Inhibition of Proteolytic Activity of a Chlamydial Proteasome/Protease-Like Activity Factor by Antibodies from Humans Infected with Chlamydi
http://www.100md.com
感染与免疫杂志 2005年第7期
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr., San Antonio, Texas 78229
ABSTRACT
We have previously shown that individuals infected with Chlamydia trachomatis can develop a robust antibody response to a chlamydia-secreted protein (designated chlamydial proteasome/protease-like activity factor [CPAF]). We now report that sera collected from these infected individuals neutralized the proteolytic activity of CPAF. Depletion of the serum sample with CPAF proteins to remove the CPAF-specific antibodies effectively blocked the neutralization, whereas similar depletion with the HSP60 proteins failed to do so. We further demonstrated that the CPAF central region covering residues 200 to 338 was predominantly recognized by the human neutralization antibodies. The significance of the CPAF neutralization antibodies generated in chlamydia-infected individuals is discussed.
TEXT
Urogenital tract infection with Chlamydia trachomatis is a leading cause of sexually transmitted bacterial diseases in the United States. However, the pathogenic mechanisms remain unclear, and there are no effective vaccines for preventing C. trachomatis infections and/or the associated infection-induced diseases. It is thought that the chlamydia-induced diseases are largely due to host inflammatory responses provoked by chlamydial interactions with host cells (8, 10). Chlamydia has evolved various strategies for protecting the infected cells from the host defense system (2, 5-7, 13-15). A chlamydia-secreted protein designated chlamydial proteasome/protease-like activity factor (CPAF) was identified in the cytosol of the chlamydia-infected cells (13). CPAF was both necessary and sufficient for degrading host transcriptional factors, including RFX5 required for major histocompatibility complex gene activation (13), which may provide a molecular explanation for chlamydial evasion of host immune recognition. Interestingly, humans infected with C. trachomatis can develop a robust antibody response to CPAF (9). However, the significance of the human anti-CPAF antibodies in chlamydial pathogenesis and host immunity against chlamydial infection is unknown. The focus of the current study is to evaluate whether the human anti-CPAF antibodies can neutralize the CPAF proteolytic activity since it is the CPAF proteolytic activity that may aid in chlamydial evasion of host immune recognition.
A cell-free degradation assay that has been previously established for measuring CPAF activity (3, 4, 13) was used to assess the ability of the human sera to block CPAF degradation of RFX5 (Fig. 1). A nuclear extract (containing RFX5 [15]) from normal HeLa cells was used as the substrate, and a cytosolic fraction (L2S100; containing functional CPAF [13]) made from C. trachomatis L2-infected HeLa cells was used as the enzyme source. After the substrate and enzyme mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 1 h, the residual RFX5 was detected with a rabbit anti-RFX5 antibody on a Western blot as described previously (15). L2S100 degraded RFX5, and the degradation was inhibited by lactacystin, a proteasome inhibitor known to be able to inhibit CPAF, but not by the solvent dimethyl sulfoxide alone (lanes 1 to 4), indicating that the assay was suitable for measuring CPAF-specific proteolytic activity as previously demonstrated (3, 13, 15). Sera collected from individuals diagnosed with C. trachomatis urogenital infection were found to contain high titers of antibodies to CPAF (9). Five such anti-CPAF positive sera were pooled together, and the pooled sera were tested for their ability to neutralize CPAF proteolytic activity by using the cell-free degradation assay. Three anti-CPAF negative sera collected from individuals with or without C. trachomatis urogenital infection were also pooled as the controls. When the L2S100 was incubated with the pooled anti-CPAF positive human sera prior to reacting with the substrate, the RFX5 degradation was inhibited (Fig. 1, lanes 5 and 6). Further dilution of the anti-CPAF positive sera removed the inhibitory effect (lane 7). As controls, the mouse monoclonal antibodies 100a and 54b did not show any significant inhibitory effects on the RFX5 degradation (lanes 12 and 13), a finding which is consistent with previous observations that neither 100a nor 54b neutralized CPAF activity, although these monoclonal antibodies bind to CPAF well (3, 13). A more relevant control is that the pooled anti-CPAF negative human sera failed to affect the RFX5 degradation activity of L2S100 (lanes 8 and 9) regardless of dilution. These observations have demonstrated that sera from individuals infected with C. trachomatis can neutralize the ability of CPAF to degrade RFX5.
To further evaluate whether the CPAF-specific antibodies in the human sera are indeed responsible for the neutralization activity, we used glutathione S-transferase (GST)-CPAF fusion proteins immobilized onto glutathione-conjugated beads to remove the CPAF-specific antibodies from the serum samples and evaluated the neutralization ability of the remaining serum samples in the cell-free degradation assay. The same anti-CPAF positive and negative human sera tested in Fig. 1 were used in the depletion-preabsorption experiment. As shown in Fig. 2, the cell-free assay worked well in measuring CPAF activity (lanes 1 to 4). Although the pooled anti-CPAF positive sera effectively neutralized the RFX5 degradation activity (lane 5), the residual serum sample after depletion with the GST-CPAF fusion proteins completely lost the neutralization ability (lane 6). As a depletion antigen control, GST-HSP60 fusion protein was used to deplete the same pooled anti-CPAF positive sera. The depletion with GST-HSP60 fusion proteins failed to remove the serum neutralization ability (lane 7). Consistent with what was shown in Fig. 1, the pooled anti-CPAF negative sera did not affect the RFX5 degradation by CPAF (lane 8). These observations have confirmed that the CPAF-specific antibodies in the CPAF-positive human sera are required for the neutralization of CPAF degradation activity.
We further mapped the immunoreactivity of the anti-CPAF positive human sera with 14 CPAF fragments in the form of GST fusion proteins (4) both in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Fig. 3A) and by Western blot assay (Fig. 3B) as described previously (9, 12). Both the ELISA and Western blot assays consistently showed that a strong antibody reactivity was detected with the CPAF fragments 1-283, 1-488, 1-525, 9-609, 60-609, 136-609, 186-609, 242-609, and 284-609, in addition to the full-length 1-609. In contrast, the fragments 1-100, 1-200, 488-609, 387-609, and 338-609 were only minimally recognized by the human sera. These results suggest that the immunodominant region of CPAF is located between residues 200 and 338.
Finally, we used these CPAF fragments to further determine the CPAF regions targeted by the human neutralization antibodies in a depletion-preabsorption experiment as described in Fig. 2. Shown in Fig. 4A are the human antibody neutralization patterns with or without preabsorption with CPAF fragments. Again, the human antibodies neutralized CPAF degradation activity (lane 5), and the antibody neutralization was removed by preabsorption with the full-length GST-CPAF (lane 6) but not the control GST-HSP60 proteins (lane 7). These results validated the current preabsorption experiment. More importantly, preabsorption with the CPAF fragments that displayed a strong reactivity with human sera, including CPAF fragments 1-283, 1-488, 1-525, 9-609, 60-609, 136-609, 186-609, 242-609, and 284-609 (see Fig. 3), significantly removed the neutralization ability of the human antibodies. However, the preabsorption with the minimally reactive CPAF fragments, including CPAF fragments 1-100, 1-200, 488-609, 387-609, and 338-609 (see Fig. 3), failed to block the human antibody neutralization. It is clear that the immunoreactive CPAF regions are also predominantly targeted by the human neutralization antibodies (Fig. 4B).
Although we have comprehensively analyzed the human serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody neutralization of CPAF degradation activity, the significance of the human CPAF neutralization antibodies in chlamydial pathogenesis and immunity is still unclear. Since CPAF is believed to play an important role in chlamydial evasion of host defense through its proteolytic activity, the human antibody neutralization of CPAF proteolytic activity may be beneficial to host defense against chlamydial infection. However, CPAF is confined within the infected host cells when it degrades host transcription factors. Since serum IgG antibodies cannot get inside host cells, it is hard to imagine how the CPAF-specific antibodies in the human sera contribute to the inhibition of the intracellular CPAF activity. In addition, CPAF is not in the infectious form of chlamydial organisms (13). It is unlikely that the CPAF neutralization antibodies can directly affect the chlamydial organism infectivity. Furthermore, various previous studies have demonstrated a lack of correlation of the IgG neutralizing antibodies against other chlamydia-encoded proteins, such as MOMP, with protection against chlamydial challenge infection (11).
Nevertheless, the fact that the human serum antibodies can neutralize CPAF proteolytic activity suggests that humans have the ability to make antibodies with the correct fine specificities for neutralizing CPAF function. The next step is to test whether the CPAF-specific secretary IgA antibodies from the urogenital tract of individuals infected with C. trachomatis can also neutralize the CPAF proteolytic activity. Since secretory IgA (sIgA) can access to intracellular environment, we hypothesize that the CPAF-specific neutralization sIgA antibodies may play a role in host defense against chlamydial infection by neutralizing CPAF function intracellularly. With the inhibition of CPAF function, the infected cells may be able to restore their ability to express major histocompatibility complex antigens and to present chlamydial peptides to T cells. This hypothesis is consistent with the observation that the level of chlamydia-specific sIgA antibodies in human urogenital tracts was inversely correlated with the number of chlamydial organisms recovered from the urogenital tracts (1).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was supported in part by grants (to G.Z.) from the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
REFERENCES
1. Brunham, R. C., C. C. Kuo, L. Cles, and K. K. Holmes. 1983. Correlation of host immune response with quantitative recovery of Chlamydia trachomatis from the human endocervix. Infect. Immun. 39:1491-1494.
2. Dean, D., and V. C. Powers. 2001. Persistent Chlamydia trachomatis infections resist apoptotic stimuli. Infect. Immun. 69:2442-2447.
3. Dong, F., M. Pirbhai, Y. Zhong, and G. Zhong. 2004. Cleavage-dependent activation of a chlamydia-secreted protease. Mol. Microbiol. 52:1487-1494.
4. Dong, F., J. Sharma, Y. Xiao, Y. Zhong, and G. Zhong. 2004. Intramolecular dimerization is required for the chlamydia-secreted CPAF to degrade host transcriptional factors. Infect. Immun. 72:3869-3875.
5. Fan, T., H. Lu, H. Hu, L. Shi, G. A. McClarty, D. M. Nance, A. H. Greenberg, and G. Zhong. 1998. Inhibition of apoptosis in chlamydia-infected cells: blockade of mitochondrial cytochrome c release and caspase activation. J. Exp. Med. 187:487-496.
6. Greene, W., Y. Xiao, Y. Huang, G. McClarty, and G. Zhong. 2004. Chlamydia-infected cells continue to undergo mitosis and resist induction of apoptosis. Infect. Immun. 72:451-460.
7. Greene, W., and G. Zhong. 2003. Inhibition of host cell cytokinesis by Chlamydia trachomatis infection. J. Infect. 47:45-51.
8. Rasmussen, S. J., L. Eckmann, A. J. Quayle, L. Shen, Y. X. Zhang, D. J. Anderson, J. Fierer, R. S. Stephens, and M. F. Kagnoff. 1997. Secretion of proinflammatory cytokines by epithelial cells in response to Chlamydia infection suggests a central role for epithelial cells in chlamydial pathogenesis J. Clin. Investig. 99:77-87.
9. Sharma, J., A. M. Bosnic, J. M. Piper, and G. Zhong. 2004. Human antibody responses to a Chlamydia-secreted protease factor. Infect. Immun. 72:7164-7171.
10. Stephens, R. S. 2003. The cellular paradigm of chlamydial pathogenesis. Trends Microbiol. 11:44-51.
11. Su, H., M. Parnell, and H. D. Caldwell. 1995. Protective efficacy of a parenterally administered MOMP-derived synthetic oligopeptide vaccine in a murine model of Chlamydia trachomatis genital tract infection: serum neutralizing IgG antibodies do not protect against chlamydial genital tract infection. Vaccine 13:1023-1032.
12. Xiao, Y., Y. Zhong, H. Su, Z. Zhou, P. Chiao, and G. Zhong. 2005. NF-B activation is not required for Chlamydia trachomatis inhibition of host epithelial cell apoptosis. J. Immunol. 174:1701-1708.
13. Zhong, G., P. Fan, H. Ji, F. Dong, and Y. Huang. 2001. Identification of a chlamydial protease-like activity factor responsible for the degradation of host transcription factors. J. Exp. Med. 193:935-942.
14. Zhong, G., T. Fan, and L. Liu. 1999. Chlamydia inhibits interferon gamma-inducible major histocompatibility complex class II expression by degradation of upstream stimulatory factor 1. J. Exp. Med. 189:1931-1938.
15. Zhong, G., L. Liu, T. Fan, P. Fan, and H. Ji. 2000. Degradation of transcription factor RFX5 during the inhibition of both constitutive and interferon gamma-inducible major histocompatibility complex class I expression in chlamydia-infected cells. J. Exp. Med. 191:1525-1534.(Jyotika Sharma, Feng Dong)
ABSTRACT
We have previously shown that individuals infected with Chlamydia trachomatis can develop a robust antibody response to a chlamydia-secreted protein (designated chlamydial proteasome/protease-like activity factor [CPAF]). We now report that sera collected from these infected individuals neutralized the proteolytic activity of CPAF. Depletion of the serum sample with CPAF proteins to remove the CPAF-specific antibodies effectively blocked the neutralization, whereas similar depletion with the HSP60 proteins failed to do so. We further demonstrated that the CPAF central region covering residues 200 to 338 was predominantly recognized by the human neutralization antibodies. The significance of the CPAF neutralization antibodies generated in chlamydia-infected individuals is discussed.
TEXT
Urogenital tract infection with Chlamydia trachomatis is a leading cause of sexually transmitted bacterial diseases in the United States. However, the pathogenic mechanisms remain unclear, and there are no effective vaccines for preventing C. trachomatis infections and/or the associated infection-induced diseases. It is thought that the chlamydia-induced diseases are largely due to host inflammatory responses provoked by chlamydial interactions with host cells (8, 10). Chlamydia has evolved various strategies for protecting the infected cells from the host defense system (2, 5-7, 13-15). A chlamydia-secreted protein designated chlamydial proteasome/protease-like activity factor (CPAF) was identified in the cytosol of the chlamydia-infected cells (13). CPAF was both necessary and sufficient for degrading host transcriptional factors, including RFX5 required for major histocompatibility complex gene activation (13), which may provide a molecular explanation for chlamydial evasion of host immune recognition. Interestingly, humans infected with C. trachomatis can develop a robust antibody response to CPAF (9). However, the significance of the human anti-CPAF antibodies in chlamydial pathogenesis and host immunity against chlamydial infection is unknown. The focus of the current study is to evaluate whether the human anti-CPAF antibodies can neutralize the CPAF proteolytic activity since it is the CPAF proteolytic activity that may aid in chlamydial evasion of host immune recognition.
A cell-free degradation assay that has been previously established for measuring CPAF activity (3, 4, 13) was used to assess the ability of the human sera to block CPAF degradation of RFX5 (Fig. 1). A nuclear extract (containing RFX5 [15]) from normal HeLa cells was used as the substrate, and a cytosolic fraction (L2S100; containing functional CPAF [13]) made from C. trachomatis L2-infected HeLa cells was used as the enzyme source. After the substrate and enzyme mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 1 h, the residual RFX5 was detected with a rabbit anti-RFX5 antibody on a Western blot as described previously (15). L2S100 degraded RFX5, and the degradation was inhibited by lactacystin, a proteasome inhibitor known to be able to inhibit CPAF, but not by the solvent dimethyl sulfoxide alone (lanes 1 to 4), indicating that the assay was suitable for measuring CPAF-specific proteolytic activity as previously demonstrated (3, 13, 15). Sera collected from individuals diagnosed with C. trachomatis urogenital infection were found to contain high titers of antibodies to CPAF (9). Five such anti-CPAF positive sera were pooled together, and the pooled sera were tested for their ability to neutralize CPAF proteolytic activity by using the cell-free degradation assay. Three anti-CPAF negative sera collected from individuals with or without C. trachomatis urogenital infection were also pooled as the controls. When the L2S100 was incubated with the pooled anti-CPAF positive human sera prior to reacting with the substrate, the RFX5 degradation was inhibited (Fig. 1, lanes 5 and 6). Further dilution of the anti-CPAF positive sera removed the inhibitory effect (lane 7). As controls, the mouse monoclonal antibodies 100a and 54b did not show any significant inhibitory effects on the RFX5 degradation (lanes 12 and 13), a finding which is consistent with previous observations that neither 100a nor 54b neutralized CPAF activity, although these monoclonal antibodies bind to CPAF well (3, 13). A more relevant control is that the pooled anti-CPAF negative human sera failed to affect the RFX5 degradation activity of L2S100 (lanes 8 and 9) regardless of dilution. These observations have demonstrated that sera from individuals infected with C. trachomatis can neutralize the ability of CPAF to degrade RFX5.
To further evaluate whether the CPAF-specific antibodies in the human sera are indeed responsible for the neutralization activity, we used glutathione S-transferase (GST)-CPAF fusion proteins immobilized onto glutathione-conjugated beads to remove the CPAF-specific antibodies from the serum samples and evaluated the neutralization ability of the remaining serum samples in the cell-free degradation assay. The same anti-CPAF positive and negative human sera tested in Fig. 1 were used in the depletion-preabsorption experiment. As shown in Fig. 2, the cell-free assay worked well in measuring CPAF activity (lanes 1 to 4). Although the pooled anti-CPAF positive sera effectively neutralized the RFX5 degradation activity (lane 5), the residual serum sample after depletion with the GST-CPAF fusion proteins completely lost the neutralization ability (lane 6). As a depletion antigen control, GST-HSP60 fusion protein was used to deplete the same pooled anti-CPAF positive sera. The depletion with GST-HSP60 fusion proteins failed to remove the serum neutralization ability (lane 7). Consistent with what was shown in Fig. 1, the pooled anti-CPAF negative sera did not affect the RFX5 degradation by CPAF (lane 8). These observations have confirmed that the CPAF-specific antibodies in the CPAF-positive human sera are required for the neutralization of CPAF degradation activity.
We further mapped the immunoreactivity of the anti-CPAF positive human sera with 14 CPAF fragments in the form of GST fusion proteins (4) both in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Fig. 3A) and by Western blot assay (Fig. 3B) as described previously (9, 12). Both the ELISA and Western blot assays consistently showed that a strong antibody reactivity was detected with the CPAF fragments 1-283, 1-488, 1-525, 9-609, 60-609, 136-609, 186-609, 242-609, and 284-609, in addition to the full-length 1-609. In contrast, the fragments 1-100, 1-200, 488-609, 387-609, and 338-609 were only minimally recognized by the human sera. These results suggest that the immunodominant region of CPAF is located between residues 200 and 338.
Finally, we used these CPAF fragments to further determine the CPAF regions targeted by the human neutralization antibodies in a depletion-preabsorption experiment as described in Fig. 2. Shown in Fig. 4A are the human antibody neutralization patterns with or without preabsorption with CPAF fragments. Again, the human antibodies neutralized CPAF degradation activity (lane 5), and the antibody neutralization was removed by preabsorption with the full-length GST-CPAF (lane 6) but not the control GST-HSP60 proteins (lane 7). These results validated the current preabsorption experiment. More importantly, preabsorption with the CPAF fragments that displayed a strong reactivity with human sera, including CPAF fragments 1-283, 1-488, 1-525, 9-609, 60-609, 136-609, 186-609, 242-609, and 284-609 (see Fig. 3), significantly removed the neutralization ability of the human antibodies. However, the preabsorption with the minimally reactive CPAF fragments, including CPAF fragments 1-100, 1-200, 488-609, 387-609, and 338-609 (see Fig. 3), failed to block the human antibody neutralization. It is clear that the immunoreactive CPAF regions are also predominantly targeted by the human neutralization antibodies (Fig. 4B).
Although we have comprehensively analyzed the human serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody neutralization of CPAF degradation activity, the significance of the human CPAF neutralization antibodies in chlamydial pathogenesis and immunity is still unclear. Since CPAF is believed to play an important role in chlamydial evasion of host defense through its proteolytic activity, the human antibody neutralization of CPAF proteolytic activity may be beneficial to host defense against chlamydial infection. However, CPAF is confined within the infected host cells when it degrades host transcription factors. Since serum IgG antibodies cannot get inside host cells, it is hard to imagine how the CPAF-specific antibodies in the human sera contribute to the inhibition of the intracellular CPAF activity. In addition, CPAF is not in the infectious form of chlamydial organisms (13). It is unlikely that the CPAF neutralization antibodies can directly affect the chlamydial organism infectivity. Furthermore, various previous studies have demonstrated a lack of correlation of the IgG neutralizing antibodies against other chlamydia-encoded proteins, such as MOMP, with protection against chlamydial challenge infection (11).
Nevertheless, the fact that the human serum antibodies can neutralize CPAF proteolytic activity suggests that humans have the ability to make antibodies with the correct fine specificities for neutralizing CPAF function. The next step is to test whether the CPAF-specific secretary IgA antibodies from the urogenital tract of individuals infected with C. trachomatis can also neutralize the CPAF proteolytic activity. Since secretory IgA (sIgA) can access to intracellular environment, we hypothesize that the CPAF-specific neutralization sIgA antibodies may play a role in host defense against chlamydial infection by neutralizing CPAF function intracellularly. With the inhibition of CPAF function, the infected cells may be able to restore their ability to express major histocompatibility complex antigens and to present chlamydial peptides to T cells. This hypothesis is consistent with the observation that the level of chlamydia-specific sIgA antibodies in human urogenital tracts was inversely correlated with the number of chlamydial organisms recovered from the urogenital tracts (1).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was supported in part by grants (to G.Z.) from the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
REFERENCES
1. Brunham, R. C., C. C. Kuo, L. Cles, and K. K. Holmes. 1983. Correlation of host immune response with quantitative recovery of Chlamydia trachomatis from the human endocervix. Infect. Immun. 39:1491-1494.
2. Dean, D., and V. C. Powers. 2001. Persistent Chlamydia trachomatis infections resist apoptotic stimuli. Infect. Immun. 69:2442-2447.
3. Dong, F., M. Pirbhai, Y. Zhong, and G. Zhong. 2004. Cleavage-dependent activation of a chlamydia-secreted protease. Mol. Microbiol. 52:1487-1494.
4. Dong, F., J. Sharma, Y. Xiao, Y. Zhong, and G. Zhong. 2004. Intramolecular dimerization is required for the chlamydia-secreted CPAF to degrade host transcriptional factors. Infect. Immun. 72:3869-3875.
5. Fan, T., H. Lu, H. Hu, L. Shi, G. A. McClarty, D. M. Nance, A. H. Greenberg, and G. Zhong. 1998. Inhibition of apoptosis in chlamydia-infected cells: blockade of mitochondrial cytochrome c release and caspase activation. J. Exp. Med. 187:487-496.
6. Greene, W., Y. Xiao, Y. Huang, G. McClarty, and G. Zhong. 2004. Chlamydia-infected cells continue to undergo mitosis and resist induction of apoptosis. Infect. Immun. 72:451-460.
7. Greene, W., and G. Zhong. 2003. Inhibition of host cell cytokinesis by Chlamydia trachomatis infection. J. Infect. 47:45-51.
8. Rasmussen, S. J., L. Eckmann, A. J. Quayle, L. Shen, Y. X. Zhang, D. J. Anderson, J. Fierer, R. S. Stephens, and M. F. Kagnoff. 1997. Secretion of proinflammatory cytokines by epithelial cells in response to Chlamydia infection suggests a central role for epithelial cells in chlamydial pathogenesis J. Clin. Investig. 99:77-87.
9. Sharma, J., A. M. Bosnic, J. M. Piper, and G. Zhong. 2004. Human antibody responses to a Chlamydia-secreted protease factor. Infect. Immun. 72:7164-7171.
10. Stephens, R. S. 2003. The cellular paradigm of chlamydial pathogenesis. Trends Microbiol. 11:44-51.
11. Su, H., M. Parnell, and H. D. Caldwell. 1995. Protective efficacy of a parenterally administered MOMP-derived synthetic oligopeptide vaccine in a murine model of Chlamydia trachomatis genital tract infection: serum neutralizing IgG antibodies do not protect against chlamydial genital tract infection. Vaccine 13:1023-1032.
12. Xiao, Y., Y. Zhong, H. Su, Z. Zhou, P. Chiao, and G. Zhong. 2005. NF-B activation is not required for Chlamydia trachomatis inhibition of host epithelial cell apoptosis. J. Immunol. 174:1701-1708.
13. Zhong, G., P. Fan, H. Ji, F. Dong, and Y. Huang. 2001. Identification of a chlamydial protease-like activity factor responsible for the degradation of host transcription factors. J. Exp. Med. 193:935-942.
14. Zhong, G., T. Fan, and L. Liu. 1999. Chlamydia inhibits interferon gamma-inducible major histocompatibility complex class II expression by degradation of upstream stimulatory factor 1. J. Exp. Med. 189:1931-1938.
15. Zhong, G., L. Liu, T. Fan, P. Fan, and H. Ji. 2000. Degradation of transcription factor RFX5 during the inhibition of both constitutive and interferon gamma-inducible major histocompatibility complex class I expression in chlamydia-infected cells. J. Exp. Med. 191:1525-1534.(Jyotika Sharma, Feng Dong)