当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《英国医生杂志》 > 2004年第13期 > 正文
编号:11339885
Reluctance in child protection must be for several reasons
http://www.100md.com 《英国医生杂志》
     EDITOR—In his news item Dyer reports that doctors are reluctant to work on child protection committees.1 I have yet to meet a paediatrician who is genuinely keen to do child protection work. Not surprisingly, the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health is experiencing enormous difficulties filling the relevant posts.

    Most paediatricians in training today do not wish to do community paediatrics in the future. It is certainly essential to have a named paediatrician for child protection in every hospital, but, ironically, in my experience, even the named paediatricians for child protection in some cases are reluctant to show passion in this field.

    This general reluctance must be for several reasons, not least a lack of proper training. The royal college should look into this with an open mind. Also, why should only paediatricians have the responsibility for child protection work? There is no reason why other medical specialties such as general practice and orthopaedics should not take equal responsibility.

    Ashok Beckaya, staff paediatrician

    Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals Trust, Epsom KT18 7EG beckaya@aol.com

    Competing interests: None declared.

    References

    Dyer O. Doctors reluctant to work on child protection committees, survey shows. BMJ 2004;328: 307. (7 February.)