎾寸☉娴滈箖姊婚崒娆戭槮闁硅绻濆畷婵嬪即閻愬秶鍠愮换婵嬪磼濡嘲浜鹃柟鐑樻尵缁♀偓濠殿喗锕╅崢楣冨矗閸℃稒鈷戠紓浣股戠粈鈧梺绋匡工濠€閬嶅焵椤掍胶鍟查柟鍑ゆ嫹 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹瀹勬噴褰掑炊瑜忛弳锕傛煕椤垵浜濋柛娆忕箻閺屸剝寰勭€n亝顔呭┑鐐叉▕娴滄粌娲块梻浣规偠閸庤崵寰婇懞銉ь洸闁绘劦鍓氶崣蹇斾繆椤栨粌甯堕悽顖氱埣閺岋綀绠涢妷鈺傤€嶉梺闈涙搐鐎氱増鎱ㄩ埀顒勬煥濞戞ê顏柛锝勫嵆濮婄儤娼幍顔煎闂佸湱鎳撳ú顓烆嚕椤愶箑绠荤紓浣股戝▍銏ゆ⒑鐠恒劌娅愰柟鍑ゆ嫹 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹瀹勬噴褰掑炊瑜忛弳锕傛煟閵忊懚鍦玻濡ゅ懏鐓欓柟娈垮枛椤eジ鏌涚€e墎绡€闁哄本娲樺鍕醇濠靛棗顥欐繝鐢靛仦閸ㄦ儼褰滃┑鈩冨絻閻楁捇寮婚弴锛勭杸闁哄洨鍊妷鈺傜叆婵炴垶鐟уú瀛樻叏婵犲懏顏犻柟鐟板婵℃悂濡烽敂鎯х稈闂傚倷鑳堕幊鎾诲吹閺嶎厼绠柨鐕傛嫹 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閻戣姤鍊块柨鏇炲€归崕鎴犳喐閻楀牆绗掗柡鍕╁劦閺屾盯寮撮妸銉т哗闂佹悶鍔岄崐鍨潖濞差亶鏁嗛柍褜鍓涚划鏃堟偨缁嬭法锛涢梺闈涚墕椤︿即鎮″☉銏$厱闁靛绲介崝姘舵煟韫囷絼閭柡灞剧⊕閹棃鍩ラ崨鏉挎儓闂備礁鎼悮顐﹀礉閹达箑绠栭柕鍫濐槸绾惧吋绻涢幋鐑囦緵濞寸》鎷� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸婂潡鏌ㄩ弴鐐测偓褰掑磿閹寸姵鍠愰柣妤€鐗嗙粭鎺旂棯閹呯Ш闁哄矉绻濆畷鍫曞煛娴e湱鈧儳鈹戦悙鍙夊櫧濠电偐鍋撻梺鍝勭焿缁犳垼鐏掓繛鎾村嚬閸ㄩ亶鍩㈤幘鏂ユ斀闁绘劖褰冮幃鎴︽煟濡ゅ啫鈻堢€殿喖顭锋俊鎼佸煛閸屾矮绨介梻浣呵归張顒傜矙閹达富鏁傞柨鐕傛嫹 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸婂潡鏌ㄩ弴鐐测偓褰掑磿閹寸姵鍠愰柣妤€鐗嗙粭鎺旂棯閹勫仴闁哄本绋戣灃闁告剬鍛存7婵犵數鍋涘Ο濠冪濠婂嫬鍔旈梻鍌欑劍鐎笛兾涙担鑲濇盯宕熼顐㈡闂佺鍕垫畷闁抽攱鍨块幃褰掑箒閹烘垵顬堝┑鐐叉噺閸旀瑩寮婚悢鐓庣闁靛牆妫楅锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸ゅ嫰鏌ら崫銉︽毄濞寸姵姘ㄧ槐鎾诲磼濞嗘帒鍘$紓渚囧櫘閸ㄥ爼濡撮崘顔煎窛閻庢稒锚娴犲ジ姊虹紒妯虹伇濠殿喓鍊濆畷鎴﹀Ω瑜忕壕濂告倵閿濆骸浜滄い鏇熺矒閺岋絾鎯旈鐓庘拫濠殿喖锕ㄥ▍锝夊箲閸曨垰惟闁靛濡囪ぐ姘舵⒒娴g儤鍤€闁搞倖鐗犻獮蹇涙晸閿燂拷 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸ゅ嫰鏌涢锝嗙缁炬儳娼¢弻锝夊閳惰泛婀辨竟鏇熺節濮橆厾鍘甸梺纭咁潐閸旓箓宕靛▎鎴犵<闁逞屽墯瀵板嫰骞囬鐓庣导闂備焦鎮堕崕顖炲礉瀹ュ洣鐒婇柣銏犳啞閻撴盯鏌涢埄鍐ㄥ闁逞屽墯缁诲牆顕f繝姘╅柍鍝勫€告禍鐐烘⒑缁嬫寧婀扮紒瀣灴椤㈡棃鏁撻敓锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸ゅ嫰鏌涢锝嗙8闁逞屽厸閻掞妇鎹㈠┑瀣妞ゆ挾濯Σ鍗炩攽閻愬瓨缍戦柛姘儏宀e灝鈻庨幋婵愭闁荤喐鐟ョ€氼亞鎹㈤崱娑欑厪闁割偅绻冮崳娲煕閿濆懏璐$紒杈ㄥ浮閹晛鐣烽崶褉鎷伴梻浣告惈鐞氼偊宕濋幋锕€绠栭柕鍫濐槸绾惧吋绻涢幋鐑囦緵濞寸》鎷� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾圭€瑰嫭鍣磋ぐ鎺戠倞妞ゆ帒顦伴弲顏堟⒑閸濆嫮鈻夐柛妯垮亹缁牓宕掑☉姘鳖啎闂佺硶鍓濊摫閻忓浚鍘鹃惀顏堝箚瑜庨崑銉╂煛瀹€瀣?濞寸媴濡囬幏鐘诲箵閹烘埈娼涢梻鍌欑劍閻綊宕愬┑鍫笉闁哄稁鍘奸拑鐔兼煏婵炵偓娅嗛柛瀣閺屾稓浠﹂崜褉妲堝銈呴獜閹凤拷 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸ゅ嫰鏌ら崫銉︽毄濞寸姵纰嶆穱濠囨倷椤忓嫧鍋撻弽顓炲瀭闁汇垻枪閻ゎ噣鏌℃径瀣仼闁哄棴绠撻弻锟犲炊閵夈儳浠肩紓浣哄Х缁垶濡甸崟顖氱睄闁稿本绮嶉幉妯衡攽閳藉棗浜滈柟铏~蹇涙惞鐟欏嫬纾梺闈浨归崕鏌ユ偟閵忋倖鈷戦柣鐔告緲濞堚晠鏌熼崙銈嗗 缂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧綊鏌熼梻瀵割槮缁炬儳婀辩槐鎺斺偓锝庡亾缁扁晜绻涘顔荤盎閸ユ挳姊虹化鏇燁€嗛柡鍛矒椤㈡瑩寮崼鐔叉嫼閻熸粎澧楃敮妤呮晬閻旇櫣纾奸悹浣告贡缁♀偓閻庢鍣崑鍛崲濠靛鐐婇柕濞у啫姹查梻鍌欒兌缁垰煤閺嶎厼纾归柛锔诲幐閸嬫挸顫濋悙顒€顏� 婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柟闂寸绾惧鏌i幇顒佹儓闁搞劌鍊块弻娑㈩敃閿濆棛顦ョ紓浣哄С閸楁娊寮诲☉銏╂晝闁挎繂妫涢ˇ銉х磼閻愵剙鍔ょ紓宥咃躬瀵鍨鹃幇浣告倯闁硅偐琛ラ埀顒€纾鎰版⒒娴h櫣甯涢悽顖涘浮閹ê顫濈捄浣曪箓鏌涢弴銊ョ仩缂佺姵濞婇弻鐔煎箹椤撶偟浠梺杞扮窔缁犳牠寮婚敐鍡樺劅闁靛繈鍨归弳锟犳⒑閻熸澘娈╅柟鍑ゆ嫹 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸ゅ嫰鏌涢锝嗙闁稿被鍔庨幉绋款吋婢舵ɑ鏅梺鎸庣箓椤︻垳绮诲鑸电厾闁告挻褰冮崢鍛婃叏鐟欏嫷娈滄慨濠冩そ瀹曘劍绻濋崒姣挎洟姊洪崫銉バi柣妤佺矌閸掓帡宕奸悢椋庣獮闂佸綊鍋婇崢楣冨矗閸℃稒鈷戠紓浣股戠粈鈧梺绋匡工濠€閬嶅焵椤掍胶鍟查柟鍑ゆ嫹 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸婂潡鏌ㄩ弴妤€浜惧銈庝簻閸熸潙鐣疯ぐ鎺濇晪闁告侗鍨伴弫绋库攽閻愬瓨灏伴柛鈺佸暣瀹曟垿骞橀幖顓燁啍闂佺粯鍔樼亸娆戠不婵犳碍鐓涘ù锝堫潐瀹曞矂鏌℃担瑙勫磳闁轰焦鎹囬弫鎾绘晸閿燂拷 婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柛娑橈功缁犻箖鏌嶈閸撴氨鎹㈠☉娆愬闁告劕寮堕幖鎰棯閹规劦鍤欓柍瑙勫灴閹晠宕f径瀣€风紓鍌欒兌婵參宕归崼鏇炶摕闁靛ň鏅滈崑鍡涙煕鐏炲墽鈽夋い蹇ユ嫹 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸ゅ嫰鏌涢锝嗙闁稿被鍔庨幉鍛婃償閵娿儳鐣鹃梺鍝勫€哥花閬嶅醇椤忓牊鐓曟い鎰剁悼缁犳ɑ銇勯弬鎸庮棦婵﹨娅i幑鍕Ω閵夛妇褰氶梻浣烘嚀閸ゆ牠骞忛敓锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹瀹勬噴褰掑炊椤掑鏅悷婊冪箻楠炴垿濮€閵堝懐鐤€濡炪倖鎸嗛崟闈涙櫖闂傚倸饪撮崑鍕洪敂鍓х煓闁瑰濮锋稉宥嗐亜閺嶎偄浠﹂柣鎾卞劦閺岋綁寮撮悙娴嬪亾閸︻厸鍋撳鐐 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸婂潡鏌ㄩ弴鐐测偓鍝ョ不閺嶎厽鐓曟い鎰剁稻缁€鈧紒鐐劤濞硷繝寮婚妶鍥ф瀳闁告鍋涢~顐︽⒑濞茶骞楅柣鐔叉櫊瀵鎮㈤崨濠勭Ф闂佽鍨庨崨顔ф帡姊绘担鑺ャ€冪紒鈧担鑲濇稑鈹戠€n亣鎽曢梺闈浥堥弲婊堝磻閸℃稒鐓曢悘鐐插⒔閳藉銇勮箛銉﹀ 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹瀹勬噴褰掑炊瑜忛弳锕傛煕椤垵浜濋柛娆忕箻閺屸剝寰勭€n亝顔呭┑鐐叉▕娴滄粓鎮″☉妯忓綊鏁愰崶褍濡哄┑鐐茬墦缁犳牕顫忓ú顏勭闁肩⒈鍓欑敮銉╂⒑缁嬫鍎忛柟鍐查叄閸┿垹顓兼径瀣汗缂傚倷鐒﹀玻鍧楀矗閸℃稒鈷戠紓浣股戠粈鈧梺绋匡工濠€閬嶅焵椤掍胶鍟查柟鍑ゆ嫹 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋為悧鐘汇€侀弴銏犵厱婵﹩鍘介妵婵嬫煛娴gǹ鏆i柛鈹惧亾濡炪倖宸婚崑鎾绘煟濠婂喚鐓肩€规洖缍婇、娆戞喆閸曨厸鍋撴繝姘拺閻熸瑥瀚崝銈囩磼婢跺缍戦悡銈嗐亜閹惧崬鐏╅柡瀣╃窔閺岀喖宕滆鐢盯鏌¢崨顔藉€愰柡灞诲姂閹倝宕掑☉姗嗕紦
婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柟闂寸绾惧鏌i幇顒佹儓闁搞劌鍊块弻娑㈩敃閿濆棛顦ョ紓浣哄Т缂嶅﹪寮诲澶婁紶闁告洦鍓欏▍锝夋⒑缁嬭儻顫﹂柛鏃€鍨垮濠氬Χ閸氥倕婀遍埀顒婄秵閸嬪懘鎮甸幒妤佲拺缂備焦锚缁楁帡鏌ㄩ弴銊ら偗鐎殿喖顭锋俊鎼佸煛閸屾矮绨介梻浣呵归張顒傜矙閹达富鏁傞柨鐕傛嫹: 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閻戣姤鍊块柨鏇炲€归崕鎴犳喐閻楀牆绗掗柡鍕╁劦閺屾盯寮撮妸銉т哗闂佹悶鍔岄崐鍨潖濞差亶鏁嗛柍褜鍓涚划鏃堟偨缁嬭法锛涢梺闈涚墕椤︿即鎮″☉銏$厱闁靛绲介崝姘舵煟韫囷絼閭柡灞剧⊕閹棃鍩ラ崨鏉挎儓闂備礁鎼悮顐﹀礉閹达箑绠栭柕鍫濐槸绾惧吋绻涢幋鐑囦緵濞寸》鎷� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾圭€瑰嫭鍣磋ぐ鎺戠倞鐟滄粌霉閺嶎厽鐓忓┑鐐靛亾濞呭棝鏌涙繝鍌涘仴闁哄被鍔戝鎾倷濞村浜剧憸鐗堝笒绾惧鏌ㄩ悢鍝勑i柣鎾卞劦閺岋繝宕堕…鎴炵暥婵炲瓨绮屾晶浠嬪焵椤掆偓閸樻粓宕戦幘缁樼叆婵犻潧妫欓崳娲煕鐎c劌鍔﹂柡灞稿墲閹峰懐鎲撮崟顐わ紦闂備浇妗ㄩ悞锕傚箲閸ヮ剙鏋侀柟鍓х帛閺呮悂鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾圭€瑰嫭鍣磋ぐ鎺戠倞妞ゆ帒顦伴弲顏堟⒑閸濆嫮鈻夐柛妯垮亹缁牓宕奸悢绋垮伎濠碘槅鍨板ḿ锟犲传閾忓厜鍋撶憴鍕闁绘搫绻濆璇测槈閵忕姷鍔撮梺鍛婂姦娴滄牕危閸儲鈷戠紓浣姑粭鎺楁煟韫囨柨鍝哄┑锛勬暬瀹曠喖顢涘槌栧敽闂備浇顫夐幆宀勫垂闁秴鏋佸Δ锝呭暞閻撶喖骞栧ǎ顒€鐏柛鐔哥叀閺岀喖宕欓妶鍡楊伓 婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柟闂寸绾惧鏌i幇顒佹儓闁搞劌鍊块弻娑㈩敃閿濆棛顦ョ紓浣哄Т缂嶅﹪寮诲澶婁紶闁告洦鍓欏▍锝夋⒑濞茶骞楁い銊ワ躬瀵顓奸崼顐n€囬梻浣告啞閹稿鎯勯鐐叉槬闁逞屽墯閵囧嫰骞掗幋婵囩亾濠电偛鍚嬮崝娆撳蓟閻斿搫鏋堥柛妤冨仒閸犲﹤螖閻橀潧浠滅紒缁橈耿瀵偊骞樼紒妯绘闂佽法鍣﹂幏锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋涢ˇ鐢稿极閹剧粯鍋愰柛鎰紦缂冩洟姊绘担铏瑰笡闁告梹岣挎禍绋库枎閹捐櫕杈堥梺鎸庢礀閸婂綊鎮¢悢鍏肩厪闊洤锕ラ崵澶愭煕閿旇骞樺☉鎾崇Ч閺屸€愁吋鎼粹€崇闂佺粯鎸堕崕鐢稿蓟閿濆鍗抽柣鎰ゴ閸嬫捇宕烽娑樹壕婵ḿ鍋撶€氾拷 婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柟闂寸绾惧鏌i幇顒佹儓闁搞劌鍊块弻娑㈩敃閿濆棛顦ョ紓浣哄С閸楁娊骞冭ぐ鎺戠倞鐟滃秹寮埀顒傜磽閸屾艾鈧湱鍠婂鍥ㄥ床婵炴垯鍨归獮銏′繆椤栨繃顏犲ù鐓庢处缁绘繂鈻撻崹顔界亶婵犵數鍋涢敃顏勵嚕婵犳艾惟闁冲搫鍊告禍鐐烘⒑缁嬫寧婀扮紒瀣灴椤㈡棃鏁撻敓锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧湱鈧懓瀚崳纾嬨亹閹烘垹鍊炲銈庡墻閸撴岸鎯勯姘辨殾闁绘梻鈷堥弫宥嗙箾閹寸伝鑲╃磾閺囥垺鈷掑ù锝呮啞鐠愶繝鏌涚€n偅灏い顏勫暣瀹曠ǹ螖閳ь剟寮告担鎼炩偓鎺戭潩閿濆懍澹曢梻浣告惈鐞氼偊宕濋幋锕€绠栭柕鍫濐槸绾惧吋绻涢幋鐑囦緵濞寸》鎷� 濠电姷鏁告慨鐑藉极閸涘﹥鍙忛柣銏犲閺佸﹪鏌″搴″箹缂佹劖顨嗘穱濠囧Χ閸涱収浠鹃梺鐟板暱閻倸顫忕紒妯诲閻熸瑥瀚禒鈺呮⒑閸涘﹥鐓ョ紒缁樺姍閸┿垽寮惔鎾搭潔濠电姴锕ら幊宥囩磾閺囥垺鈷掗柛灞剧懄缁佺増绻涙径瀣鐎规洘濞婇弫鍐磼濮橀硸鍞甸梻浣芥硶閸o箓骞忛敓锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋為悧鐘汇€侀弴銏℃櫇闁逞屽墰婢规洟宕烽鐘碉紲闁诲函缍嗛崑鎾舵閳哄倻绠剧€瑰壊鍠曠花濠氬炊閹绢喗鈷戦柟鑲╁仜閸旂數绱掗懠璺盒撶紒鍌氱Ч瀹曟粏顦存俊顐灦閺屸剝寰勭€i潧鍔屽┑鈩冨絻缂嶅﹪骞冨Δ鈧~婵嬫倷椤掆偓椤忥拷 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸婂潡鏌ㄩ弴鐐测偓鎼佸垂閸屾稓绡€闂傚牊渚楅崕鎰版煕婵犲倹鍋ラ柡灞诲姂瀵挳鎮欏ù瀣壕闁告稑饪撮弨浼存⒒閸屾瑨鍏岀紒顕呭灦瀹曟繂螖閸涱厽鐎梺鍛婄缚閸庢娊鎯岄崱妞绘斀闁绘ê寮舵径鍕煟閹惧崬鍔﹂柡宀嬬秮瀵挳鎮欏ù瀣壕闁革富鍘搁崑鎾愁潩閻愵剙顏� 婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閹绢喗鍎夊鑸靛姇缁狙囧箹鐎涙ɑ灏ù婊呭亾娣囧﹪濡堕崟顓炲闂佸憡鐟ョ换姗€寮婚悢铏圭<闁靛繒濮甸悘鍫ユ煟鎼淬垼澹樻い锔垮嵆婵$敻宕熼姘鳖唺闂佺懓鐡ㄧ换宥嗙婵傚憡鈷戦柦妯侯槸閺嗙喖鏌涢悩宕囧⒌鐎殿喖顭锋俊鎼佸煛閸屾矮绨介梻浣呵归張顒傜矙閹达富鏁傞柨鐕傛嫹 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸婂潡鏌ㄩ弴鐐测偓鍝ョ不閺嶎厽鐓曟い鎰剁稻缁€鈧紒鐐劤濞硷繝寮婚悢铏圭<婵☆垵娅i鍌炴⒑閸濆嫭锛旈梻鍕缁岃鲸绻濋崶鑸垫櫖濠电偛妫欑敮鈺呭礉閸涱厸鏀介柣鎰皺濮g偤鏌¢崨顖氣枅鐎殿喖顭锋俊鎼佸煛閸屾矮绨介梻浣呵归張顒傜矙閹达富鏁傞柨鐕傛嫹 婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戝鈧倿顢欓悙顒夋綗闂佸搫娲㈤崹鍦缂佹ḿ绠鹃柟瀛樼懃閻掓椽鏌℃担绋款伃闁哄本鐩俊鐑筋敊閻撳寒娼荤紓鍌欑劍閸旀牠銆冩繝鍥ц摕闁绘梻鍘х粻鏌ユ煙娴煎瓨娑ф繛鍫弮濮婃椽宕ㄦ繝鍌滀患婵犵數鍋愰崑鎾绘⒑閸濆嫯顫﹂柛鏃€鍨块獮鍐Χ婢跺﹦锛滃┑鐐村灦閿曗晜瀵奸敓锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾圭€瑰嫭鍣磋ぐ鎺戠倞妞ゆ巻鍋撶痪鎯ь煼閺岀喖骞嶉纰辨毉闂佺ǹ顑冮崐婵嬪蓟閿熺姴绀冮柕濞у喚鏆梻浣规偠閸斿矂宕愰崸妤€钃熺憸鎴犵不濞戙垺鏅查柛娑卞墰閸戣绻濋悽闈涗粶闁硅櫕鍔栫换娑㈠焵椤掑嫭鐓涢悘鐐额嚙婵倿鏌熼鍝勨偓婵嗙暦閹烘垟妲堟慨妤€妫旂槐锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾圭€瑰嫭鍣磋ぐ鎺戠倞妞ゆ巻鍋撶痪鎯ь煼閺岀喖骞嶉纰辨毉闂佺ǹ顑冮崐婵嬪蓟閿熺姴绀冮柕濞у喚鏆梻浣规偠閸斿矂宕愯ぐ鎺懳﹂柛鏇ㄥ灠閸愨偓闂侀潧臎閸涱垰甯撶紓鍌氬€烽懗鑸垫叏闂堟党娑㈠礃椤旇壈鎽曢梺闈浥堥弲婊堝磻閸℃稒鐓曢悘鐐插⒔閳藉銇勮箛銉﹀ 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾圭€瑰嫭鍣磋ぐ鎺戠倞妞ゆ巻鍋撶痪鎯ь煼閺岀喖骞嶉纰辨毉闂佺ǹ顑冮崐婵嬪蓟閿熺姴绀冮柕濞у喚鏆梻浣规偠閸斿矂宕愰崸妤€钃熼柣鏂跨殱閺嬫棃鏌涢…鎴濇灍闁诲繑鎹囧娲川婵犲孩鐣烽悗鍏夊亾闁归棿绀侀拑鐔兼煏婵炵偓娅嗛柛瀣閺屾稓浠﹂崜褉妲堝銈呴獜閹凤拷 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋為悧鐘汇€侀弴銏℃櫇闁逞屽墰婢规洝銇愰幒鎾充画濠电偛妫楃换鎰邦敂閳哄懏鐓曢柕濠忛檮椤ュ牓鏌″畝瀣暠閾伙絽銆掑鐓庣仭濡ゆ棃姊绘担鍛婃儓婵☆偄閰e畷鎰攽鐎n亣鎽曢梺闈浥堥弲婊堝磻閸℃稒鐓曢悘鐐插⒔閳藉銇勮箛銉﹀ 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸ゅ嫰鏌涢锝嗙缂佺姷濞€閺岀喖骞戦幇闈涙闁荤喐鐟辩粻鎾诲箖濡ゅ懏鏅查幖绮光偓鎰佹交闂備焦鎮堕崝宥囨崲閸儳宓侀柡宥庣仈鎼搭煈鏁嗛柍褜鍓氭穱濠囨嚃閳哄啯锛忛梺璇″瀻娴i晲鍒掗梻浣告惈鐞氼偊宕濋幋锕€绠栭柕鍫濐槸绾惧吋绻涢幋鐑囦緵濞寸》鎷� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕閻庤娲忛崕鎶藉焵椤掑﹦绉甸柍褜鍓﹂崣蹇曠礊娓氣偓閻涱噣骞掑Δ鈧粻濠氭煕濞嗘劌缂氶柣顓熷浮濮婄粯鎷呴崫銉ㄥ┑鈽嗗亯濞夋洜鍒掗崼鐔虹懝闁逞屽墮閻e嘲鈻庨幘鏉戜汗缂傚倷鐒﹀玻鍧楀矗閸℃稒鈷戠紓浣股戠粈鈧梺绋匡工濠€閬嶅焵椤掍胶鍟查柟鍑ゆ嫹
当前位置: 首页 > 医学版 > 期刊论文 > 基础医学 > 病菌学杂志 > 2005年 > 第15期 > 正文
编号:11202912
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Reactivation by Phorb

     Division of Infectious Diseases and Program in Translational Immunovirology and Biodefense

    Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota

    ABSTRACT

    Latently human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected memory CD4+ T cells represent the major obstacle to eradicating HIV from infected patients. Antigens, T-cell receptor (TCR) ligation, and phorbol esters can reactivate HIV from latency in a protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent manner; however, it is unknown which specific PKC isoforms are required for this effect. We demonstrate that constitutively active (CA) forms of both PKC, PKCA148E, and PKC, PKCA25E, induce HIV long terminal repeat (LTR)-dependent transcription in Jurkat and primary human CD4+ T cells and that both PKCA148E and PKCA25E cause HIV reactivation in J1.1 T cells. Suppression of both PKC and PKC with short hairpinned (sh) RNA inhibited CD3/CD28-induced HIV LTR-dependent transcription and HIV reactivation in J1.1 T cells. Both prostratin and phorbol myristate 13-acetate induced HIV LTR-dependent transcription and HIV reactivation in J1.1 T cells that was blocked by shRNA against either PKC or PKC. Since suppression of PKC and PKC together has no greater inhibitory effect on HIV reactivation than inhibition of PKC alone, our data confirm that PKC and PKC act in sequence. The requirement for PKC and PKC for prostratin-induced HIV reactivation and the ability of selective PKC or PKC agonists to induce HIV transcription indicate that these PKC isoforms are important targets for therapeutic drug design.

    INTRODUCTION

    The effectiveness of current antiretroviral agents is underscored by their inability to impact transcriptionally inactive viral reservoirs. Accordingly, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) viral rebound is commonly observed when patients cease taking antiretroviral agents (15, 18, 19, 50, 58). Sequence analysis of rebound viral isolates indicates significant homology with proviral sequences from infected memory CD4+ T cells (61), suggesting that such cell populations act as a principal viral reservoir that is unaffected by antiretroviral therapy. Indeed, memory CD4+ T cells which contain HIV provirus have been defined to be transcriptionally inactive and to have an in vivo half-life of several years (13, 14). Consequently an estimated 60 or more years of fully supportive antiretroviral therapy may be required to fully purge such a reservoir, a time frame which is both impractical and clinically not useful. Three conceptually distinct approaches have been proposed as ways of impacting such viral reservoirs: toxins designed to eliminate virus-containing cells (5, 21, 38), antiviral intensification strategies to prevent repopulation of the latent pools (12, 26, 32, 37, 59), and compounds which stimulate HIV long terminal repeat (LTR) transcription, thereby rendering such cells susceptible to antiretroviral agents and/or the cytotoxic effects of viral replication (30, 49).

    The HIV type 1 (HIV-1) LTR is regulated in large part by cellular transcription factors, including NF-B, AP-1, SP-1, and NF-AT (reviewed in reference 28). Consequently, stimuli which activate these transcription factors cause HIV LTR-driven viral replication (17, 20, 41). Antigen presentation or T-cell receptor (TCR) cross-linking can induce HIV reactivation from latently infected CD4+ T cells in vitro (15) through protein kinase C (PKC)-mediated activation of NF-B (40). Direct activation of PKC by phorbol esters reactivates HIV from latency in cell lines (27, 29, 45) and, more importantly, it induces HIV reactivation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and primary quiescent T cells (1, 9, 10). PKC activation induces HIV from latency by targeting multiple regulatory elements of HIV LTR. In addition to NF-B, PKC induces HIV LTR transcription via activation of the AP-1 transcription factor; however, its action is largely dependent on a cooperation with NF-B (35, 46, 60). PKC also increases HIV-1 gene expression by phosphorylation of the virally encoded TAT transcription factor and cellular TAR-binding factors (25, 27).

    Among the PKC isoforms in T cells, the novel PKC isoform PKC plays a crucial role in T-cell activation and proliferation (3, 6, 51). PKC activates NF-B (16, 36, 51) and AP-1 (4, 56) transcription factors, which bind to multiple sites in the enhancer region of the HIV-1 LTR. In addition PKC acts upstream of PKC to induce NF-B following CD3/CD28 ligation (54). Since HIV reactivation following CD3/CD28 ligation is NF-B dependent, together these data suggest that each of these two PKC isoforms may be required to mediate reactivation of latent HIV. Indeed, inhibition of both conventional and novel PKC isoforms blocks HIV reactivation following costimulation with CD3 and CD28 antibodies in the SCID-hu(Thy/Liv) model (9).

    While TCR cross-linking can reactivate latent HIV in primary T cells in vitro (9, 11), clinical efforts to reduce the latent pool of HIV by treatment with the anti-CD3 antibody OKT-3 alone or in combination with interleukin-2 fails to meaningfully decrease the viral reservoir (32, 44, 55). The phorbol esters (8, 33) and 1,2-diacylglycerol analogs (24), including the non-tumor-promoting phorbol ester prostratin (23), have been suggested as agents to reactivate HIV and eradicate the pool of latently HIV-infected CD4+ T cells (22, 23). More recently, phorbol esters including prostratin have been directly evaluated for their ability to reactivate latent virus (30, 31). Indeed, prostratin causes significant reactivation of latent HIV from memory T-cell pools (7, 10, 30, 48). The mechanism by which prostratin causes viral reactivation is, therefore, of interest, and two independent studies now suggest that conventional and novel PKC isoforms are required (22, 57), although which specific PKC isoforms are involved and whether they are absolutely required is unknown. The present study was designed to address the specific requirement of different PKC isoforms following TCR- or phorbol ester-mediated HIV LTR reactivation and to determine whether such PKC isoforms are absolutely required.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Plasmids. Generation and characterization of isoform-specific PKC suppression vectors were previously described (54). The HIV LTR and HIV LTR (B)-dependent firefly luciferase reporter expression vector (B-luc) has been previously described (17). The pRL-TK expression vector, which provides constitutive expression of Renilla luciferase, is commercially available (Promega, Madison, WI). GFP-PCI was a gift from D. McKean (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN). The Sp1-luciferase reporter was kindly provided by D. Billadeau (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN). The mammalian expression vector, pEF1/Myc-His, was purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Constitutively active forms, PKCA25E and PKCA148E, were previously described (54).

    Constitutively active IKK?S177E/S181E was generated by site-directed mutagenesis using mutagenic primers (sense, 5'-GAACTTTGCACAGAATTCGTGGGGA; antisense, 5'-TTCTGTGCAAAGTTCGCCCTGATCC; sense IKK? with BamHI site [underlined], GGGATCCATCCATGAGCTGGTCACCT; antisense IKK? with XbaI site [underlined], CGTCTAGATTATGAGGCCTGCTCCAG) and cloned into pGEM-T Easy. The cDNA coding for IKK?S177E/S181E was excised and subcloned into HA-pcDNA3 I at the BamHI XbaI site. The sequences of all generated constructs were verified by sequencing.

    Cell culture and reagents. Jurkat T cells and latently HIV-1-infected J1.1 T cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD and maintained in RPMI 1640 (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin, and 2 mM L-glutamine. Cells were grown to a density of 3 x 105 to 5 x 105/ml at the time of the different experiments. Ionomycin was purchased from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA), and tumor necrosis factor alpha was purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Leupeptin, aprotinin, and pepstatin A were obtained from Boehringer Mannheim (Indianapolis, IN). Antihemagglutinin (anti-HA) high-affinity antibodies were purchased from Boehringer Mannheim (Indianapolis, IN). OKT3 antibodies were obtained from Ortho Biotech (Raritan, NJ), and anti-CD28 was purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA). Anti-PKC (C-20) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Anti-PKC?1 and anti-PKC were purchased from BD Transduction Laboratories (San Diego, CA).

    To isolate CD4+ T cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy volunteer blood donors were obtained from buffy coats by using RossetteSep cocktail CD4+ antibodies in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol (StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada). The remaining cell population was repeatedly found to be 98% CD4+ T cells as determined by flow cytometry. CD4+ T cells used in the various experiments were maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), 2 mM L-glutamine, and antibiotics (penicillin [100 U/ml] and streptomycin [100 μg/ml]) at 0.5 x 106 cells/ml. For Jurkat T cells, ionomycin was used at 3.5 μg/ml. Jurkat and J1.1 T cells were cross-linked with 10 μg/ml of anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies or isotype control antibodies as previously described (53).

    Cell extract preparation and immunoblotting. To obtain total cellular proteins, cells were washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline, resuspended in a modified whole-cell extract PD buffer (53) (40 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8], 0.3 M NaCl, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 6 mM EDTA, 6 mM EGTA, 10 mM NaF, 10 mM P-nitrophenyl phosphate 10 mM ?-glycerophosphate, 300 μM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 2 μM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, aprotinin at 10 μg/ml, leupeptin at 1 μg/ml, pepstatin 1 μg/ml) and centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 15 min at 4°C. The resulting supernatant contained total cellular protein. The amount of cellular protein present in the clarified supernatant was calculated by using the Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA) protein assay. For Western immunoblot assays, equal amounts of whole-cell extract were loaded and separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA). Immunoblotting was performed with specific antibodies and visualized by using the ECL Western blotting detection kit (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, England).

    Gene transfection, p24 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and reporter assays. Jurkat T and J1.1 T cells were electroporated using a BTX Electro Square Porator T820 (BTX Corporation, San Diego, CA) at 325 V, 10 ms, and 350 V, 10 ms, correspondingly. Primary CD4+ T cells were electroporated by using Nucleofector (U-14 program; Amaxa Inc., Gaithersburg, MD) in accordance with a protocol for unstimulated human T cells. Where indicated, transfection efficiency was monitored by green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression.

    Jurkat T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids and grown for 18 to 24 h. Cells were stimulated for 12 h with ionomycin (3.5 μg/ml), prostratin (10 μM), or phorbol myristate 13-acetate (PMA; 10 ng/ml) or cross-linked with anti-CD3 (10 μg/ml) and anti-CD28 (10 μg/ml) antibodies as previously described (54). Thereafter, cells were washed twice in cold phosphate-buffered saline and lysed with 100 μl lysis buffer (Dual-Luciferase reporter assay system; Promega, Madison, WI). Firefly and Renilla luciferase activities from 20 μl of extract were assayed using the Promega Dual-Luciferase reporter assay system reagents and a Berthold Lumat following the manufacturer's recommendations. B-Luciferase activity was normalized to Renilla expression. All transfection experiments were performed in duplicate.

    Concentrations of p24 Gag in supernatants of J1.1 T cells were measured in duplicate by using a p24 ELISA kit (ZeptoMetrix Corporation, Buffalo, NY).

    RESULTS

    Constitutively active forms of both PKC and PKC induce HIV LTR activation via NF-B in Jurkat and human primary CD4+ T cells. Recently we demonstrated that PKC acts upstream of PKC to activate NF-B following CD3/CD28 stimulation in uninfected T cells (54). Since antigen presentation, TCR ligation, and phorbol esters all lead to NF-B activation and subsequent HIV LTR transcription, we first examined the role of both PKC and PKC in induction of HIV-1 LTR transcriptional activity in T lymphocytes mediated by these stimuli.

    First, we studied whether CA forms of PKC, PKCA25E, and PKC, PKCA148E, can induce HIV-1 LTR transcriptional activity. Jurkat T cells were transfected with either PKCA25E or PKCA148E, together with luciferase reporter plasmids containing the wild-type HIV-1 LTR or the LTR lacking the two B sites, HIV-LTR (B). As shown in Fig. 1A, expression of either PKCA25E or PKCA148E induced HIV LTR transcriptional activity preferentially via NF-B, since deletion of B sites strongly impaired HIV LTR activation (Fig. 1A). As previously shown (54), ionomycin treatment is required for efficient NF-B activation by PKCA25E, since expression of PKCA25E resulted in only a moderate increase of HIV LTR transcriptional activity (Fig. 1A) which was further augmented by ionomycin treatment. Similar to PKCA148E, PKCA25E induced HIV LTR transcription via B sites (Fig. 1A). While PKCA25E and PKCA148E strongly activated NF-B-dependent transcription (25- to 200-fold) of HIV LTR, both only modestly induced (1.2- to 2-fold) transcriptional activity of the transcription factor, Sp1 (Fig. 1B).

    To further confirm the relevance of these findings, we studied whether PKCA25E and PKCA148E can induce HIV-1 LTR transcriptional activity in human primary CD4+ T cells. Purified human CD4+ T cells were transfected with either PKCA25E or PKCA148E, together with the luciferase reporter plasmids mentioned above. Similar to our results with Jurkat T cells, expression of either PKCA25E or PKCA148E in human primary CD4+ T cells induced HIV-LTR transcriptional activity via B sites (Fig. 1C and D).

    Taken together these results demonstrate that both PKC and PKC can induce HIV LTR transcription preferentially through B sites in Jurkat and primary CD4+ T cells.

    Suppression of either PKC or PKC inhibits HIV LTR activation by CD3/CD28 stimulation in Jurkat T cells. To identify which of the two PKC isoforms mediates CD3/CD28-induced HIV LTR activation, we utilized isoform-specific PKC suppression vectors (54), which direct synthesis of short hairpinned (sh) RNA molecules specific for targeting of either human PKC or human PKC. Jurkat T cells were transfected with either pFRT-PKC or pFRT-PKC together with luciferase reporter plasmids as mentioned above. The levels of PKC and PKC expression in transfected cells were analyzed 48 h later by immunoblotting with anti-PKC and anti-PKC antibodies. As shown in Fig. 2C, transfection of Jurkat T cells with either pFRT-PKC or pFRT-PKC resulted in selective and significant reduction of PKC and PKC expression. Neither of the shRNA constructs affected the levels of PKC?1. Cross-linking of transfected Jurkat T cells with CD3 and CD28 antibodies induced HIV LTR-dependent luciferase activity preferentially via B sites of LTR (Fig. 2A and B). Suppression of either PKC or PKC significantly impaired CD3/CD28-induced HIV LTR-dependent luciferase activity. In contrast, suppression of either PKC or PKC had no effect on a basal or prostratin-induced Sp1-dependent luciferase activity (Fig. 2D), suggesting that both PKCs are dispensable for Sp1 transcription. Altogether, these results indicate that both PKC isoforms are required for CD3/CD28-induced HIV LTR-dependent transcription via B sites in Jurkat T cells.

    Constitutively active forms of both PKC and PKC reactivate HIV in latently infected J1.1 T cells. To further define the role of both PKCs in HIV reactivation, we studied HIV LTR-dependent transcription and HIV-1 production in the latently HIV-infected CD3+ J 1.1 T-cell line (42). J1.1 T cells were transfected with HA-PKCA25E or HA-PKCA148E or, as a positive control, with the constitutively active form of IKK?, HA-IKK?S177E,S181E, together with either HIV LTR (Fig. 3A) or HIV LTR (B)- luciferase reporters (Fig. 3B) and the tkRenilla reporter plasmid. Thirty-six hours later, supernatants were collected to measure p24 Gag levels and cells were harvested to assay luciferase activities. Expression of either PKCA148E or PKCA25E induced HIV LTR transcriptional activity in J1.1 T cells through both NF-B-dependent and non-NF-B-dependent pathways (Fig. 3A and B).

    To test whether PKCA25E, HA-PKCA148E, or HA-IKK?S177E,S181E can reactivate HIV from latency, we measured p24 Gag levels in supernatants of transfected J1.1 cells. As shown in Fig. 3D, the expression of the constitutively active forms of PKC, PKC, or IKK? induce strong p24 Gag production in J1.1 T cells, which correlates with HIV LTR activation (Fig. 3A and B).

    Taken together, these results demonstrate that activation of either PKC or PKC is sufficient for the activation of HIV LTR transcription and for subsequent HIV reactivation in latently infected T cells.

    Suppression of either PKC or PKC inhibits HIV reactivation by CD3/CD28 stimulation in J1.1 T cells. To confirm which of the two PKC isoforms is required for the CD3/CD28-induced HIV reactivation, J1.1 T cells were transfected with control vector, pFRT-PKC alone, pFRT-PKC alone, or pFRT-PKC together with pFRT-PKC. HIV LTR or HIV LTR (B) luciferase plasmids and Renilla were cotransfected. Forty-eight hours later cells were cross-linked with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies and then cells and supernatants were harvested to assay luciferase activity (Fig. 4A), PKC expression (Fig. 4B), and p24 Gag concentrations (Fig. 4C). As shown in Fig. 4A, stimulation of J1.1 T cells with anti-CD3 anti-CD28 antibodies induced a threefold increase in HIV LTR transcription. Deletion of two B sites in the LTR resulted in a 50% decrease of CD3/CD28-induced HIV LTR transcription. Suppression of PKC inhibited B-specific CD3/CD28-induced HIV LTR transcription and resulted in a twofold decrease of p24 levels in CD3/CD28-treated J1.1 T cells. Conversely, PKC suppression inhibited both B-dependent and to a lesser degree B-independent CD3/CD28-induced HIV LTR transcription, potentially altering AP-1 (4, 56) and NF-AT (2, 43, 56) activation. Simultaneous suppression of both PKCs did not have a greater effect on CD3/CD28-induced HIV LTR transcription and p24 production than suppression of PKC or PKC alone (Fig. 4A and C), confirming that PKC and PKC act in sequence following CD3/CD28 stimulation (54).

    Both PKC and PKC are required for HIV reactivation by phorbol esters in J 1.1 T cells. Having shown that both PKC isoforms are required for CD3/CD28-mediated HIV reactivation, we addressed the role of both PKCs in phorbol ester-mediated HIV reactivation from latency. Isoform-specific PKC suppression vectors were expressed in J1.1. T cells that were then stimulated with two different phorbol esters, PMA or prostratin. Stimulation of J1.1 T cells with PMA or prostratin induced 12-fold increases in HIV LTR-dependent luciferase activity that was reduced by deletion of the B sites of HIV LTR [Fig. 5A, HIV-LTR (B)] or suppression of PKC. PKC suppression resulted in a twofold decrease of p24 Gag production induced by PMA or prostratin (Fig. 5B). It also blocked 50% of HIV LTR-dependent transcription induced by either PMA or prostratin. As with CD3/CD28 stimulation, suppression of PKC had no effect on PMA- or prostratin-induced HIV LTR (B) transcription (Fig. 5A). Suppression of PKC blocked almost 50% of prostratin PMA-mediated HIV LTR activation via B sites and resulted in a twofold decrease of prostratin- or PMA-induced HIV LTR (B) transcription. PKC suppression also significantly decreased p24 production induced by prostratin (P < 0.05) (Fig. 5B). Similar to CD3/CD28 stimulation, suppression of both PKC and PKC together was no more effective in blocking PMA- or prostratin-induced HIV LTR transcription and p24 production than suppression of PKC alone.

    DISCUSSION

    In this study we have demonstrated a specific requirement for both PKC and PKC in HIV reactivation following TCR ligation or stimulation with the non-tumor-promoting ester prostratin in T lymphocytes. We conclude this based on observations that selective suppression of PKC, PKC, or both PKC isoforms inhibits HIV LTR transcription and HIV reactivation following CD3/CD28 cross-linking or prostratin treatment in Jurkat and J1.1 T cells. Several interesting features of HIV reactivation by these stimuli are underscored by our results. First, HIV reactivation by either CD3/CD28 engagement or prostratin stimulation requires both PKC and PKC, demonstrating that both PKC isoforms are necessary. Second, suppression of PKC alone or PKC alone has the same inhibitory effect on HIV LTR transcription as suppression of both PKC isoforms together, suggesting that PKC and PKC act in sequence to activate HIV LTR transcription. These findings are consistent with our previous observation that PKC acts upstream of PKC to activate NF-B following TCR ligation (54). Exactly how PKC upregulates PKC is undefined, yet potential direct phosphorylation of PKC by PKC at the plasma membrane may be required for either full PKC activation or to prolong PKC signaling following either CD3/CD28 engagement or prostratin stimulation. The murine PKC undergoes inducible phosphorylation at the C terminus on two adjacent (Thr-692 and Thr-703) residues following TCR or phorbol ester stimulation, which is required for NF-B activation (52). We observed that the C-terminal phosphorylation of PKC occurs in a PKC-dependent manner (data not shown), suggesting that PKC can directly phosphorylate the two adjacent serine residues, S685 and S703, in human PKC (unpublished data). Therefore, PKC-mediated phosphorylation prolongs PKC activation which, as we have previously demonstrated (53), is required for efficient NF-B transcription. Consequently, persistent PKC activation may be necessary for efficient HIV LTR transcription and subsequent HIV reactivation from latency. This contention is supported by the fact that the constitutively active form of PKC provides prolonged signaling and, therefore, it induces HIV LTR transcription in primary CD4+ T cells (Fig. 1C) and efficiently reactivates HIV from latency (Fig. 3D). Finally, we demonstrated that suppression of either PKC or PKC inhibits prostratin-mediated or CD3/CD28-mediated HIV LTR transcription via B sites. However, suppression of PKC also has a significant effect on prostratin-induced HIV LTR (B) transcription and a smaller effect on CD3/CD28-induced HIV LTR (B) transcription, potentially due to inhibition of other transcription factors, such as AP-1. Previously it was shown that prostratin induces both NF-B- and AP-1-dependent transcription (57). Our data are in agreement, since constitutively active forms of both PKC and PKC can induce transcription of HIV LTR lacking B sites (Fig. 3B) and potently induce AP-1-dependent transcription in J1.1 T cells (data not shown). However, it is noteworthy that the magnitude of AP-1 activation by PKC is much greater than that by PKC. Therefore, selective inhibition of CD3/CD28- and prostratin-induced HIV LTR (B) transcription by suppression of PKC but not PKC indicates that PKC and PKC pathways are divergent. This is in agreement with the previous observation that PKC activates NF-B, but not AP-1, in a PKC-dependent manner (54). It is possible that the divergence in the PKC and PKC signaling pathway occurs on the level of Ste20-related proline- and alanine-rich kinase, which recently has been shown to mediate PKC, but not PKC, signaling to AP-1 (34). Therefore, while both PKC isoforms induce HIV LTR transcription via B sites, PKC also contributes in HIV LTR transcription via AP-1 sites. The conclusion that both PKC and PKC are required for HIV reactivation is in agreement with recently published data demonstrating that CD3/CD28 costimulation and prostratin treatment reactivate HIV from latency in the SCID-HU Thy/Liv model (9) in both a PKC- and NF-B-dependent manner. Similarly, a role for PKC in mediating prostratin-induced HIV reactivation is further supported by observations that prostratin induces translocation of several conventional, novel, and atypical PKC isoforms to the cell membrane, suggesting that all these PKC isoforms can contribute to HIV reactivation (57). That suggestion is supported by observations that simultaneous inhibition of conventional and novel PKC isoforms together completely blocks prostratin-induced HIV reactivation (9, 57). However, inhibition of conventional PKC isoforms or PKC with inhibitor TER14687 which blocks PKC translocation, demonstrated that these drugs failed to prevent prostratin-induced HIV reactivation from latency (47, 57). These data are in sharp contrast to our results obtained with specific suppression constructs (Fig. 5), where we showed that PKC suppression abrogates both prostratin- and CD3/CD28-induced HIV LTR reactivation. Whether the previous report succeeded in achieving complete inhibition of conventional PKC isoforms is untested. Similarly, although TER14687has been shown to prevent PKC translocation to the membrane following OKT3 stimulation by interfering with PKC-Fyn interactions (47), it is not clear whether the PKC-Fyn interaction is required for prostratin-induced PKC translocation and activation. Therefore, direct suppression of PKC with shRNA seems to be a more reliable approach to address the requirement for PKC function in prostratin-induced HIV reactivation. In doing so, we have demonstrated the absolute requirement for PKC in both TCR- and prostratin-induced HIV reactivation.

    The sequential nature of PKC and PKC activation is probably not limited to TCR or prostratin signaling pathways. Studies with another non-tumor-promoting phorbol ester, 12-deoxyphorbol 13-phenylacetate (DPP), suggest that DPP induces the same set of genes as prostratin and PMA (8), implying a similar PKC- and PKC-dependent signal transduction pathway. In contrast to phorbol esters, synthetic diacylglycerol (DAG) lactones can reactivate HIV with the same efficiency as DPP without causing T-cell proliferation and upregulation of tumor necrosis factor alpha (24). Of note, these DAG lactones have 20- to 100-fold lower PKC binding affinity than DPP, raising the possibility that DAG lactones can preferentially target PKC, thereby avoiding PKC-mediated T-cell activation.

    Altogether our data provide novel insights on the role of PKC and PKC in HIV reactivation in T cells. The inability to efficiently reactivate HIV from latency represents a major barrier to HIV eradication. Identification of PKC and PKC as necessary for HIV reactivation following TCR and phorbol ester stimulation indicates that these cellular targets may provide a key for the development of new therapies. Moreover, since PKC activation has been implicated in tumorigenesis (reviewed in reference 39), selection of PKC as a therapeutic target may yield clinically relevant new agents.

    REFERENCES

    Adams, M., L. Sharmeen, J. Kimpton, J. M. Romeo, J. V. Garcia, B. M. Peterlin, M. Groudine, and M. Emerman. 1994. Cellular latency in human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals with high CD4 levels can be detected by the presence of promoter-proximal transcripts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:3862-3866.

    Altman, A., S. Kaminski, V. Busuttil, N. Droin, J. Hu, Y. Tadevosyan, R. A. Hipskind, and M. Villalba. 2004. Positive feedback regulation of PLC1/Ca2+ signaling by PKC in restimulated T cells via a Tec kinase-dependent pathway. Eur. J. Immunol. 34:2001-2011.

    Baier, G., D. Telford, L. Giampa, K. M. Coggeshall, G. Baier-Bitterlich, N. Isakov, and A. Altman. 1993. Molecular cloning and characterization of PKC-theta, a novel member of the protein kinase C (PKC) gene family expressed predominantly in hematopoietic cells. J. Biol. Chem. 268:4997-5004.

    Baier-Bitterlich, G., F. Uberall, B. Bauer, F. Fresser, H. Wachter, H. Grunicke, G. Utermann, A. Altman, and G. Baier. 1996. Protein kinase C-theta isoenzyme selective stimulation of the transcription factor complex AP-1 in T lymphocytes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:1842-1850.

    Bera, T. K., P. E. Kennedy, E. A. Berger, C. F. I. Barbas, and I. Pastan. 1998. Specific killing of HIV-infected lymphocytes by a recombinant immunotoxin directed against the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein. Mol. Med. 4:384-391.

    Bi, K., Y. Tanaka, N. Coudronniere, K. Sugie, S. Hong, M. J. B. van Stipdonk, and A. Altman. 2001. Antigen-induced translocation of PKC-theta to membrane rafts is required for T cell activation. Nat. Immunol. 2:556-563.

    Biancotto, A., J.-C. Grivel, F. Gondois-Rey, L. Bettendroffer, R. Vigne, S. Brown, L. B. Margolis, and I. Hirsch. 2004. Dual role of prostratin in inhibition of infection and reactivation of human immunodeficiency virus from latency in primary blood lymphocytes and lymphoid tissue. J. Virol. 78:10507-10515.

    Bocklandt, S., P. M. Blumberg, and D. H. Hamer. 2003. Activation of latent HIV-1 expression by the potent anti-tumor promoter 12-deoxyphorbol 13-phenylacetate. Antivir. Res. 59:89-98.

    Brooks, D. G., P. A. Arlen, L. Gao, C. M. Kitchen, and J. A. Zack. 2003. Identification of T cell-signaling pathways that stimulate latent HIV in primary cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:12955-12960.

    Brooks, D. G., D. H. Hamer, P. A. Arlen, L. Gao, G. Bristol, C. M. R. Kitchen, E. A. Berger, and J. A. Zack. 2003. Molecular characterization, reactivation, and depletion of latent HIV. Immunity 19:413-423.

    Brooks, D. G., S. G. Kitchen, C. M. R. Kitchen, D. D. Scripture-Adams, and J. A. Zack. 2001. Generation of HIV latency during thymopoiesis. Nat. Med. 7:459-464.

    Chapuis, A. G., G. Paolo Rizzardi, C. D'Agostino, A. Attinger, C. Knabenhans, S. Fleury, H. Acha-Orbea, and G. Pantaleo. 2000. Effects of mycophenolic acid on human immunodeficiency virus infection in vitro and in vivo. Nat. Med. 6:762-768.

    Chun, T.-W., L. M. Carruth, D. Finzi, X. Shen, J. A. DiGiuseppe, H. Taylor, M. Hermankova, K. Chadwick, J. Margolick, T. C. Quinn, Y.-H. Kuo, R. Brookmeyer, M. A. Zeiger, P. Barditch-Croveo, and R. F. Siliciano. 1997. Quantification of latent tissue reservoirs and total body viral load in HIV-1 infection. Nature 387:183-188.

    Chun, T.-W., D. Finzi, J. Margolick, K. Chadwick, D. Schwartz, and R. F. Siliciano. 1995. In vivo fate of HIV-1-infected T cells: quantitative analysis of the transition to stable latency. Nat. Med. 1:1284-1290.

    Chun, T.-W., L. Stuyver, S. B. Mizell, L. A. Ehler, J. A. M. Mican, M. Baseler, A. L. Lloyd, M. A. Nowak, and A. S. Fauci. 1997. Presence of an inducible HIV-1 latent reservoir during highly active antiretroviral therapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:13193-13197.

    Coudronniere, N., M. Villalba, N. Englund, and A. Altman. 2000. NF-B activation induced by T cell receptor/CD28 costimulation is mediated by protein kinase C-theta. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:3394-3399.

    Duh, E. J., W. J. Maury, T. M. Folks, A. S. Fauci, and A. B. Rabson. 1989. Tumor necrosis factor alpha activates human immunodeficiency virus type 1 through induction of nuclear factor binding to the NF-B sites in the long terminal repeat. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:5974-5978.

    Finzi, D., J. Blankson, J. D. Siliciano, J. Margolick, K. Chadwick, T. Pierson, K. Smith, J. Lisziewicz, F. Lori, C. Flexner, T. C. Quinn, R. E. Chaisson, E. Rosenberg, B. Walker, S. Gange, J. Gallant, and R. F. Siliciano. 1999. Latent infection of CD4+ T cells provides a mechanism for lifelong persistence of HIV-1, even in patients on effective combination therapy. Nat. Med. 5:512-517.

    Finzi, D., M. Hermankova, T. Pierson, L. M. Carruth, C. Buck, R. E. Chaisson, T. C. Quinn, K. Chadwick, J. Margolick, R. Brookmeyer, J. Gallant, M. Markowitz, D. D. Ho, D. D. Richman, and R. F. Siliciano. 1997. Identification of a reservoir for HIV-1 in patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy. Science 278:1295-1300.

    Folks, T. M., K. A. Clouse, J. Justement, A. Rabson, E. Duh, J. H. Kehrl, and A. S. Fauci. 1989. Tumor necrosis factor alpha induces expression of human immunodeficiency virus in a chronically infected T-cell clone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:2365-2368.

    Goldstein, H., M. Pettoello-Mantovani, T. K. Bera, I. H. Pastan, and E. A. Berger. 2000. Chimeric toxins targeted to the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein augment the in vivo activity of combination antiretroviral therapy in thy/liv-SCID-Hu mice. J. Infect. Dis. 181:921-926.

    Gulakowski, R. J., J. B. McMahon, R. W. Buckheit, Jr., K. R. Gustafson, and M. R. Boyd. 1997. Antireplicative and anticytopathic activities of prostratin, a non-tumor-promoting phorbol ester, against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Antivir. Res. 33:87-97.

    Gustafson, K. R., J. H. Cardellina, J. B. McMahon, R. J. Gulakowski, J. Ishitoya, Z. Szallasi, N. E. Lewin, P. M. Blumberg, O. S. Weislow, J. A. Beutler, R. W. Buckheit, Jr., G. M. Cragg, P. A. Cox, J. P. Bader, and M. R. Boyd. 1992. A nonpromoting phorbol from the Samoan medicinal plant Homalanthus nutans inhibits cell killing by HIV-1. J. Med. Chem. 35:1978-1986.

    Hamer, D. H., S. Bocklandt, L. McHugh, T. W. Chun, P. M. Blumberg, D. M. Sigano, and V. E. Marquez. 2003. Rational design of drugs that induce human immunodeficiency virus replication. J. Virol. 77:10227-10236.

    Han, X. M., A. Laras, M. P. Rounseville, A. Kumar, and P. R. Shank. 1992. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat-mediated trans activation correlates with the phosphorylation state of a cellular TAR RNA stem-binding factor. J. Virol. 66:4065-4072.

    Havlir, D. V., P. B. Gilbert, K. Bennett, A. C. Collier, M. S. Hirsch, P. Tebas, E. M. Adams, L. J. Wheat, D. Goodwin, S. Schnittman, M. K. Holohan, and D. D. Richman. 2001. Effects of treatment intensification with hydroxyurea in HIV-infected patients with virologic suppression. AIDS 15:1379-1388.

    Jakobovits, A., A. Rosenthal, and D. J. Capon. 1990. Trans-activation of HIV-1 LTR-directed gene expression by tat requires protein kinase C. EMBO J. 9:1165-1170.

    Jones, K. A., and B. M. Peterlin. 1994. Control of RNA initiation and elongation at the HIV-1 promoter. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63:717-743.

    Kinter, A. L., G. Poli, W. Maury, T. M. Folks, and A. S. Fauci. 1990. Direct and cytokine-mediated activation of protein kinase C induces human immunodeficiency virus expression in chronically infected promonocytic cells. J. Virol. 64:4306-4312.

    Korin, Y. D., D. G. Brooks, S. Brown, A. Korotzer, and J. A. Zack. 2002. Effects of prostratin on T-cell activation and human immunodeficiency virus latency. J. Virol. 76:8118-8123.

    Kulkosky, J., D. M. Culnan, J. Roman, G. Dornadula, M. Schnell, M. R. Boyd, and R. J. Pomerantz. 2001. Prostratin: activation of latent HIV-1 expression suggests a potential inductive adjuvant therapy for HAART. Blood 98:3006-3015.

    Kulkosky, J., G. Nunnari, M. Otero, S. Calarota, G. Dornadula, H. Zhang, A. Malin, J. Sullivan, Y. Xu, J. DeSimone, T. Babinchak, J. Stern, W. Cavert, A. Haase, and R. J. Pomerantz. 2002. Intensification and stimulation therapy for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reservoirs in infected persons receiving virally suppressive highly active antiretroviral therapy. J. Infect. Dis. 186:1403-1411.

    Kulkosky, J., J. Sullivan, Y. Xu, E. Souder, D. H. Hamer, and R. J. Pomerantz. 2004. Expression of latent HAART-persistent HIV type 1 induced by novel cellular activating agents. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 20:497-505.

    Li, Y., J. Hu, R. Vita, B. Sun, H. Tabata, and A. Altman. 2004. SPAK kinase is a substrate and target of PKC-theta in T-cell receptor-induced AP-1 activation pathway. EMBO J. 23:1112-1122.

    Li, Y., G. Mak, and B. R. Franza, Jr. 1994. In vitro study of functional involvement of Sp1, NF-B/Rel, and AP1 in phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-mediated HIV-1 long terminal repeat activation. J. Biol. Chem. 269:30616-30619.

    Lin, X., A. O'Mahony, Y. Mu, R. Geleziunas, and W. C. Greene. 2000. Protein kinase C-theta participates in NF-B activation induced by CD3-CD28 costimulation through selective activation of IB kinase ?. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:2933-2940.

    Lori, F., A. Malykh, A. Cara, D. Sun, J. N. Weinstein, J. Lisziewicz, and R. C. Gallo. 1994. Hydroxyurea as an inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus-type 1 replication. Science 266:801-805.

    McHugh, L., S. Hu, B. K. Lee, K. Santora, P. E. Kennedy, E. A. Berger, I. Pastan, and D. H. Hamer. 2002. Increased affinity and stability of an anti-HIV-1 envelope immunotoxin by structure-based mutagenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 277:34383-34890.

    Michie, A. M., and R. Nakagawa. 2005. The link between PKC regulation and cellular transformation. Immunol. Lett. 96:155-162.

    Nabel, G., and D. Baltimore. 1987. An inducible transcription factor activates expression of human immunodeficiency virus in T cells. Nature 326:711-713.

    Osborn, L., S. Kunkel, and G. J. Nabel. 1989. Tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin 1 stimulate the human immunodeficiency virus enhancer by activation of the nuclear factor B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:2336-2340.

    Perez, V. L., T. Rowe, J. S. Justement, S. T. Butera, C. H. June, and T. M. Folks. 1991. An HIV-1-infected T cell clone defective in IL-2 production and Ca2+ mobilization after CD3 stimulation. J. Immunol. 147:3145-3148.

    Pfeifhofer, C., K. Kofler, T. Gruber, N. G. Tabrizi, C. Lutz, K. Maly, M. Leitges, and G. Baier. 2003. Protein kinase C theta affects Ca2+ mobilization and NFAT cell activation in primary mouse T cells. J. Exp. Med. 197:1525-1535.

    Prins, J. M., S. Jurriaans, R. M. E. van Praag, H. Blaak, R. van Rij, P. Schellekens, I. J. M. ten Berge, S.-L. Yong, C. H. Fox, M. T. L. Roos, F. de Wolf, J. Goudsmit, H. Schuitemaker, and J. M. A. Lange. 1999. Immuno-activation with anti-CD3 and recombinant human IL-2 in HIV-1-infected patients on potent antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 13:2405-2410.

    Qatsha, K. A., C. Rudolph, D. Marme, C. Schachtele, and W. S. May. 1993. Go 6976, a selective inhibitor of protein kinase C, is a potent antagonist of human immunodeficiency virus 1 induction from latent/low-level-producing reservoir cells in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:4674-4678.

    Roebuck, K. A., D. S. Gu, and M. F. Kagnoff. 1996. Activating protein-1 cooperates with phorbol ester activation signals to increase HIV-1 expression. AIDS 10:819-826.

    Ron, D., E. W. Napolitano, A. Voronova, N. J. Vasquez, D. N. Roberts, B. L. Calio, R. H. Caothien, S. M. Pettiford, S. Wellik, J. B. Mandac, and L. M. Kauvar. 1999. Direct interaction in T-cells between PKC and the tyrosine kinase p59fyn. J. Biol. Chem. 274:19003-19010.

    Rullas, J., M. Bermejo, J. Garcia-Perez, M. Beltran, N. Gonzalez, M. Hezareh, S. J. Brown, and J. Alcami. 2004. Prostratin induces HIV activation and downregulates HIV receptors in peripheral blood lymphocytes. Antivir. Ther. 9:545-554.

    Scripture-Adams, D. D., D. G. Brooks, Y. D. Korin, and J. A. Zack. 2002. Interleukin-7 induced expression of latent human immunodeficiency virus type 1 with minimal effects on T-cell phenotype. J. Virol. 76:13077-13082.

    Siliciano, J. D., J. Kajdas, D. Finzi, T. C. Quinn, K. Chadwick, J. Margolick, C. Kovacs, S. Gange, and R. F. Siliciano. 2003. Long-term follow-up studies confirm the stability of the latent reservoir for HIV-1 in resting CD4+ T cells. Nat. Med. 9:727-728.

    Sun, Z., C. W. Arendt, W. Ellmeier, E. M. Schaeffer, M. J. Sunshine, L. Gandhi, J. Annes, D. Petrizilka, A. Kupfer, P. L. Schwartzberg, and D. R. Littman. 2000. PKC-theta is required for TCR-induced NF-B activation in mature but not immature T lymphocytes. Nature 404:402-407.

    Thebault, S., and J. Ochoa-Garay. 2004. Characterization of TCR-induced phosphorylation of PKC in primary murine lymphocytes. Mol. Immunol. 40:931-942.

    Trushin, S. A., K. N. Pennington, A. Algeciras-Schimnich, and C. V. Paya. 1999. Protein kinase C and calcineurin synergize to activate IB kinase and NF-B in T lymphocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 274:22923-22931.

    Trushin, S. A., K. N. Pennington, E. M. Carmona, S. Asin, D. N. Savoy, D. D. Billadeau, and C. V. Paya. 2003. Protein kinase C- (PKC-) acts upstream of PKC-theta to activate IB kinase and NF-B in T lymphocytes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:7068-7081.

    van Praag, R. M. E., J. M. Prins, M. T. L. Roos, P. Schellekens, I. J. M. ten Berge, S.-L. Yong, H. Schuitemaker, A. J. M. Eerenberg, S. Jurriaans, F. de Wolf, C. H. Fox, J. Goudsmit, F. Miedema, and J. M. A. Lange. 2001. OKT3 and IL-2 treatment for purging of the latent HIV-1 reservoir in vivo results in selective long-lasting CD4+ T cell depletion. J. Clin. Immunol. 21:218-226.

    Werlen, G., E. Jacinto, Y. Xia, and M. Karin. 1998. Calcineurin preferentially synergizes with PKC-theta to activate JNK and IL-2 promoter in T lymphocytes. EMBO J. 17:3101-3111.

    Williams, S. A., L. F. Chen, H. Kwon, D. Fenard, D. Bisgrove, E. Verdin, and W. C. Greene. 2004. Prostratin antagonizes HIV latency by activating NF-B. J. Biol. Chem. 279:42008-42017.

    Wong, J. K., M. Hezareh, H. F. Gunthard, D. V. Havlir, C. C. Ignacio, C. A. Spina, and D. D. Richman. 1997. Recovery of replication-competent HIV despite prolonged suppression of plasma viremia. Science 278:1291-1295.

    Yang, B., L. Gao, L. Li, Z. Lu, X. Fan, C. A. Patel, R. J. Pomerantz, G. C. DuBois, and H. Zhang. 2003. Potent suppression of viral infectivity by the peptides that inhibit multimerization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Vif proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 278:6596-6602.

    Yang, X., Y. Chen, and D. Gabuzda. 1999. ERK MAP kinase links cytokine signals to activation of latent HIV-1 infection by stimulating a cooperative interaction of AP-1 and NF-B. J. Biol. Chem. 274:27981-27988.

    Zhang, L., C. Chung, B.-S. Hu, T. He, Y. Guo, A. J. Kim, E. Sklusky, X. Jin, A. Hurley, B. Ramratnam, M. Markowitz, and D. D. Ho. 2000. Genetic characterization of rebounding HIV-1 after cessation of highly active antiretroviral therapy. J. Clin. Investig. 106:839-845.(Sergey A. Trushin, Gary D)
    婵犵數濮烽弫鎼佸磿閹寸姴绶ら柦妯侯棦濞差亝鍋愰悹鍥皺椤︻厼鈹戦悩缁樻锭婵炲眰鍊濋、姘舵焼瀹ュ棛鍘卞┑鐐村灥瀹曨剟寮搁妶鍡愪簻闁冲搫鍟崢鎾煛鐏炲墽鈽夐柍钘夘樀瀹曪繝鎮欏顔介獎闂備礁鎼ˇ顐﹀疾濠婂吘娑㈠礃椤旇壈鎽曞┑鐐村灦鑿ら柡瀣叄閻擃偊宕堕妸锕€鐨戦梺绋款儐閹歌崵绮嬮幒鏂哄亾閿濆簼绨介柛鏃撶畱椤啴濡堕崱妤€娼戦梺绋款儐閹瑰洭寮诲☉銏″亹鐎规洖娲㈤埀顒佸笚娣囧﹪宕f径濠傤潓闂佸疇顫夐崹鍨暦閸洖鐓橀柣鎰靛墰娴滄瑩姊虹拠鏌ヮ€楃紒鐘茬Ч瀹曟洟宕¢悙宥嗙☉閳藉濮€閻橀潧濮︽俊鐐€栫敮鎺椝囬鐐村€堕柨鏃傜摂濞堜粙鏌i幇顒佲枙闁稿孩姊归〃銉╂倷閸欏鏋犲銈冨灪濡啫鐣烽妸鈺婃晣闁绘劙娼ч幖绋库攽閻樺灚鏆╅柛瀣█楠炴捇顢旈崱妤冪瓘闂佽鍨奸悘鎰洪鍕吅闂佺粯锚閸氣偓缂佹顦靛娲箰鎼达絿鐣甸梺鐟板槻椤戝鐣烽悽绋块唶婵犮埄浜濆Λ鍐极閸屾粎椹抽悗锝庝簻婵″ジ姊绘担鍛婃喐闁稿鍋ら獮鎰板箮閽樺鎽曢梺鍝勬储閸ㄥ綊鐛姀銈嗙厸闁搞儮鏅涘瓭婵犵鈧尙鐭欓柡宀嬬秮婵偓闁宠桨鑳舵禒鈺冪磽閸屾氨孝闁挎洦浜悰顔界節閸ャ劍娅㈤梺缁樓圭亸娆撴偪閳ь剚淇婇悙顏勨偓鏍箰妤e啫纾婚柣鏂挎憸椤╃兘鏌熼幍顔碱暭闁抽攱鍨块弻娑㈡晜鐠囨彃绗岄梺鑽ゅ枑閸f潙煤椤忓嫀褔鏌涢妷顔惧帥婵炶偐鍠栧娲礃閸欏鍎撻梺鐟板暱濮橈妇鎹㈠鑸碘拻濞达絽鎳欒ぐ鎺戝珘妞ゆ帒鍊婚惌娆撴煙閻戞﹩娈曢柛濠傜仛閵囧嫰寮崹顔规寖缂佺偓鍎抽妶鎼佸蓟閿熺姴绀冮柕濞垮劗閸嬫挾绮欓幐搴㈢槑濠电姷鏁告慨顓㈠箯閸愵喖绀嬮柛顭戝亞閺夊綊鏌f惔銏╁晱闁哥姵鐗犻幃銉╂偂鎼达絾娈惧┑顔姐仜閸嬫挸鈹戦埄鍐憙妞わ附濞婇弻娑㈠箻閺夋垹浠哥紓浣虹帛缁嬫捇鍩€椤掍胶鈯曞畝锝呮健閹本绻濋崑鑺ユ閹晠宕f径瀣瀾闂備浇妗ㄧ欢锟犲闯閿濆鈧線寮撮姀鈩冩珕闂佽姤锚椤︿粙鍩€椤掍胶鈽夐柍瑙勫灴閺佸秹宕熼锛勬崟濠电姭鎷冮崨顔界彧缂備緡鍠楅悷锔炬崲濠靛鐐婇柕濞у啫绠版繝鐢靛О閸ㄧ厧鈻斿☉銏℃櫇闁靛牆顦Ч鏌ユ煛閸モ晛鏋戦柛娆忕箻閺岋綁鎮㈤悡搴濆枈濠碘槅鍨崑鎾绘⒒娴h姤銆冪紒鈧担铏圭煋闁圭虎鍠楅崑鈺傜節闂堟侗鍎忕紒鈧崘鈹夸簻妞ゆ挾鍠庨悘锝夋煙鐎电ǹ鍘存慨濠勭帛閹峰懐绮电€n亝鐣伴梻浣告憸婵敻骞戦崶褏鏆︽繝闈涳功閻も偓濠电偞鍨兼ご鎼佸疾閿濆洨纾介柛灞剧懅閸斿秴鐣濋敐鍛仴闁糕斂鍨藉顕€宕奸悢鍝勫箺闂備胶鎳撻顓㈠磿閹寸偟鐟规繛鎴欏灪閻撴洟鏌¢崒姘变虎闁哄棴缍侀弻鈥崇暆鐎n剛鐦堥悗瑙勬礃鐢帡锝炲┑瀣垫晣闁绘﹢娼ч獮鈧紓鍌氬€搁崐鐑芥倿閿曞倶鈧啴宕ㄥ銈呮喘閺屽棗顓奸崨顖氬Е婵$偑鍊栫敮鎺楀窗濮橆兗缂氶柟閭﹀枤绾惧吋銇勯弮鍥т汗缂佺姴顭烽弻銊モ攽閸繀妲愰梺杞扮閸熸潙鐣烽幒鎴僵闁告鍋為幉銏ゆ⒒娴h棄鍚瑰┑鐐╁亾缂傚倸鍊归懝楣冨煝瀹ュ鏅查柛銉㈡櫇閻撳姊洪崜鑼帥闁哥姵鎹囬崺鈧い鎺嶇缁楁帗銇勯锝囩疄妞ゃ垺锕㈤幃鈺咁敃閿濆孩缍岄梻鍌氬€风欢姘缚瑜嶇叅闁靛牆鎮垮ú顏勎╅柍杞拌兌閸旓箑顪冮妶鍡楃瑨闁稿妫濆銊╂偋閸垻顔曟繝銏f硾椤戝洤煤鐎电硶鍋撶憴鍕8闁搞劏濮ゆ穱濠囧醇閺囩偟鍊為梺闈浨归崕鐑樺閺囥垺鐓熼柣鏂挎憸閻苯顭胯椤ㄥ牓寮鍢夋棃宕崘顏嗏棨濠电姰鍨奸崺鏍礉閺嶎厼纾婚柨婵嗩槹閻撴洟鏌曟径妯虹仩妞も晩鍓欓埥澶愬箻閻熸壆姣㈢紓浣介哺鐢岣胯箛娑樜╃憸蹇涙偩婵傚憡鈷戠憸鐗堝俯濡垵鈹戦悙鈺佷壕闂備浇顕栭崰妤冨垝閹捐绠板┑鐘插暙缁剁偛顭跨捄铏圭伇婵﹦鍋撶换婵嬫偨闂堟稐绮跺銈嗘处閸樹粙骞堥妸锔哄亝闁告劑鍔嶅Σ顒勬⒑閸濆嫮鈻夐柛妯恒偢瀹曞綊宕掗悙瀵稿帾婵犵數鍋熼崑鎾斥枍閸℃稒鐓曢悗锝冨妼婵″ジ妫佹径鎰叆婵犻潧妫欓崳褰掓煛閸℃瑥鏋戝ǎ鍥э躬椤㈡稑顫濋崡鐐╁徍婵犳鍠栭敃銉ヮ渻娴犲鈧線寮撮姀鈩冩珳闂佺硶鍓濋悷锕傤敇婵犳碍鈷掑ù锝堟鐢盯鏌熺喊鍗炰簽闁瑰箍鍨归埞鎴犫偓锝庡墮缁侊箓鏌f惔顖滅У闁哥姵鐗滅划濠氭晲閸℃瑧鐦堟繝鐢靛Т閸婃悂顢旈锔界厵闁哄鍋勬慨鍌涙叏婵犲啯銇濇鐐村姈閹棃鏁愰崒娑辨綌闂傚倷绀侀幖顐︽偋濠婂牆绀堥柣鏃堫棑閺嗭箓鏌i悢绋款棎闁割偒浜弻娑㈠即閵娿儱瀛e┑鐐存綑鐎氼剟鈥旈崘顔嘉ч柛鈩冾殘閻熸劙姊虹紒妯洪嚋缂佺姵鎸搁锝夊箮缁涘鏅滈梺鍓插亞閸犳捇宕㈤柆宥嗏拺闁荤喓澧楅幆鍫㈢磼婢跺缍戦柣锝囨暬瀹曞崬鈽夊▎鎴濆笚闁荤喐绮嶇划鎾崇暦濠婂喚娼╂い鎺戭槹閸嶇敻姊洪棃娴ュ牓寮插⿰鍫濈;闁稿瞼鍋為悡銉╂煟閺傛寧鎯堢€涙繈鏌i悢鍝ユ嚂缂佺姵鎹囬悰顕€寮介鐐殿啇濡炪倖鎸鹃崑鐔哥椤栨粎纾藉ù锝嗗絻娴滅偓绻濋姀锝嗙【闁愁垱娲濋妵鎰板箳閹寸媭妲梻浣呵圭换妤呭磻閹邦兘鏋旈柕鍫濐槹閳锋垹绱撴担璐細缂佺姵鐗犻弻锝夊煛婵犲倻浠╅梺浼欑悼閸忔﹢寮幘缁樺亹闁肩⒈鍓﹀Σ浼存⒒娴h棄浜归柍宄扮墦瀹曟粌顫濇0婵囨櫓闂佺鎻梽鍕煕閹达附鍋i柛銉岛閸嬫捇鎼归銈勭按闂傚倷绀侀幉锟犲蓟閵婏富娈介柟闂寸閻撴繈鏌熼幑鎰靛殭缂佺媴缍侀弻锝夊箛椤撶喓绋囧銈呭閹告悂鍩為幋锔藉亹閻犲泧鍐х矗闂備礁鎽滈崳銉╁垂閸洜宓侀柛鈩冪☉绾惧吋鎱ㄩ敐搴″箹缂傚秴锕獮鍐煛閸涱厾顔岄梺鍦劋缁诲倹淇婇柨瀣瘈闁汇垽娼цⅴ闂佺ǹ顑嗛幑鍥蓟閻斿皝鏋旈柛顭戝枟閻忔挾绱掓ィ鍐暫缂佺姵鐗犲濠氭偄鐞涒€充壕闁汇垻娅ラ悷鐗堟瘎闂佽崵鍠愮划搴㈡櫠濡ゅ懏鍋傞柨鐔哄Т閽冪喐绻涢幋娆忕仼缂佺姵濞婇弻锟犲磼濮樿鲸鐨戦梺鍝勵儏閹冲酣鍩為幋锔藉€烽柛娆忣槸濞咃綁姊绘担绋跨盎缂佽尙鍋撶粚杈ㄧ節閸パ咁啋濡炪倖妫佹慨銈呪枍閵忋倖鈷戦悹鎭掑妼濞呮劙鏌熼崙銈嗗

   闂傚倷娴囬褍霉閻戣棄鏋佸┑鐘宠壘绾捐鈹戦悩鍙夋悙缂佹劖顨婇弻锟犲炊閳轰焦鐏侀梺宕囨嚀缁夋挳鍩為幋锔藉亹闁告瑥顦伴幃娆忊攽閳藉棗浜濋柨鏇樺灲瀵鈽夐姀鐘栥劑鏌曡箛濠傚⒉闁绘繃鐗犻幃宄扳堪閸愩劎鐩庨梺鐟板殩閹凤拷  闂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥嚄閼哥數浠氱紓鍌欒兌缁垶銆冮崨鏉戠厺鐎广儱顦崡鎶芥煏韫囨洖校闁诲寒鍓熷铏圭磼濡搫顫庨梺绋跨昂閸婃繂鐣烽弴鐐垫殕闁告洦鍓涢崢浠嬫⒑闁稑宓嗘繛浣冲嫭娅犳い鏂款潟娴滄粓骞栭幖顓炵仭閻庢熬鎷�  闂傚倸鍊峰ù鍥х暦閸偅鍙忛柡澶嬪殮濞差亜围闁搞儻绲芥禍鐐叏濡厧甯堕柣蹇ラ檮閵囧嫰濮€閿涘嫭鍣板Δ鐘靛仜椤戝寮崘顔肩劦妞ゆ帒鍊婚惌鍡涙煕閺囥劌鐏¢柣鎾跺枑娣囧﹪顢涘┑鎰缂備浇灏畷鐢垫閹炬剚鍚嬮煫鍥ㄦ煥椤忥拷  闂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥嚄閸洖绠犻柟鎹愵嚙鐟欙箓鎮楅敐搴″闁搞劍绻堥獮鏍庨鈧俊鑲╃棯閹佸仮闁哄本娲樼换娑㈡倷椤掍胶褰呴梻浣告啞椤ㄥ棙绻涙繝鍥ц摕闁斥晛鍟欢鐐烘倵閿濆簼绨介柛鏃偳归埞鎴﹀煡閸℃浼堥梺鐟板殩閹凤拷   闂傚倸鍊搁崐宄懊归崶顒婄稏濠㈣泛顑囬々鎻捗归悩宸剰缂佲偓婢跺备鍋撻崗澶婁壕闂佸憡娲﹂崜娆愮闁秵鈷戦梻鍫熶腹濞戙垹宸濇い鏍ュ€楁惔濠傗攽閻樺灚鏆╅柛瀣☉铻炴繛鍡樻尭缁€澶愭煛瀹ュ骸浜炲☉鎾崇У缁绘盯宕卞Ο璇查瀺闂佺粯鎸诲ú妯兼崲濞戙垹骞㈡俊顖氬悑閸n參鏌f惔銏㈠暡闁瑰嚖鎷�   闂傚倸鍊搁崐椋庣矆娓氣偓楠炲鍨鹃幇浣圭稁缂傚倷鐒﹁摫闁告瑥绻橀弻鐔虹磼閵忕姵鐏堥梺娲诲幗椤ㄥ﹪寮诲☉銏犵労闁告劦浜栧Σ鍫㈢磽閸屾瑨顔夐柡鍛█瀵鎮㈢喊杈ㄦ櫖濠电姴锕ら崰姘跺汲椤撶儐娓婚柕鍫濆暙閸旂敻鏌熼崙銈嗗