婵犵妲呴崑鎾跺緤妤e啯鍋嬮柣妯款嚙杩濋梺璺ㄥ櫐閹凤拷
闂傚倷绀侀幖顐︽偋韫囨稑绐楅幖娣妼閸ㄥ倿鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘: 闂佽娴烽弫濠氬磻婵犲洤绐楅柡鍥╁枔閳瑰秴鈹戦悩鍙夋悙婵☆偅锕㈤弻娑㈠Ψ閵忊剝鐝栭悷婊冨簻閹凤拷 闂傚倷绶氬ḿ鑽ゆ嫻閻旂厧绀夐幖娣妼閸氬綊骞栧ǎ顒€鐏柍缁樻礋閺屻劑寮崹顔规寖濠电偟銆嬮幏锟� 闂備浇宕垫慨宥夊礃椤垳鐥梻浣告惈椤戝倿宕滃┑鍫㈢煓濠㈣泛澶囬崑鎾绘晲鎼粹€崇缂備椒绶ら幏锟� 闂傚倷鑳舵灙妞ゆ垵鍟村畷鏇㈡焼瀹ュ懐鐣洪悗骞垮劚椤︻垳鐥閺屾稓浠﹂悙顒傛缂備胶濯撮幏锟� 闂傚倷鑳堕、濠勭礄娴兼潙纾块梺顒€绉撮崹鍌炴煛閸愩劎澧涢柣鎺曨嚙椤法鎹勯搹鍦紘濠碉紕鍎戦幏锟� 闂傚倷鑳剁涵鍫曞疾閻愭祴鏋嶉柨婵嗩槶閳ь兛绶氬畷銊╁级閹寸媭妲洪梺鑽ゅТ濞层倕螣婵犲洤绀夐柨鐕傛嫹 婵犵數鍋為崹鍫曞箰鐠囧唽缂氭繛鍡樺灱婵娊鏌曟径鍡樻珔缂佲偓瀹€鍕仯闁搞儜鍕ㄦ灆闂佸憡妫戦幏锟� 闂傚倷娴囬崑鎰版偤閺冨牆鍨傚ù鍏兼儗閺佸棝鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂備浇顕х€涒晠宕樻繝姘挃闁告洦鍓氶崣蹇涙煥閻曞倹瀚� 婵犵數鍋為崹鍫曞箹閳哄懎鍌ㄩ柣鎾崇瘍閻熸嫈鏃堝川椤撶媭妲洪梺鑽ゅТ濞层倕螣婵犲洤绀夐柨鐕傛嫹 闂傚倷绀侀幉锟犮€冭箛娑樼;闁糕剝绋戦弸渚€鏌熼幑鎰靛殭缂佺姵鍨块弻锟犲礋椤愶絿顩伴梺鍝ュ櫐閹凤拷
婵犵數鍎戠徊钘壝洪敂鐐床闁稿本绋撻々鐑芥煥閻曞倹瀚�: 闂傚倷绀侀幖顐﹀磹閻戣棄纭€闁告劕妯婂〒濠氭煥閻曞倹瀚� 闂備浇宕垫慨鏉懨洪妶鍥e亾濮樼厧鐏︽い銏$懇閺佹捇鏁撻敓锟� 闂備浇宕甸崰鎰版偡閵夈儙娑樷槈閵忕姷锛涢梺璺ㄥ櫐閹凤拷 闂備焦鐪归崺鍕垂闁秵鍋ら柡鍥ュ灪閸庡﹪鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷鐒﹂惇褰掑磹閺囩喐娅犻柦妯侯樈濞兼牠鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷鐒﹂惇褰掑磿閸楃伝娲Ω閿旇棄寮块梺璺ㄥ櫐閹凤拷 闂傚倷鑳舵灙缂佺粯顨呴悾鐑芥偨缁嬫寧鐎梺璺ㄥ櫐閹凤拷 闂傚倷鑳堕崕鐢稿磻閹捐绀夐煫鍥ㄦ尵閺嗐倝鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷鑳堕、濠勭礄娴兼潙纾规俊銈呮噹缁犳牠鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷娴囬鏍礂濞嗘挸纾块柡灞诲劚閻ら箖鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷鑳舵灙妞ゆ垵鍟村畷鏇㈠箻椤旂瓔妫呴梺璺ㄥ櫐閹凤拷 缂傚倸鍊搁崐绋棵洪妶鍡╂闁归棿绶¢弫濠囨煥閻曞倹瀚� 婵犵數鍋為崹鍫曞箰閸洖纾归柡宥庡幖閻掑灚銇勯幒鎴敾閻庢熬鎷� 闂傚倷鑳堕崢褍顕i幆鑸汗闁告劦鍠栫粈澶愭煥閻曞倹瀚� 闂傚倷鐒﹀鍨熆娓氣偓楠炲繘鏁撻敓锟� 婵犵數濞€濞佳囧磻婵犲洤绠柨鐕傛嫹 闂傚倷鑳堕崢褎鎯斿⿰鍫濈闁跨噦鎷� 闂備浇顕х换鎰殽韫囨稑绠柨鐕傛嫹 闂傚倷鐒﹂幃鍫曞磿閼碱剛鐭欓柟杈惧瘜閺佸棝鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂備浇宕垫慨鏉懨洪埡浣烘殾闁割煈鍋呭▍鐘绘煥閻曞倹瀚� 闂傚倷绀侀幖顐⒚洪敃鈧玻鍨枎閹惧秴娲弫鎾绘晸閿燂拷
婵犵數鍋為崹鍫曞箹閳哄懎鍌ㄩ柤娴嬫櫃閻掑﹪鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘: 闂備焦鐪归崺鍕垂闁秵鍋ら柡鍥ュ灪閸庡﹪鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷娴囧銊╂倿閿曞倹鍋¢柨鏇楀亾瀹€锝呮健閺佹捇鏁撻敓锟� 闂傚倷娴囬鏍礈濮樿鲸宕查柛鈩冪☉閻掑灚銇勯幒鎴敾閻庢熬鎷� 婵犵數鍋為崹鍫曞箹閳哄懎鐭楅柍褜鍓涢埀顒冾潐閹碱偊骞忛敓锟� 闂傚倷绀侀幉锟犳偋閻愯尙鏆﹂柣銏⑶圭粻鏍煥閻曞倹瀚� 婵犵數鍋為崹鍫曞箰鐠囧唽缂氭繛鍡樺灱婵娊鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倸鍊峰ù鍥涢崟顖涘亱闁圭偓妞块弫渚€鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 濠电姵顔栭崰妤勬懌闂佹悶鍔忓▔娑滅亱闂佽法鍣﹂幏锟� 闂傚倷绀侀幖顐﹀磹缁嬫5娲Χ閸ワ絽浜剧痪鏉款槹鐎氾拷 闂傚倷鐒﹂崹婵嬫倿閿曞倸桅闁绘劗鏁哥粈濠囨煥閻曞倹瀚� 婵犲痉鏉库偓妤佹叏閹绢喖瀚夋い鎺戝閽冪喖鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷鐒﹂幃鍫曞磿閹绘帞鏆︽俊顖欒濞尖晠鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 婵犵绱曢崑娑㈩敄閸ヮ剙绐楅柟鎹愵嚙閸戠娀鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷娴囬崑鎰版偤閺冨牆鍨傞柧蹇e亝濞呯娀鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷娴囬崑鎰版偤閺冨牆鍨傛い鏍ㄧ矌缁犳棃鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷娴囬崑鎰版偤閺冨牆鍨傞柟娈垮枤閸楁岸鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷绀侀幖顐﹀磹鐟欏嫬鍨旈柦妯侯槺閺嗐倝鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷鑳堕幊鎾诲触鐎n剙鍨濋幖娣妼绾惧ジ鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷绀侀崥瀣i幒鎾变粓闁归棿绀侀崙鐘绘煥閻曞倹瀚�
当前位置: 首页 > 医学版 > 期刊论文 > 基础医学 > 感染与免疫杂志 > 2006年 > 第1期 > 正文
编号:11255009
Fibronectin Binding Protein BBK32 of the Lyme Disease Spirochete Promotes Bacterial Attachment to Glycosaminoglycans

     Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Ave. North, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655

    ABSTRACT

    Borrelia burgdorferi, the agent of Lyme disease, causes a multisystemic illness that can affect the skin, heart, joints, and nervous system and is capable of attachment to diverse cell types. Among the host components recognized by this spirochete are fibronectin and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). Three surface-localized GAG-binding bacterial ligands, Bgp, DbpA, and DbpB, have been previously identified, but recent studies suggested that at least one additional GAG-binding ligand is expressed on the spirochetal surface when the spirochete is adapted to the mammalian host environment. BBK32 is a surface lipoprotein that is produced during infection and that has been shown to bind to fibronectin. In this study, we show that, when BBK32 was produced from a shuttle vector in an otherwise nonadherent high-passage B. burgdorferi strain, the protein localized on the bacterial surface and conferred attachment to fibronectin and to mammalian cell monolayers. In addition, the high-passage strain producing BBK32 bound to purified preparations of the GAGs dermatan sulfate and heparin, as well as to these GAGs on the surfaces of cultured mammalian cells. Recombinant BBK32 recognized purified heparin, indicating that the bacterial attachment to GAGs was due to direct binding by BBK32. This GAG-binding activity of BBK32 is apparently independent of fibronectin recognition, because exogenous heparin had no effect on BBK32-mediated bacterial binding to fibronectin.

    INTRODUCTION

    Lyme disease, the most prevalent vector-borne illness in the United States, results from infection by the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. Following the bite from an infected Ixodes tick, these spirochetes establish a local infection in the skin, often giving rise to a characteristic rash termed erythema migrans. Some B. burgdorferi strains are capable of dissemination to multiple secondary sites, such as distant skin sites, brain, heart, or joints, and the presence of spirochetes in these tissues results in diverse clinical manifestations, including arthritis, carditis, neuroborreliosis, and acrodermatitis (44, 52, 53; for a review, see reference 46).

    For many bacterial pathogens, attachment to host tissues is believed to be a critical step during colonization and is typically mediated by adhesins, i.e., surface proteins that promote bacterial attachment to host cells (16). Consistent with its ability to cause a multisystemic infection in mammals, B. burgdorferi attaches to a variety of cell types in vitro, including lymphocytes, platelets, epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and neuroglia (9, 11, 19, 20, 49, 50). Among the host cell components recognized are integrins (7, 8), fibronectin (21, 39, 49), and proteoglycans (23, 24, 29). Proteoglycans consist of a core protein covalently linked to glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), which are long, linear, and highly sulfated disaccharide repeats (for a review, see reference 48). Classes of GAGs, such as heparin, heparan sulfate, dermatan sulfate, and chondroitin-6-sulfate, differ in structure and are often functionally distinguished by their differential sensitivities to cleavage by specific lyases.

    In addition to binding to intact proteoglycans, B. burgdorferi is capable of attachment to GAG chains (24, 29, 30), and culture of B. burgdorferi under "host-adapted" conditions in dialysis membrane chambers implanted in the rat peritoneal cavity (1) results in significantly enhanced binding to both endothelial cells and heparin, suggesting that GAG binding may play an important role within the mammalian host (37). In fact, production of the GAG-binding adhesin Vsp2 by the related relapsing fever spirochete Borrelia turicatae is associated with efficient colonization of the joint and blood of infected SCID mice, while production of a related protein, Vsp1, which does not efficiently bind GAGs, is associated with infection of the brain (5, 33, 38, 54). For B. burgdorferi, different classes of GAGs mediate in vitro bacterial attachment to different types of mammalian cells, e.g., heparan sulfate largely mediates attachment of B. burgdorferi to cultured endothelial cells, whereas dermatan sulfate and heparan sulfate promote spirochetal attachment to cultured glial cells (31). In addition, the particular GAG-binding specificity varies with the particular B. burgdorferi strain, resulting in corresponding differences in the spectrum of cell types to which each strain binds. Thus, a B. burgdorferi strain that binds dermatan sulfate and heparan sulfate attaches to both glial and endothelial cells, whereas another strain that binds only dermatan sulfate selectively binds glial cells (36).

    A simple hypothesis to explain these results is that B. burgdorferi produces multiple GAG-binding adhesins and that the repertoire of adhesins produced by a given strain is responsible for its particular GAG binding specificity. In fact, three GAG-binding surface proteins have been identified. Bgp (Borrelia GAG-binding protein) is a heparin-binding hemagglutinin that is both secreted into the media and localized on the bacterial surface (6, 35). Decorin binding protein A (DbpA) and DbpB are surface lipoproteins that, in addition to binding the proteoglycan decorin (22), bind to GAGs (17, 37). Bgp, DbpA, and DbpB do not appear to entirely account for the enhanced GAG-binding activity displayed by host-adapted bacteria (37), suggesting that this pathogen encodes at least one additional GAG-binding pathway.

    Upon prolonged culture, B. burgdorferi commonly loses plasmids that are required for full infectivity in mice but not required for in vitro growth (2, 25, 27, 34, 41, 45). B. burgdorferi strain B314 is a high-passage derivative of strain B31 that has lost many plasmids, including the plasmid carrying dbpA and dbpB (43), and is incapable of attaching to mammalian cells in vitro (17). The absence of potentially redundant binding pathways encoded by strain B314 greatly simplifies characterization of the cell binding activities of ectopically expressed adhesins, and we recently showed that expression of dbpA or dbpB from a shuttle vector (47) conferred on B. burgdorferi strain B314 distinct GAG- and mammalian cell-binding phenotypes (17). Strain B314 also lacks lp36, which encodes BBK32, a 47-kDa surface lipoprotein that recognizes the extracellular matrix protein fibronectin (18, 39). In the present study, we produced BBK32 in B314 and demonstrated that the protein promotes spirochetal attachment to host cells not only by recognizing fibronectin but also by recognizing GAGs.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Bacterial strains and cell lines. All strains of B. burgdorferi were cultured in BSK-H complete medium (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) at 33°C. Borrelia transformants were cultured in BSK-H complete medium supplemented with kanamycin (200 μg/ml). The high-passage B314 B. burgdorferi strain was a generous gift from Tom Schwan (RML, Hamilton, MT). 293 human kidney epithelial, HEp-2 human epithelial, C6 rat glioma, and EAhy-926 human endothelial cells were cultured as described previously (36).

    Plasmids and cloning. To generate a recombinant maltose-binding protein (MBP)-BBK32 fusion protein that lacked the BBK32 signal sequence and lipid moiety, codons 21 to 354 of the strain B31 BBK32 were amplified using forward primer 5'-CGGAATTCGATTTATTCATAAGATAT-3' and reverse primer 5'-GCAAGCTTTAAGTACCAAACGCCATTCTT-3' (restriction sites underlined) and cloned into the pMal-c2 vector (Novagen, Madison, WI). The resulting plasmid, pMBP-BBK32, was transformed into Escherichia coli BL21 and its sequence confirmed by DNA sequencing. To construct a shuttle vector that promoted expression of cloned genes during in vitro culture of B. burgdorferi, the strain B31 ospC promoter (nucleotides –184 to –9), which is active during growth in BSK-H (43), was amplified using PCR with forward primer 5'-CCCAAGCTTTTAATTTTAGCATATTTGGCTTTG-3' and reverse primer 5'-ACGCGTCGACCCTCCTTTTTATTTATGAATTATT-3' (restriction sites underlined). This 175-bp amplicon was ligated into the HindIII and SalI sites of shuttle vector pBSV2 (47) (generously provided by Patricia Rosa, RML, Hamiliton, MT) to generate pJF21. To modify pJF21 to produce BBK32 in vitro, the entire BBK32 gene, encoding full-length BBK32 (354 amino acids), was amplified by PCR using forward primer 5'-ACGCGTCGACATGAAAAAAGTTAAAAGTAAATATTTGG-3' and reverse primer 5'-CGCGGATCCGTACCAAACGCCATTCTTGTCAATGATCC-3' and was inserted into the SalI and BamHI sites of pJF21 to generate pBBK32B31, herein referred to as "pBBK32."

    Electroporation of B. burgdorferi B314. Electrocompetent B314 spirochetes were transformed with 30 μg of plasmid DNA and cultured in BSK-H complete medium at 37°C for 24 h as previously described (17). Aliquots of the culture were mixed with 1.8% analytical grade agarose (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and plated onto a solidified BSK-H-agarose layer in sterilized 100- by 20-mm tissue culture dishes (Falcon) in the presence of kanamycin (200 μg/ml). Plates were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere for 2 weeks. Colonies were selected and cultured at 37°C in liquid BSK-H medium containing kanamycin (200 μg/ml) until mid-logarithmic phase and then stored at –80°C in BSK-H containing 20% glycerol.

    Generation of BBK32 antiserum. MBP and MBP-BBK32 were purified from pMAL-c2 and pMBP-BBK32, respectively, using an amylose column (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Five- to 6-week-old BALB/c mice were immunized with 200 μg of either MBP or MBP-BBK32 in complete Freund's adjuvant. The animals were boosted twice with 200 μg of the same proteins in incomplete Freund's adjuvant at 2-week intervals, and antisera were prepared after terminal cardiac puncture.

    Proteinase K treatment, SDS-PAGE, and Western blotting. To detect BBK32 protein, lysates from 1 x 107 bacteria were separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). BBK32 and FlaB were identified by immunoblotting using a polyclonal antibody against MBP-BBK32 (diluted 1:10,000) or monoclonal antibody CB1 (a gift from J. Benach, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY) against FlaB (diluted 1:200), respectively. Surface localization of BBK32 was determined as previously described (39). Briefly, 1 x 107 bacteria were centrifuged and pellets were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). After the final wash, pellets were gently lifted with 5 mM MgCl2 in PBS supplemented with 4 mg/ml proteinase K (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. To inactivate proteinase K, 150 μg phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride was added to each pellet. Pellets were washed twice with 5 mM MgCl2 in PBS, lysed, and separated by 10% SDS-PAGE. Proteins were identified by immunoblotting as described above.

    Radiolabeling B. burgdorferi. Radiolabeled spirochetes were prepared by culturing at 33°C in BSK-H medium supplemented with 60 μCi of [35S]methionine and [35S]cysteine per ml. When cultures achieved mid-log-phase density (about 5 x 107 bacteria per ml), spirochetes were centrifuged at 10,000 x g, washed three times with 0.2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS, and stored as aliquots at –80°C in BSK-H containing 20% glycerol.

    Attachment of radiolabeled bacteria to purified GAGs and fibronectin. Prior to each assay, wells from Nunc 96-well break-apart microtiter plates were coated with either 1 mg/ml purified human fibronectin or 5 mg/ml dermatan sulfate, heparin, or chondroitin-6-sulfate in PBS at 4°C overnight. Wells were washed three times with 0.5% Tween in PBS. Frozen aliquots of radiolabeled spirochetes were thawed and resuspended at 1 x 108 cells/ml in BSK-H and were incubated at room temperature for 2 h. Radiolabeled spirochetes were then diluted 1:3 with 10 mM glucose, 50 mM NaCl, and 10 mM HEPES, at pH 7.0, and added in quadruplicate wells at 1 x 106 spirochetes/well. To enhance substrate-spirochete contact, plates were centrifuged at 190 x g for 5 min and then rocked at room temperature for 1 h. Unbound spirochetes were removed by washing wells four times with 0.2% BSA in PBS. Plates were then air dried, and the percentage of bound bacteria in each well was determined by liquid scintillation.

    Attachment of radiolabeled bacteria to mammalian cells. One day before each assay, mammalian cells were lifted with 0.05% trypsin and 0.53 mM EDTA (Gibco BRL) and plated in Nunc 96-well break-apart microtiter plates previously UV sterilized and coated with 2 μg/ml MBP-Inv497, an MBP fused to the invasin protein from Yersinia pseudotuberculosis (28). Just before the addition of radiolabeled spirochetes, cell monolayers were washed twice with PBS.

    Inhibition of binding with exogenous GAGs. Radiolabeled spirochetes were prepared as described above and were incubated for 30 min at room temperature in BSK-H supplemented with 2 mg/ml GAGs. Following incubation, spirochetes were diluted 1:3 with 10 mM glucose, 50 mM NaCl, and 10 mM HEPES at pH 7.0 before addition to wells containing cell monolayers or coated with fibronectin or GAG.

    Enzymatic removal of specific classes of GAGs. Monolayers were incubated for 2 h with 0.5 U/ml heparinase I, heparitinase, or chondroitinase ABC (Sigma) at 37°C in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 1% BSA, 10–2 trypsin inhibitory units/ml aprotinin, and 165 μg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. After the monolayers were washed twice with PBS, radiolabeled spirochetes were added to treated monolayers as described above.

    RESULTS

    Expression of BBK32 in strain B314 results in localization of the lipoprotein on the spirochetal surface and confers spirochetal binding to fibronectin and cultured mammalian cells. Some strains of B. burgdorferi do not express BBK32 during in vitro culture (14, 39). To ensure high-level expression of BBK32 in our standard nonadherent B. burgdorferi strain B314, we first modified the shuttle vector pBSV2 (47) to carry the promoter for ospC, which is expressed by this strain during in vitro culture (43) (see Materials and Methods). The BBK32 gene from low-passage B. burgdorferi strain B31 was inserted into the modified shuttle vector pJF21 to generate pBBK32. Strain B314, which as mentioned above lacks the plasmid encoding BBK32 (18), was transformed with pBBK32, and immunoblotting of bacterial lysates with antiserum raised against an MBP-BBK32 fusion, or, as a control, against MBP, revealed that B314/pBBK32 produced abundant BBK32, whereas B314 harboring the control vector pJF21 produced none (Fig. 1A). In fact, B314/pBBK32 produced BBK32 at higher levels than did the low-passage strain B31. Far-Western blotting of lysates of B314/pBBK32 with purified fibronectin revealed that the BBK32 produced by this strain was competent for binding fibronectin (Fig. 1A, bottom). BBK32 produced by B314/pBBK32, but not control periplasmic FlaB protein, was degraded by exposure of spirochetes to proteinase K, demonstrating that the BBK32 was produced predominantly on the surface of the transformant (Fig. 1B).

    In order to determine whether production of BBK32 is sufficient to promote spirochete attachment to fibronectin, strain B314 harboring either the shuttle vector pJF21 or pBBK32 was tested for the ability to bind to mock-coated wells or wells coated with fibronectin. Transformants expressing BBK32, but not control transformants, specifically attached to immobilized fibronectin (Fig. 2). In fact, B314/pBBK32 bound to fibronectin significantly better than did strain B31, consistent with its higher level of BBK32 production.

    Cultured mammalian cells commonly produce fibronectin (10), so BBK32 was tested for the ability to mediate attachment of strain B314 to different types of cultured mammalian cells. B314/pBBK32, but not B314 harboring the vector control, bound efficiently to 293 kidney epithelial cells, EA-Hy926 endothelial cells, and C6 glial cells (Fig. 3). For each cell line, the level of attachment of B314/pBBK32 exceeded that of strain B31, suggesting that, in these assays, the overproduction of BBK32 was more than sufficient to compensate for the absence of binding pathways mediated by DbpA or DbpB, which are not produced by B314/pBBK32 (17).

    BBK32 recognizes glycosaminoglycans on the surface of mammalian cells and promotes spirochete attachment to purified GAGs. It has been reported that HEp-2 epithelial cells do not produce fibronectin (12), and we confirmed that these cells, when cultured under our laboratory conditions, did not produce detectable fibronectin (Table 1). Unexpectedly, B314/pBBK32 bound to HEp-2 cells virtually as efficiently as it bound to 293, EA-Hy926, and C6 cells, which produce easily detectable amounts of fibronectin (Fig. 3, Table 1), suggesting that fibronectin is not the sole receptor for BBK32 produced by mammalian cells. Bacteria that have been grown in dialysis membrane chambers in the rat peritoneum display considerably higher levels of GAG binding than do bacteria grown in vitro, and this "host-induced" GAG binding activity could not be entirely accounted for by DbpA, DbpB, or Bgp, the previously identified GAG binding surface proteins of B. burgdorferi (37). Therefore, we tested whether BBK32 might recognize GAGs on the host cell surface, using 293 epithelial cells, a cell line which we have previously shown to produce GAGs recognized by B. burgdorferi (36).

    Specific classes of GAGs on the surface of 293 cells were enzymatically removed by digestion with lyases prior to binding by B314/pBBK32 or, for comparison, strain B31. Removal of heparin-, heparan sulfate-, or chondroitin sulfate-related GAGs with heparinase, heparitinase, or chondroitinase ABC, respectively, significantly reduced host cell binding by both of these bacterial strains (Fig. 4A). Strain B31 appeared somewhat less dependent on heparin- and heparan sulfate-related GAGs for binding to 293 cells than did strain B314/pBBK32, consistent with the fact that B31 produces DbpA and DbpB, which recognize chondroitin sulfates on this cell line (17). Combination lyase digestion to remove diverse classes of GAGs from 293 cells resulted in a further reduction of binding by B314/pBBK32 (Fig. 4A). The putative recognition of GAGs by BBK32 predicts that exogenous GAGs should inhibit attachment of B314/pBBK32 to 293 cells. Strain B314/pBBK32, or for comparison strain B31, was incubated with purified GAGs prior to binding to 293 cells. Heparin, a heparan sulfate analog, and dermatan sulfate both blocked binding, whereas chondroitin-6-sulfate had no effect (Fig. 4B). Finally, to test whether GAGs are sufficient to promote attachment of B. burgdorferi expressing BBK32, B314/pBBK32 was tested for the ability to attach to purified GAGs immobilized in microtiter wells. This strain, like strain B31, attached to wells coated with dermatan sulfate or heparin even more efficiently than to wells coated with fibronectin (Fig. 4C). As predicted, neither strain bound to wells coated with chondroitin-6-sulfate.

    To determine whether attachment of strain B314/pBBK32 was due to a direct interaction between BBK32 and GAGs, recombinant MBP-BBK32 was tested for the ability to bind to purified heparin, or as a control, fibronectin, immobilized in microtiter wells. As expected, MBP-BBK32 bound to fibronectin, and with an efficiency 10-fold higher than MBP (Fig. 5). In addition, while MBP-BBK32 did not bind to chondroitin-6-sulfate, it recognized heparin as efficiently as it did fibronectin. These results indicate that BBK32 is capable of promoting B. burgdorferi attachment to mammalian cells by recognizing GAGs or fibronectin.

    Bacterial attachment to fibronectin mediated by BBK32 is not inhibitable by heparin. The BBK32 fibronectin-binding domain has been localized by deletion analysis to residues 131 to 162 in the unordered N-terminal half of BBK32 (26, 40, 42). If the same domain also promotes GAG binding, exogenous GAGs might inhibit BBK32-mediated spirochetal attachment to fibronectin. We found that a high (2-mg/ml) concentration of heparin did not diminish attachment of B314/pBBK32 to immobilized fibronectin (Fig. 6). In contrast, binding of this strain to immobilized heparin was diminished fivefold by exogenous heparin, and this inhibition was specific to heparin because chondroitin-6-sulfate had no effect. These results suggest that recognition of fibronectin and GAG binding represent independent activities of BBK32.

    DISCUSSION

    The development of vectors capable of replication in B. burgdorferi has facilitated new approaches in the study of virulence-associated phenotypes of B. burgdorferi (13, 47). We previously utilized complementation of the high-passage nonadherent B. burgdorferi strain B314 as a straightforward assay for surface molecules that promote spirochetal attachment to mammalian cells and uncovered previously unrecognized GAG-binding activities of the decorin binding proteins DbpA and DbpB (17). Here we utilized the ospC promoter, which is active during in vitro culture, to ectopically express lipoprotein BBK32 in strain B314 and found that BBK32 promoted bacterial attachment to purified fibronectin and to mammalian cells in vitro, thus confirming that it indeed functions as a fibronectin-binding adhesin. In addition, production of BBK32 by strain B314 revealed a second adhesive activity, one that promotes binding to diverse mammalian cells through the recognition of dermatan sulfate and heparan sulfate.

    It seems likely that the fibronectin- and GAG-binding activities of BBK32 are independent, because high concentrations of heparin could not diminish binding of B314/pBBK32 to immobilized fibronectin. These results confirm those of Johnson and coworkers, who showed, using far-Western assays, that heparin did not inhibit binding of fibronectin to BBK32 (39). In addition, the fibronectin-binding domain identified by these investigators, amino acids 131 to 162 (40), contains highly conserved acidic amino acids and seems unlikely to interact with GAGs, which are also highly negatively charged.

    B. burgdorferi strain B314 producing BBK32 bound to HEp-2 cells, which did not produce fibronectin detectable by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), suggesting that GAGs are sufficient to promote BBK32-mediated bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells. In addition, enzymatic removal of GAGs from 293 epithelial cells resulted in an eightfold decrease in binding by B314/pBBK32, suggesting that GAGs represent the major 293 cell receptor for BBK32. In contrast, enzymatic removal of GAGs expressed by Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells did not diminish binding by B314/pBBK32, and this recombinant strain bound to CHO cells deficient for GAG synthesis as efficiently as to wild-type CHO cells (J. R. Fischer, unpublished observations). Hence, the relative contribution of GAGs and fibronectin to cell attachment may vary with the target cell.

    B. burgdorferi strain N40, when grown in dialysis membrane chambers in the rat peritoneum, a condition designed to mimic conditions of growth during mammalian infection (1), produces a marked increase in binding to purified heparin and to heparan sulfate produced by EAhy-926 endothelial cells (37). Recombinant derivatives of the previously identified GAG binding ligands, Bgp, DbpA and DbpB, were incapable of efficiently inhibiting GAG-mediated cell binding by host-adapted B. burgdorferi strain N40, suggesting that this strain produces other GAG-binding surface molecules. BBK32 is not produced by strain N40 during in vitro culture or in the unfed tick but is induced upon tick feeding and mammalian infection (15). Although the regulation of BBK32 in strain N40 appears to differ from that in B31 (39) and although it is unclear whether BBK32 of strain B31 is upregulated in the mammalian host (3), BBK32 expression in strain B31 cultured in vitro is nevertheless induced upon exposure to mammalian blood (51), consistent with the hypothesis that BBK32 may promote cell adhesion of B. burgdorferi during mammalian infection. Thus, the present finding that BBK32 promotes spirochetal attachment to GAGs suggests that this adhesin may contribute to the observed induction of GAG-binding activity by strain N40. We cannot easily test this hypothesis with strain B314/pBBK32 because it lacks lp25, which is required for growth in implanted dialysis membrane chambers. However, our recent isolation of a defined BBK32 mutant of strain B31 will permit a rigorous test of the role of BBK32 in GAG binding by host-adapted bacteria (Fischer, unpublished).

    Previously observed B. burgdorferi strain differences in GAG-binding specificity were hypothesized to result from the expression of different sets of GAG-binding adhesins, each with unique specificity (36). BBK32 now joins DbpA and DbpB as B. burgdorferi proteins that have been documented to mediate spirochetal attachment to GAGs when expressed on the bacterial surface (17). (Bgp is also a candidate GAG-binding adhesin, but ectopic expression of bgp in strain B314 did not result in a detectable increase in cell attachment (K. T. LeBlanc, unpublished observation). As predicted, each of these three adhesins demonstrates unique GAG-binding and cell-binding specificities. We previously showed that DbpA mediates bacterial attachment to purified dermatan sulfate and 293 cells (17). DbpB possesses these same activities but additionally promotes binding to purified chondroitin-6-sufate and C6 glial cells. Neither DbpA nor DbpB is capable of promoting spirochetal attachment to EA-Hy926 endothelial cells. In contrast, we showed here that BBK32 promotes bacterial binding to purified heparin as well as to dermatan sulfate and promotes binding to GAGs expressed by 293 epithelial cells, C6 glial cells, and EA-Hy926 endothelial cells (Fig. 3) (Fischer, unpublished). Differences in GAG binding mediated by the Vsp proteins of B. turicatae are associated with differences in tissue tropism (5, 33, 38, 54), suggesting that the GAG-binding adhesins of B. burgdorferi similarly influence tissue colonization. Consistent with this notion, infection of wild-type and decorin-deficient mice suggested that decorin may promote the spread of the pathogen and its survival in tissues that express relatively high levels of decorin (4, 32). The present study indicates that BBK32 and DbpA/DbpB not only recognize different protein-associated receptors (fibronectin and decorin, respectively) but also possess unique GAG-binding activities that provide potentially nonredundant function during mammalian infection.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    We thank Nikhat Parveen for helpful discussion and careful review of the manuscript, Tom Schwan for the B314 strain, Patti Rosa and Philip Stewart for pBSV2, and Jorge Benach for CB1 monoclonal antibody.

    This work was supported by NIH R01-AI37601 to J.L., PHS A107349 to J.F., and a Massachusetts Chapter of the Arthritis Foundation Summer Fellowship and a Homeland Security Fellowship to K.L.

    REFERENCES

    1. Akins, D. R., K. W. Bourell, M. J. Caimano, M. V. Norgard, and J. D. Radolf. 1998. A new animal model for studying Lyme disease spirochetes in a mammalian host-adapted state. J. Clin. Investig. 101:2240-2250.

    2. Barbour, A. G. 1988. Plasmid analysis of Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme disease agent. J. Clin. Microbiol. 26:475-478.

    3. Brooks, C. S., P. S. Hefty, S. E. Jolliff, and D. R. Akins. 2003. Global analysis of Borrelia burgdorferi genes regulated by mammalian host-specific signals. Infect. Immun. 71:3371-3383.

    4. Brown, E. L., R. M. Wooten, B. J. Johnson, R. V. Iozzo, A. Smith, M. C. Dolan, B. P. Guo, J. J. Weis, and M. Hook. 2001. Resistance to Lyme disease in decorin-deficient mice. J. Clin. Investig. 107:845-852.

    5. Cadavid, D., V. Bundoc, and A. G. Barbour. 1993. Experimental infection of the mouse brain by a relapsing fever Borrelia species: a molecular analysis. J. Infect. Dis. 168:143-151.

    6. Cluss, R. G., D. A. Silverman, and T. R. Stafford. 2004. Extracellular secretion of the Borrelia burgdorferi Oms28 porin and Bgp, a glycosaminoglycan binding protein. Infect. Immun. 72:6279-6286.

    7. Coburn, J., W. Chege, L. Magoun, S. C. Bodary, and J. M. Leong. 1999. Characterization of a candidate Borrelia burgdorferi 3-chain integrin ligand identified using a phage display library. Mol. Microbiol. 34:926-940.

    8. Coburn, J., J. M. Leong, and J. K. Erban. 1993. Integrin IIb 3 mediates binding of the Lyme disease agent Borrelia burgdorferi to human platelets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:7059-7063.

    9. Comstock, L. E., and D. D. Thomas. 1989. Penetration of endothelial cell monolayers by Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect. Immun. 57:1626-1628.

    10. Dean, D. C., T. M. Birkenmeier, G. D. Rosen, and S. J. Weintraub. 1991. Glycoprotein synthesis and secretion. Expression of fibronectin and its cell surface receptors. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 144:S25-S28.

    11. Dorward, D. W., E. R. Fischer, and D. M. Brooks. 1997. Invasion and cytopathic killing of human lymphocytes by spirochetes causing Lyme disease. Clin. Infect. Dis. 25(Suppl. 1):S2-S8.

    12. Dramsi, S., F. Bourdichon, D. Cabanes, M. Lecuit, H. Fsihi, and P. Cossart. 2004. FbpA, a novel multifunctional Listeria monocytogenes virulence factor. Mol. Microbiol. 53:639-649.

    13. Eggers, C. H., M. J. Caimano, M. L. Clawson, W. G. Miller, D. S. Samuels, and J. D. Radolf. 2002. Identification of loci critical for replication and compatibility of a Borrelia burgdorferi cp32 plasmid and use of a cp32-based shuttle vector for the expression of fluorescent reporters in the Lyme disease spirochaete. Mol. Microbiol. 43:281-295.

    14. Fikrig, E., S. W. Barthold, W. Sun, W. Feng, S. R. Telford III, and R. A. Flavell. 1997. Borrelia burgdorferi P35 and P37 proteins, expressed in vivo, elicit protective immunity. Immunity 6:531-539.

    15. Fikrig, E., W. Feng, S. W. Barthold, S. R. Telford III, and R. A. Flavell. 2000. Arthropod- and host-specific Borrelia burgdorferi bbk32 expression and the inhibition of spirochete transmission. J. Immunol. 164:5344-5351.

    16. Finlay, B. B., and S. Falkow. 1997. Common themes in microbial pathogenicity revisited. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 61:136-169.

    17. Fischer, J. R., N. Parveen, L. Magoun, and J. M. Leong. 2003. Decorin-binding proteins A and B confer distinct mammalian cell type-specific attachment by Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme disease spirochete. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:7307-7312.

    18. Fraser, C. M., S. Casjens, W. M. Huang, G. G. Sutton, R. Clayton, R. Lathigra, O. White, K. A. Ketchum, R. Dodson, E. K. Hickey, M. Gwinn, B. Dougherty, J. F. Tomb, R. D. Fleischmann, D. Richardson, J. Peterson, A. R. Kerlavage, J. Quackenbush, S. Salzberg, M. Hanson, R. van Vugt, N. Palmer, M. D. Adams, J. Gocayne, J. C. Venter, et al. 1997. Genomic sequence of a Lyme disease spirochaete, Borrelia burgdorferi. Nature 390:580-586.

    19. Galbe, J. L., E. Guy, J. M. Zapatero, E. I. Peerschke, and J. L. Benach. 1993. Vascular clearance of Borrelia burgdorferi in rats. Microb. Pathog. 14:187-201.

    20. Garcia-Monco, J. C., B. Fernandez-Villar, and J. L. Benach. 1989. Adherence of the Lyme disease spirochete to glial cells and cells of glial origin. J. Infect. Dis. 160:497-506.

    21. Grab, D. J., C. Givens, and R. Kennedy. 1998. Fibronectin-binding activity in Borrelia burgdorferi. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1407:135-145.

    22. Guo, B. P., E. L. Brown, D. W. Dorward, L. C. Rosenberg, and M. Hook. 1998. Decorin-binding adhesins from Borrelia burgdorferi. Mol. Microbiol. 30:711-723.

    23. Guo, B. P., S. J. Norris, L. C. Rosenberg, and M. Hook. 1995. Adherence of Borrelia burgdorferi to the proteoglycan decorin. Infect. Immun. 63:3467-3472.

    24. Isaacs, R. 1994. Borrelia burgdorferi bind to epithelial cell proteoglycan. J. Clin. Investig. 93:809-819.

    25. Johnson, R. C., N. Marek, and C. Kodner. 1984. Infection of Syrian hamsters with Lyme disease spirochetes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 20:1099-1101.

    26. Kim, J. H., J. Singvall, U. Schwarz-Linek, B. J. Johnson, J. R. Potts, and M. Hook. 2004. BBK32, a fibronectin binding MSCRAMM from Borrelia burgdorferi, contains a disordered region that undergoes a conformational change on ligand binding. J. Biol. Chem. 279:41706-41714.

    27. Labandeira-Rey, M., and J. T. Skare. 2001. Decreased infectivity in Borrelia burgdorferi strain B31 is associated with loss of linear plasmid 25 or 28-1. Infect. Immun. 69:446-455.

    28. Leong, J. M., R. Fournier, and R. R. Isberg. 1990. Identification of the integrin binding domain of the Yersinia pseudotuberculosis invasin protein. EMBO J. 9:1979-1989.

    29. Leong, J. M., P. E. Morrissey, E. Ortega-Barria, M. E. Pereira, and J. Coburn. 1995. Hemagglutination and proteoglycan binding by the Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect. Immun. 63:874-883.

    30. Leong. J. M., D. Robbins, L. Rosenfeld, B. Lahiri, and N. Parveen. 1998. Structural requirements for glycosaminoglycan recognition by the Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect. Immun. 66:6045-6048.

    31. Leong, J. M., H. Wang, L. Magoun, J. A. Field, P. E. Morrissey, D. Robbins, J. B. Tatro, J. Coburn, and N. Parveen. 1998. Different classes of proteoglycans contribute to the attachment of Borrelia burgdorferi to cultured endothelial and brain cells. Infect. Immun. 66:994-999.

    32. Liang, F. T., E. L. Brown, T. Wang, R. V. Iozzo, and E. Fikrig. 2004. Protective niche for Borrelia burgdorferi to evade humoral immunity. Am. J. Pathol. 165:977-985.

    33. Magoun, L., W. R. Zuckert, D. Robbins, N. Parveen, K. R. Alugupalli, T. G. Schwan, A. G. Barbour, and J. M. Leong. 2000. Variable small protein (Vsp)-dependent and Vsp-independent pathways for glycosaminoglycan recognition by relapsing fever spirochaetes. Mol. Microbiol. 36:886-897.

    34. Norris, S. J., J. K. Howell, S. A. Garza, M. S. Ferdows, and A. G. Barbour. 1995. High- and low-infectivity phenotypes of clonal populations of in vitro-cultured Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect. Immun. 63:2206-2212.

    35. Parveen, N., and J. M. Leong. 2000. Identification of a candidate glycosaminoglycan-binding adhesin of the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. Mol. Microbiol. 35:1220-1234.

    36. Parveen, N., D. Robbins, and J. M. Leong. 1999. Strain variation in glycosaminoglycan binding influences cell type-specific binding among Lyme disease spirochetes. Infect. Immun. 67:1743-1749.

    37. Parveen, N., M. Caimano, J. D. Radolf, and J. M. Leong. 2003. Adaptation of the Lyme disease spirochaete to the mammalian host environment results in enhanced glycosaminoglycan and host cell binding. Mol. Microbiol. 47:1433-1444.

    38. Pennington, P. M., D. Cadavid, and A. G. Barbour. 1999. Characterization of VspB of Borrelia turicatae: a major outer membrane protein expressed in blood and tissues of mice. Infect. Immun. 67:4637-4645.

    39. Probert, W. S., and B. J. Johnson. 1998. Identification of a 47 kDa fibronectin-binding protein expressed by Borrelia burgdorferi isolate B31. Mol. Microbiol. 30:1003-1015.

    40. Probert, W. S., J. H. Kim, M. Hook, and B. J. Johnson. 2001. Mapping the ligand-binding region of Borrelia burgdorferi fibronectin-binding protein BBK32. Infect. Immun. 69:4129-4133.

    41. Purser, J. E., and S. J. Norris. 2000. Correlation between plasmid content and infectivity in Borrelia burgdorferi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:13865-13870.

    42. Raibaud, S., U. Schwarz-Linek, J. H. Kim, H. T. Jenkins, E. R. Baines, S. Gurusidappa, M. Hook, and J. R. Potts. 2005. Borrelia burgdorferi binds fibronectin through a tandem beta zipper—a common mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 280:18803-18809.

    43. Sadziene, A., B. Wilske, M. Ferdows, and A. Barbour. 1993. The cryptic ospC gene of Borrelia burgdorferi B31 is located on a circular plasmid. Infect. Immun. 61:2192-2195.

    44. Seinost, G., D. E. Dykhuizen, R. J. Dattwyler, W. T. Golde, J. J. Dunn, I. N. Wang, G. P. Wormser, M. E. Schriefer, and B. J. Luft. 1999. Four clones of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto cause invasive infection in humans. Infect. Immun. 67:3518-3524.

    45. Simpson, W. J., C. F. Garon, and T. G. Schwan. 1990. Analysis of supercoiled circular plasmids in infectious and non-infectious Borrelia burgdorferi. Microb. Pathog. 8:109-118.

    46. Steere, A. C., J. Coburn, and L. Glickstein. 2004. The emergence of Lyme disease. J. Clin. Investig. 113:1093-1101.

    47. Stewart, P. E., R. Thalken, J. L. Bono, and P. Rosa. 2001. Isolation of a circular plasmid region sufficient for autonomous replication and transformation of infectious Borrelia burgdorferi. Mol. Microbiol. 39:714-721.

    48. Sugahara, K., T. Mikami, T. Uyama, S. Mizuguchi, K. Nomura, and H. Kitagawa. 2003. Recent advances in the structural biology of chondroitin sulfate and dermatan sulfate. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 13:612-620.

    49. Szczepanski, A., M. B. Furie, J. L. Benach, B. P. Lane, and H. B. Fleit. 1990. Interaction between Borrelia burgdorferi and endothelium in vitro. J. Clin. Investig. 85:1637-1647.

    50. Thomas, D. D., and L. E. Comstock. 1989. Interaction of Lyme disease spirochetes with cultured eucaryotic cells. Infect. Immun. 57:1324-1326.

    51. Tokarz, R., J. M. Anderton, L. I. Katona, and J. L. Benach. 2004. Combined effects of blood and temperature shift on Borrelia burgdorferi gene expression as determined by whole genome DNA array. Infect. Immun. 72:5419-5432.

    52. Wang, G., C. Ojaimi, H. Wu, V. Saksenberg, R. Iyer, D. Liveris, S. A. McClain, G. P. Wormser, and I. Schwartz. 2002. Disease severity in a murine model of lyme borreliosis is associated with the genotype of the infecting Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto strain. J. Infect. Dis. 186:782-791.

    53. Wang, G., A. P. van Dam, I. Schwartz, and J. Dankert. 1999. Molecular typing of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato: taxonomic, epidemiological, and clinical implications. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12:633-653.

    54. Zuckert, W. R., J. E. Lloyd, P. E. Stewart, P. A. Rosa, and A. G. Barbour. 2004. Cross-species surface display of functional spirochetal lipoproteins by recombinant Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect. Immun. 72:1463-1469.(Joshua R. Fischer, Kimber)
    婵犵數濮烽弫鎼佸磿閹寸姴绶ら柦妯侯棦濞差亝鍋愰悹鍥皺椤︻厼鈹戦悩缁樻锭婵炲眰鍊濋、姘舵焼瀹ュ棛鍘卞┑鐐村灥瀹曨剟寮搁妶鍡愪簻闁冲搫鍟崢鎾煛鐏炲墽鈽夐柍钘夘樀瀹曪繝鎮欏顔介獎闂備礁鎼ˇ顐﹀疾濠婂吘娑㈠礃椤旇壈鎽曞┑鐐村灦鑿ら柡瀣叄閻擃偊宕堕妸锕€鐨戦梺绋款儐閹歌崵绮嬮幒鏂哄亾閿濆簼绨介柛鏃撶畱椤啴濡堕崱妤€娼戦梺绋款儐閹瑰洭寮诲☉銏″亹鐎规洖娲㈤埀顒佸笚娣囧﹪宕f径濠傤潓闂佸疇顫夐崹鍨暦閸洖鐓橀柣鎰靛墰娴滄瑩姊虹拠鏌ヮ€楃紒鐘茬Ч瀹曟洟宕¢悙宥嗙☉閳藉濮€閻橀潧濮︽俊鐐€栫敮鎺椝囬鐐村€堕柨鏃傜摂濞堜粙鏌i幇顒佲枙闁稿孩姊归〃銉╂倷閸欏鏋犲銈冨灪濡啫鐣烽妸鈺婃晣闁绘劙娼ч幖绋库攽閻樺灚鏆╅柛瀣█楠炴捇顢旈崱妤冪瓘闂佽鍨奸悘鎰洪鍕吅闂佺粯锚閸氣偓缂佹顦靛娲箰鎼达絿鐣甸梺鐟板槻椤戝鐣烽悽绋块唶婵犮埄浜濆Λ鍐极閸屾粎椹抽悗锝庝簻婵″ジ姊绘担鍛婃喐闁稿鍋ら獮鎰板箮閽樺鎽曢梺鍝勬储閸ㄥ綊鐛姀銈嗙厸闁搞儮鏅涘瓭婵犵鈧尙鐭欓柡宀嬬秮婵偓闁宠桨鑳舵禒鈺冪磽閸屾氨孝闁挎洦浜悰顔界節閸ャ劍娅㈤梺缁樓圭亸娆撴偪閳ь剚淇婇悙顏勨偓鏍箰妤e啫纾婚柣鏂挎憸椤╃兘鏌熼幍顔碱暭闁抽攱鍨块弻娑㈡晜鐠囨彃绗岄梺鑽ゅ枑閸f潙煤椤忓嫀褔鏌涢妷顔惧帥婵炶偐鍠栧娲礃閸欏鍎撻梺鐟板暱濮橈妇鎹㈠鑸碘拻濞达絽鎳欒ぐ鎺戝珘妞ゆ帒鍊婚惌娆撴煙閻戞﹩娈曢柛濠傜仛閵囧嫰寮崹顔规寖缂佺偓鍎抽妶鎼佸蓟閿熺姴绀冮柕濞垮劗閸嬫挾绮欓幐搴㈢槑濠电姷鏁告慨顓㈠箯閸愵喖绀嬮柛顭戝亞閺夊綊鏌f惔銏╁晱闁哥姵鐗犻幃銉╂偂鎼达絾娈惧┑顔姐仜閸嬫挸鈹戦埄鍐憙妞わ附濞婇弻娑㈠箻閺夋垹浠哥紓浣虹帛缁嬫捇鍩€椤掍胶鈯曞畝锝呮健閹本绻濋崑鑺ユ閹晠宕f径瀣瀾闂備浇妗ㄧ欢锟犲闯閿濆鈧線寮撮姀鈩冩珕闂佽姤锚椤︿粙鍩€椤掍胶鈽夐柍瑙勫灴閺佸秹宕熼锛勬崟濠电姭鎷冮崨顔界彧缂備緡鍠楅悷锔炬崲濠靛鐐婇柕濞у啫绠版繝鐢靛О閸ㄧ厧鈻斿☉銏℃櫇闁靛牆顦Ч鏌ユ煛閸モ晛鏋戦柛娆忕箻閺岋綁鎮㈤悡搴濆枈濠碘槅鍨崑鎾绘⒒娴h姤銆冪紒鈧担铏圭煋闁圭虎鍠楅崑鈺傜節闂堟侗鍎忕紒鈧崘鈹夸簻妞ゆ挾鍠庨悘锝夋煙鐎电ǹ鍘存慨濠勭帛閹峰懐绮电€n亝鐣伴梻浣告憸婵敻骞戦崶褏鏆︽繝闈涳功閻も偓濠电偞鍨兼ご鎼佸疾閿濆洨纾介柛灞剧懅閸斿秴鐣濋敐鍛仴闁糕斂鍨藉顕€宕奸悢鍝勫箺闂備胶鎳撻顓㈠磿閹寸偟鐟规繛鎴欏灪閻撴洟鏌¢崒姘变虎闁哄棴缍侀弻鈥崇暆鐎n剛鐦堥悗瑙勬礃鐢帡锝炲┑瀣垫晣闁绘﹢娼ч獮鈧紓鍌氬€搁崐鐑芥倿閿曞倶鈧啴宕ㄥ銈呮喘閺屽棗顓奸崨顖氬Е婵$偑鍊栫敮鎺楀窗濮橆兗缂氶柟閭﹀枤绾惧吋銇勯弮鍥т汗缂佺姴顭烽弻銊モ攽閸繀妲愰梺杞扮閸熸潙鐣烽幒鎴僵闁告鍋為幉銏ゆ⒒娴h棄鍚瑰┑鐐╁亾缂傚倸鍊归懝楣冨煝瀹ュ鏅查柛銉㈡櫇閻撳姊洪崜鑼帥闁哥姵鎹囬崺鈧い鎺嶇缁楁帗銇勯锝囩疄妞ゃ垺锕㈤幃鈺咁敃閿濆孩缍岄梻鍌氬€风欢姘缚瑜嶇叅闁靛牆鎮垮ú顏勎╅柍杞拌兌閸旓箑顪冮妶鍡楃瑨闁稿妫濆銊╂偋閸垻顔曟繝銏f硾椤戝洤煤鐎电硶鍋撶憴鍕8闁搞劏濮ゆ穱濠囧醇閺囩偟鍊為梺闈浨归崕鐑樺閺囥垺鐓熼柣鏂挎憸閻苯顭胯椤ㄥ牓寮鍢夋棃宕崘顏嗏棨濠电姰鍨奸崺鏍礉閺嶎厼纾婚柨婵嗩槹閻撴洟鏌曟径妯虹仩妞も晩鍓欓埥澶愬箻閻熸壆姣㈢紓浣介哺鐢岣胯箛娑樜╃憸蹇涙偩婵傚憡鈷戠憸鐗堝俯濡垵鈹戦悙鈺佷壕闂備浇顕栭崰妤冨垝閹捐绠板┑鐘插暙缁剁偛顭跨捄铏圭伇婵﹦鍋撶换婵嬫偨闂堟稐绮跺銈嗘处閸樹粙骞堥妸锔哄亝闁告劑鍔嶅Σ顒勬⒑閸濆嫮鈻夐柛妯恒偢瀹曞綊宕掗悙瀵稿帾婵犵數鍋熼崑鎾斥枍閸℃稒鐓曢悗锝冨妼婵″ジ妫佹径鎰叆婵犻潧妫欓崳褰掓煛閸℃瑥鏋戝ǎ鍥э躬椤㈡稑顫濋崡鐐╁徍婵犳鍠栭敃銉ヮ渻娴犲鈧線寮撮姀鈩冩珳闂佺硶鍓濋悷锕傤敇婵犳碍鈷掑ù锝堟鐢盯鏌熺喊鍗炰簽闁瑰箍鍨归埞鎴犫偓锝庡墮缁侊箓鏌f惔顖滅У闁哥姵鐗滅划濠氭晲閸℃瑧鐦堟繝鐢靛Т閸婃悂顢旈锔界厵闁哄鍋勬慨鍌涙叏婵犲啯銇濇鐐村姈閹棃鏁愰崒娑辨綌闂傚倷绀侀幖顐︽偋濠婂牆绀堥柣鏃堫棑閺嗭箓鏌i悢绋款棎闁割偒浜弻娑㈠即閵娿儱瀛e┑鐐存綑鐎氼剟鈥旈崘顔嘉ч柛鈩冾殘閻熸劙姊虹紒妯洪嚋缂佺姵鎸搁锝夊箮缁涘鏅滈梺鍓插亞閸犳捇宕㈤柆宥嗏拺闁荤喓澧楅幆鍫㈢磼婢跺缍戦柣锝囨暬瀹曞崬鈽夊▎鎴濆笚闁荤喐绮嶇划鎾崇暦濠婂喚娼╂い鎺戭槹閸嶇敻姊洪棃娴ュ牓寮插⿰鍫濈;闁稿瞼鍋為悡銉╂煟閺傛寧鎯堢€涙繈鏌i悢鍝ユ嚂缂佺姵鎹囬悰顕€寮介鐐殿啇濡炪倖鎸鹃崑鐔哥椤栨粎纾藉ù锝嗗絻娴滅偓绻濋姀锝嗙【闁愁垱娲濋妵鎰板箳閹寸媭妲梻浣呵圭换妤呭磻閹邦兘鏋旈柕鍫濐槹閳锋垹绱撴担璐細缂佺姵鐗犻弻锝夊煛婵犲倻浠╅梺浼欑悼閸忔﹢寮幘缁樺亹闁肩⒈鍓﹀Σ浼存⒒娴h棄浜归柍宄扮墦瀹曟粌顫濇0婵囨櫓闂佺鎻梽鍕煕閹达附鍋i柛銉岛閸嬫捇鎼归銈勭按闂傚倷绀侀幉锟犲蓟閵婏富娈介柟闂寸閻撴繈鏌熼幑鎰靛殭缂佺媴缍侀弻锝夊箛椤撶喓绋囧銈呭閹告悂鍩為幋锔藉亹閻犲泧鍐х矗闂備礁鎽滈崳銉╁垂閸洜宓侀柛鈩冪☉绾惧吋鎱ㄩ敐搴″箹缂傚秴锕獮鍐煛閸涱厾顔岄梺鍦劋缁诲倹淇婇柨瀣瘈闁汇垽娼цⅴ闂佺ǹ顑嗛幑鍥蓟閻斿皝鏋旈柛顭戝枟閻忔挾绱掓ィ鍐暫缂佺姵鐗犲濠氭偄鐞涒€充壕闁汇垻娅ラ悷鐗堟瘎闂佽崵鍠愮划搴㈡櫠濡ゅ懏鍋傞柨鐔哄Т閽冪喐绻涢幋娆忕仼缂佺姵濞婇弻锟犲磼濮樿鲸鐨戦梺鍝勵儏閹冲酣鍩為幋锔藉€烽柛娆忣槸濞咃綁姊绘担绋跨盎缂佽尙鍋撶粚杈ㄧ節閸パ咁啋濡炪倖妫佹慨銈呪枍閵忋倖鈷戦悹鎭掑妼濞呮劙鏌熼崙銈嗗

   闂傚倷娴囬褍霉閻戣棄鏋佸┑鐘宠壘绾捐鈹戦悩鍙夋悙缂佹劖顨婇弻锟犲炊閳轰焦鐏侀梺宕囨嚀缁夋挳鍩為幋锔藉亹闁告瑥顦伴幃娆忊攽閳藉棗浜濋柨鏇樺灲瀵鈽夐姀鐘栥劑鏌曡箛濠傚⒉闁绘繃鐗犻幃宄扳堪閸愩劎鐩庨梺鐟板殩閹凤拷  闂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥嚄閼哥數浠氱紓鍌欒兌缁垶銆冮崨鏉戠厺鐎广儱顦崡鎶芥煏韫囨洖校闁诲寒鍓熷铏圭磼濡搫顫庨梺绋跨昂閸婃繂鐣烽弴鐐垫殕闁告洦鍓涢崢浠嬫⒑闁稑宓嗘繛浣冲嫭娅犳い鏂款潟娴滄粓骞栭幖顓炵仭閻庢熬鎷�  闂傚倸鍊峰ù鍥х暦閸偅鍙忛柡澶嬪殮濞差亜围闁搞儻绲芥禍鐐叏濡厧甯堕柣蹇ラ檮閵囧嫰濮€閿涘嫭鍣板Δ鐘靛仜椤戝寮崘顔肩劦妞ゆ帒鍊婚惌鍡涙煕閺囥劌鐏¢柣鎾跺枑娣囧﹪顢涘┑鎰缂備浇灏畷鐢垫閹炬剚鍚嬮煫鍥ㄦ煥椤忥拷  闂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥嚄閸洖绠犻柟鎹愵嚙鐟欙箓鎮楅敐搴″闁搞劍绻堥獮鏍庨鈧俊鑲╃棯閹佸仮闁哄本娲樼换娑㈡倷椤掍胶褰呴梻浣告啞椤ㄥ棙绻涙繝鍥ц摕闁斥晛鍟欢鐐烘倵閿濆簼绨介柛鏃偳归埞鎴﹀煡閸℃浼堥梺鐟板殩閹凤拷   闂傚倸鍊搁崐宄懊归崶顒婄稏濠㈣泛顑囬々鎻捗归悩宸剰缂佲偓婢跺备鍋撻崗澶婁壕闂佸憡娲﹂崜娆愮闁秵鈷戦梻鍫熶腹濞戙垹宸濇い鏍ュ€楁惔濠傗攽閻樺灚鏆╅柛瀣☉铻炴繛鍡樻尭缁€澶愭煛瀹ュ骸浜炲☉鎾崇У缁绘盯宕卞Ο璇查瀺闂佺粯鎸诲ú妯兼崲濞戙垹骞㈡俊顖氬悑閸n參鏌f惔銏㈠暡闁瑰嚖鎷�   闂傚倸鍊搁崐椋庣矆娓氣偓楠炲鍨鹃幇浣圭稁缂傚倷鐒﹁摫闁告瑥绻橀弻鐔虹磼閵忕姵鐏堥梺娲诲幗椤ㄥ﹪寮诲☉銏犵労闁告劦浜栧Σ鍫㈢磽閸屾瑨顔夐柡鍛█瀵鎮㈢喊杈ㄦ櫖濠电姴锕ら崰姘跺汲椤撶儐娓婚柕鍫濆暙閸旂敻鏌熼崙銈嗗