Comparison of Three Molecular Methods Used for Subtyping of Legionella pneumophila Strains Isolated during an Epidemic of Legionellosis in R
http://www.100md.com
微生物临床杂志 2005年第10期
Department of Infectious Parasitic and Immunomediate Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanita, Rome, Italy
ABSTRACT
In the summer of 2003 a community-acquired outbreak of Legionella pneumophila occurred in Rome, Italy. Three molecular typing methods, pulse-field gel electrophoresis, amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis, and sequence-based typing (SBT), were used to establish the clonal correlation among the isolates of the epidemic cluster. By comparison of the methods, SBT was the most rapid and the easiest to perform and provided unambiguous results.
TEXT
Legionella naturally inhabits protozoa aquatic environments as a parasite. The increased frequency of outbreaks of Legionella pneumophila is primarily due to the contamination of artificial aquatic environments. Molecular typing with associated epidemiological investigations can help establish the link between clinical and environmental isolates and identify the source of infection (2, 17, 24). However, the efficiencies of the various typing methods vary, and not all typing methods are standardized (14, 26, 27). The need for extensive comparison among the different molecular typing methods is widely recognized (3, 7). By exploiting the need for molecular characterization of isolates from a recent epidemic of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 infection to establish the source of infection, in the present study we have compared three molecular typing methods. The outbreak occurred in the period from August to October 2003 in a neighborhood of Rome, with 15 notified cases, including one death (21). In accordance with epidemiological investigations, microbiological analyses by incubation of -buffered charcoal yeast extract (Oxoid, United Kingdom) agar plates at 37°C with 2.5% CO2 showed L. pneumophila contamination of water and air samples from the cooling tower of a shopping center in the area. Monoclonal antibody (MAb) typing, performed by indirect immunofluorescence assay with the "Dresden MAb panel" (14), revealed the common subgroup Philadelphia for the single clinical epidemic-related isolate and the nine environmental epidemic-related isolates.
As serotyping is insufficient as a means of ascertaining the actual source of contamination (3, 15), the genetic relatedness between human and environmental strains was determined both by comparison of the genomic profiles by pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis (AFLP) analysis and by comparison of the nucleotide sequences of five genes by sequence-based typing (SBT). Data from the epidemic-related isolates were also compared to data from unrelated strains.
PFGE was performed as described by Castellani Pastoris et al. (5) by using 20 U of NotI (Roche, Italy) for overnight macrorestriction at 37°C of the genomic DNA plugs. Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosomal DNA (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.) was used as a size marker. As shown in Fig. 1, PFGE produced genomic patterns that were the same for the clinical and the environmental isolates from the epidemic, but these patterns were dissimilar from those for the control strains. The NotI enzyme was chosen because of its rare restriction sites in the genome of Legionella, in which it produces only a few high-molecular-weight fragments. However, comparison of the genomic profiles showed very thick bands that could be constituted by one or more unresolved fragments. In addition, macrorestriction of only one of the epidemic-related environmental samples produced a faint additional band that was absent from the other isolates. This might constitute a confounding factor in the attribution of clonality. Although the results obtained by PFGE were overall in agreement with those obtained by MAb typing, the isolates of L. pneumophila with the same patterns might not come from the same environmental source (18). Therefore, these results, even if they are reliable (16, 22), should be used with caution (7, 25). On the other hand, PFGE is time-consuming, technically difficult, and somewhat cumbersome to perform because of the need to prepare plugs with fresh bacterial cultures, lyse the bacteria, and define the correct parameters for the electrophoretic run.
The second method used in this study was AFLP analysis, currently considered the "gold standard" for the typing of L. pneumophila (10, 11). PCR amplification was performed both by using puRe Taq Ready-to-Go PCR beads (Amersham BioSciences, United Kingdom) and by using 2.5 U of Taq polymerase from a commercial PCR kit (Applied Biosystems) with 75 ng selective primer AFLP-PstI-G (5'-GACTGCGTACATGCAGG-3'). The MBI Fermentas Ladder Mix (MBI Fermentas, United Kingdom) was used as a molecular size marker. AFLP analysis is technically easier and faster to perform than PFGE and is less expensive. In our study, it confirmed the high similarity of the DNA fingerprints of the cluster-related clinical and environmental isolates (Fig. 2), but AFLP analysis allowed a more reliable comparison than PFGE, because it showed more numerous smaller fragments. Remarkably, as shown in Fig. 2A, the environmental strain unrelated to the epidemic had a profile very similar to those of the isolates involved in the epidemic, whereas unrelated clinical and type strains had clearly different banding patterns. Figure 2B shows the results of AFLP analysis performed for comparative purposes with Taq polymerase from an Applied Biosystems commercial PCR kit. More bands were detected for the environmental isolates from the epidemic, while unrelated strains had a different genomic pattern. More relevant general profiles were different, depending on the Taq polymerase used; therefore, comparison of the genome types with those in the AFLP database (www.ewgli.org) could give incorrect results. Moreover, as in PFGE, the analysis of the AFLP banding patterns by visual or computational methods proved to be difficult because band discrimination is subjective.
SBT, proposed by Gaia et al. for L. pneumophila serogroup 1 and non-serogroup 1 (12, 13), was also used in this study. We sequenced both strands of the amplicons of five of the six genes (flaA, proA, mip, asd, and pilE) suggested to be used for sequencing with the primers described by Gaia et al. (13). The sequences were determined by using an ABI PRISM BigDye terminator DNA sequencing kit and were analyzed on a 310 ABI DNA sequencer (Applied BioSystems). The sequenced amplicons of each gene from the isolates from the epidemic showed 100% identity. These sequences were compared with those in the European Working Group for Legionella Infections (EWGLI) SBT database, and for every gene, only the sequences of the isolates from the epidemic all matched the same allelic target with the same allelic number (Table 1). The control strains matched different alleles. The results were always clear, reliable, and reproducible. Although all molecular methods demonstrated the clonal relationship of the epidemic cluster, SBT was sufficiently rapid and the easiest to perform by using the same PCR cycle and the same sequencing analysis for all genes. Although AFLP analysis and SBT have similar performance times, for each PCR, SBT requires only 50 ng genomic DNA instead of the 1.5 μg required for AFLP. This means that minipreparations of genomic DNA (1) are sufficient for performance of the SBT assay, which is relevant in typing experiments. Moreover, if we consider that molecular biology laboratories usually have a sequencer, the costs of the equipment required to perform SBT, as well as materials and labor, are similar to those required to perform AFLP analysis, but the results of SBT are unambiguous and reproducible.
SBT has been used successfully to type other bacteria for both evolutionary and epidemiological studies (9, 17, 19). Multilocus sequence typing has been developed to determine the allelic variations of multiple housekeeping genes (8, 20, 23). Recently, some studies have explored the suitability of sequencing single genes to differentiate bacterial strains (4, 6). DNA sequence typing has multiple advantages over fingerprinting-based methods: less subjectivity in interpretation of the results, transferability of the data among laboratories, the portability of the data through web-based databases, and the opportunity for use of the data to probe pathogen evolution and to track the spread of clonal groups. Therefore, the use of the SBT method for robust genotyping with high discriminatory power is warranted, and the method is proposed as the new gold standard for the typing of L. pneumophila (12, 13).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to A. Cassone and G. Orefici for encouragement, support, and useful suggestions throughout this study. We also thank Alessandra Ciervo and Ian Stansfield for critical analysis of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl (ed.). 1994. Current protocols in molecular biology. Greene Publishing Associates and Wiley Interscience, New York, N.Y.
Bartlett, J. G. 1993. Legionnaires' disease: over-treated, under-diagnosed. J. Crit. Illness 8:755-768.
Bernarder, S., K. Jacobson, H. Helbig, P. C. Luck, and M. Lundholm. 2003. A hospital-associated outbreak of Legionnaires' disease caused by Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 is characterized by stable genetic fingerprinting but variable monoclonal antibody patterns. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:2503-2508.
Cai, S., D. Y. Kabuki, A. Y. Kuaye, T. G. Cargioli, M. S. Chung, R. Nielsen, and M. Wiedmann. 2002. Rational design of DNA sequence-based strategies for subtyping Listeria monocytogenes J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:3319-3325.
Castellani Pastoris, M., L. Ciceroni, R. Lo Monaco, P. Goldoni, B. Mentore, G. Flego, L. Cattani, S. Ciarrocchi, A. Pinto, and P. Visca. 1997. Molecular epidemiology of an outbreak of Legionnaires' disease associated with a cooling tower in Genova-Sestri Ponente, Italy. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 16:883-892.
Diggle, M. A., C. M. Bell, and S. C. Clarke. 2003. Nucleotide sequence-based typing of meningococci directly from clinical samples. J. Med. Microbiol. 52:505-508.
Drenning, S., J. E. Stout, J. R. Joly, and V. L. Yu. 2001. Unexpected similarity of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns of unrelated clinical isolates of Legionella pneumophila, serogroup 1. J. Infect. Dis. 183:628-632.
Enright, M. C., N. P. Day, C. E. Davies, S. J. Peacock, and B. G. Spratt. 2000. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1008-1015.
Feil, E. J., M. C. Enright, and B. G. Spratt. 2000. Estimating the relative contributions of mutation and recombination to clonal diversification: a comparison between Neisseria meningitidis and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Res. Microbiol. 151:465-469.
Fry, N. K., J. M. Bangsborg, S. Bernarder, J. Etienne, B. Forsblom, V. Gaia, P. Hasenberger, C. Pelaz, M. Strulens, S. A. Uldum, P. Visca, and T. G. Harrison. 2000. Assessment of intercentre reproducibility and epidemiological concordance of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 genotyping by amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 19:773-780.
Fry, N. K., J. M. Bangsborg, A. Bergmans, S. Bernander, J. Etienne, L. Franzin, V. Gaia, P. Hasenberger, B. Baladron Jimenez, D. Jonas, D. Lindsay, S. Mentula, A. Papoutsi, M. Struelens, S. A. Uldum, P. Visca, W. Wannet, and T. G. Harrison. 2002. Designation of the European Working Group on Legionella Infection (EWGLI) amplified fragment length polymorphism types of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 and results of intercentre proficiency testing using a standard protocol. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 10:722-728.
Gaia, V., N. K. Fry, T. G. Harrison, and R. Peduzzi. 2003. Sequence-based typing of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 offers the potential for true portability in legionellosis outbreak investigation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:2932-2939.
Gaia, V., N. K. Fry. B. Afshar, P. C. Luck, H. Meugnier, J. Etienne, R. Peduzzi, and T. G. Harrison. 2005. Consensus sequence-based scheme for epidemiological typing of clinical and environmental isolates of Legionella pneumophila. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:2047-2052.
Haertl, R., and G. Bandlow. 1991. Subtyping of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates by small-fragment restriction endonuclease analysis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 10:630-635.
Helbig, J. H., S. Arder, M. Castellani Pastoris, J. Etienne, V. Gaia, S. Lauwers, D. Lindsay, P. C. Luck, T. Marques, S. Mentula, M. F. Peeters, C. Pelaz, M. Struelens, S. A. Uldum, G. Wewalka, and T. G. Harrison. 2002. Pan-European study on culture-proven Legionnaires' disease: distribution of Legionella pneumophila serogroups and monoclonal subgroups. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 21:710-716.
Johnson, W. M., K. Bernarder, T. J. Marrie, and S. D. Tyler. 1994. Discriminatory genomic fingerprinting of Legionella pneumophila by pulsed-field electrophoresis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:2620-2621.
Kotetishvili, M., O. C. Stine, A. Kreger, J. G. Morris, Jr., and A. Sulakvelidze. 2002. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of clinical and environmental salmonella strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1626-1635.
Lawrence, C., E. Ronco, S. Dubrou, R. Leclercq, C. Nauciel, and P. Matsiota-Bernard. 1999. Molecular typing of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates from patients and the nosocomial environment by arbitrarily primed PCR and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J. Med. Microbiol. 48:327-333.
Nicolas, P., G. Raphenon, M. Guibourdenche, L. Decousset, R. Stor, and A. B. Gaye. 2000. The 1998 Senegal epidemic of meningitis was due to the clonal expansion of A:4:P1.9, clone III-1, sequence type 5 Neisseria meningitidis strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:198-200.
Noller, A. C., M. C. McEllistrem, O. C. Stine, J. G. Morris, Jr., D. J. Boxrud, B. Dixon, and L. H. Harrison. 2003. Multilocus sequence typing reveals a lack of diversity among Escherichia coli O157:H7 isolates that are distinct by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:675-679.
Rota, M. C., G. Pontrelli, M. Scaturro, A. Bella, A. R. Bellomo, M. O. Trinito, S. Salmaso, and M. L. Ricci. Legionnaires' disease outbreak in Rome, Italy. Epidemiol. Infect., in press.
Schoonmaker, D., T. Heimberger, and G. Birkhead. 1992. Comparison of ribotyping and restriction enzyme analysis using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for distinguishing Legionella pneumophila isolates obtained during a nosocomial outbreak. J. Clin. Microbiol. 6:1491-1498.
Spratt, B. G. 1999. Multilocus sequence typing: molecular typing of bacterial pathogens in an era of rapid DNA sequencing and the internet. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2:312-316.
Stout, J. E., and V. L. Yu. 1997. Legionellosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 337:682-687.
Thouverez, M., C. Godard, R. Leprat, and D. Talon. 2003. Is pulsed-field gel electrophoresis a valuable tool to identify nosocomial cases of Legionella pneumophila disease J. Hosp. Infect. 55:254-259.
Van Belkum, A., H. Maas, H. Verbrugh, and N. Van Leeuwen. 1996. Serotyping, ribotyping, PCR-mediated ribosomal 16S-23S spacer analysis and arbitrarily primed PCR for epidemiological studies on Legionella pneumophila. Res. Microbiol. 147:405-413.
Welsh, J., and M. McClelland. 1990. Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:7213-7218.(M. Scaturro, M. Losardo, )
婵犵數濮烽弫鎼佸磿閹寸姴绶ら柦妯侯棦濞差亝鍋愰悹鍥皺椤︻厼鈹戦悩缁樻锭婵炲眰鍊濋、姘舵焼瀹ュ棛鍘卞┑鐐村灥瀹曨剟寮搁妶鍡愪簻闁冲搫鍟崢鎾煛鐏炲墽鈽夐柍钘夘樀瀹曪繝鎮欏顔介獎闂備礁鎼ˇ顐﹀疾濠婂吘娑㈠礃椤旇壈鎽曞┑鐐村灦鑿ら柡瀣叄閻擃偊宕堕妸锕€鐨戦梺绋款儐閹歌崵绮嬮幒鏂哄亾閿濆簼绨介柛鏃撶畱椤啴濡堕崱妤€娼戦梺绋款儐閹瑰洭寮诲☉銏″亹鐎规洖娲㈤埀顒佸笚娣囧﹪宕ｆ径濠傤潓闂佸疇顫夐崹鍨暦閸洖鐓橀柣鎰靛墰娴滄瑩姊虹拠鏌ヮ€楃紒鐘茬Ч瀹曟洟宕￠悙宥嗙☉閳藉濮€閻橀潧濮︽俊鐐€栫敮鎺椝囬鐐村€堕柨鏃傜摂濞堜粙鏌ｉ幇顒佲枙闁稿孩姊归〃銉╂倷閸欏鏋犲銈冨灪濡啫鐣烽妸鈺婃晣闁绘劙娼ч幖绋库攽閻樺灚鏆╅柛瀣█楠炴捇顢旈崱妤冪瓘闂佽鍨奸悘鎰洪鍕吅闂佺粯锚閸氣偓缂佹顦靛娲箰鎼达絿鐣甸梺鐟板槻椤戝鐣烽悽绋块唶婵犮埄浜濆Λ鍐极閸屾粎椹抽悗锝庝簻婵″ジ姊绘担鍛婃喐闁稿鍋ら獮鎰板箮閽樺鎽曢梺鍝勬储閸ㄥ綊鐛姀銈嗙厸闁搞儮鏅涘瓭婵犵鈧尙鐭欓柡宀嬬秮婵偓闁宠桨鑳舵禒鈺冪磽閸屾氨孝闁挎洦浜悰顔界節閸ャ劍娅㈤梺缁樓圭亸娆撴偪閳ь剚淇婇悙顏勨偓鏍箰妤ｅ啫纾婚柣鏂挎憸椤╃兘鏌熼幍顔碱暭闁抽攱鍨块弻娑㈡晜鐠囨彃绗岄梺鑽ゅ枑閸ｆ潙煤椤忓嫀褔鏌涢妷顔惧帥婵炶偐鍠栧娲礃閸欏鍎撻梺鐟板暱濮橈妇鎹㈠鑸碘拻濞达絽鎳欒ぐ鎺戝珘妞ゆ帒鍊婚惌娆撴煙閻戞﹩娈曢柛濠傜仛閵囧嫰寮崹顔规寖缂佺偓鍎抽妶鎼佸蓟閿熺姴绀冮柕濞垮劗閸嬫挾绮欓幐搴㈢槑濠电姷鏁告慨顓㈠箯閸愵喖绀嬮柛顭戝亞閺夊綊鏌ｆ惔銏╁晱闁哥姵鐗犻幃銉╂偂鎼达絾娈惧┑顔姐仜閸嬫挸鈹戦埄鍐憙妞わ附濞婇弻娑㈠箻閺夋垹浠哥紓浣虹帛缁嬫捇鍩€椤掍胶鈯曞畝锝呮健閹本绻濋崑鑺ユ閹晠宕ｆ径瀣瀾闂備浇妗ㄧ欢锟犲闯閿濆鈧線寮撮姀鈩冩珕闂佽姤锚椤︿粙鍩€椤掍胶鈽夐柍瑙勫灴閺佸秹宕熼锛勬崟濠电姭鎷冮崨顔界彧缂備緡鍠楅悷锔炬崲濠靛鐐婇柕濞у啫绠版繝鐢靛О閸ㄧ厧鈻斿☉銏℃櫇闁靛牆顦Ч鏌ユ煛閸モ晛鏋戦柛娆忕箻閺岋綁鎮㈤悡搴濆枈濠碘槅鍨崑鎾绘⒒娴ｈ姤銆冪紒鈧担铏圭煋闁圭虎鍠楅崑鈺傜節闂堟侗鍎忕紒鈧崘鈹夸簻妞ゆ挾鍠庨悘锝夋煙鐎电ǹ鍘存慨濠勭帛閹峰懐绮电€ｎ亝鐣伴梻浣告憸婵敻骞戦崶褏鏆︽繝闈涳功閻も偓濠电偞鍨兼ご鎼佸疾閿濆洨纾介柛灞剧懅閸斿秴鐣濋敐鍛仴闁糕斂鍨藉顕€宕奸悢鍝勫箺闂備胶鎳撻顓㈠磿閹寸偟鐟规繛鎴欏灪閻撴洟鏌￠崒姘变虎闁哄棴缍侀弻鈥崇暆鐎ｎ剛鐦堥悗瑙勬礃鐢帡锝炲┑瀣垫晣闁绘﹢娼ч獮鈧紓鍌氬€搁崐鐑芥倿閿曞倶鈧啴宕ㄥ銈呮喘閺屽棗顓奸崨顖氬Е婵＄偑鍊栫敮鎺楀窗濮橆兗缂氶柟閭﹀枤绾惧吋銇勯弮鍥т汗缂佺姴顭烽弻銊モ攽閸繀妲愰梺杞扮閸熸潙鐣烽幒鎴僵闁告鍋為幉銏ゆ⒒娴ｈ棄鍚瑰┑鐐╁亾缂傚倸鍊归懝楣冨煝瀹ュ鏅查柛銉㈡櫇閻撳姊洪崜鑼帥闁哥姵鎹囬崺鈧い鎺嶇缁楁帗銇勯锝囩疄妞ゃ垺锕㈤幃鈺咁敃閿濆孩缍岄梻鍌氬€风欢姘缚瑜嶇叅闁靛牆鎮垮ú顏勎╅柍杞拌兌閸旓箑顪冮妶鍡楃瑨闁稿妫濆銊╂偋閸垻顔曟繝銏ｆ硾椤戝洤煤鐎电硶鍋撶憴鍕８闁搞劏濮ゆ穱濠囧醇閺囩偟鍊為梺闈浨归崕鐑樺閺囥垺鐓熼柣鏂挎憸閻苯顭胯椤ㄥ牓寮鍢夋棃宕崘顏嗏棨濠电姰鍨奸崺鏍礉閺嶎厼纾婚柨婵嗩槹閻撴洟鏌曟径妯虹仩妞も晩鍓欓埥澶愬箻閻熸壆姣㈢紓浣介哺鐢岣胯箛娑樜╃憸蹇涙偩婵傚憡鈷戠憸鐗堝俯濡垵鈹戦悙鈺佷壕闂備浇顕栭崰妤冨垝閹捐绠板┑鐘插暙缁剁偛顭跨捄铏圭伇婵﹦鍋撶换婵嬫偨闂堟稐绮跺銈嗘处閸樹粙骞堥妸锔哄亝闁告劑鍔嶅Σ顒勬⒑閸濆嫮鈻夐柛妯恒偢瀹曞綊宕掗悙瀵稿帾婵犵數鍋熼崑鎾斥枍閸℃稒鐓曢悗锝冨妼婵″ジ妫佹径鎰叆婵犻潧妫欓崳褰掓煛閸℃瑥鏋戝ǎ鍥э躬椤㈡稑顫濋崡鐐╁徍婵犳鍠栭敃銉ヮ渻娴犲鈧線寮撮姀鈩冩珳闂佺硶鍓濋悷锕傤敇婵犳碍鈷掑ù锝堟鐢盯鏌熺喊鍗炰簽闁瑰箍鍨归埞鎴犫偓锝庡墮缁侊箓鏌ｆ惔顖滅У闁哥姵鐗滅划濠氭晲閸℃瑧鐦堟繝鐢靛Т閸婃悂顢旈锔界厵闁哄鍋勬慨鍌涙叏婵犲啯銇濇鐐村姈閹棃鏁愰崒娑辨綌闂傚倷绀侀幖顐︽偋濠婂牆绀堥柣鏃堫棑閺嗭箓鏌ｉ悢绋款棎闁割偒浜弻娑㈠即閵娿儱瀛ｅ┑鐐存綑鐎氼剟鈥旈崘顔嘉ч柛鈩冾殘閻熸劙姊虹紒妯洪嚋缂佺姵鎸搁锝夊箮缁涘鏅滈梺鍓插亞閸犳捇宕㈤柆宥嗏拺闁荤喓澧楅幆鍫㈢磼婢跺缍戦柣锝囨暬瀹曞崬鈽夊▎鎴濆笚闁荤喐绮嶇划鎾崇暦濠婂喚娼╂い鎺戭槹閸嶇敻姊洪棃娴ュ牓寮插⿰鍫濈；闁稿瞼鍋為悡銉╂煟閺傛寧鎯堢€涙繈鏌ｉ悢鍝ユ嚂缂佺姵鎹囬悰顕€寮介鐐殿啇濡炪倖鎸鹃崑鐔哥椤栨粎纾藉ù锝嗗絻娴滅偓绻濋姀锝嗙【闁愁垱娲濋妵鎰板箳閹寸媭妲梻浣呵圭换妤呭磻閹邦兘鏋旈柕鍫濐槹閳锋垹绱撴担璐細缂佺姵鐗犻弻锝夊煛婵犲倻浠╅梺浼欑悼閸忔﹢寮幘缁樺亹闁肩⒈鍓﹀Σ浼存⒒娴ｈ棄浜归柍宄扮墦瀹曟粌顫濇０婵囨櫓闂佺鎻梽鍕煕閹达附鍋ｉ柛銉岛閸嬫捇鎼归銈勭按闂傚倷绀侀幉锟犲蓟閵婏富娈介柟闂寸閻撴繈鏌熼幑鎰靛殭缂佺媴缍侀弻锝夊箛椤撶喓绋囧銈呭閹告悂鍩為幋锔藉亹閻犲泧鍐х矗闂備礁鎽滈崳銉╁垂閸洜宓侀柛鈩冪☉绾惧吋鎱ㄩ敐搴″箹缂傚秴锕獮鍐煛閸涱厾顔岄梺鍦劋缁诲倹淇婇柨瀣瘈闁汇垽娼цⅴ闂佺ǹ顑嗛幑鍥蓟閻斿皝鏋旈柛顭戝枟閻忔挾绱掓ィ鍐暫缂佺姵鐗犲濠氭偄鐞涒€充壕闁汇垻娅ラ悷鐗堟瘎闂佽崵鍠愮划搴㈡櫠濡ゅ懏鍋傞柨鐔哄Т閽冪喐绻涢幋娆忕仼缂佺姵濞婇弻锟犲磼濮樿鲸鐨戦梺鍝勵儏閹冲酣鍩為幋锔藉€烽柛娆忣槸濞咃綁姊绘担绋跨盎缂佽尙鍋撶粚杈ㄧ節閸パ咁啋濡炪倖妫佹慨銈呪枍閵忋倖鈷戦悹鎭掑妼濞呮劙鏌熼崙銈嗗ABSTRACT
In the summer of 2003 a community-acquired outbreak of Legionella pneumophila occurred in Rome, Italy. Three molecular typing methods, pulse-field gel electrophoresis, amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis, and sequence-based typing (SBT), were used to establish the clonal correlation among the isolates of the epidemic cluster. By comparison of the methods, SBT was the most rapid and the easiest to perform and provided unambiguous results.
TEXT
Legionella naturally inhabits protozoa aquatic environments as a parasite. The increased frequency of outbreaks of Legionella pneumophila is primarily due to the contamination of artificial aquatic environments. Molecular typing with associated epidemiological investigations can help establish the link between clinical and environmental isolates and identify the source of infection (2, 17, 24). However, the efficiencies of the various typing methods vary, and not all typing methods are standardized (14, 26, 27). The need for extensive comparison among the different molecular typing methods is widely recognized (3, 7). By exploiting the need for molecular characterization of isolates from a recent epidemic of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 infection to establish the source of infection, in the present study we have compared three molecular typing methods. The outbreak occurred in the period from August to October 2003 in a neighborhood of Rome, with 15 notified cases, including one death (21). In accordance with epidemiological investigations, microbiological analyses by incubation of -buffered charcoal yeast extract (Oxoid, United Kingdom) agar plates at 37°C with 2.5% CO2 showed L. pneumophila contamination of water and air samples from the cooling tower of a shopping center in the area. Monoclonal antibody (MAb) typing, performed by indirect immunofluorescence assay with the "Dresden MAb panel" (14), revealed the common subgroup Philadelphia for the single clinical epidemic-related isolate and the nine environmental epidemic-related isolates.
As serotyping is insufficient as a means of ascertaining the actual source of contamination (3, 15), the genetic relatedness between human and environmental strains was determined both by comparison of the genomic profiles by pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis (AFLP) analysis and by comparison of the nucleotide sequences of five genes by sequence-based typing (SBT). Data from the epidemic-related isolates were also compared to data from unrelated strains.
PFGE was performed as described by Castellani Pastoris et al. (5) by using 20 U of NotI (Roche, Italy) for overnight macrorestriction at 37°C of the genomic DNA plugs. Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosomal DNA (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.) was used as a size marker. As shown in Fig. 1, PFGE produced genomic patterns that were the same for the clinical and the environmental isolates from the epidemic, but these patterns were dissimilar from those for the control strains. The NotI enzyme was chosen because of its rare restriction sites in the genome of Legionella, in which it produces only a few high-molecular-weight fragments. However, comparison of the genomic profiles showed very thick bands that could be constituted by one or more unresolved fragments. In addition, macrorestriction of only one of the epidemic-related environmental samples produced a faint additional band that was absent from the other isolates. This might constitute a confounding factor in the attribution of clonality. Although the results obtained by PFGE were overall in agreement with those obtained by MAb typing, the isolates of L. pneumophila with the same patterns might not come from the same environmental source (18). Therefore, these results, even if they are reliable (16, 22), should be used with caution (7, 25). On the other hand, PFGE is time-consuming, technically difficult, and somewhat cumbersome to perform because of the need to prepare plugs with fresh bacterial cultures, lyse the bacteria, and define the correct parameters for the electrophoretic run.
The second method used in this study was AFLP analysis, currently considered the "gold standard" for the typing of L. pneumophila (10, 11). PCR amplification was performed both by using puRe Taq Ready-to-Go PCR beads (Amersham BioSciences, United Kingdom) and by using 2.5 U of Taq polymerase from a commercial PCR kit (Applied Biosystems) with 75 ng selective primer AFLP-PstI-G (5'-GACTGCGTACATGCAGG-3'). The MBI Fermentas Ladder Mix (MBI Fermentas, United Kingdom) was used as a molecular size marker. AFLP analysis is technically easier and faster to perform than PFGE and is less expensive. In our study, it confirmed the high similarity of the DNA fingerprints of the cluster-related clinical and environmental isolates (Fig. 2), but AFLP analysis allowed a more reliable comparison than PFGE, because it showed more numerous smaller fragments. Remarkably, as shown in Fig. 2A, the environmental strain unrelated to the epidemic had a profile very similar to those of the isolates involved in the epidemic, whereas unrelated clinical and type strains had clearly different banding patterns. Figure 2B shows the results of AFLP analysis performed for comparative purposes with Taq polymerase from an Applied Biosystems commercial PCR kit. More bands were detected for the environmental isolates from the epidemic, while unrelated strains had a different genomic pattern. More relevant general profiles were different, depending on the Taq polymerase used; therefore, comparison of the genome types with those in the AFLP database (www.ewgli.org) could give incorrect results. Moreover, as in PFGE, the analysis of the AFLP banding patterns by visual or computational methods proved to be difficult because band discrimination is subjective.
SBT, proposed by Gaia et al. for L. pneumophila serogroup 1 and non-serogroup 1 (12, 13), was also used in this study. We sequenced both strands of the amplicons of five of the six genes (flaA, proA, mip, asd, and pilE) suggested to be used for sequencing with the primers described by Gaia et al. (13). The sequences were determined by using an ABI PRISM BigDye terminator DNA sequencing kit and were analyzed on a 310 ABI DNA sequencer (Applied BioSystems). The sequenced amplicons of each gene from the isolates from the epidemic showed 100% identity. These sequences were compared with those in the European Working Group for Legionella Infections (EWGLI) SBT database, and for every gene, only the sequences of the isolates from the epidemic all matched the same allelic target with the same allelic number (Table 1). The control strains matched different alleles. The results were always clear, reliable, and reproducible. Although all molecular methods demonstrated the clonal relationship of the epidemic cluster, SBT was sufficiently rapid and the easiest to perform by using the same PCR cycle and the same sequencing analysis for all genes. Although AFLP analysis and SBT have similar performance times, for each PCR, SBT requires only 50 ng genomic DNA instead of the 1.5 μg required for AFLP. This means that minipreparations of genomic DNA (1) are sufficient for performance of the SBT assay, which is relevant in typing experiments. Moreover, if we consider that molecular biology laboratories usually have a sequencer, the costs of the equipment required to perform SBT, as well as materials and labor, are similar to those required to perform AFLP analysis, but the results of SBT are unambiguous and reproducible.
SBT has been used successfully to type other bacteria for both evolutionary and epidemiological studies (9, 17, 19). Multilocus sequence typing has been developed to determine the allelic variations of multiple housekeeping genes (8, 20, 23). Recently, some studies have explored the suitability of sequencing single genes to differentiate bacterial strains (4, 6). DNA sequence typing has multiple advantages over fingerprinting-based methods: less subjectivity in interpretation of the results, transferability of the data among laboratories, the portability of the data through web-based databases, and the opportunity for use of the data to probe pathogen evolution and to track the spread of clonal groups. Therefore, the use of the SBT method for robust genotyping with high discriminatory power is warranted, and the method is proposed as the new gold standard for the typing of L. pneumophila (12, 13).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to A. Cassone and G. Orefici for encouragement, support, and useful suggestions throughout this study. We also thank Alessandra Ciervo and Ian Stansfield for critical analysis of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl (ed.). 1994. Current protocols in molecular biology. Greene Publishing Associates and Wiley Interscience, New York, N.Y.
Bartlett, J. G. 1993. Legionnaires' disease: over-treated, under-diagnosed. J. Crit. Illness 8:755-768.
Bernarder, S., K. Jacobson, H. Helbig, P. C. Luck, and M. Lundholm. 2003. A hospital-associated outbreak of Legionnaires' disease caused by Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 is characterized by stable genetic fingerprinting but variable monoclonal antibody patterns. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:2503-2508.
Cai, S., D. Y. Kabuki, A. Y. Kuaye, T. G. Cargioli, M. S. Chung, R. Nielsen, and M. Wiedmann. 2002. Rational design of DNA sequence-based strategies for subtyping Listeria monocytogenes J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:3319-3325.
Castellani Pastoris, M., L. Ciceroni, R. Lo Monaco, P. Goldoni, B. Mentore, G. Flego, L. Cattani, S. Ciarrocchi, A. Pinto, and P. Visca. 1997. Molecular epidemiology of an outbreak of Legionnaires' disease associated with a cooling tower in Genova-Sestri Ponente, Italy. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 16:883-892.
Diggle, M. A., C. M. Bell, and S. C. Clarke. 2003. Nucleotide sequence-based typing of meningococci directly from clinical samples. J. Med. Microbiol. 52:505-508.
Drenning, S., J. E. Stout, J. R. Joly, and V. L. Yu. 2001. Unexpected similarity of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns of unrelated clinical isolates of Legionella pneumophila, serogroup 1. J. Infect. Dis. 183:628-632.
Enright, M. C., N. P. Day, C. E. Davies, S. J. Peacock, and B. G. Spratt. 2000. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1008-1015.
Feil, E. J., M. C. Enright, and B. G. Spratt. 2000. Estimating the relative contributions of mutation and recombination to clonal diversification: a comparison between Neisseria meningitidis and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Res. Microbiol. 151:465-469.
Fry, N. K., J. M. Bangsborg, S. Bernarder, J. Etienne, B. Forsblom, V. Gaia, P. Hasenberger, C. Pelaz, M. Strulens, S. A. Uldum, P. Visca, and T. G. Harrison. 2000. Assessment of intercentre reproducibility and epidemiological concordance of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 genotyping by amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 19:773-780.
Fry, N. K., J. M. Bangsborg, A. Bergmans, S. Bernander, J. Etienne, L. Franzin, V. Gaia, P. Hasenberger, B. Baladron Jimenez, D. Jonas, D. Lindsay, S. Mentula, A. Papoutsi, M. Struelens, S. A. Uldum, P. Visca, W. Wannet, and T. G. Harrison. 2002. Designation of the European Working Group on Legionella Infection (EWGLI) amplified fragment length polymorphism types of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 and results of intercentre proficiency testing using a standard protocol. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 10:722-728.
Gaia, V., N. K. Fry, T. G. Harrison, and R. Peduzzi. 2003. Sequence-based typing of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 offers the potential for true portability in legionellosis outbreak investigation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:2932-2939.
Gaia, V., N. K. Fry. B. Afshar, P. C. Luck, H. Meugnier, J. Etienne, R. Peduzzi, and T. G. Harrison. 2005. Consensus sequence-based scheme for epidemiological typing of clinical and environmental isolates of Legionella pneumophila. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:2047-2052.
Haertl, R., and G. Bandlow. 1991. Subtyping of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates by small-fragment restriction endonuclease analysis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 10:630-635.
Helbig, J. H., S. Arder, M. Castellani Pastoris, J. Etienne, V. Gaia, S. Lauwers, D. Lindsay, P. C. Luck, T. Marques, S. Mentula, M. F. Peeters, C. Pelaz, M. Struelens, S. A. Uldum, G. Wewalka, and T. G. Harrison. 2002. Pan-European study on culture-proven Legionnaires' disease: distribution of Legionella pneumophila serogroups and monoclonal subgroups. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 21:710-716.
Johnson, W. M., K. Bernarder, T. J. Marrie, and S. D. Tyler. 1994. Discriminatory genomic fingerprinting of Legionella pneumophila by pulsed-field electrophoresis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:2620-2621.
Kotetishvili, M., O. C. Stine, A. Kreger, J. G. Morris, Jr., and A. Sulakvelidze. 2002. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of clinical and environmental salmonella strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1626-1635.
Lawrence, C., E. Ronco, S. Dubrou, R. Leclercq, C. Nauciel, and P. Matsiota-Bernard. 1999. Molecular typing of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates from patients and the nosocomial environment by arbitrarily primed PCR and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J. Med. Microbiol. 48:327-333.
Nicolas, P., G. Raphenon, M. Guibourdenche, L. Decousset, R. Stor, and A. B. Gaye. 2000. The 1998 Senegal epidemic of meningitis was due to the clonal expansion of A:4:P1.9, clone III-1, sequence type 5 Neisseria meningitidis strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:198-200.
Noller, A. C., M. C. McEllistrem, O. C. Stine, J. G. Morris, Jr., D. J. Boxrud, B. Dixon, and L. H. Harrison. 2003. Multilocus sequence typing reveals a lack of diversity among Escherichia coli O157:H7 isolates that are distinct by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:675-679.
Rota, M. C., G. Pontrelli, M. Scaturro, A. Bella, A. R. Bellomo, M. O. Trinito, S. Salmaso, and M. L. Ricci. Legionnaires' disease outbreak in Rome, Italy. Epidemiol. Infect., in press.
Schoonmaker, D., T. Heimberger, and G. Birkhead. 1992. Comparison of ribotyping and restriction enzyme analysis using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for distinguishing Legionella pneumophila isolates obtained during a nosocomial outbreak. J. Clin. Microbiol. 6:1491-1498.
Spratt, B. G. 1999. Multilocus sequence typing: molecular typing of bacterial pathogens in an era of rapid DNA sequencing and the internet. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2:312-316.
Stout, J. E., and V. L. Yu. 1997. Legionellosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 337:682-687.
Thouverez, M., C. Godard, R. Leprat, and D. Talon. 2003. Is pulsed-field gel electrophoresis a valuable tool to identify nosocomial cases of Legionella pneumophila disease J. Hosp. Infect. 55:254-259.
Van Belkum, A., H. Maas, H. Verbrugh, and N. Van Leeuwen. 1996. Serotyping, ribotyping, PCR-mediated ribosomal 16S-23S spacer analysis and arbitrarily primed PCR for epidemiological studies on Legionella pneumophila. Res. Microbiol. 147:405-413.
Welsh, J., and M. McClelland. 1990. Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:7213-7218.(M. Scaturro, M. Losardo, )