棣栭〉
鏈熷垔: 寰俊鏂囩珷 鍦ㄧ嚎涔︾睄 璧勬枡涓嬭浇 鍋ュ悍鏉傚織 鎶ュ垔閫夌紪 鍩虹鍖诲 涓村簥鍖诲 鑽 瀛︽姤 涓浗鍖诲 鍗敓鎬昏
淇濆仴: 鏂伴椈 璇勮 瑙嗙偣 甯歌瘑 鐤剧梾 鐥囩姸 鍏荤敓 鐢ㄨ嵂 鎶ょ悊 鎬ユ晳 鍋ヨ韩 缇庡 涓ゆ€� 鑲插効 鐢� 濂� 鑰� 灏� 鍥涘 璇荤墿 鏇村
涓尰: 甯歌瘑 鏁欐潗 鎬濊€� 涓嵂 鍖荤悊 涓村簥 閽堥 姘戞棌 鏂囧寲 钁椾綔 楠屾柟 鍥捐氨 椋熺枟 鑽墿 鑽笟 鑽競 鏂拌嵂 鎼滅储 鑻辨枃
当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《新英格兰医药杂志》 > 2004年第21期 > 正文
编号:11305024
Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stents
http://www.100md.com 《新英格兰医药杂志》

     To the Editor: The optimal duration of clopidogrel therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention is the subject of ongoing debate. Stone et al. (Jan. 15 issue)1 report the efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting stents as compared with bare-metal stents in reducing the rates of restenosis at nine months. Although clopidogrel therapy for six months was prescribed to prevent late thrombosis, the authors question the benefit of prolonged thienopyridine therapy in patients who have received a drug-eluting stent. Do the authors recommend a change in the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients who have received these stents? As contemporary clinical practice suggests, drug-eluting stents are used for more complex lesions (i.e., bifurcation lesions), which are associated with higher rates of late thrombosis than are simple lesions.2

    Clopidogrel therapy for at least 12 months is indicated for the prevention of late thrombosis after intracoronary radiation for in-stent restenosis.3 An additional benefit with 12 months of clopidogrel therapy has been demonstrated in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention with a bare-metal stent.4 Furthermore, prolonged administration of clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes, many of whom will proceed to undergo coronary intervention, has established benefits.5 Clopidogrel therapy for six months may be insufficient in the era of drug-eluting stents.

    Andrew E. Ajani, M.D.

    Royal Melbourne Hospital

    3050 Melbourne, Australia

    Ron Waksman, M.D.

    Washington Hospital Center

    Washington, DC 20010

    ron.waksman@medstar.net

    References

    Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, et al. A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2004;350:221-231.

    Lemos PA, Serruys PW, van Domburg RT, et al. Unrestricted utilization of sirolimus-eluting stents compared with conventional bare stent implantation in the "real world": the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) Registry. Circulation 2004;109:190-195.

    Waksman R, Ajani AE, Pinnow E, et al. Twelve versus six months of clopidogrel to reduce major cardiac events in patients undergoing gamma-radiation therapy for in-stent restenosis: Washington Radiation for In-Stent restenosis Trial (WRIST) 12 versus WRIST PLUS. Circulation 2002;106:776-778.

    Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, Mann JT III, et al. Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002;288:2411-2420.

    The Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events Trial Investigators. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 2001;345:494-502.

    The authors reply: Although studies in patients with acute coronary syndromes who undergo angioplasty suggest that the administration of thienopyridines should be continued for at least 9 to 12 months,1,2 prolonged therapy may be economically burdensome, and the risk of stent thrombosis should an interruption of thienopyridine therapy become necessary is unknown. In our study (TAXUS-IV), clopidogrel therapy for six months was empirically recommended to provide a wide margin of safety, although research in single-stent porcine models in vivo has shown equivalent rates of endothelialization with slow-release paclitaxel-eluting stents and bare-metal stents (Boston Scientific: unpublished data). It is unknown whether a shorter duration of thienopyridine therapy is sufficient for simple lesions or whether prolonged administration is required for complex lesions; this point will require formal testing.

    Apart from providing protection against stent thrombosis, long-term administration of thienopyridine after angioplasty may promote freedom from future adverse cardiovascular events, either by preventing or mitigating plaque rupture or by decreasing the risk of spontaneous or device-induced thromboembolism. In this regard, the encouraging results of the CREDO (Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Events during Observation) trial require replication, since the administration of clopidogrel before stenting contributed to the late benefits seen with long-term use of clopidogrel.2 In the absence of evidence that thienopyridine administration for more than 1 year has an acceptable cost–benefit ratio and is cost effective, we recommend 6 to 12 months of clopidogrel after implantation of a drug-eluting stent.

    Gregg W. Stone, M.D.

    Cardiovascular Research Foundation

    New York, NY 10022

    gstone@crf.org

    Stephen G. Ellis, M.D.

    Cleveland Clinic Foundation

    Cleveland, OH 44195

    Mary E. Russell, M.D.

    Boston Scientific

    Natick, MA 01760

    References

    The Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events Trial Investigators. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 2001;345:494-502.

    Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, Mann JT III, et al. Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002;288:2411-2420.
    淇℃伅浠呬緵鍙傝€冿紝涓嶆瀯鎴愪换浣曚箣寤鸿銆佹帹鑽愭垨鎸囧紩銆傛枃绔犵増鏉冨睘浜庡師钁椾綔鏉冧汉锛岃嫢鎮ㄨ涓烘鏂囦笉瀹滆鏀跺綍渚涘ぇ瀹跺厤璐归槄璇伙紝璇烽偖浠舵垨鐢佃瘽閫氱煡鎴戜滑锛屾垜浠敹鍒伴€氱煡鍚庯紝浼氱珛鍗冲皢鎮ㄧ殑浣滃搧浠庢湰缃戠珯鍒犻櫎銆�

   寰俊鏂囩珷  鍏虫敞鐧炬媷  璇勮鍑犲彞  鎼滅储鏇村   鎺ㄥ瓨缁欐湅鍙�   鍔犲叆鏀惰棌