婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戝鈧倿鎸婃竟鈺嬬秮瀹曘劑寮堕幋鐙呯幢闂備浇顫夊畷妯衡枖濞戞碍顐介柕鍫濇啒閺冨牊鏅查柛娑卞幗濞堟煡姊虹粙娆惧剰妞ゆ垵顦靛濠氭晲閸涘倻鍠庨埢搴ㄥ箚瑜庨鍕煛婢跺棙娅嗙紒璇茬墕椤繘鎼圭憴鍕/闂侀潧枪閸庢煡鎮甸姀銈嗏拺闁荤喐婢樺▓鈺呮煙閸戙倖瀚�
闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾圭€瑰嫭鍣磋ぐ鎺戠倞妞ゆ帊绀侀崜顓烆渻閵堝棗濮х紒鐘冲灴閻涱噣濮€閵堝棛鍘撻柡澶屽仦婢瑰棝宕濆鍡愪簻闁哄倸鐏濋顐ょ磼鏉堛劍宕岀€规洘甯掗~婵嬵敄閽樺澹曢梺鍛婄缚閸庢娊鎯屽▎鎾寸厱闁哄洢鍔岄悘鐘电磼閻欌偓閸ㄥ爼寮婚妸鈺傚亞闁稿本绋戦锟�/濠电姷鏁告慨鐑藉极閸涘﹥鍙忛柣鎴f閺嬩線鏌熼梻瀵割槮缁惧墽绮换娑㈠箣閺冣偓閸ゅ秹鏌涢妷顔煎⒒闁轰礁娲弻鏇$疀閺囩倫銉︺亜閿旇娅嶉柟顔筋殜瀹曟寰勬繝浣割棜闂傚倷绀侀幉鈥趁洪敃鍌氱;濠㈣埖鍔曢弰銉╂煟閹邦喖鍔嬮柍閿嬪灴閹綊骞侀幒鎴濐瀳濠电偛鎳忛崝娆撳蓟閻旂厧绀勯柕鍫濇椤忥拷/缂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾剧懓顪冪€n亝鎹i柣顓炴閵嗘帒顫濋敐鍛闂佽姤蓱缁诲倿婀侀梺缁樏Ο濠囧磿韫囨稒鐓曢柕濞垮劚閳ь剚鎮傚﹢渚€姊虹粙璺ㄧ闁告艾顑囩槐鐐哄箣閿旂晫鍘遍梺闈浨归崕閬嶅焵椤掆偓濞尖€愁嚕婵犳艾惟闁冲搫鍊告禍鐐烘⒑缁嬫寧婀扮紒瀣灴椤㈡棃鏁撻敓锟�
闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋為悧鐘汇€侀弴銏℃櫆闁芥ê顦純鏇㈡⒒婵犲骸浜滄繛璇у缁瑩骞嬮悩鐢靛箵濠德板€曢幊搴g不鐟欏嫮绠鹃柨婵嗛婢ь喖鈹戦垾鐐藉仮闁哄本鐩俊鎼佸Ψ閵夈垹浜鹃柛褎顨呴拑鐔兼煏婵炵偓娅嗛柛瀣閺屾稓浠﹂崜褉妲堝銈呴獜閹凤拷: 闂傚倸鍊搁崐宄懊归崶顒夋晪鐟滃秹婀侀梺缁樺灱濡嫰寮告担绯曟斀闁绘ê鐤囨竟妯肩棯閹规劦鍤欓柍瑙勫灴閹晠宕f径瀣€风紓鍌欑劍閸旀牠銆冩繝鍥ц摕闁跨喓濮撮悙濠囨煃鏉炴壆鍔嶉柣蹇庣窔濮婂搫鐣烽崶銊ユ畬缂備礁顦伴幐鎶藉春閻愬搫绠i柨鏃囨娴滃綊姊洪崨濠勬噧妞わ缚鍗抽獮鍐ㄢ枎韫囧﹥鏂€闂佸疇妫勫Λ妤佺濠靛鐓ラ柡鍥悘鑼偓娈垮枦椤曆囧煡婢舵劕顫呴柣妯荤墦閸旀垿寮婚弴锛勭杸濠电姴鍊搁埛澶愭⒑缂佹ḿ绠栭柣妤冨█楠炲啫鐣¢幍鍐茬墯闂佸憡鍔戦崝搴ㄦ儎鎼淬劍鈷戦柣鐔告緲濞堚晠鏌熼崙銈嗗 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣椤愯姤鎱ㄥ鍡楀幊缂傚倹宀搁弻銈嗘叏閹邦兘鍋撻弽顐熷亾濮橆剦鐓奸柡宀嬬秮瀵噣宕掑顑跨帛缂傚倷璁查崑鎾愁熆閼搁潧濮囩紒鐘侯潐缁绘盯鏁愭惔鈥愁潻婵犵鈧偨鍋㈤柡灞剧☉椤繈顢楅崒婧炪劌螖閻橀潧浠﹂柣妤佹礉瑜颁礁顪冮妶鍡楀潑闁稿鎹囬弻锝堢疀閿濆懏鐝濋梺鍝勮嫰缁夊墎妲愰幒鎳崇喖鎳¢妶搴⑿ч梻鍌欑閹碱偆鎮锕€绀夐柟瀛樼箥閸ゆ洘銇勯幒鎴濐仼闁搞劌鍊归妵鍕籍閸ヨ埖缍堥柣搴$仛閻楁鎹㈠┑瀣仺闂傚牊绋愰幋鐑芥⒑闂堟稒顥滄い鎴濐樀閻涱喛绠涘☉娆愭闂佽法鍣﹂幏锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹瀹勬噴褰掑炊瑜忛弳锕傛煕椤垵浜濋柛娆忕箳閳ь剙绠嶉崕閬嵥囬婊呯焼闁告劏鏂傛禍婊勩亜閹捐泛鏋庨柣蹇ョ秮閺岋綁濡烽濠氬仐濠殿喖锕︾划顖炲箯閸涙潙宸濆┑鐘插暙閸撳灚淇婇悙顏勨偓鏍垂閻㈢ǹ纾归柛顭戝枤閺嗭附绻濇繝鍌氭殜闁衡偓娴犲鐓曟い鎰Т閻忣噣鏌i幘瀛樺鞍缂佺粯绻堟慨鈧柨婵嗘閵嗘劖绻濋姀锝嗙【婵炲樊鍘奸悾鐑藉箣閿曗偓缁犺崵绱撴担鑲℃垵鈻嶅⿰鍫熺厵闁兼祴鏅炶棢闂侀€炲苯澧痪缁㈠弮椤㈡瑩骞嬮悩鐢碉紳闂佺ǹ鏈悷锕偹囨搴g<闂婎剚褰冮埀顒佺箞閻涱喛绠涘☉娆愭闂佽法鍣﹂幏锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸ゅ嫰鏌ら崫銉︽毄濞寸姵纰嶆穱濠囨倷椤忓嫧鍋撻弽顓炲瀭闁汇垻枪閻ゎ噣鏌℃径瀣仼闁哄棴绠撻弻锟犲炊閵夈儳浠鹃梺缁樺笩閸嬫劙鍩€椤掆偓缁犲秹宕曢柆宥呯疇闁规壆澧楅崑鈺傜箾瀹割喕绨奸柛濠傜仛椤ㄣ儵鎮欓懠顑胯檸闂佸憡姊圭喊宥夊Φ閸曨垱鏅滈悹鍥皺娴狀垶姊哄Ч鍥у姶濞存粣缍佽棟鐟滅増甯楅悡娑㈡倶閻愭彃鈷旈柕鍡樺笒闇夐柣娆忔噽閻g敻鏌熼鐣屾噰妞ゃ垺顨婂畷鎺戔槈閸楃偞鍊犵紓鍌氬€搁崐鎼佸磹閻戣姤鍤勯柤鎼佹涧閸ㄦ棃鏌熺紒銏犳灈缂佺媭鍨堕弻銊╂偆閸屾稑顏� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸ゅ嫰鏌涢锝嗙8闁逞屽厸閻掞妇鎹㈠┑瀣妞ゆ挾濯Σ鍗炩攽閻愬瓨缍戦柛姘儏宀e灝鈻庨幋婵愭闂佺鍕垫畷闁抽攱鍨堕妵鍕箳閸℃ぞ澹曠紓鍌欑椤︿即骞愰崘鑼殾鐟滅増甯掔壕濂告煟閹邦剦鍤熼柛妯绘倐濮婃椽宕ㄦ繝鍌氼潎闂佸憡鏌ㄧ€涒晠寮茬捄琛℃闁靛骏绱曢崢浠嬫⒑閸︻厼鍔嬫繛璇х畵瀹曢潧鈻庨幇鈺€绨诲銈嗘尨閸撴繄娑甸崼鏇熺厵闁荤喐婢橀顓㈡煙閻撳海绉虹€规洜鍏橀、妯衡攽閸埄妲板┑鐘垫暩婵兘銆傞鐐潟闁哄洢鍨圭壕鍧楁煙鏉堝墽鐣辩紒鐙€鍨堕弻銊╂偆閸屾稑顏� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸ゅ嫰鏌涢幘鑼妽闁稿繑绮撻弻娑㈩敃閿濆棛顦ラ梺姹囧€濈粻鏍蓟閿濆绠涙い鎾跺О閸嬬偤姊洪崫鍕靛剰缂佸缍婂濠氬Ω閵夈垺鏂€闂佺硶妾ч弲婊嗗€撮梻鍌欑窔閳ь剛鍋涢懟顖炲储閸濄儳纾奸柤闀愮祷婢规﹢鏌i敐鍥у幋濠碘剝鎮傞崺鈩冩媴濞差亞宕滈梻鍌欒兌閹虫捇顢氶鐔峰灁妞ゆ挾鍊i敐鍚ゆ椽顢旈崨顏呭闂備胶鍘ч~鏇㈠磹閺囩偟鎽ュ┑鐘垫暩閸嬫盯鎯囨导鏉戠9闁哄浄绱曟禍钘夆攽閻樺灚鏆╁┑顔芥綑鐓ら柕鍫濇川閻棗顭块懜闈涘闁绘挶鍎甸弻锝夊即閻愭祴鍋撻崷顓涘亾濮樼偓瀚� 婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柟闂寸绾惧鏌i幇顒佹儓闁搞劌鍊块弻娑㈩敃閿濆棛顦ョ紓浣哄С閸楁娊骞冭ぐ鎺戠倞鐟滃秹寮埀顒傜磽閸屾艾鈧湱鍠婂鍥ㄥ床婵炴垯鍨归獮銏′繆椤栨繃顏犲ù鐓庢处缁绘繂鈻撻崹顔界亶婵犵數鍋涢敃顏勵嚕婵犳艾鍗抽柣鏃堫棑缁愮偤姊虹化鏇炲⒉閽冮亶鏌e┑鍥ㄢ拻缂佽鲸鎸婚幏鍛村箵閹哄秴顥氶梺璇查閸樻粓宕戦幘缁樼厱闁哄洢鍔屾晶顔济归悪鈧崹璺侯潖濞差亜绠归柣鎰絻婵⊙囨⒑閸涘﹥纾搁柛鏂跨Ч閹﹢宕卞☉娆屾嫽婵炶揪绲介幉锟犲疮閻愮繝绻嗘い鎰剁到閻忓瓨顨ラ悙鑼闁轰焦鎹囬弫鎾绘晸閿燂拷 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾圭€瑰嫭鍣磋ぐ鎺戠倞妞ゆ巻鍋撶痪鎯ь煼閺岀喖骞嶉纰辨毉闂佺ǹ顑冮崐婵嬪蓟閿熺姴绀冮柕濞у喚鏆梻浣规偠閸斿矂宕愰幖浣圭畳闂備胶枪缁绘劙宕ョ€n喖纾挎俊銈呮噺閻撴稑霉閿濆懏鍟炴い銉e灲閺岋紕浠︾拠鎻掝潎闂佽鍠撻崐婵嗙暦閹烘垟妲堟慨妤€妫旂槐锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹瀹勬噴褰掑炊椤掑鏅悷婊冪箻閸┾偓妞ゆ帊鑳堕埢鎾绘煛閸涱垰孝闁伙絽鍢茶灒闁煎鍊楅惁鍫濃攽椤旀枻渚涢柛妯绘倐楠炴劙宕橀瑙f嫼闂佸憡绋戦敃銉﹀緞閸曨垱鐓曢柟鐐綑閸濊櫣鈧娲╃紞鈧紒鐘崇☉閳藉鈻庨幋婵嗘辈闂傚倷鑳剁划顖毭洪弽顓炵9闁革富鍘搁崑鎾愁潩閻愵剙顏� 婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柟闂寸绾惧鏌i幇顒佹儓闁搞劌鍊块弻娑㈩敃閿濆棛顦ョ紓浣哄Т缂嶅﹪寮诲澶婁紶闁告洦鍓欏▍锝夋⒑缁嬭儻顫﹂柛鏃€鍨垮濠氭晲婢跺﹦顔掗悗瑙勬礀濞层劌危韫囨稒鈷戦柤濮愬€曢弸鎴︽倵濮橆剛澧︾€殿噮鍣e畷鐓庘攽閸℃瑧宕哄┑锛勫亼閸婃牠骞愰悙顒€鍨旀い鎾跺€i敐鍚ゆ椽顢旈崨顏呭闂備胶鍘ч~鏇㈠磹閺囩偟鎽ュ┑鐘垫暩閸嬫盯鎯囨导鏉戠9闁哄浄绱曟禍钘夆攽閻樺灚鏆╁┑顔芥綑鐓ら柕鍫濇川閻棗顭块懜闈涘闁绘挶鍎甸弻锝夊即閻愭祴鍋撻崷顓涘亾濮樼偓瀚� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋涢ˇ鐢稿极閹剧粯鍋愭い鏃傛嚀娴滈箖鏌涢幇闈涘箻闁汇倐鍋撴繝鐢靛仦閸ㄨ泛鐜婚崸妤佹櫖婵炴垯鍨洪埛鎴犵磼椤栨稒绀€濠⒀嗗皺缁辨帞鈧綆鍋勯悘瀵糕偓娈垮枛閹诧紕绮悢鐓庣劦妞ゆ帒瀚拑鐔兼煟閺冨倸甯剁紒鐘崇叀閺岀喐瀵肩€涙ɑ閿┑鐐茬墱閸樺墽妲愰幘瀛樺闁告繂瀚呴敐澶嬬厱闁靛ǹ鍎查崑銉р偓娈垮枛椤兘寮幘缁樺亹闁肩⒈鍓﹀Σ瑙勪繆閻愵亜鈧牠宕濊瀵板﹪宕稿灏栧亾閸涱喖顕遍悗娑櫱氶幏娲⒑閸涘﹦缂氶柛搴″船閳诲秹骞囬悧鍫㈠幍闂佸憡鍨崐鏍偓姘炬嫹
婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柟闂寸绾惧潡鏌熺€电ǹ孝缂佽翰鍊濋弻锕€螣娓氼垱锛嗗┑鐐叉▕娴滄繈寮插⿰鍫熺厽闁逛即娼ф晶顕€骞栭弶鎴含婵﹨娅g划娆撳箰鎼淬垺瀚崇紓鍌欑椤戝棝骞戦崶顒€违闁告稑鐡ㄩ崐濠氭煠閹帒鍔ら柛娆忔濮婅櫣绱掑Ο鑽ゎ槬闂佺ǹ锕ゅ﹢閬嶅焵椤掍胶鍟查柟鍑ゆ嫹: 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋為悧鐘汇€侀弴銏℃櫇闁逞屽墰婢规洝銇愰幒鎾跺幗闂佺鎻徊楣兯夋径宀€妫い鎾寸☉娴滈箖姊婚崒娆戭槮闁硅绻濆畷婵嬪即閻愬秶鍠愮换婵嬪磼濡嘲浜鹃柟鐑樻尵缁♀偓濠殿喗锕╅崢楣冨矗閸℃稒鈷戠紓浣股戠粈鈧梺绋匡工濠€閬嶅焵椤掍胶鍟查柟鍑ゆ嫹 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹瀹勬噴褰掑炊瑜忛弳锕傛煕椤垵浜濋柛娆忕箻閺屸剝寰勭€n亝顔呭┑鐐叉▕娴滄粌娲块梻浣规偠閸庤崵寰婇懞銉ь洸闁绘劦鍓氶崣蹇斾繆椤栨粌甯堕悽顖氱埣閺岋綀绠涢妷鈺傤€嶉梺闈涙搐鐎氱増鎱ㄩ埀顒勬煥濞戞ê顏柛锝勫嵆濮婄儤娼幍顔煎闂佸湱鎳撳ú顓烆嚕椤愶箑绠荤紓浣股戝▍銏ゆ⒑鐠恒劌娅愰柟鍑ゆ嫹 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹瀹勬噴褰掑炊瑜忛弳锕傛煟閵忊懚鍦玻濡ゅ懏鐓欓柟娈垮枛椤eジ鏌涚€e墎绡€闁哄本娲樺鍕醇濠靛棗顥欐繝鐢靛仦閸ㄦ儼褰滃┑鈩冨絻閻楁捇寮婚弴锛勭杸闁哄洨鍊妷鈺傜叆婵炴垶鐟уú瀛樻叏婵犲懏顏犻柟鐟板婵℃悂濡烽敂鎯х稈闂傚倷鑳堕幊鎾诲吹閺嶎厼绠柨鐕傛嫹 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閻戣姤鍊块柨鏇炲€归崕鎴犳喐閻楀牆绗掗柡鍕╁劦閺屾盯寮撮妸銉т哗闂佹悶鍔岄崐鍨潖濞差亶鏁嗛柍褜鍓涚划鏃堟偨缁嬭法锛涢梺闈涚墕椤︿即鎮″☉銏$厱闁靛绲介崝姘舵煟韫囷絼閭柡灞剧⊕閹棃鍩ラ崨鏉挎儓闂備礁鎼悮顐﹀礉閹达箑绠栭柕鍫濐槸绾惧吋绻涢幋鐑囦緵濞寸》鎷� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸婂潡鏌ㄩ弴鐐测偓褰掑磿閹寸姵鍠愰柣妤€鐗嗙粭鎺旂棯閹呯Ш闁哄矉绻濆畷鍫曞煛娴e湱鈧儳鈹戦悙鍙夊櫧濠电偐鍋撻梺鍝勭焿缁犳垼鐏掓繛鎾村嚬閸ㄩ亶鍩㈤幘鏂ユ斀闁绘劖褰冮幃鎴︽煟濡ゅ啫鈻堢€殿喖顭锋俊鎼佸煛閸屾矮绨介梻浣呵归張顒傜矙閹达富鏁傞柨鐕傛嫹 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸婂潡鏌ㄩ弴鐐测偓褰掑磿閹寸姵鍠愰柣妤€鐗嗙粭鎺旂棯閹勫仴闁哄本绋戣灃闁告剬鍛存7婵犵數鍋涘Ο濠冪濠婂嫬鍔旈梻鍌欑劍鐎笛兾涙担鑲濇盯宕熼顐㈡闂佺鍕垫畷闁抽攱鍨块幃褰掑箒閹烘垵顬堝┑鐐叉噺閸旀瑩寮婚悢鐓庣闁靛牆妫楅锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸ゅ嫰鏌ら崫銉︽毄濞寸姵姘ㄧ槐鎾诲磼濞嗘帒鍘$紓渚囧櫘閸ㄥ爼濡撮崘顔煎窛閻庢稒锚娴犲ジ姊虹紒妯虹伇濠殿喓鍊濆畷鎴﹀Ω瑜忕壕濂告倵閿濆骸浜滄い鏇熺矒閺岋絾鎯旈鐓庘拫濠殿喖锕ㄥ▍锝夊箲閸曨垰惟闁靛濡囪ぐ姘舵⒒娴g儤鍤€闁搞倖鐗犻獮蹇涙晸閿燂拷 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸ゅ嫰鏌涢锝嗙缁炬儳娼¢弻锝夊閳惰泛婀辨竟鏇熺節濮橆厾鍘甸梺纭咁潐閸旓箓宕靛▎鎴犵<闁逞屽墯瀵板嫰骞囬鐓庣导闂備焦鎮堕崕顖炲礉瀹ュ洣鐒婇柣銏犳啞閻撴盯鏌涢埄鍐ㄥ闁逞屽墯缁诲牆顕f繝姘╅柍鍝勫€告禍鐐烘⒑缁嬫寧婀扮紒瀣灴椤㈡棃鏁撻敓锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸ゅ嫰鏌涢锝嗙8闁逞屽厸閻掞妇鎹㈠┑瀣妞ゆ挾濯Σ鍗炩攽閻愬瓨缍戦柛姘儏宀e灝鈻庨幋婵愭闁荤喐鐟ョ€氼亞鎹㈤崱娑欑厪闁割偅绻冮崳娲煕閿濆懏璐$紒杈ㄥ浮閹晛鐣烽崶褉鎷伴梻浣告惈鐞氼偊宕濋幋锕€绠栭柕鍫濐槸绾惧吋绻涢幋鐑囦緵濞寸》鎷� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾圭€瑰嫭鍣磋ぐ鎺戠倞妞ゆ帒顦伴弲顏堟⒑閸濆嫮鈻夐柛妯垮亹缁牓宕掑☉姘鳖啎闂佺硶鍓濊摫閻忓浚鍘鹃惀顏堝箚瑜庨崑銉╂煛瀹€瀣?濞寸媴濡囬幏鐘诲箵閹烘埈娼涢梻鍌欑劍閻綊宕愬┑鍫笉闁哄稁鍘奸拑鐔兼煏婵炵偓娅嗛柛瀣閺屾稓浠﹂崜褉妲堝銈呴獜閹凤拷 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸ゅ嫰鏌ら崫銉︽毄濞寸姵纰嶆穱濠囨倷椤忓嫧鍋撻弽顓炲瀭闁汇垻枪閻ゎ噣鏌℃径瀣仼闁哄棴绠撻弻锟犲炊閵夈儳浠肩紓浣哄Х缁垶濡甸崟顖氱睄闁稿本绮嶉幉妯衡攽閳藉棗浜滈柟铏~蹇涙惞鐟欏嫬纾梺闈浨归崕鏌ユ偟閵忋倖鈷戦柣鐔告緲濞堚晠鏌熼崙銈嗗 缂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧綊鏌熼梻瀵割槮缁炬儳婀辩槐鎺斺偓锝庡亾缁扁晜绻涘顔荤盎閸ユ挳姊虹化鏇燁€嗛柡鍛矒椤㈡瑩寮崼鐔叉嫼閻熸粎澧楃敮妤呮晬閻旇櫣纾奸悹浣告贡缁♀偓閻庢鍣崑鍛崲濠靛鐐婇柕濞у啫姹查梻鍌欒兌缁垰煤閺嶎厼纾归柛锔诲幐閸嬫挸顫濋悙顒€顏� 婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柟闂寸绾惧鏌i幇顒佹儓闁搞劌鍊块弻娑㈩敃閿濆棛顦ョ紓浣哄С閸楁娊寮诲☉銏╂晝闁挎繂妫涢ˇ銉х磼閻愵剙鍔ょ紓宥咃躬瀵鍨鹃幇浣告倯闁硅偐琛ラ埀顒€纾鎰版⒒娴h櫣甯涢悽顖涘浮閹ê顫濈捄浣曪箓鏌涢弴銊ョ仩缂佺姵濞婇弻鐔煎箹椤撶偟浠梺杞扮窔缁犳牠寮婚敐鍡樺劅闁靛繈鍨归弳锟犳⒑閻熸澘娈╅柟鍑ゆ嫹 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸ゅ嫰鏌涢锝嗙闁稿被鍔庨幉绋款吋婢舵ɑ鏅梺鎸庣箓椤︻垳绮诲鑸电厾闁告挻褰冮崢鍛婃叏鐟欏嫷娈滄慨濠冩そ瀹曘劍绻濋崒姣挎洟姊洪崫銉バi柣妤佺矌閸掓帡宕奸悢椋庣獮闂佸綊鍋婇崢楣冨矗閸℃稒鈷戠紓浣股戠粈鈧梺绋匡工濠€閬嶅焵椤掍胶鍟查柟鍑ゆ嫹 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸婂潡鏌ㄩ弴妤€浜惧銈庝簻閸熸潙鐣疯ぐ鎺濇晪闁告侗鍨伴弫绋库攽閻愬瓨灏伴柛鈺佸暣瀹曟垿骞橀幖顓燁啍闂佺粯鍔樼亸娆戠不婵犳碍鐓涘ù锝堫潐瀹曞矂鏌℃担瑙勫磳闁轰焦鎹囬弫鎾绘晸閿燂拷 婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柛娑橈功缁犻箖鏌嶈閸撴氨鎹㈠☉娆愬闁告劕寮堕幖鎰棯閹规劦鍤欓柍瑙勫灴閹晠宕f径瀣€风紓鍌欒兌婵參宕归崼鏇炶摕闁靛ň鏅滈崑鍡涙煕鐏炲墽鈽夋い蹇ユ嫹 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸ゅ嫰鏌涢锝嗙闁稿被鍔庨幉鍛婃償閵娿儳鐣鹃梺鍝勫€哥花閬嶅醇椤忓牊鐓曟い鎰剁悼缁犳ɑ銇勯弬鎸庮棦婵﹨娅i幑鍕Ω閵夛妇褰氶梻浣烘嚀閸ゆ牠骞忛敓锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹瀹勬噴褰掑炊椤掑鏅悷婊冪箻楠炴垿濮€閵堝懐鐤€濡炪倖鎸嗛崟闈涙櫖闂傚倸饪撮崑鍕洪敂鍓х煓闁瑰濮锋稉宥嗐亜閺嶎偄浠﹂柣鎾卞劦閺岋綁寮撮悙娴嬪亾閸︻厸鍋撳鐐 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸婂潡鏌ㄩ弴鐐测偓鍝ョ不閺嶎厽鐓曟い鎰剁稻缁€鈧紒鐐劤濞硷繝寮婚妶鍥ф瀳闁告鍋涢~顐︽⒑濞茶骞楅柣鐔叉櫊瀵鎮㈤崨濠勭Ф闂佽鍨庨崨顔ф帡姊绘担鑺ャ€冪紒鈧担鑲濇稑鈹戠€n亣鎽曢梺闈浥堥弲婊堝磻閸℃稒鐓曢悘鐐插⒔閳藉銇勮箛銉﹀ 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹瀹勬噴褰掑炊瑜忛弳锕傛煕椤垵浜濋柛娆忕箻閺屸剝寰勭€n亝顔呭┑鐐叉▕娴滄粓鎮″☉妯忓綊鏁愰崶褍濡哄┑鐐茬墦缁犳牕顫忓ú顏勭闁肩⒈鍓欑敮銉╂⒑缁嬫鍎忛柟鍐查叄閸┿垹顓兼径瀣汗缂傚倷鐒﹀玻鍧楀矗閸℃稒鈷戠紓浣股戠粈鈧梺绋匡工濠€閬嶅焵椤掍胶鍟查柟鍑ゆ嫹 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋為悧鐘汇€侀弴銏犵厱婵﹩鍘介妵婵嬫煛娴gǹ鏆i柛鈹惧亾濡炪倖宸婚崑鎾绘煟濠婂喚鐓肩€规洖缍婇、娆戞喆閸曨厸鍋撴繝姘拺閻熸瑥瀚崝銈囩磼婢跺缍戦悡銈嗐亜閹惧崬鐏╅柡瀣╃窔閺岀喖宕滆鐢盯鏌¢崨顔藉€愰柡灞诲姂閹倝宕掑☉姗嗕紦
婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柟闂寸绾惧鏌i幇顒佹儓闁搞劌鍊块弻娑㈩敃閿濆棛顦ョ紓浣哄Т缂嶅﹪寮诲澶婁紶闁告洦鍓欏▍锝夋⒑缁嬭儻顫﹂柛鏃€鍨垮濠氬Χ閸氥倕婀遍埀顒婄秵閸嬪懘鎮甸幒妤佲拺缂備焦锚缁楁帡鏌ㄩ弴銊ら偗鐎殿喖顭锋俊鎼佸煛閸屾矮绨介梻浣呵归張顒傜矙閹达富鏁傞柨鐕傛嫹: 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閻戣姤鍊块柨鏇炲€归崕鎴犳喐閻楀牆绗掗柡鍕╁劦閺屾盯寮撮妸銉т哗闂佹悶鍔岄崐鍨潖濞差亶鏁嗛柍褜鍓涚划鏃堟偨缁嬭法锛涢梺闈涚墕椤︿即鎮″☉銏$厱闁靛绲介崝姘舵煟韫囷絼閭柡灞剧⊕閹棃鍩ラ崨鏉挎儓闂備礁鎼悮顐﹀礉閹达箑绠栭柕鍫濐槸绾惧吋绻涢幋鐑囦緵濞寸》鎷� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾圭€瑰嫭鍣磋ぐ鎺戠倞鐟滄粌霉閺嶎厽鐓忓┑鐐靛亾濞呭棝鏌涙繝鍌涘仴闁哄被鍔戝鎾倷濞村浜剧憸鐗堝笒绾惧鏌ㄩ悢鍝勑i柣鎾卞劦閺岋繝宕堕…鎴炵暥婵炲瓨绮屾晶浠嬪焵椤掆偓閸樻粓宕戦幘缁樼叆婵犻潧妫欓崳娲煕鐎c劌鍔﹂柡灞稿墲閹峰懐鎲撮崟顐わ紦闂備浇妗ㄩ悞锕傚箲閸ヮ剙鏋侀柟鍓х帛閺呮悂鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾圭€瑰嫭鍣磋ぐ鎺戠倞妞ゆ帒顦伴弲顏堟⒑閸濆嫮鈻夐柛妯垮亹缁牓宕奸悢绋垮伎濠碘槅鍨板ḿ锟犲传閾忓厜鍋撶憴鍕闁绘搫绻濆璇测槈閵忕姷鍔撮梺鍛婂姦娴滄牕危閸儲鈷戠紓浣姑粭鎺楁煟韫囨柨鍝哄┑锛勬暬瀹曠喖顢涘槌栧敽闂備浇顫夐幆宀勫垂闁秴鏋佸Δ锝呭暞閻撶喖骞栧ǎ顒€鐏柛鐔哥叀閺岀喖宕欓妶鍡楊伓 婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柟闂寸绾惧鏌i幇顒佹儓闁搞劌鍊块弻娑㈩敃閿濆棛顦ョ紓浣哄Т缂嶅﹪寮诲澶婁紶闁告洦鍓欏▍锝夋⒑濞茶骞楁い銊ワ躬瀵顓奸崼顐n€囬梻浣告啞閹稿鎯勯鐐叉槬闁逞屽墯閵囧嫰骞掗幋婵囩亾濠电偛鍚嬮崝娆撳蓟閻斿搫鏋堥柛妤冨仒閸犲﹤螖閻橀潧浠滅紒缁橈耿瀵偊骞樼紒妯绘闂佽法鍣﹂幏锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋涢ˇ鐢稿极閹剧粯鍋愰柛鎰紦缂冩洟姊绘担铏瑰笡闁告梹岣挎禍绋库枎閹捐櫕杈堥梺鎸庢礀閸婂綊鎮¢悢鍏肩厪闊洤锕ラ崵澶愭煕閿旇骞樺☉鎾崇Ч閺屸€愁吋鎼粹€崇闂佺粯鎸堕崕鐢稿蓟閿濆鍗抽柣鎰ゴ閸嬫捇宕烽娑樹壕婵ḿ鍋撶€氾拷 婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柟闂寸绾惧鏌i幇顒佹儓闁搞劌鍊块弻娑㈩敃閿濆棛顦ョ紓浣哄С閸楁娊骞冭ぐ鎺戠倞鐟滃秹寮埀顒傜磽閸屾艾鈧湱鍠婂鍥ㄥ床婵炴垯鍨归獮銏′繆椤栨繃顏犲ù鐓庢处缁绘繂鈻撻崹顔界亶婵犵數鍋涢敃顏勵嚕婵犳艾惟闁冲搫鍊告禍鐐烘⒑缁嬫寧婀扮紒瀣灴椤㈡棃鏁撻敓锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧湱鈧懓瀚崳纾嬨亹閹烘垹鍊炲銈庡墻閸撴岸鎯勯姘辨殾闁绘梻鈷堥弫宥嗙箾閹寸伝鑲╃磾閺囥垺鈷掑ù锝呮啞鐠愶繝鏌涚€n偅灏い顏勫暣瀹曠ǹ螖閳ь剟寮告担鎼炩偓鎺戭潩閿濆懍澹曢梻浣告惈鐞氼偊宕濋幋锕€绠栭柕鍫濐槸绾惧吋绻涢幋鐑囦緵濞寸》鎷� 濠电姷鏁告慨鐑藉极閸涘﹥鍙忛柣銏犲閺佸﹪鏌″搴″箹缂佹劖顨嗘穱濠囧Χ閸涱収浠鹃梺鐟板暱閻倸顫忕紒妯诲閻熸瑥瀚禒鈺呮⒑閸涘﹥鐓ョ紒缁樺姍閸┿垽寮惔鎾搭潔濠电姴锕ら幊宥囩磾閺囥垺鈷掗柛灞剧懄缁佺増绻涙径瀣鐎规洘濞婇弫鍐磼濮橀硸鍞甸梻浣芥硶閸o箓骞忛敓锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋為悧鐘汇€侀弴銏℃櫇闁逞屽墰婢规洟宕烽鐘碉紲闁诲函缍嗛崑鎾舵閳哄倻绠剧€瑰壊鍠曠花濠氬炊閹绢喗鈷戦柟鑲╁仜閸旂數绱掗懠璺盒撶紒鍌氱Ч瀹曟粏顦存俊顐灦閺屸剝寰勭€i潧鍔屽┑鈩冨絻缂嶅﹪骞冨Δ鈧~婵嬫倷椤掆偓椤忥拷 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸婂潡鏌ㄩ弴鐐测偓鎼佸垂閸屾稓绡€闂傚牊渚楅崕鎰版煕婵犲倹鍋ラ柡灞诲姂瀵挳鎮欏ù瀣壕闁告稑饪撮弨浼存⒒閸屾瑨鍏岀紒顕呭灦瀹曟繂螖閸涱厽鐎梺鍛婄缚閸庢娊鎯岄崱妞绘斀闁绘ê寮舵径鍕煟閹惧崬鍔﹂柡宀嬬秮瀵挳鎮欏ù瀣壕闁革富鍘搁崑鎾愁潩閻愵剙顏� 婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閹绢喗鍎夊鑸靛姇缁狙囧箹鐎涙ɑ灏ù婊呭亾娣囧﹪濡堕崟顓炲闂佸憡鐟ョ换姗€寮婚悢铏圭<闁靛繒濮甸悘鍫ユ煟鎼淬垼澹樻い锔垮嵆婵$敻宕熼姘鳖唺闂佺懓鐡ㄧ换宥嗙婵傚憡鈷戦柦妯侯槸閺嗙喖鏌涢悩宕囧⒌鐎殿喖顭锋俊鎼佸煛閸屾矮绨介梻浣呵归張顒傜矙閹达富鏁傞柨鐕傛嫹 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸婂潡鏌ㄩ弴鐐测偓鍝ョ不閺嶎厽鐓曟い鎰剁稻缁€鈧紒鐐劤濞硷繝寮婚悢铏圭<婵☆垵娅i鍌炴⒑閸濆嫭锛旈梻鍕缁岃鲸绻濋崶鑸垫櫖濠电偛妫欑敮鈺呭礉閸涱厸鏀介柣鎰皺濮g偤鏌¢崨顖氣枅鐎殿喖顭锋俊鎼佸煛閸屾矮绨介梻浣呵归張顒傜矙閹达富鏁傞柨鐕傛嫹 婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戝鈧倿顢欓悙顒夋綗闂佸搫娲㈤崹鍦缂佹ḿ绠鹃柟瀛樼懃閻掓椽鏌℃担绋款伃闁哄本鐩俊鐑筋敊閻撳寒娼荤紓鍌欑劍閸旀牠銆冩繝鍥ц摕闁绘梻鍘х粻鏌ユ煙娴煎瓨娑ф繛鍫弮濮婃椽宕ㄦ繝鍌滀患婵犵數鍋愰崑鎾绘⒑閸濆嫯顫﹂柛鏃€鍨块獮鍐Χ婢跺﹦锛滃┑鐐村灦閿曗晜瀵奸敓锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾圭€瑰嫭鍣磋ぐ鎺戠倞妞ゆ巻鍋撶痪鎯ь煼閺岀喖骞嶉纰辨毉闂佺ǹ顑冮崐婵嬪蓟閿熺姴绀冮柕濞у喚鏆梻浣规偠閸斿矂宕愰崸妤€钃熺憸鎴犵不濞戙垺鏅查柛娑卞墰閸戣绻濋悽闈涗粶闁硅櫕鍔栫换娑㈠焵椤掑嫭鐓涢悘鐐额嚙婵倿鏌熼鍝勨偓婵嗙暦閹烘垟妲堟慨妤€妫旂槐锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾圭€瑰嫭鍣磋ぐ鎺戠倞妞ゆ巻鍋撶痪鎯ь煼閺岀喖骞嶉纰辨毉闂佺ǹ顑冮崐婵嬪蓟閿熺姴绀冮柕濞у喚鏆梻浣规偠閸斿矂宕愯ぐ鎺懳﹂柛鏇ㄥ灠閸愨偓闂侀潧臎閸涱垰甯撶紓鍌氬€烽懗鑸垫叏闂堟党娑㈠礃椤旇壈鎽曢梺闈浥堥弲婊堝磻閸℃稒鐓曢悘鐐插⒔閳藉銇勮箛銉﹀ 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾圭€瑰嫭鍣磋ぐ鎺戠倞妞ゆ巻鍋撶痪鎯ь煼閺岀喖骞嶉纰辨毉闂佺ǹ顑冮崐婵嬪蓟閿熺姴绀冮柕濞у喚鏆梻浣规偠閸斿矂宕愰崸妤€钃熼柣鏂跨殱閺嬫棃鏌涢…鎴濇灍闁诲繑鎹囧娲川婵犲孩鐣烽悗鍏夊亾闁归棿绀侀拑鐔兼煏婵炵偓娅嗛柛瀣閺屾稓浠﹂崜褉妲堝銈呴獜閹凤拷 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕濡ょ姷鍋為悧鐘汇€侀弴銏℃櫇闁逞屽墰婢规洝銇愰幒鎾充画濠电偛妫楃换鎰邦敂閳哄懏鐓曢柕濠忛檮椤ュ牓鏌″畝瀣暠閾伙絽銆掑鐓庣仭濡ゆ棃姊绘担鍛婃儓婵☆偄閰e畷鎰攽鐎n亣鎽曢梺闈浥堥弲婊堝磻閸℃稒鐓曢悘鐐插⒔閳藉銇勮箛銉﹀ 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸ゅ嫰鏌涢锝嗙缂佺姷濞€閺岀喖骞戦幇闈涙闁荤喐鐟辩粻鎾诲箖濡ゅ懏鏅查幖绮光偓鎰佹交闂備焦鎮堕崝宥囨崲閸儳宓侀柡宥庣仈鎼搭煈鏁嗛柍褜鍓氭穱濠囨嚃閳哄啯锛忛梺璇″瀻娴i晲鍒掗梻浣告惈鐞氼偊宕濋幋锕€绠栭柕鍫濐槸绾惧吋绻涢幋鐑囦緵濞寸》鎷� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕閻庤娲忛崕鎶藉焵椤掑﹦绉甸柍褜鍓﹂崣蹇曠礊娓氣偓閻涱噣骞掑Δ鈧粻濠氭煕濞嗘劌缂氶柣顓熷浮濮婄粯鎷呴崫銉ㄥ┑鈽嗗亯濞夋洜鍒掗崼鐔虹懝闁逞屽墮閻e嘲鈻庨幘鏉戜汗缂傚倷鐒﹀玻鍧楀矗閸℃稒鈷戠紓浣股戠粈鈧梺绋匡工濠€閬嶅焵椤掍胶鍟查柟鍑ゆ嫹
当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《病菌学杂志》 > 2006年第11期 > 正文
编号:11303938
Silencing of Hepatitis A Virus Infection by Small Interfering RNAs
http://www.100md.com 《病菌学杂志》

     Department of Medical Molecular Biology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany

    Health Science Center and Department of Medicine and Clinical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan

    Institute for Molecular Virology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin

    ABSTRACT

    Infection by hepatitis A virus (HAV) can cause acute hepatitis and, rarely, fulminant liver failure, in particular in patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus. Based on our previous observation that small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) can silence translation and replication of the firefly luciferase-encoding HAV replicon, we now exploited this technology to demonstrate the effect of siRNAs on viral infection in Huh-7 cells. Freshly and persistently infected cells were transfected with siRNAs targeting various sites in the HAV nonstructural genes. Compared to a single application, consecutive siRNA transfections targeting multiple sequences in the viral genome resulted in a more efficient and sustained silencing effect than a single transfection. In most instances, multiple applications of a single siRNA led to the emergence of viral escape mutants with mutated target sites that rendered these genomes resistant to RNA interference (RNAi). Efficient and sustained suppression of the viral infectivity was achieved after consecutive applications of an siRNA targeting a computer-predicted hairpin structure. This siRNA holds promise as a therapeutic tool for severe courses of HAV infection. In addition, the results provide new insight into the structural bases for sequence-specific RNAi.

    INTRODUCTION

    Hepatitis A virus (HAV) has a single-stranded RNA genome of 7.5 kb with positive polarity. As a member of the picornavirus family, it is unique in its biological properties, in particular, in its highly protracted replicative cycle in cell cultures and inability to shut off the host cell metabolism. HAV causes a self-limiting infection of the liver with usually mild or no symptoms in young patients, whereas adult patients might suffer from severe symptoms. In immune-compromised or chronically infected patients, fulminant hepatic failure is often associated with a high mortality rate (15, 52). Albeit vaccines against hepatitis A virus can prevent the disease (3, 14, 31), they are futile for fulminant hepatitis. Therefore, therapeutic intervention strategies to prevent progression to a life-threatening liver disease are still in need. Given that the rapid degradation of the HAV genome can ameliorate viral infection and thus prevent fulminant failure, RNA interference (RNAi) based on sequence-specific genome degradation may present a novel and specific therapeutic approach in preventing severe disease progression.

    Initially demonstrated in Caenorabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster, RNAi is now recognized as a valuable tool to silence viral infections (reviewed in references 22, 48, and 50). Among the numerous viruses that have been successfully silenced by RNAi, there are five representatives of the picornavirus family: poliovirus (19, 20), human rhinovirus (45), enterovirus 71 (37), foot-and-mouth disease virus (7, 9, 36), and coxsackievirus B3 (1, 40). Recently, we have shown that genome replication of an HAV replicon can be efficiently inhibited by small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) targeting either coding or noncoding regions of the genome (26, 27, 34). Yet, silencing of the complete HAV life cycle by RNAi has so far not been addressed, owing to several unique features of this virus that might conflict with efficient gene silencing. The noncytolytic replication of HAV in cell culture is unusual for a picornavirus, yet typical for other hepatitis viruses, such as hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus (HCV), for which successful RNAi has been reported (4, 18, 30, 50). In contrast to most picornaviruses, HAV replicates asynchronously in cell culture due to the highly protracted uncoating of the viral RNA. The HAV capsid differs from that of other picornaviruses in its high physical stability, which efficiently protects the genome from degradation. This feature and the relative long half-life of the viral genome may hamper the efficacy of short-lived siRNAs (35). Finally, due to the high mutation rate during RNA virus replication, the HAV genome has the potential to escape the siRNA inhibitory pressure with the emergence of resistant mutants.

    Various approaches have been tested to efficiently and sustainably interfere with viral replication, including siRNA-expressing vectors and multiple siRNA applications. In general, however, the sequence and/or structural motifs of an individual siRNA and its target still remain elusive. Hence, to more efficiently suppress HCV and poliovirus replication, multiple sequences within the viral genome have been targeted using endonuclease-generated siRNAs (21, 30). In order to reduce nonspecific effects on cellular genes, unique and, possibly, conserved sequences in the viral genome should be targeted.

    In the experimental setting of the HAV-infected cell culture, we elaborated molecular details to efficiently interfere with HAV replication. We used various siRNAs that target sequences within the region encoding the HAV nonstructural proteins and that had been successfully shown to inhibit replication of the HAV replicon (26, 34). Although specific and sustained suppression by siRNAs was observed, their efficiency and the emergence of RNAi-resistant mutants varied significantly and depended on the amount of actively replicating viral genomes present under various infection conditions. Comparing the viral escape genomes, evidence was obtained that RNAi-resistant genomes either preexisted in the quasispecies populations of the viral inoculum or emerged by mutation under the siRNA selection pressure. We identified an exceptionally efficient siRNA target (2C-1) in the HAV gene 2C that significantly reduced the viral infectious titer without giving way to measurable viral escape mutants. Unlike the other siRNA targets, computer folding of the entire HAV genome predicts the 2C-1 target assumes a hairpin conformation. Our data suggest that RNAi may provide a specific antiviral approach to treat severe cases of hepatitis A.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Cells and viruses. African green monkey kidney (BS-C-1) cells and the human hepatoma cells (Huh-7) (41) were grown in Dulbecco's modified minimal essential medium (DMEM) supplemented with 2 mM glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, and fetal calf serum (10% in growth and 2% in maintenance medium). HAV inoculum derived from recombinant cDNA pT7-18f (32) was used to infect the cells at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.1 50% tissue culture infective doses (TCID50)/cell. Huh-7 cells persistently infected with HAV (Huh-7/HAV) were prepared by consecutive passages (five times every fifth day) of HAV-infected cells as described previously for human embryo fibroblasts (51).

    siRNAs. siRNA duplexes targeting various domains of the HAV nonstructural proteins were designed and synthetically prepared as described previously (26). The nucleotide (nt) sequences of the siRNAs were the following (5' to 3'): 2C-1 (GGUUGAAGUUAAACCUGCUUU, nt 4796 to 4813; accession number M59808 augmented with known 5'- and 3'-terminal bases); 2C-2 (UGAUAUGUUGAAUGUUAAUUU; nt 4838 to 4856); 3A (UGAUAGUGCAGUAGCUGAGUU; nt 5030 to 5048); 3C (UAGAGGUGGAACUUACUAUUU; nt 5480 to 5498); 3D-1 (AGCUGAAAUUGAUCCAAUGUU; nt 6089 to 6107); and 3D-2 (GAAACUUGGCAUGACAGCUUU; nt 7073 to 7091). In addition, the mutated siRNA 2C-1mut containing four nucleotide mutations (shown in bold) was used as a control for target specificity (GAUUGAAGUCAAACCAGCAUU). All siRNA duplexes contained two uridine residues at the 3' ends, and their location in the HAV genome is schematically depicted below in Fig. 1. Control siRNAs targeting -actin or a scrambled sequence were obtained from Ambion.

    siRNA transfection. The efficiency of cell transfection was optimized using carboxyfluorescein-labeled negative control siRNA (Ambion). More than 80% of the cells were transfected using 80 pmol of carboxyfluorescein-labeled siRNA per 104 cells in a six-well plate at 30 to 40% confluence (not shown). This amount of siRNA was used in all transfection experiments. BS-C-1 and Huh-7 cells were grown to 30 to 40% confluence in antibiotic-free medium in a six-well plate. Eighty picomoles of siRNA in 0.25 ml OptiMEM-1 (Invitrogen) and 4 μl Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) in 0.25 ml OptiMEM were incubated separately for 5 min at room temperature before incubating them together for 20 min at room temperature. The liposome/siRNA complex was added to the cells previously washed with 1 ml OptiMEM. The cells were incubated at 37°C for 6 h with rocking the plate every 15 min to prevent cell drying. Immediately after siRNA treatment, the cells were either infected with HAV or transfected with synthetic HAV transcripts (see below). Consecutive siRNA transfections, if applied, were performed similarly to single transfection.

    HAV infection with viral inoculum (acute infection). The HAV inoculum prepared by multiple passages of HAV (strain 18f) in BS-C-1 cells was used to infect siRNA-transfected BS-C-1 or Huh-7 cells at an MOI of 0.1 TCID50/cell. After 3 to 4 h of incubation at 37°C, the inoculum was replaced with antibiotic-free growth medium (DMEM10), which was changed every 4 to 5 days. The cells were harvested at the indicated time points in 0.25 ml 150 mM phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.5 (PBS) containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBS-T), and the cell lysate was prepared as described below.

    HAV infection with synthetic transcripts. Immediately after the first treatment of Huh-7 cells with siRNAs as described above, 1 μg synthetic HAV RNA produced by T7 in vitro transcription of pT7-18f (strain 18f) (32) was transfected into 104 cells (one well of a six-well plate) using 3 μl DMRIE-C as recommended by the manufacturer (Invitrogen). After 6 h, the transfection mixture was replaced by growth medium without antibiotics (DMEM10), and the incubation was continued with medium change every 4 to 5 days. At day 3 to 5 posttransfection (p.t.), cells of two wells were harvested to assay the HAV antigen level and infectivity, while the cells from the other two wells were split 1:4 and transfected again 1 day later with the same siRNAs at a confluence of approximately 30% to 40%. siRNA transfections were repeated three times in total.

    siRNA transfection of persistently infected cells (established HAV infection). Persistently infected Huh-7/HAV cells in six-well plates were siRNA transfected as described above. The cells were harvested in duplicate at days 1 and 6 p.t. At day 5 p.t., the cells in two wells were split 1:4. After reaching 30 to 40% confluence (usually the next day), they were used for a second transfection with the same siRNA (day 6). Four days later, the transfected cells of two wells were harvested (day 10), whereas the other two wells were split 1:4 on day 9 p.t. and transfected with siRNA on day 10. The final cell harvest was done on day 14 p.t.

    Analysis of cell lysate. After three cycles of freeze-thaw, the cell lysate was clarified by centrifugation and the supernatant was used to analyze HAV antigen, infectivity by end point titration, and -actin and viral proteins by immunoblotting. The number of HAV genome copies was determined by real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). The nucleotide sequence of the rescued viral genome was determined after RT-PCR amplification of the target region (see below).

    HAV antigen detection. The particle-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with monoclonal anti-HAV antibody 7E7 (Mediagnost, Germany) was applied to detect the HAV antigen (32). Immunoblot analysis of VP1 was performed as described before (32).

    End point titration. To determine the HAV infectivity after siRNA treatment, cell lysates were diluted in OptiMEM and 0.25 ml of each dilution was inoculated into 4 wells of Huh-7 cells grown in a 24-well plate. After 3 h of incubation at 37°C, the inoculum was replaced with 0.5 ml of maintenance medium and the incubation was continued with medium change every 5 days. Eleven to 12 days later, the infected cells were washed with 0.5 ml PBS prior to the addition of 0.2 ml PBS-T. The cells were broken up by freeze-thawing directly in the plate, and 0.1 ml of the extract was assayed for HAV antigen (see above). The TCID50/ml was calculated according to the Reed-Muench method.

    HAV genome quantification. Total RNA was extracted with TRIzol (Invitrogen), and HAV RNA was reverse transcribed at 50°C for 1 h using 2.5 mM oligo(dT)15-18 and 10 U/μl SuperScript III (Invitrogen). Real-time PCR with 0.5 μM primers specific for HAV 3C (sense, 5'-ACTTTGGAAATAGCAGGACTGG-3'; antisense, 5'-AGATTGATTCGATGAAACC-3') was performed by using SYBR Green supermix (Bio-Rad) in a Bio-Rad iCycler. The profile included an incubation at 95°C for 5 min and 35 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 55°C, and 72°C. The data were normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene amplification using the same profile, except for the annealing temperature (62°C instead of 55°C). The following GAPDH-specific primers were used: sense, 5'-AACAGCGACACCCACTCCTC-3'; antisense, 5'-GGAGGGGAGATTCAGTGTGGT-3'. Full-length HAV cDNA was used as the standard for quantitative PCR.

    Sequencing of the rescued viral genome. Cytoplasmic RNA was extracted with TRIzol (Invitrogen) from siRNA-treated HAV-infected Huh-7 cells, persistently infected Huh-7/HAV cells, or Huh-7 cells transfected with synthetic HAV RNA, reverse transcribed, and PCR amplified using the C.therm. polymerase one-step RT-PCR system (Roche) and sense and antisense primers targeting genome regions encoding HAV 2C (5'-TGATGGAGTTAAGGACTGCGAGTTTTTCCAACTGGTTA-3' and 5'-CATTATCATCTGAAATTCCCCGAGACCACAACTCCATGAATTCAG-3'), 3A (5'-AGAGGGGGAGGAGAGAGCTTAACATCGATTGCATTG-3' and 5'-GTCCTGCTATTTCCAAAGTTAACTGAGATTCTACTGGATCTGCATC-3'), 3C (5'-GATGCAGATCCAGTAGAATCTCAGTTAACTTTGGAAATAGCAGGAC-3' and 5'-GTAAACTCCACTTTCATAATTCTCTTACTTTCAATTTTCTTATC-3'), or 3D (5'-GATAAGAAAATTGAAAGTAAGAGAATTATGAAAGTGGAGTTTAC-3' and 5'-GACTGAACAAAATAATAGAATTTCTGATAAAACTCATAGCCATGC-3') according to the manufacturer's protocol. The 2C amplification product was sequenced with the sense primer 5'-ATTAGTTTGCATCATTGATGATATTGGCCAAAACACAA-3', for analyzing the sequence of both 2C target regions. For sequencing the 3A and 3C amplification products, the antisense primer 5'-ACACCATGATATACCCCTTGAGCTGGGATTGGTTCTTCCTC-3' and sense primer 5'-GTAATATCTCTAAACTGAGGAATTGTAGGAACCTTCATCAG-3' were used, respectively. The sense 5'-GTTTTAATAGTTTCTCGAGATGTACAGATCGATAATCTTGATTTGAT-3' and the antisense 5'-GTATGGAAACCTGGATTC-3' primers were used to sequence the 3D-1 and 3D-2 target regions in the RT-PCR amplification product of the rescued viruses. Sequencing was performed by the dideoxynucleotide termination method (AGOWA, Berlin, Germany).

    Reporter gene expression. HAV and poliovirus replicon RNAs were transcribed with T7 RNA polymerase (RiboMax; Promega) from plasmids pT7-18f-LUC-A60 (33) and pRLuc181 (kind gift of R. Andino) linearized with AgeI and MluI, respectively. Runoff transcripts were characterized by denaturing 0.8% agarose gel and spectrophotometry before transfection into Huh-7 cells. Luciferase activity was measured as described previously (16).

    Preparation of RNAi-resistant genomes. The QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis procedure (Stratagene) was used to insert mutations into the 3D-1 and 3D-2 target sites of the full-length (33) and firefly luciferase-encoding HAV cDNAs. For this, the sense primer 5'-gctatgcccttttctaaAGCAGAGATTGATCCAATGgctgtgatgttatctaag-3' or 5'-caaaaaattgtagatgagtttaaGAAGCTTGGTATGACAGCTacttctgctgacaag-3' and their complementary oligonucleotides, respectively, were used. The target regions and mutated nucleotides are shown in capital letters and bold, respectively. Before transfer of a PflMI-AatII fragment into dephosphorylated and restricted with the same enzymes pT7-18f-A60 and replicon pT7-18f-LUC-A60 (33), the sequence of a fragment containing a double-mutated 3D-1 region (3.3 kb) was verified (AGOWA, Berlin, Germany). The transfer of the fragment containing a double-mutated 3D-2 region (2.5 kb) into both plasmids was performed in a similar way using XhoI and AatII restriction enzymes. After linearization with AgeI, T7 transcripts of the parental and mutated viral and replicon genomes were generated and analyzed as described earlier (33). Two consecutive transfections of double-mutated full-length and replicon RNAs into siRNA-pretreated Huh-7 cells were done in triplicate and quadruplicate, respectively.

    RNA secondary structure prediction. An online siRNA design service (MWG siMAX) was used to anticipate possible genome sites within HAV for effective siRNAs. Possible local secondary structures (optimal energy) for these regions were generated as part of these procedures. The sequence of HAV-18f (accession number M59808) was extended to include known 5'- and 3'-terminal bases and analyzed in its entirety (7,507 bases) for optimal and suboptimal folding patterns, using methods similar to other picornaviruses (44). The P-num (pairing number) values are a standard output for this method and tabulate the relative fidelity with which each base in the optimal fold would choose to maintain that configuration, if offered a defined energy window (+12 kcal) near the optimal (–1,848 kcal). The match value tests the number of times (percent) a base was observed to take its most popular pairing partner in the sampled cohort (100 times) of suboptimal structures within an energy window (+9 kcal) near the optimum.

    RESULTS

    Recently, we have shown that replication of the HAV replicon encoding the firefly luciferase in place of the viral capsid proteins was efficiently suppressed by siRNAs targeting various domains of the nonstructural proteins or the reporter gene (26, 34). Preliminary data indicated that some of these siRNAs might also silence HAV infection. However, antiviral interference with siRNAs faces major challenges, as this virus replicates slowly and its RNA might outlast the half-life of siRNAs. To advance our understanding of the molecular requirements and genetic consequences of efficient RNAi, HAV replication under various cell culture conditions was tested in the presence of a set of siRNAs that were successfully used to inhibit HAV subgenomic RNA replication (26). The following parameters were analyzed: (i) host cells that distinctively support HAV replication; (ii) various schemes of infection (acute, persistent, or initiated by the HAV RNA transcript); (iii) single or multiple applications of one or more siRNAs; finally, (iv) emergence of escape mutations in the siRNA target region.

    Silencing of acute HAV infection. HAV-susceptible BS-C-1 cells were transfected with the synthetic siRNA duplexes 2C-1, 2C-2, 3A, 3C, 3D-1, and 3D-2 targeting the HAV genome at the sites indicated in Fig. 1. Note that target site 2C-1 is located in a stem-loop structure of the computer-folded full-length HAV genome and more exposed than any of the other targets (see below). Immediately after siRNA transfection, the cells were infected with the 18f variant of HAV strain HM175. A scrambled siRNA was used as a negative control (Ambion). To assess suppression of HAV replication, the decrease in viral particle formation and the reduction of viral infectivity were determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and by end point titration, respectively. Moderate suppression of viral particle formation was observed 5 and 10 days p.t. (not shown). Depending on the siRNA used, the infectious titer (TCID50/ml) decreased by 0.75 to 2.5 orders of magnitude compared to cells treated with control siRNA (data not shown). At day 15 p.t., the suppression levels were less than at earlier time points (maximum, 15% inhibition of particle formation and 0.25 log for infectivity). Possibly due to the short half-life of the transfected siRNAs compared to the slow and asynchronous replication of HAV, crucial RNAi levels were only attained at early stages of infection. Alternatively, the emergence of mutant viruses that had escaped RNAi might be reason for abating RNAi (21). To prevent the emergence of siRNA-resistant mutants, we treated HAV-infected cells with a mixture of two siRNAs. Compared to the effect of a single siRNA, two siRNAs combined induced a more sustained suppression, albeit the effect was not additive (not shown). At 10 and 15 days p.t., inhibition of viral particle formation and infectivity was twice as high when two RNAs were used in combination, implying that besides the short half-life of the siRNA duplexes, the emergence of viral escape mutants may limit the efficiency of RNAi (see below).

    HAV replication is less efficient in BS-C-1 cells than in liver cells, which are the natural host for HAV replication in vivo and produce larger amounts of infectious virus (35, 47) or viral replicon (16, 57). To test whether the extent of RNAi depended on the host cell line and the rate of viral replication, the human hepatoma cell line Huh-7 was transfected with the same set of siRNAs and infected with HAV as described above. In contrast to BS-C-1 cells, in Huh-7 cells HAV infection was inhibited in a sustained manner (Fig. 2A, B, and C). A 104.7-fold suppression of infectivity was observed 4 days p.t. (Fig. 2A), with the tendency to decrease over time (2.6 orders of magnitude at day 8 p.t. [Fig. 2B] and 1.6 log at day 12 p.t. [Fig. 2C]). All HAV-specific siRNAs suppressed HAV replication to almost the same extent (TCID50/ml values varied maximally by ±0.5 log (Fig. 2A, B, and C), which was confirmed after quantitative analysis of the viral structural protein VP1 by immunoblotting (data not shown). As mentioned above and further analyzed below, the loss of specific suppression of HAV infection at late time points might reflect the emergence of mutant viruses escaping RNAi.

    To directly measure the loss of viral genomes by RNAi, the viral genome copy number was determined by real-time RT-PCR in siRNA-treated and HAV-infected Huh-7 cells 4 and 12 days p.t. The genome equivalent/infectious particle ratio was 1 x 102 in the case of cells treated for 4 days with control siRNA (1 x 108.57 physical genomes to 1 x 106.6 of infectious viral particles), whereas the ratio was approximately 104.0 in HAV siRNA-treated cells (1 x 106.2 genome copies per 1 x 102.2 infectious particles) (Fig. 2A). The reduction in genome number was clearly less pronounced than the loss of infectivity as detected by end point titration (Fig. 2A, B, and C), implying that degradation of viral RNA mediated by specific siRNAs is incomplete. Apparently, partially degraded yet noninfectious genomes were still detected by real-time RT-PCR. At a later time point, the difference in genome number in cells treated with HAV-specific and unspecific siRNAs was marginal.

    In order to assess whether a short-term RNAi effect can be prolonged and also to prevent the escape of RNAi-resistant viral mutants, different siRNAs were consecutively transfected into HAV-infected cells. Acutely infected Huh-7 cells were transfected on days 0, 2, 5, and 8 with various siRNAs as indicated (Fig. 2D), and the infectious titer was determined 12 days postinfection. Viral replication was substantially more suppressed after consecutive siRNAs applications (titer reduction by 3.7 log [Fig. 2D] compared to 1.6 log for single application [Fig. 2C]). A similar enhancement of RNAi by consecutive siRNA applications was also obvious in HAV-infected BS-C-1 cells. At day 15 p.t., the acute HAV infection as judged by infectivity titer was 37 times more efficiently suppressed than that after a single siRNA transfection (not shown). The reduction of the infectious titer was in good agreement with the loss of HAV genome copies detected by real-time RT-PCR, indicating that siRNA genome degradation was more efficient after repeated siRNA treatments compared to a single transfection (not shown). Taken together, the results suggest that HAV RNAi was sustained after consecutive siRNA transfection and depended on the viral replication rate, which was influenced by the host cells (35). Substantially stronger inhibition of the acute HAV infection was achieved in human hepatoma cells than in BS-C-1 cells, and viral replication was significantly more suppressed when siRNAs targeting different HAV genomic regions were consecutively applied.

    RNAi targeting the established HAV infection. The data obtained with Huh-7 cells (Fig. 2) clearly indicated that siRNAs delivered into the cells at the same time as the viral inoculum (acute infection) can efficiently suppress HAV replication and may thus be of therapeutic use. However, in order to treat severe cases of acute hepatitis A and possibly fulminant liver failure (52), an ongoing HAV infection has to be suppressed. To address this issue in a model system, a persistent HAV infection in hepatoma cells (Huh-7/HAV) was established and its suppression by RNAi was studied. Since in persistently infected cells viral genome replication is highly retarded with only a small proportion of the genomes replicating, we aimed to stimulate viral replication. To this end, persistently infected Huh-7/HAV cells were induced to divide by splitting them 1 day prior to siRNA treatment, as we had recently shown that viral replication is enhanced in actively dividing cells (35). Moreover, to enhance the silencing efficacy, applications with the same siRNA were repeated. The data presented in Fig. 3A clearly show that siRNA 2C-1 efficiently suppressed the formation of viral particles, in particular after the second and third siRNA applications. In parallel, the infectivity titer decreased after each application of siRNA 2C-1, resulting in a 3-log reduction after three consecutive applications (Fig. 3B).

    A similar loss of HAV antigen was observed after multiple applications of siRNA 3C (Fig. 3A). However, this effect seemed to be mostly due to stress-related cell death upon repeated siRNA transfections. Weak or no suppression of the HAV antigen (30% to 40%) was observed after transfection of siRNAs 2C-2 and 3A. Intriguingly, after three applications of siRNA 2C-2, the infectious titer increased compared to transfection with negative control siRNA (Fig. 3B). The two first applications of siRNAs 3D-1 and 3D-2 suppressed viral particle formation to approximately 30% to 50%. However, the initial HAV antigen level (Fig. 3A) and infectivity (not shown) were almost restored after an additional siRNA treatment. While similar infectious titers (107 TCID50/ml) were detectable in acutely and persistently infected cells, the established HAV infection was much less suppressed than the acute infection (Fig. 2), implying that a large proportion of the viral genomes in persistently infected cells were inaccessible to the RNAi machinery. Although not directly proven here, observations of ours and another group suggest that most HAV genomes in persistently infected cells are packaged and only a minor fraction of all potentially infectious genomes is actively replicating and accessible to gene silencing (reference 2 and unpublished observation). The data may also imply that RNAi-resistant viral mutants might have emerged from the viral quasispecies genome present in persistently infected cells.

    To determine whether the appearance of siRNA-resistant mutants after multiple siRNA applications was the cause for the increase in viral antigen level and infectivity (Fig. 3A and B), total RNA was isolated from the lysates of infected and siRNA-treated cells (Fig. 3A) and the viral genomes were sequenced after RT-PCR amplification of the target domain. As expected, viral genomes that had resisted the treatment with siRNA 3D-1 and 3D-2 carried mutations in the target sequences (Fig. 4, bottom row, middle and right panels). At the indicated time point, a mixture of two nucleotides was found at positions 4 and 7 of target 3D-1 and at position 4 of target 3D-2, suggesting the selection of RNAi-resistant sequences from the viral quasispecies. As these nucleotide exchanges were in the wobble position of the codons, none of the mutations resulted in an altered amino acid residue. Interestingly, the C-to-U substitution causing a G-U mismatch in the central position (11th nt) of the 3D-2 target site (bottom row, right panel) was complete and similar to that described for poliovirus (21).

    Nucleotide sequence determination of the 2C-2 target region revealed that positions 11 and 17 were partially mutated, resulting in a change from amino acid residue asparagine (N) to aspartic acid (D) in both positions (Fig. 4, bottom row, left panel). No nucleotide changes were found in the 3A and 3C target regions of the rescued viruses (not shown). As overall suppression by siRNAs 3A and 3C was either low or nonspecific, this suggests that these targets were mostly inaccessible for RNAi. Finally, sequence analysis of the virus present in low amounts after the third treatment with siRNA 2C-1 revealed no changes (not shown). Taken together, the analysis of the viral genomes rescued after siRNA treatments of HAV-infected cells revealed that the RNAi efficacy significantly depended on the target region. Whereas RNAi-resistant escape mutants were found for targets 2C-2, 3D-1, and 3D-2, no specific effect was achieved with siRNAs 3A and 3C and a strong silencing effect with siRNA targeting 2C-1 was observed. As the target of RNAi was the quasispecies genome of the actively replicating virus, it is most likely that these RNAi-resistant variants were already present in the quasispecies populations and that their replication was favored under the siRNA-specific selection pressure (see also reference 54). However, the possibility cannot be excluded that the viral genome had mutated in the target region under the siRNA pressure.

    RNAi targeting HAV infection initiated by synthetic RNA. To distinguish between these two possibilities, in the next experiment viral replication was initiated by infectious synthetic transcripts that encode perfectly matching target sequences. Huh-7 cells were simultaneously transfected with infectious transcripts and the various siRNAs. To ensure sustained silencing, additional siRNA transfections followed, as described above for the persistently infected cells (Fig. 3C). siRNA treatment of HAV RNA-transfected cells inhibited the viral particle formation more profoundly than that of the ongoing HAV infection in persistently infected cells (compare Fig. 3A and C), supporting our earlier observation that a large proportion of the viral genomes in persistently infected cells is protected from RNAi. Again, siRNA 2C-1 was found to be the most efficient silencer (92% inhibition), whereas siRNAs targeting 2C-2, 3A, 3C, 3D-1, and 3D-2 domains were less effective after the first treatment (80%, 56%, 79%, 78%, and 52% inhibition, respectively) (Fig. 3C). Compared to acutely (Fig. 2A) and persistently (Fig. 3A) infected cells, a similar number of infectious viral genomes was present in RNA-transfected cells as the absolute titer reached 107 TCID50/ml at 4 days p.t. The second application of siRNAs enhanced the suppression of the HAV antigen (Fig. 3C). Intriguingly, after the third siRNA application, the level of the HAV suppression was no longer enhanced but was slightly decreased. The loss in HAV antigen levels roughly correlated with the drop in the infectious titer determined after the various siRNA treatments (Fig. 3C and D). Compared to the TCID50/ml values obtained with the control siRNA, three applications of siRNA 2C-1 decreased the infectious titer by 3 orders of magnitude. For all other siRNAs, except 2C-2, the infectious titer values were below those of the control siRNA by 0.5 to 1.5 orders of magnitude. Intriguingly, the infectious titer for siRNA 2C-2-treated cells was reproducibly higher than that of the control siRNA (0.5 to 1.0 orders of magnitude) (Fig. 3D). When RNAi of the ongoing infection (Fig. 3A and B) was directly compared with the silencing of HAV replication initiated by synthetic transcripts (Fig. 3C and D) or the viral inoculum (Fig. 2), it was obvious that a higher silencing effect was achieved under the latter conditions. Whereas in the ongoing HAV infection the suppression of viral particle formation after one siRNA application was maximally 70%, it was up to 95% in infections initiated by synthetic HAV RNA and similar to that of the acute infection (compare Fig. 3A and C and Fig. 2). Most likely, the limited RNAi effect on an ongoing HAV infection was due to the inaccessibility of a substantial portion of the viral genomes that were packaged.

    To examine whether RNAi-resistant viral variants had evolved under the infection and selection conditions described for Fig. 3, the total RNA of the HAV-expressing cells treated three times with siRNA was used for sequence determination as described above. In contrast to RNAi of the established HAV infection (Fig. 4, bottom row, middle and right panels), neither of the viral genomes derived from synthetic RNA and replicating in the presence of siRNAs 3D-1 or 3D-2 had nucleotide changes (Fig. 4, middle row, middle and right panels). Interestingly, a similar difference between resistant mutants emerging from synthetic transcripts or established replications was recently described for HCV (56). Moreover, the genomes replicating in the presence of siRNAs 2C-1, 3A, and 3C were unchanged under the selective pressure used (not shown). However, similar to the siRNA 2C-2-mediated silencing of the ongoing infection (bottom row, left panel), the virus that emerged from synthetic transcripts carried mutations at the 2C-2 target positions A11G and A17G (middle row, left panel). These mutations resulted in an amino acid change from Asn to Asp. Under all experimental conditions used, the A11G and A17G mutations in target 2C-2 were always and repeatedly found in the background of the parental sequence. Clonal isolation of the rescued virus will be necessary to determine whether both mutations occurred in one genome and whether the wild-type virus and its nonstructural protein 2C is required (as a trans-acting factor) for replication of the mutated genome. Interestingly, the infectious titer of the virus evading three siRNA 2C-2 applications was always higher than that of the negative control (Fig. 3B and D). This implies that a more efficiently replicating virus with amino acid replacements in 2C (Asn to Asp) had evolved under siRNA 2C-2 suppression. This observation was confirmed by HAV genome quantification using real-time RT-PCR. One hundred times more genome copies were found after the third siRNA 2C-2 treatment compared to that of the scrambled siRNA (not shown). Collectively, the data presented here for the slowly replicating HAV suggest that the fraction of replicating genomes among the viral RNA and the rate of RNA synthesis and thus of mutation are major determinants for the efficiency of RNAi and the emergence of siRNA-resistant escape mutants.

    To further demonstrate that the observed RNAi was HAV specific, the suppressive effect of selected siRNAs was tested on the poliovirus replicon and different HAV strains. Luciferase expression of the poliovirus replicon was unaffected in the presence of 2C-1, 2C-1mut, and scrambled control siRNAs. In contrast, the luciferase activity of the HAV replicon (33) was significantly inhibited by siRNA 2C-1 (73.7% inhibition), but not by 2C-1mut (0.6% inhibition). The sequence specificity was further confirmed by comparing the suppressive effect on two HAV strains differing in the 2C-1 target sequence. siRNA 2C-1mut was unable to silence the replication of HAV strain 18f (0.5% inhibition) but efficiently suppressed the replication of the HAV strain (accession number D00924), whose target sequence was identical to the sequence of siRNA 2C-1mut (99.93% of inhibition).

    RNAi resistance of escaping viruses. To assess whether the viruses that had escaped RNAi were indeed resistant to siRNA treatment, viral variants (18f-3D-1mut and 18f-3D-2mut) that carried two nucleotide exchanges in the target regions 3D-1 and 3D-2, respectively, were generated by in situ mutagenesis (Fig. 5B). Besides the full-length viral genome, the same mutations were also inserted into the firefly luciferase-encoding replicon, resulting in 18f-LUC-3D-1mut and 18f-LUC-3D-2mut (Fig. 5A). After generation of in vitro transcripts, replication of the mutated genomes was tested for their sensitivity towards both siRNAs 3D-1 and 3D-2. As expected, 18f-LUC-3D-1mut and 18f-LUC-3D-2mut were resistant to siRNA 3D-1 and 3D-2, respectively (Fig. 5A, bars 2 and 6), and sensitive to 2C-1 (bars 1 and 4). In line with previously reported data (Fig. 3A and C) (26), the silence potency of siRNA 3D-2 (bar 3) was weak compared to that of siRNA 3D-1 (bar 5). Using the mutated full-length HAV genomes as targets for RNAi, the siRNA specificity was confirmed (Fig. 5B). The infectious titers of the 18f-3D-1mut and 18f-3D-2mut genomes in the presence of the respective siRNAs were similar to those of the negative controls (bars 2, 4, 7, and 8). Conversely, siRNA 3D-1 only suppressed the infectivity of 18f-3D-2mut (bar 6) without affecting 18f-3D-1mut (bar 2), whereas siRNA 3D-2 inhibited the infectivity of 18f-3D-1mut (bar 3) but not of 18f-3D-2mut (bar 7). Again, siRNA 2C-1 showed extensive inhibition of the HAV infection initiated by synthetic RNA transcripts mutated in the 3D target sites (bars 1 and 5). These data unambiguously confirm the sequence-specific effect of RNAi and suggest that consecutive siRNA applications (Fig. 3A) select mutants that either preexisted in the viral quasispecies genome or were generated during genome replication.

    DISCUSSION

    Rapidly progressing antiviral strategies based upon RNAi, which down-regulate virus replication by degrading the viral genome, appear highly promising and offer an alternative approach to conventional antiviral therapy. The genomes of RNA viruses function as both translation and replication templates, which makes them an attractive target for siRNAs. However, RNAi is faced with several challenges that must be overcome to realize its promises as an antiviral strategy. Persistently and asynchronously replicating viruses, such as HAV, may present an additional challenge to RNAi, as the siRNA half-life might unfavorably compete with the accessibility of the target site. In addition, the packaged viral genome residing in persistently infected cells efficiently resists RNAi. In fact, the highly efficient sequestration of newly synthesized HAV RNA into virions (2) has been postulated as a way to reduce the viral replication rate and seems to protect a large proportion of viral RNA from silencing. For the interpretation of the data presented here, it has to be kept in mind that identification of RNAi in HAV-infected cells requires multiple cycles due to the virus' slow and asynchronous replication, whereas in poliovirus-infected cells the silencing effect was detected after a single cycle (19, 20).

    In the experiments described here, it was striking that the extent of the RNAi effect produced by the same amount of siRNA varied among the cell types used and the type of viral infection. In contrast to Huh-7 cells, HAV infection was weakly silenced in BS-C-1 cells, which support HAV replication less efficiently. In spite of the same overall infectivity present at a given time point (107 TCID50, 4 days postinfection), we observed that silencing of an ongoing (established) infection was less efficient (up to 3 orders of magnitude) (Fig. 3B) than that of acutely infected Huh-7 cells (4.7 log suppression) (Fig. 2A). This might directly reflect the proportion of accessible target RNA in the background of inaccessible packaged genomes whose infectious nature is still detectable in the subsequent virus titration. Diverse compartmentalization might also explain inaccessibility of the RNA target. The inherent resistance of the hepatitis C or the West Nile virus genome to siRNA treatment was assumed to be due to the location of their replicative form in membranous compartments that are not exposed to the cytoplasmic RNAi machinery (17, 56). Similarly, picornaviruses have been shown to replicate in virus-induced vesicles (10). It can also not be excluded that a substantial proportion of the transfected siRNAs was sequestered by noninfectious transcripts, thus reducing the specific RNAi effect when infection was initiated by a full-length HAV RNA transcript compared to the acute infection (compare Fig. 3D with 2A). A similar dependence of the RNAi effect on the MOI was recently noticed for poliovirus (21).

    Even though sophisticated algorithms for the design of siRNAs have been applied, it is often noticed that siRNAs are inefficient in silencing (13, 24, 28, 39). We therefore tested six different siRNAs that are unique to HAV. These siRNAs had been shown to efficiently suppress the replication of the HAV replicon without inducing the double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase response (26). Interestingly, HAV itself was reported to inhibit cellular antiviral defense mechanisms induced by double-stranded RNA (6). Although all siRNAs were almost equally suppressive in acutely infected cells (Fig. 2 and data not shown), discernible effects were noticed when larger concentrations of viral or replicon target RNA were present owing to different infection schemes. siRNA 2C-1 was found to be most effective, resulting in sustained suppression of an established HAV infection without the emergence of siRNA-resistant mutants. Under the selective pressure of multiple transfections of the siRNAs 2C-2, 3D-1, and 3D-2, viral escape mutants emerged, whereas siRNAs 3A and 3C were grossly inefficient or blocked viral replication in an unspecific way.

    We show here that the selection of RNAi-resistant escape mutants was significantly enhanced in an established viral infection compared to an infection initiated by RNA transcripts that encode perfectly matching target regions (Fig. 3). This finding directly supports the notion of the viral quasispecies nature present in an established infection. As an unambiguous prove for the escape mutants' ability to indeed resist RNAi, we showed that replication of full-length or luciferase-encoding HAV RNAs that carried mutations in the 3D-1 or 3D-2 targets were completely resistant to silencing by the original siRNAs (Fig. 5). These experiments emphasize the strict sequence specificity of RNAi. On a broader context, the RNAi specificity was further confirmed by the resistance of the poliovirus replicon to HAV-specific siRNAs.

    A number of reasons have been put forward to explain the lack of silencing by siRNAs. They include protein binding (25) as well as secondary and tertiary local structures of the RNA target site that may affect the accessibility of siRNAs (5, 29, 38, 42, 43, 46, 53). When the local RNA folding of the effective and noneffective siRNA-targeted HAV regions was compared at the level of the complete HAV genome (strain 18f), distinct folding patterns were obvious (Fig. 6). The center of siRNAs 2C-1 and 3D-2 targeted a terminal loop. The target regions of the other siRNAs (2C-2, 3A, 3C, and 3D-1) covered internal helices or stacked helical motifs. In addition, prediction of each target's average "match value," a parameter recording the frequency with which particular base pairs were observed in a cohort of suboptimal structures, implied subtle differences in the pairing stabilities of the targeted regions (A. Palmenberg, unpublished observation). By this criterion, targets 3A and 3C had lower frequencies (73 and 85, respectively) and were less stable or had more alternative potential configurations than the other targets (90 to 100).

    Among all HAV targets tested here, 2C-1 with a high match value (99 to 100) was unique in that its local secondary structure was reproducibly stable in the context of the full-length HAV genome (Fig. 6). The other special feature of this target is its large single-stranded loop (6 nucleotides) located in the central region, which is known to be very sensitive for cleavage or mutation (21, 23, 49). Interestingly, no escape virus emerged under the siRNA 2C-1 selection pressure, implying that this target sequence is genetically stable. However, based on the alignment of the 2C-1 target region with some 30-nucleotide sequences deposited in the database, a substantial covariance is found, allowing, for example, a C or a G residue in some target positions. It is highly intriguing that neither of these residues was found in the sequences of the viral genomes selected under the siRNA 2C-1 suppression, implying that the rules governing the RNAi-mediated mutations and spontaneous mutations in natural strains are different.

    In contrast to 2C-1, the 3' half of the 3D-2 target sequence formed a hairpin structure (Fig. 6). Although no 3D-2 target mutations were detected when HAV infection was initiated by RNA transcripts (Fig. 4, right middle panel), mutated target sequences obviously preexisted in the quasispecies genome of the viral inoculum that resisted the siRNA 3D-2 selection pressure (Fig. 4, lower right panel). The mutated 3D-2 target sequence likely folds into a more stable structure than the parental sequence and thus resisted siRNA-mediated degradation. The selection of a more stable secondary and siRNA-resistant structure was recently described for the HIV Nef siRNA-target interaction (55). All other target sequences (2C-2, 3A, 3C, and 3D-1) were found to be part of a double-stranded structure when the full-length HAV genome was computer folded (Fig. 6). Overall, further analyses of the target's secondary structures will be required to better understand their impact for RNAi.

    Two types of mismatches were found to be sufficient for the virus to escape interference. In addition to the G-U mismatches in the center of siRNAs 3D-2 and 3D-1, an upstream-located A-A mismatch was identified in the genome of the siRNA 3D-1 escape mutants. This mismatch might be necessary to enhance the escaping ability of the G-U mismatch located in the central region (Fig. 4). Previously, it was observed that if the formation of a duplex with the target sequence required a G-U base pairing, the siRNA failed to efficiently suppress the target sequence (58). In line with our data demonstrating that the centrally located G-U mismatch is sufficient for HAV to escape siRNA suppression (Fig. 4, lower row, right panel), the inability of the G-U base pairs to participate in target recognition during RNAi was recently confirmed by the characterization of poliovirus mutants escaping siRNA inhibition (21).

    The viral escape mutant(s) that carried one or two amino acid changes and emerged after multiple siRNA 2C-2 applications was interesting, as it showed reproducibly higher infectious titers (Fig. 3B and D). One or two amino acid changes (Asn to Asp) in the central region and/or close to the 3' end of the target (Fig. 4, left panels) alone or in combination seem to enhance the viral replication rate. It is noteworthy that these mutations have not been described in the database, yet other sites in the HAV 2C region were previously shown to be responsible for HAV adaptation and efficient growth in cell culture (11, 12). Further experiments are required to elucidate the functional role of the escape mutations in protein 2C for HAV replication in cell culture. In this context the recently described trans-dominant effects of mutated viral genomes on the replication of wild-type virus and the concept of the viral quasispecies as a group of interactive variants might be considered for the enhanced replication of a mixture of 2C-2 mutants (8, 54).

    A major goal of this study was the identification of an siRNA that could efficiently suppress an active and ongoing HAV infection in a sequence-specific manner. Based on the results reported here, siRNA 2C-1 is a most promising candidate for future therapeutic application to cure severe or fulminant cases of hepatitis A.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    We thank B. Andresen, M. Fischer, and F. Horenkamp for excellent technical assistance.

    This work was supported by a grant (SFB 367, project B7) from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

    This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.

    REFERENCES

    Ahn, J., E. S. Jun, H. S. Lee, S. Y. Yoon, D. H. Kim, H., C-H. Joo, Y. K. Kim, and H. Lee. 2005. A small interfering RNA targeting coxsackievirus B3 protects permissive HeLa cells from viral challenge. J. Virol. 79:8620-8624.

    Anderson, D. A., B. C. Ross, and S. A. Locarnini. 1988. Restricted replication of hepatitis A virus in cell culture: encapsidation of viral RNA depletes the pool of RNA available for replication. J. Virol. 62:4201-4206.

    Andre, F., P. Van Damme, A. Safary, and J. Banaivala. 2002. Inactivated hepatitis A vaccine: immunogenicity, efficacy, safety and review of official recommendations for use. Expert Rev. Vaccines 1:9-23.

    Arbuthnot, P., S. Carmona, and A. Ely. 2005. Exploiting the RNA interference pathway to counter hepatitis B virus replication. Liver Int. 25:9-15.

    Bohula, E. A., A. J. Salisbury, M. Sohail, M. P. Playford, J. Riedemann, E. M. Southern, and V. M. Macaulay. 2003. The efficacy of small interfering RNAs targeted to the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF1R) is influenced by secondary structure in the IGF1R transcript. J. Biol. Chem. 278:15991-15997.

    Brack, K., I. Berk, T. Magulski, J. Lederer, A. Dotzauer, and A. Vallbracht. 2002. Hepatitis A virus inhibits cellular antiviral defense mechanisms induced by double-stranded RNA. J. Virol. 76:11920-11930.

    Chen, W., W. Yan, Q. Du, L. Fei, M. Liu, Z. Ni, Z. Sheng, and Z. Zheng. 2004. RNA interference targeting VP1 inhibits foot-and-mouth disease virus replication in BHK-21 cells and suckling mice. J. Virol. 78:6900-6907.

    Crowder, S., and K. Kirkegaard. 2005. trans-dominant inhibition of RNA viral replication can slow growth of drug-resistant viruses. Nat. Genet. 37:701-707.

    de los Santos, T., Q. Wu, S. de Avila Botton, and M. J. Grubman. 2005. Short hairpin RNA targeted to the highly conserved 2B nonstructural protein coding region inhibits replication of multiple serotypes of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Virology 335:221-231.

    Egger, D., and K. Bienz. 2005. Intracellular location and translocation of silent and active poliovirus replication complexes. J. Gen. Virol. 86:707-718.

    Emerson, S. U., C. McRill, B. Rosenblum, S. Feinstone, and R. H. Purcell. 1991. Mutations responsible for adaptation of hepatitis A virus to efficient growth in cell culture. J. Virol. 65:4882-4886.

    Emerson, S. U., Y. K. Huang, C. McRill, M. Lewis, and R. H. Purcell. 1992. Mutations in both the 2B and 2C genes of hepatitis A virus are involved in adaptation to growth in cell culture. J. Virol. 66:650-654.

    Far R. K.-K., W. Nedbal, and G. Sczakiel. 2001. Concepts to automate the theoretical design of effective antisense oligonucleotides. Bioinformatics 17:1058-1061.

    Flehmig, B., U. Heinricy, and M. Pfisterer. 1990. Simultaneous vaccination for hepatitis A and B. J. Infect. Dis. 161:865-868.

    Fuijwara, K., O. Yokosuka, F. Fukai, H. Imazeki, H. Saisho, and M. Omata. 2001. Analysis of full-length hepatitis A virus genome in sera from patients with fulminant and self-limited acute type A hepatitis. J. Hepatol. 35:112-119.

    Gauss-Müller, V., and Y. Kusov. 2002. Replication of a hepatitis A virus replicon detected by genetic recombination in vivo. J. Gen. Virol. 83:2183-2192.

    Geiss, B. J., T. C. Pierson, and M. S. Diamond. 2005. Actively replicating West Nile virus is resistant to cytoplasmic delivery of siRNA. Virol. J. 2:53-66.

    Giladi, H., M. Ketzinel-Gilad, L. Rivkin, Y. Felig, O. Nussbaum, and E. Galun. 2003. Small interfering RNA inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in mice. Mol. Ther. 8:769-776.

    Gitlin, L., S. Karelsky, and R. Andino. 2002. Short interfering RNA confers intracellular antiviral immunity in human cells. Nature 418:244-251.

    Gitlin, L., and R. Andino. 2003. Nucleic acid-based immune system: the antiviral potential of mammalian RNA silencing. J. Virol. 77:7159-7165.

    Gitlin, L., J. K. Stone, and R. Andino. 2005. Poliovirus escape from RNA interference: short interfering RNA-target recognition and implications for therapeutic approaches. J. Virol. 79:1027-1035.

    Haasnoot, P. C. J., D. Cupac, and B. Berkhout. 2003. Inhibition of virus replication by RNA interference. J. Biomed. Sci. 10:607-616.

    Heale, B. S., H. S. Soifer, C. Bowers, and J. J. Rossi. 2005. siRNA target site secondary structure predictions using local stable substructures. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:e30.

    Hohjoh, H. 2002. RNA interference (RNAi) induction with various types of synthetic oligonucleotide duplexes in cultured human cells. FEBS Lett. 521:195-199.

    Holen, T., M. Amarzguioui, M. T. Wiiger, E. Babaie, and H. Prydz. 2002. Positional effects of short interfering RNAs targeting the human coagulation trigger tissue factor. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:1757-1766.

    Kanda, T., Y. Kusov, O. Yokosuka, and V. Gauss-Müller. 2004. Interference of hepatitis A virus replication by small interfering RNAs. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 318:341-345.

    Kanda, T., B. Zhang, Y. Kusov, O. Yokosuka, and V. Gauss-Müller. 2005. Suppression of hepatitis A virus genome translation and replication by siRNAs targeting the internal ribosomal entry site. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 330:1217-1223.

    Kapadia, S. B., A. Brideau-Andersen, and F. V. Chisari. 2003. Interference of hepatitis C virus. RNA replication by short interfering RNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:2014-2018.

    Kretschmer-Kazemi Far, R., and G. Sczakiel. 2003. The activity of siRNA in mammalian cells is related to structural target accessibility: a comparison with antisense oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:4417-4424.

    Kronke, J., R. Kittler, F. Buchholz, M. P. Windisch, T. Pietschmann, R. Bartenschlager, and M. Frese. 2004. Alternative approaches for efficient inhibition of hepatitis C virus RNA replication by small interfering RNAs. J. Virol. 78:3436-3446.

    Kusov, Y., Y. A. Kazachkov, L. B. Elbert, G. I. Krutyanskaya, V. F. Poleschuk, A. V. Sobol, I. I. Titova, E. A. Lisitzina, S. G. Drozdov, and M. S. Balayan. 1990. Characteristics of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine prepared from virus propagated in heteroploid continuous monkey cell line. Vaccine 8:513-514.

    Kusov, Y., and V. Gauss-Müller. 1999. Improving proteolytic cleavage at the 3A/3B site of the hepatitis A virus polyprotein impairs processing and particle formation, and the impairment can be complemented in trans by 3AB and 3ABC. J. Virol. 73:9867-9878.

    Kusov, Y., R. Gosert, G. Dzagurov, G. Shatirishvili, M. Gerhardt, and V. Gauss-Müller. 2004. Hepatitis A virus genome modified at its 3'terminus, p. 1-37. In C. R. Williams (ed.), Focus on genome research. Nova Biomedical Books, New York, N.Y.

    Kusov, Y., J. Heering, T. Kanda, O. Yokosuka, and V. Gauss-Müller. 2004. Silencing of hepatitis A virus replication by RNA interference. Proc. 2nd Eur. Congr. Virol., Madrid, Spain, p. 77-85.

    Kusov, Y., R. Gosert, and V. Gauss-Müller. 2005. Replication and in vivo repair of the hepatitis A virus genome lacking the poly(A) tail. J. Gen. Virol. 86:1363-1368.

    Liu, M., W. Chen, Z. Ni., W. Yan, L. Fei, Y. Jiao, J. Zhang, Q. Du, X. Wei, J. Chen, Y. Liu, and Z. Zheng. 2005. Cross-inhibition to heterologous foot-and-mouth disease virus infection induced by RNA interference targeting the conserved region of viral genome. Virology 336:51-59.

    Lu, W. W., Y. Y. Hsu, J. Y. Yang, and S. H. Kung. 2004. Selective inhibition of enterovirus 71 replication by short hairpin RNAs. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 325:494-499.

    Luo, K. G., and D. C. Chang. 2004. The gene-silencing efficiency of siRNA is strongly dependent on the local structure of siRNA at the targeted region. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 318:303-310.

    McManus, M. T., C. P. Petersen, B. B. Haines, J. Chen, and P. A. Sharp. 2002. Gene silencing using micro-RNA designed hairpins. RNA 8:842-850.

    Merl, S., C. Michaelis, B. Jaschke, M. Vorpahl, S. Seidl, and R. Wessely. 2005. Targeting 2A protease by RNA interference attenuates coxsackievirus cytopathogenicity and promotes survival in highly susceptible mice. Circulation 111:1583-1592.

    Nakabayashi, H., K. Taketa, T. Yamane, M. Miyazaki, K. Miyano, and J. Sato. 1984. Phenotypical stability of a human hepatoma cell line, Huh-7, in long-term culture with chemically defined medium. Gann 75:151-158.

    Nykanen, A., B. Haley, and P. D. Zamore. 2001. ATP requirement and small interfering RNA structure in the RNA interference pathway. Cell 107:309-321.

    Overhof, M., M. Alken, R. Kretschmer-Kazemi Far, M. Lemaitre, B. Lebleu, G. Sczakiel, and I. Robbins. 2005. Local RNA target structure influences siRNA efficacy: a systematic global analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 348:871-881.

    Palmenberg, A. C., and J.-Y. Sgro. 1997. Topological organization of picornaviral genomes: statistical prediction of RNA structural signals. Semin. Virol. 8:231-241.

    Phipps, K. M., A. Martinez, J. Lu, B. A. Heinz, and G. Zhao. 2004. Small interfering RNA molecules as potential anti-human rhinovirus agents: in vitro potency, specificity, and mechanism. Antivir. Res. 61:49-55.

    Qiu, S., C. M. Adema, and T. Lane. 2005. A computational study of off-target effects of RNA interference. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:1834-1847.

    Rachow, A., V. Gauss-Müller, and C. Probst. 2003. Homogenous hepatitis A virus particles, proteolytic release of the assembly signal 2A from procapsids by factor Xa. J. Biol. Chem. 278:29744-29751.

    Saleh, M. C., R. P. Van Rij, and R. Andino. 2004. RNA silencing in viral infections: insights from poliovirus. Virus Res. 102:11-17.

    Schubert, S., A. Grünweller, V. A. Erdmann, and J. Kurreck. 2005. Local RNA target structure influences siRNA efficacy: systematic analysis of intentionally designed binding regions. J. Mol. Biol. 348:883-893.

    Taylor, J. A., and N. V. Naoumov. 2005. The potential of RNA interference as a tool in the management of viral hepatitis. J. Hepatol. 42:139-144.

    Vallbracht, A., L. Hofmann, K. G. Wurster, and B. Flehmig. 1984. Persistent infection of human embryo fibroblasts by hepatitis A virus. J. Gen. Virol. 65:609-615.

    Vento, S., T. Garofano, C. Renzini, F. Cainelli, F. Casali, G. Ghironzi, T. Ferraro, and E. Conzia. 1998. Fulminant hepatitis A associated with hepatitis A virus superinfection in patients with chronic hepatitis C. N. Engl. J. Med. 338:286-290.

    Vickers, T. A., S. Koo, C. F. Bennet, S. T. Crooke, N. M. Dean, and B. F. Baker. 2003. Efficient reduction of target RNAs by small interfering RNA and RNase H-dependent antisense agents. A comparative analysis. J. Biol. Chem. 278:7108-7118.

    Vignuzzi, M., J. K. Stone, J. J. Arnold, C. E. Cameron, and R. Andino. 2006. Quasispecies diversity determines pathogenesis through cooperative interaction in a viral population. Nature 439:344-348.

    Westerhout, E. M., M. Ooms, M. Vink, A. T. Das, and B. Berkhout. 2005. HIV-1 can escape from RNA interference by evolving an alternative structure in its RNA genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:796-804.

    Wilson, J. A., and C. D. Richardson. 2005. Hepatitis C virus replicons escape RNA interference induced by a short interfering RNA directed against the NS5b coding region. J. Virol. 79:7050-7058.

    Yi, M., and S. M. Lemon. 2002. Replication of subgenomic hepatitis A virus RNAs expressing firefly luciferase is enhanced by mutations associated with adaptation of virus to growth in cultured cells. J. Virol. 76:1171-1180.

    Yu, J.-Y., J. Taylor, S. DeRuiter, A. B. Vojtek, and D. L. Turner. 2003. Simultaneous inhibition of GSK3 and GSK3 using hairpin siRNA expression vectors. Mol. Ther. 7:228-236.(Yuri Kusov, Tatsuo Kanda,)
    婵犵數濮烽弫鎼佸磿閹寸姴绶ら柦妯侯棦濞差亝鍋愰悹鍥皺椤︻厼鈹戦悩缁樻锭婵炲眰鍊濋、姘舵焼瀹ュ棛鍘卞┑鐐村灥瀹曨剟寮搁妶鍡愪簻闁冲搫鍟崢鎾煛鐏炲墽鈽夐柍钘夘樀瀹曪繝鎮欏顔介獎闂備礁鎼ˇ顐﹀疾濠婂吘娑㈠礃椤旇壈鎽曞┑鐐村灦鑿ら柡瀣叄閻擃偊宕堕妸锕€鐨戦梺绋款儐閹歌崵绮嬮幒鏂哄亾閿濆簼绨介柛鏃撶畱椤啴濡堕崱妤€娼戦梺绋款儐閹瑰洭寮诲☉銏″亹鐎规洖娲㈤埀顒佸笚娣囧﹪宕f径濠傤潓闂佸疇顫夐崹鍨暦閸洖鐓橀柣鎰靛墰娴滄瑩姊虹拠鏌ヮ€楃紒鐘茬Ч瀹曟洟宕¢悙宥嗙☉閳藉濮€閻橀潧濮︽俊鐐€栫敮鎺椝囬鐐村€堕柨鏃傜摂濞堜粙鏌i幇顒佲枙闁稿孩姊归〃銉╂倷閸欏鏋犲銈冨灪濡啫鐣烽妸鈺婃晣闁绘劙娼ч幖绋库攽閻樺灚鏆╅柛瀣█楠炴捇顢旈崱妤冪瓘闂佽鍨奸悘鎰洪鍕吅闂佺粯锚閸氣偓缂佹顦靛娲箰鎼达絿鐣甸梺鐟板槻椤戝鐣烽悽绋块唶婵犮埄浜濆Λ鍐极閸屾粎椹抽悗锝庝簻婵″ジ姊绘担鍛婃喐闁稿鍋ら獮鎰板箮閽樺鎽曢梺鍝勬储閸ㄥ綊鐛姀銈嗙厸闁搞儮鏅涘瓭婵犵鈧尙鐭欓柡宀嬬秮婵偓闁宠桨鑳舵禒鈺冪磽閸屾氨孝闁挎洦浜悰顔界節閸ャ劍娅㈤梺缁樓圭亸娆撴偪閳ь剚淇婇悙顏勨偓鏍箰妤e啫纾婚柣鏂挎憸椤╃兘鏌熼幍顔碱暭闁抽攱鍨块弻娑㈡晜鐠囨彃绗岄梺鑽ゅ枑閸f潙煤椤忓嫀褔鏌涢妷顔惧帥婵炶偐鍠栧娲礃閸欏鍎撻梺鐟板暱濮橈妇鎹㈠鑸碘拻濞达絽鎳欒ぐ鎺戝珘妞ゆ帒鍊婚惌娆撴煙閻戞﹩娈曢柛濠傜仛閵囧嫰寮崹顔规寖缂佺偓鍎抽妶鎼佸蓟閿熺姴绀冮柕濞垮劗閸嬫挾绮欓幐搴㈢槑濠电姷鏁告慨顓㈠箯閸愵喖绀嬮柛顭戝亞閺夊綊鏌f惔銏╁晱闁哥姵鐗犻幃銉╂偂鎼达絾娈惧┑顔姐仜閸嬫挸鈹戦埄鍐憙妞わ附濞婇弻娑㈠箻閺夋垹浠哥紓浣虹帛缁嬫捇鍩€椤掍胶鈯曞畝锝呮健閹本绻濋崑鑺ユ閹晠宕f径瀣瀾闂備浇妗ㄧ欢锟犲闯閿濆鈧線寮撮姀鈩冩珕闂佽姤锚椤︿粙鍩€椤掍胶鈽夐柍瑙勫灴閺佸秹宕熼锛勬崟濠电姭鎷冮崨顔界彧缂備緡鍠楅悷锔炬崲濠靛鐐婇柕濞у啫绠版繝鐢靛О閸ㄧ厧鈻斿☉銏℃櫇闁靛牆顦Ч鏌ユ煛閸モ晛鏋戦柛娆忕箻閺岋綁鎮㈤悡搴濆枈濠碘槅鍨崑鎾绘⒒娴h姤銆冪紒鈧担铏圭煋闁圭虎鍠楅崑鈺傜節闂堟侗鍎忕紒鈧崘鈹夸簻妞ゆ挾鍠庨悘锝夋煙鐎电ǹ鍘存慨濠勭帛閹峰懐绮电€n亝鐣伴梻浣告憸婵敻骞戦崶褏鏆︽繝闈涳功閻も偓濠电偞鍨兼ご鎼佸疾閿濆洨纾介柛灞剧懅閸斿秴鐣濋敐鍛仴闁糕斂鍨藉顕€宕奸悢鍝勫箺闂備胶鎳撻顓㈠磿閹寸偟鐟规繛鎴欏灪閻撴洟鏌¢崒姘变虎闁哄棴缍侀弻鈥崇暆鐎n剛鐦堥悗瑙勬礃鐢帡锝炲┑瀣垫晣闁绘﹢娼ч獮鈧紓鍌氬€搁崐鐑芥倿閿曞倶鈧啴宕ㄥ銈呮喘閺屽棗顓奸崨顖氬Е婵$偑鍊栫敮鎺楀窗濮橆兗缂氶柟閭﹀枤绾惧吋銇勯弮鍥т汗缂佺姴顭烽弻銊モ攽閸繀妲愰梺杞扮閸熸潙鐣烽幒鎴僵闁告鍋為幉銏ゆ⒒娴h棄鍚瑰┑鐐╁亾缂傚倸鍊归懝楣冨煝瀹ュ鏅查柛銉㈡櫇閻撳姊洪崜鑼帥闁哥姵鎹囬崺鈧い鎺嶇缁楁帗銇勯锝囩疄妞ゃ垺锕㈤幃鈺咁敃閿濆孩缍岄梻鍌氬€风欢姘缚瑜嶇叅闁靛牆鎮垮ú顏勎╅柍杞拌兌閸旓箑顪冮妶鍡楃瑨闁稿妫濆銊╂偋閸垻顔曟繝銏f硾椤戝洤煤鐎电硶鍋撶憴鍕8闁搞劏濮ゆ穱濠囧醇閺囩偟鍊為梺闈浨归崕鐑樺閺囥垺鐓熼柣鏂挎憸閻苯顭胯椤ㄥ牓寮鍢夋棃宕崘顏嗏棨濠电姰鍨奸崺鏍礉閺嶎厼纾婚柨婵嗩槹閻撴洟鏌曟径妯虹仩妞も晩鍓欓埥澶愬箻閻熸壆姣㈢紓浣介哺鐢岣胯箛娑樜╃憸蹇涙偩婵傚憡鈷戠憸鐗堝俯濡垵鈹戦悙鈺佷壕闂備浇顕栭崰妤冨垝閹捐绠板┑鐘插暙缁剁偛顭跨捄铏圭伇婵﹦鍋撶换婵嬫偨闂堟稐绮跺銈嗘处閸樹粙骞堥妸锔哄亝闁告劑鍔嶅Σ顒勬⒑閸濆嫮鈻夐柛妯恒偢瀹曞綊宕掗悙瀵稿帾婵犵數鍋熼崑鎾斥枍閸℃稒鐓曢悗锝冨妼婵″ジ妫佹径鎰叆婵犻潧妫欓崳褰掓煛閸℃瑥鏋戝ǎ鍥э躬椤㈡稑顫濋崡鐐╁徍婵犳鍠栭敃銉ヮ渻娴犲鈧線寮撮姀鈩冩珳闂佺硶鍓濋悷锕傤敇婵犳碍鈷掑ù锝堟鐢盯鏌熺喊鍗炰簽闁瑰箍鍨归埞鎴犫偓锝庡墮缁侊箓鏌f惔顖滅У闁哥姵鐗滅划濠氭晲閸℃瑧鐦堟繝鐢靛Т閸婃悂顢旈锔界厵闁哄鍋勬慨鍌涙叏婵犲啯銇濇鐐村姈閹棃鏁愰崒娑辨綌闂傚倷绀侀幖顐︽偋濠婂牆绀堥柣鏃堫棑閺嗭箓鏌i悢绋款棎闁割偒浜弻娑㈠即閵娿儱瀛e┑鐐存綑鐎氼剟鈥旈崘顔嘉ч柛鈩冾殘閻熸劙姊虹紒妯洪嚋缂佺姵鎸搁锝夊箮缁涘鏅滈梺鍓插亞閸犳捇宕㈤柆宥嗏拺闁荤喓澧楅幆鍫㈢磼婢跺缍戦柣锝囨暬瀹曞崬鈽夊▎鎴濆笚闁荤喐绮嶇划鎾崇暦濠婂喚娼╂い鎺戭槹閸嶇敻姊洪棃娴ュ牓寮插⿰鍫濈;闁稿瞼鍋為悡銉╂煟閺傛寧鎯堢€涙繈鏌i悢鍝ユ嚂缂佺姵鎹囬悰顕€寮介鐐殿啇濡炪倖鎸鹃崑鐔哥椤栨粎纾藉ù锝嗗絻娴滅偓绻濋姀锝嗙【闁愁垱娲濋妵鎰板箳閹寸媭妲梻浣呵圭换妤呭磻閹邦兘鏋旈柕鍫濐槹閳锋垹绱撴担璐細缂佺姵鐗犻弻锝夊煛婵犲倻浠╅梺浼欑悼閸忔﹢寮幘缁樺亹闁肩⒈鍓﹀Σ浼存⒒娴h棄浜归柍宄扮墦瀹曟粌顫濇0婵囨櫓闂佺鎻梽鍕煕閹达附鍋i柛銉岛閸嬫捇鎼归銈勭按闂傚倷绀侀幉锟犲蓟閵婏富娈介柟闂寸閻撴繈鏌熼幑鎰靛殭缂佺媴缍侀弻锝夊箛椤撶喓绋囧銈呭閹告悂鍩為幋锔藉亹閻犲泧鍐х矗闂備礁鎽滈崳銉╁垂閸洜宓侀柛鈩冪☉绾惧吋鎱ㄩ敐搴″箹缂傚秴锕獮鍐煛閸涱厾顔岄梺鍦劋缁诲倹淇婇柨瀣瘈闁汇垽娼цⅴ闂佺ǹ顑嗛幑鍥蓟閻斿皝鏋旈柛顭戝枟閻忔挾绱掓ィ鍐暫缂佺姵鐗犲濠氭偄鐞涒€充壕闁汇垻娅ラ悷鐗堟瘎闂佽崵鍠愮划搴㈡櫠濡ゅ懏鍋傞柨鐔哄Т閽冪喐绻涢幋娆忕仼缂佺姵濞婇弻锟犲磼濮樿鲸鐨戦梺鍝勵儏閹冲酣鍩為幋锔藉€烽柛娆忣槸濞咃綁姊绘担绋跨盎缂佽尙鍋撶粚杈ㄧ節閸パ咁啋濡炪倖妫佹慨銈呪枍閵忋倖鈷戦悹鎭掑妼濞呮劙鏌熼崙銈嗗

   闂傚倷娴囬褍霉閻戣棄鏋佸┑鐘宠壘绾捐鈹戦悩鍙夋悙缂佹劖顨婇弻锟犲炊閳轰焦鐏侀梺宕囨嚀缁夋挳鍩為幋锔藉亹闁告瑥顦伴幃娆忊攽閳藉棗浜濋柨鏇樺灲瀵鈽夐姀鐘栥劑鏌曡箛濠傚⒉闁绘繃鐗犻幃宄扳堪閸愩劎鐩庨梺鐟板殩閹凤拷  闂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥嚄閼哥數浠氱紓鍌欒兌缁垶銆冮崨鏉戠厺鐎广儱顦崡鎶芥煏韫囨洖校闁诲寒鍓熷铏圭磼濡搫顫庨梺绋跨昂閸婃繂鐣烽弴鐐垫殕闁告洦鍓涢崢浠嬫⒑闁稑宓嗘繛浣冲嫭娅犳い鏂款潟娴滄粓骞栭幖顓炵仭閻庢熬鎷�  闂傚倸鍊峰ù鍥х暦閸偅鍙忛柡澶嬪殮濞差亜围闁搞儻绲芥禍鐐叏濡厧甯堕柣蹇ラ檮閵囧嫰濮€閿涘嫭鍣板Δ鐘靛仜椤戝寮崘顔肩劦妞ゆ帒鍊婚惌鍡涙煕閺囥劌鐏¢柣鎾跺枑娣囧﹪顢涘┑鎰缂備浇灏畷鐢垫閹炬剚鍚嬮煫鍥ㄦ煥椤忥拷  闂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥嚄閸洖绠犻柟鎹愵嚙鐟欙箓鎮楅敐搴″闁搞劍绻堥獮鏍庨鈧俊鑲╃棯閹佸仮闁哄本娲樼换娑㈡倷椤掍胶褰呴梻浣告啞椤ㄥ棙绻涙繝鍥ц摕闁斥晛鍟欢鐐烘倵閿濆簼绨介柛鏃偳归埞鎴﹀煡閸℃浼堥梺鐟板殩閹凤拷   闂傚倸鍊搁崐宄懊归崶顒婄稏濠㈣泛顑囬々鎻捗归悩宸剰缂佲偓婢跺备鍋撻崗澶婁壕闂佸憡娲﹂崜娆愮闁秵鈷戦梻鍫熶腹濞戙垹宸濇い鏍ュ€楁惔濠傗攽閻樺灚鏆╅柛瀣☉铻炴繛鍡樻尭缁€澶愭煛瀹ュ骸浜炲☉鎾崇У缁绘盯宕卞Ο璇查瀺闂佺粯鎸诲ú妯兼崲濞戙垹骞㈡俊顖氬悑閸n參鏌f惔銏㈠暡闁瑰嚖鎷�   闂傚倸鍊搁崐椋庣矆娓氣偓楠炲鍨鹃幇浣圭稁缂傚倷鐒﹁摫闁告瑥绻橀弻鐔虹磼閵忕姵鐏堥梺娲诲幗椤ㄥ﹪寮诲☉銏犵労闁告劦浜栧Σ鍫㈢磽閸屾瑨顔夐柡鍛█瀵鎮㈢喊杈ㄦ櫖濠电姴锕ら崰姘跺汲椤撶儐娓婚柕鍫濆暙閸旂敻鏌熼崙銈嗗