婵犵數濮烽。钘壩i崨鏉戠;闁规崘娉涚欢銈呂旈敐鍛殲闁稿顑夐弻锝呂熷▎鎯ф閺夆晜绻堝铏规崉閵娿儲鐝㈤梺鐟板殩閹凤拷
闂傚倸鍊搁崐椋庣矆娓氣偓楠炴牠顢曢敂钘変罕闂婎偄娲︾粙鎴犵玻濡ゅ懎绠规繛锝庡墮婵″ジ鏌涢妸銉モ偓鍧楀蓟閵娾晜鍋嗛柛灞剧☉椤忥拷: 闂傚倷娴囬褍霉閻戣棄鏋佸┑鐘宠壘绾捐鈹戦悩鍙夋悙缂佹劖顨婇弻锟犲炊閳轰焦鐏侀梺宕囨嚀缁夋挳鍩為幋锔藉亹闁告瑥顦伴幃娆忊攽閳藉棗浜濋柨鏇樺灲瀵鈽夐姀鐘栥劑鏌曡箛濠傚⒉闁绘繃鐗犻幃宄扳堪閸愩劎鐩庨梺鐟板殩閹凤拷 闂傚倸鍊搁崐椋庢濮橆兗缂氶柤濮愬€栫€氬鏌i弮鍌氬付缂佲偓婢舵劕绠规繛锝庡墮婵″ジ鏌涘顒傜Ш妤犵偞鐗曡彁妞ゆ巻鍋撻柣蹇e櫍閺屽秶绱掑Ο鑽ゎ槹闂佸搫琚崝鎴濐嚕椤掑嫬鍨傛い鏃囶潐鐎垫牗绻濋悽闈涗户闁靛棗顑夐獮蹇涙晸閿燂拷 闂傚倸鍊峰ù鍥х暦閸偅鍙忕€广儱顦粈鍐┿亜椤撶喎鐏i柣銉邯濮婄粯鎷呴崨濠冨創濡炪倖鍨甸崐鍨暦濠婂啠鏀介柛顐犲灮閻撴挻绻濋姀锝嗙【濠㈣泛娲畷鎴﹀箻缂佹ɑ娅滈柟鑲╄ˉ閳ь剙纾鎴犵磽閸屾瑦顦风紒韬插€濋獮蹇涙晸閿燂拷 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥嚄閼哥數浠氭俊鐐€栭崹鐢稿疮閺夋垹鏆﹂柡鍥ュ灪閻掕偐鈧箍鍎遍幊鎰版偩濞差亝鍊垫鐐茬仢閸旀碍銇勯敂璇茬仯闁汇儺浜iˇ褰掓煛鐏炲墽銆掑ù鐙呯畵閹瑩顢楅崒娑卞悋缂傚倸鍊烽懗鑸靛垔閹绢喖绠柨鐕傛嫹 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥嚄閸洏鈧焦绻濋崟顓狀槱婵炴潙鍚嬪ḿ娆戝閸ф鈷戞い鎺嗗亾缂佸鎸冲畷褰掑磼閻愬鍘搁梺鍛婂姂閸斿孩鏅跺☉銏$厽闁圭儤娲﹂崵娆愩亜椤撯剝纭堕柟鐟板閹煎綊宕烽婵堢濠电姷顣槐鏇㈠磿閹达箑绠柨鐕傛嫹 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥嚄閸撲焦鍏滈柛顐f礀閻ら箖鏌i幇顓犮偞闁哄绉归弻銊モ攽閸♀晜肖闂侀€炲苯鍘哥紒鑸佃壘閻g兘濡搁埡浣洪獓闂佺懓顕刊顓炍eú顏呪拺闁煎鍊曞瓭濠电偛鐪伴崐鏇$亽婵犵數濮村ú銈囩矆婢舵劖鐓ラ柣鏇炲€圭€氾拷 婵犵數濮烽弫鎼佸磻閻愬搫鍨傞柛顐f礀缁犱即鎮归崶褍鏂€缂傚倹纰嶇换娑㈠幢濡櫣浼囨繝娈垮枟婵炲﹪寮婚弴鐔风窞闁糕剝蓱閻濇梻绱撴担鎻掍壕閻庡厜鍋撻柛鏇ㄥ墮娴狀垶姊洪幖鐐插妧闁告洏鍔嶉悘鍡涙⒒娴e憡鍟炴俊顐e灴楠炲繘鏁撻敓锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐宄懊归崶顒€纾婚柟鎵閸嬨倝鏌¢崘銊у闁搞劌鍊搁湁闁稿繐鍚嬮崕妤呮煛娴e憡顥㈤柡灞诲姂閹倝宕掑☉姗嗕紦 闂傚倸鍊峰ù鍥敋瑜忛埀顒佺▓閺呯姴鐣峰Ο鑽ょ瘈婵﹩鍘搁幐鍐⒑閸涘﹥澶勯柛鎾村哺瀹曪綀绠涘☉娆戝弳闂佺粯娲栭崐鍦偓姘炬嫹 婵犵數濮烽弫鎼佸磻閻愬搫鍨傞柛顐f礀缁犲綊鏌嶉崫鍕櫣闁稿被鍔戦弻锝夊箻瀹曞洨妲忛梺鑽ゅ枑鐎氬牓寮崼婵嗙獩濡炪倖鎸炬刊顓炍eú顏呪拺闁煎鍊曞瓭濠电偛鐪伴崐鏇$亽婵犵數濮村ú銈囩矆婢舵劖鐓ラ柣鏇炲€圭€氾拷 闂傚倸鍊搁崐椋庣矆娓氣偓楠炲鏁撻悩顔瑰亾閸愵厾鐤€婵炴垶岣块敍娑㈡⒑缁洖澧茬紒瀣灴瀵憡绗熼埀顒勫蓟閻旂厧绠查柟浼存涧濞堫厾绱撴担鍝勑i柛銊ユ健瀵鏁撻悩鑼槹濡炪倖鍔х徊鍧椼€呮导瀛樷拺闁告縿鍎卞▍鎰版煙閸戙倖瀚�
婵犵數濮烽弫鎼佸磿閹寸姴绶ら柦妯侯棦濞差亝鏅滈柣鎰靛墮鎼村﹪姊虹粙鎸庢拱缂佸鎹囬妴鍛存倻閼恒儳鍙嗛梺缁樻礀閸婂湱鈧熬鎷�: 闂傚倸鍊搁崐椋庣矆娓氣偓楠炴牠顢曢敃鈧壕褰掓煟閹达絾顥夌痪顓涘亾闂備礁鎲¢崝鏇炍熸繝鍌樷偓鎺撶節濮橆厾鍙嗛梺缁樻礀閸婂湱鈧熬鎷� 闂傚倸鍊峰ù鍥х暦閸偅鍙忛柡澶嬪殮濞差亜围闁搞儻绲芥禍鐐叏濡厧甯堕柣蹇ラ檮閵囧嫰濮€閿涘嫭鍣伴梺杞扮劍閹瑰洭寮幘缁樻櫢闁跨噦鎷� 闂傚倸鍊峰ù鍥х暦閻㈢ǹ绐楅柟鎵閸嬶繝鏌曟径鍫濆壔婵炴垶菤濡插牓鏌曡箛鏇炐ラ柨娑欑洴濮婅櫣鎹勯妸銉︾彚闂佺懓鍤栭幏锟� 闂傚倸鍊烽悞锕傛儑瑜版帒鏄ラ柛鏇ㄥ灠閸ㄥ倿姊洪鈧粔鐢稿磻閵堝鐓涢柛銉e劚閻忣亪鏌涙惔鈽呰含闁哄被鍔戦幃銈夊磼濞戞﹩浼� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥倿閿曞倹鍎戠憸鐗堝笒绾惧綊鏌¢崶鈺佹瀾婵炲懐濞€閺岋箑螣娓氼垱鈻撳┑鐐插悑閻楃娀寮婚妸鈺傚亞闁稿本绋戦锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥倿閿曞倹鍎戠憸鐗堝笒绾惧潡鏌涘Δ鍐х闯婵炲樊浜滄儫闂佹寧妫佸Λ鍕嚕閸ф鈷戦悹鎭掑妼濞呮劙鏌熼崙銈嗗 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥嚄閼哥數浠氱紓鍌欒兌缁垶銆冮崨瀛樺仼闁绘垼濮ら崑銊х磼鐎n偄顕滈柣搴墴濮婅櫣鎹勯妸銉︾彚闂佺懓鍤栭幏锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥嚄閸洖纾块柣銏⑶圭壕濠氭煙閹规劦鍤欑紒鈧径鎰彄闁搞儯鍔嶇亸鐢告煛閸℃劕鈧繈寮婚妸鈺傚亞闁稿本绋戦锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥嚄閸洏鈧焦绻濋崟顓狀槱婵炴潙鍚嬪ḿ娆戝鐟欏嫪绻嗛柕鍫濇噺閸e湱绱掗悩宕囧⒌闁哄被鍔戦幃銈夊磼濞戞﹩浼� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐宄懊归崶顒夋晪闁哄稁鍘肩粈鍌涚箾閸℃ɑ灏痪鎯ф健閺岋紕浠︾拠鎻掑闂佹眹鍊濈粻鏍蓟閵娾晜鍋嗛柛灞剧☉椤忥拷 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥嚄閼哥數浠氭俊鐐€栭崹鐢稿疮閺夋垹鏆﹂柡鍥ュ灩缁犵粯銇勯弮鍌滄憘婵☆偄鎳樺铏规崉閵娿儲鐝㈤梺鐟板殩閹凤拷 缂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾圭紒瀣紩濞差亜围闁糕檧鏅滈鏃堟⒑瑜版帗锛熺紒璁圭節瀵偅绻濋崶銊у弳闂佺粯娲栭崐鍦偓姘炬嫹 婵犵數濮烽弫鎼佸磻閻愬搫鍨傞柛顐f礀缁犱即鏌涢锝嗙缁炬儳缍婇弻鈥愁吋鎼粹€崇闂佺粯甯掗悘姘跺Φ閸曨垰绠抽柟鎼灡閺侀箖鏌f惔銏㈠暡闁瑰嚖鎷� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥嚄閸洖鍌ㄧ憸宥夘敋閿濆绠氶柤鍓插厸濮规姊洪崨濠傚Е闁哥姵鐗滅划鍫熷緞閹邦厾鍙嗛梺缁樻礀閸婂湱鈧熬鎷� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥倿閿曗偓椤啴宕归鍛數婵炴挻鍩冮崑鎾搭殽閻愯尙绠婚柡浣规崌閺佹捇鏁撻敓锟� 婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婄箾閳ь剚绻涙担鍐叉搐绾捐鈹戦悩鍙夋悙缂佺媭鍨堕弻銊╂偆閸屾稑顏� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥嚄閸洖鍌ㄧ憸搴ㄥ箚閺傚簱鍫柛顐g箘椤斿棝姊虹捄銊ユ珢闁瑰嚖鎷� 闂傚倸鍊峰ù鍥敋瑜忛幑銏ゅ箛椤撗勵啍闂婎偄娲︾粙鎴犵不椤栫偞鐓ラ柣鏇炲€圭€氾拷 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥倿閿曞倸绠栭柛顐f礀绾惧潡鏌ょ喊鍗炲闁活厽鐟╅弻鐔告綇閹呮В闂佽桨绀佸Λ婵嬪蓟閵娾晜鍋嗛柛灞剧☉椤忥拷 闂傚倸鍊峰ù鍥х暦閸偅鍙忛柡澶嬪殮濞差亜鐓涘ù锝囧劋濞堥箖姊洪崜鑼帥闁稿鎳庨埢宥夋偐缂佹ḿ鍙嗛梺缁樻礀閸婂湱鈧熬鎷� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐椋庣矆娓氣偓楠炴牠顢曢埛姘そ閺佸啴鍩€椤掆偓閻滃宕归瑙勭€婚梺瑙勫劤缁夋潙煤椤撱垹鏋侀柟鍓х帛閺呮悂鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘
婵犵數濮烽弫鎼佸磻閻愬搫鍨傞柛顐f礀缁犲綊鏌嶉崫鍕櫣闁稿被鍔戦弻銈吤圭€n偅鐝掗梺缁樺笒閿曨亪寮婚妸鈺傚亞闁稿本绋戦锟�: 闂傚倸鍊烽悞锕傛儑瑜版帒鏄ラ柛鏇ㄥ灠閸ㄥ倿姊洪鈧粔鐢稿磻閵堝鐓涢柛銉e劚閻忣亪鏌涙惔鈽呰含闁哄被鍔戦幃銈夊磼濞戞﹩浼� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐宄懊归崶褜娴栭柕濞炬櫆閸婂潡鏌ㄩ弴鐐测偓褰掑磻閿熺姵鐓ラ柡鍥殔娴滃墽鈧厜鍋撻柨婵嗘噺閸嬨儵鏌℃担瑙勫磳闁轰焦鎹囬弫鎾绘晸閿燂拷 闂傚倸鍊搁崐宄懊归崶顒夋晪闁哄稁鍘肩粈鍫熸叏濡潡鍝虹€规洘鐓¢弻娑㈠焺閸愵亖妲堥梺缁樺笒閻忔岸濡甸崟顖氱闁规惌鍨遍弫楣冩煟鎼淬垻鍟查柟鍑ゆ嫹 婵犵數濮烽弫鎼佸磻閻愬搫鍨傞柛顐f礀缁犲綊鏌嶉崫鍕櫣闁活厽顨婇弻宥堫檨闁告挻鐩崺鈧い鎺戝枤濞兼劙鏌熺喊鍗炰喊妤犵偛绻橀弫鎾绘晸閿燂拷 闂傚倸鍊搁崐椋庣矆娓氣偓楠炲鏁撻悩鍐蹭罕闂佺粯鍔樼亸娆撳汲閿曞倹鐓熼柕蹇婃嚉閸︻厾涓嶉柡宥庡幗閻撱儵鏌i弴鐐测偓鍦偓姘炬嫹 婵犵數濮烽弫鎼佸磻閻愬搫鍨傞柛顐f礀缁犱即鎮归崶褍鏂€缂傚倹纰嶇换娑㈠幢濡櫣浼囨繝娈垮枟婵炲﹪寮婚妸鈺傚亞闁稿本绋戦锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹瀹勬噴褰掑炊椤剚鐩畷鐔碱敍濞戞ü缃曢梻浣告贡閸嬫挸顪冮崸妤€鏋佸〒姘e亾闁哄被鍔戦幃銈夊磼濞戞﹩浼� 濠电姷鏁告慨鐢割敊閺嶎厼绐楁俊銈呭閹冲矂姊绘担瑙勫仩闁告柨绻愰埢鏂库槈濠婂懍缃曢梻鍌欐祰濞夋洟宕抽敃鍌氱闁跨噦鎷� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐椋庣矆娓氣偓楠炴牠顢曢敃鈧壕鍦磼鐎n偓绱╂繛宸簻鍥撮梺鎼炲劵缁茶姤绂嶉崜褏妫柡澶嬵儥濡插綊鎮楀鐐 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥倿閿曞倸鍨傛繝闈涱儐閸婂潡鏌ㄩ弴鐐测偓鍛婎攰闂備胶绮崝妤呭极閸濄儳鐭嗗┑鐘叉处閻撱儵鏌i弴鐐测偓鍦偓姘炬嫹 婵犵數濮撮惀澶愬级鎼存挸浜炬俊銈勭劍閸欏繘鏌熺紒銏犳灈閻庢艾顦伴妵鍕箳閹存繍浠奸梺钘夊暟閸犳牠寮婚妸鈺傚亞闁稿本绋戦锟� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥倿閿曞倸绠栭柛顐f礀绾惧潡鏌熺紒妯虹闁哄棴闄勬穱濠囶敍濞嗘帩鍔呭┑鐐茬毞閺呯娀寮婚妸鈺傚亞闁稿本绋戦锟� 婵犵數濮烽。顔炬閺囥垹纾绘繛鎴欏焺閺佸嫰鏌涢妷顔煎缂佹劖顨婇弻鐔煎箲閹伴潧娈梺鍛婂灩婵炩偓闁哄被鍔戦幃銈夊磼濞戞﹩浼� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐宄懊归崶顒€纾婚柟鎵閸嬨倝鏌¢崘銊у闁搞劌鍊块弻褑绠涢敐鍛凹濠电偛鎳愭繛鈧柡灞诲姂閹倝宕掑☉姗嗕紦 闂傚倸鍊搁崐宄懊归崶顒€纾婚柟鎵閸嬨倝鏌¢崘銊у闁搞劌鍊归妵鍕冀閵娧呯厒缂備胶濮靛Λ鍐蓟閵娾晜鍋嗛柛灞剧☉椤忥拷 闂傚倸鍊搁崐宄懊归崶顒€纾婚柟鎵閸嬨倝鏌¢崘銊у闁搞劌鍊块弻鐔封枔閸喗鐏撻梺鍛婎殕瀹€鎼佸蓟閵娾晜鍋嗛柛灞剧☉椤忥拷 闂傚倸鍊搁崐椋庣矆娓氣偓楠炴牠顢曢敃鈧壕褰掓偡濞嗗繐顏╅柛銊︽閺岋箑螣娓氼垱楔闂佸搫妫庨崐婵嬪蓟閵娾晜鍋嗛柛灞剧☉椤忥拷 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鐑芥嚄閸洖绠犻柟鎹愵嚙鐟欙箓鎮楅敐搴″闁搞劍绻堥獮鏍庨鈧俊鑲╃棯閹佸仮闁哄被鍔戦幃銈夊磼濞戞﹩浼� 闂傚倸鍊搁崐椋庣矆娓氣偓瀹曘儳鈧綆鈧叏缍侀獮鎺楀箻閸欐ḿ鐭掗梻浣哥秺濡法绮堟笟鈧畷娆撴偐缂佹ḿ鍙嗛梺缁樻礀閸婂湱鈧熬鎷�
当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《国际神经病学神经外科学杂志》 > 200年第2期 > 正文
编号:11357018
Mapping the onset and progression of atrophy in familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration
http://www.100md.com 《神经病学神经外科学杂志》

     1 Dementia Research Group, Institute of Neurology, London, UK

    2 Department of Neuropsychology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK

    3 Department of Clinical Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK

    4 Division of Neuroscience and Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College of Science, Engineering and Medicine, London, UK

    Correspondence to:

    Professor M N Rossor

    Dementia Research Group, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK; m.rossor@dementia.ion.ucl.ac.uk

    ABSTRACT

    Background: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) may be inherited as an autosomal dominant disease. Studying patients "at risk" for developing FTLD can provide insights into the earliest onset and evolution of the disease.

    Method: We carried out approximately annual clinical, MRI, and neuropsychological assessments on an asymptomatic 51 year old "at risk" family member from a family with FTLD associated with ubiquitin-positive and tau-negative inclusion bodies. We used non-linear (fluid) registration of serial MRI to determine areas undergoing significant regional atrophy at different stages of the disease.

    Results: Over the first 26 months of the study, the patient remained asymptomatic, but subsequently developed progressive speech production difficulties, and latterly severe orofacial dyspraxia, dyscalculia, frontal executive impairment, and limb dyspraxia. Regional atrophy was present prior to the onset of symptoms, and was initially centred on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the left middle frontal gyrus. Latterly, there was increasing asymmetric left frontal and parietal atrophy. Imaging revealed excess and increasing global atrophy throughout the study. Neuropsychological evaluation revealed mild intellectual impairment prior to the onset of these clinical symptoms; frontal executive and left parietal impairment subsequently emerged, culminating in widespread cognitive impairment. Fluid registered MRI allowed the emerging atrophy patterns to be delineated.

    Conclusion: We have demonstrated the onset and progressive pattern of in vivo atrophy in familial FTLD using fluid registered MRI and correlated this with the clinical features. Fluid registered MRI may be a useful technique in assessing patterns of focal atrophy in vivo and demonstrating the progression of degenerative diseases.

    Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer’s disease; BBSI, brain boundary shift integral; EOD, early onset dementia; FTD, frontotemporal dementia; FTLD, frontotemporal lobar degeneration; MAPT, microtubule associated protein tau; NART, National Adult Reading Test; PA, progressive non-fluent aphasia; TIV, total intracranial volume; SD, semantic dementia; WAIS-R, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised

    Keywords: atrophy; fluid registration; frontotemporal lobar degeneration; MRI; presymptomatic

    Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is a collective term for disorders characterised by focal frontal and temporal lobar atrophy, and clinically by behavioural changes and language deficits. Consensus criteria describe three prototypical clinical FTLD syndromes: frontotemporal dementia (FTD), progressive non-fluent aphasia (PA), and semantic dementia (SD).1,2 FTD is characterised by early personality change and disordered social conduct; PA commences as a disorder of expressive language; and the hallmark of SD is an impairment of comprehension of word meaning and/or object identity. In all three syndromes, perceptual and spatial functions, praxis, and memory are generally intact or relatively well preserved until the disease is advanced. The underlying neuropathological substrate is variable and the clinical manifestations are better related to the topographical distribution of the atrophy rather than to specific histopathological findings.

    Approximately 30–50% of patients with FTLD have a family history of early onset dementia (EOD) with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance.2–4 The largest group of these families have tau-positive neuronal and glial inclusions at histology, which are usually associated with mutations in the tau gene (MAPT: microtubule associated protein tau) on chromosome 17q21.5–7 A further proportion of families with autosomal dominant FTLD have ubiquitin-positive, tau-negative inclusions with or without clinical features of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. A minority of these ubiquitin-positive and tau-negative families show linkage either to chromosome 98 or 17q21.9–12 Finally, a proportion of families have no distinctive histopathological findings; a single Danish family in this latter group shows linkage to chromosome 3.13

    The occurrence of autosomal dominant dementias allows the possibility of gaining unique insights into their pathogenesis and earliest clinical features. By following healthy individuals "at risk" for autosomal dominant disease, it has been possible to demonstrate the clinical, neuropsychological, and imaging changes occurring at the very earliest (presymptomatic) stages of Alzheimer’s disease (AD).14 The development of techniques such as non-linear (fluid) registration of serial MR images, has allowed the emergence and progression of regional atrophy to be revealed in vivo.15–17

    We describe the use of fluid registration to determine the progression of atrophy and clinical and neuropsychological features in an initially asymptomatic patient who proceeded to develop FTLD.

    METHODS

    Family

    This is a British kindred with seven individuals affected with EOD spanning three generations (fig 1). There are few clinical data for earlier generations. Patient III.1 died aged 57 years of lobar pneumonia, with a diagnosis of pre-senile dementia. Patient III.2 died at age 60 years of "cerebral sclerosis" in a psychiatric hospital. Patient III.4 died of bronchopneumonia, with an underlying diagnosis of pre-senile dementia, in the same hospital at age 58 years. No notes survive for any of these family members.

    Figure 1 Family tree with index patient marked with arrow. Circles represent females, squares males, and diamonds are anonymised individuals. Filled symbols represent affected family members. Deceased family members are marked with a diagonal slash.

    Patient IV.1 was assessed when aged 56 years. At that time there was a 4 year history of personality change, disordered social conduct, and cognitive decline. He was wheelchair bound and incontinent, laughed in response to questioning or any attempt to engage him in conversation, and had no comprehensible speech. Brain CT revealed generalised involutional changes particularly prominent over the frontal and temporal areas. He died 12 months later and underwent neuropathological examination. His brain was severely atrophic with the left frontal and temporal lobes most affected. Microscopy revealed no plaques or tangles but showed neuronal loss and astrocytosis with status spongiosus in the superficial layers of the temporal and especially frontal cortex. Immunohistochemistry for ubiquitin revealed a small number of intracytoplasmic inclusions in the hippocampal dentate granule cells, and abnormal neurites and intracytoplasmic inclusions in the superficial layer of the frontal and temporal lobe cortices, as well as intranuclear inclusions in the limbic cortices. Tau and -synuclein immunohistochemistry was negative. The postmortem diagnosis was of familial FTLD with ubiquitin-positive (tau and synuclein negative) inclusions. Although the family was too small for formal linkage studies screening for tau gene mutations was negative.

    Prospective study

    The index case, patient IV.3, was enrolled into our prospective longitudinal "at risk" study aged 51 years. Approval was

    NEUROLOGICAL AND NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING

    Assessments were conducted approximately annually and patient IV.3 underwent a standard clinical interview and neurological examination, and was tested on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).18

    The neuropsychological assessment comprised a comprehensive cognitive battery (see also Janssen et al19,20). The following areas of cognition were investigated: general intellectual functions (shortened version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R),21 Advanced Progressive Matrices22); verbal recognition and recall memory (verbal version of the Recognition Memory Test,23 Paired Associate Learning Test24); visual memory (visual version of the Recognition Memory Test,23 Topographical Memory Test24); nominal function (Graded-Difficulty Naming Test25); word comprehension (Synonyms Test26); literacy (National Adult Reading Test (NART)27); spelling (Graded-Difficulty Spelling Test28); arithmetic (Graded-Difficulty Arithmetic Test29); visual perceptual and visuospatial functions (Silhouettes and Cubes from the Visual Object and Space Perception Battery30); frontal "executive" functions (Modified Card Sorting Test,31 Cognitive Estimates Test,32 Trail Making Test,33 Hayling Sentence Completion Test,34 Weigl Colour Form Sorting Test35); and speed and attention (Digit Copying and Cancelling 0’s36).

    NEUROIMAGING

    Acquisition and pre-processing

    Seven T1 weighted volumetric MRI scans were acquired over a period of 68 months using two scanners (the first three scans were performed on one scanner, the subsequent four scans on the other). Both scanners were 1.5T GE Signa Units (General Electric, Milwaukee, WI). Scans were acquired using a spoiled gradient echo technique (256x128x128 matrix, FOV 24x24x19.2 cm, TR/TE/NEX/FLIP = 35/5/1/35°). This yielded 124 contiguous 1.5 mm thick slices, which were transferred to a Sun Enterprise 250 workstation (Sun Microsystems, Mountain View, CA) for analysis.

    Qualitative assessment and calculation of global atrophy

    Each MRI scan was reported by an experienced neuroradiologist blinded to the clinical information. Image processing was performed using the MIDAS software tool.37 A semi-automated technique, using intensity thresholding and a series of erosions and dilations, was applied to delineate brain tissue. Total intracranial volumes (TIV) were measured for each scan.38 A rigid body 9 degrees of freedom registration was performed to align the repeat scan onto the baseline image.39 Brain volumes for each scan were calculated directly from the MIDAS software tool and corrected for TIV. Whole brain atrophy rates were calculated between intervals from the registered scans using a validated automated technique, the brain boundary shift integral (BBSI).40,41

    Assessment of regional atrophy: fluid registration

    The fluid registration model has been described previously.42,43 Using the rigidly aligned repeat scan as a starting point, the model generates a voxel-level deformation field. The determinant of the Jacobian matrix from the deformation field gives a measure of volume change at the voxel level, and voxel compression maps are created by using a colour overlay to signify this volume change.

    RESULTS

    Patient IV.3 attended for nine visits. Neuropsychological assessments were performed at six of these time points, and MRI was performed at seven. Details of these assessments at each time point are presented below, with an overview shown in fig 2. The neuropsychological scores are summarised in table 1.

    Figure 2 Overview of the clinical, neuropsychological, and MRI assessments that patient IV.3 underwent during the course of the study. N-psych, neuropsychology.

    Table 1 Summary of neuropsychological assessments

    Patient IV.3

    At visit 1 patient IV.3 was 51 years old. She was left handed and had been working as a librarian for 26 years. She did not smoke and only rarely drank alcohol. She reported no cognitive or behavioural symptoms, and the clinical assessment was unremarkable, with no evidence of cognitive impairment.

    At neuropsychological assessment (1), on the shortened version of the WAIS-R, she scored at an average level on the Verbal scale (VIQ 97) and at the upper end of the low average range on the Performance scale (PIQ 87). She performed at an average level on the Advanced Progressive Matrices. Her premorbid optimal level of functioning was estimated using the NART to be in the superior range (FIQ 123).27 This discrepancy indicates a significant intellectual decline.44 However, there was no evidence for deficits in memory or visuoperceptual or frontal executive function.

    Cross sectional MRI (1) was reported as normal; however, the initial calculated brain volume was slightly small at 1099 ml or 82% of TIV (normal range: 83–89%).

    Visit 2 (14 months)

    At the second assessment, she again reported no cognitive or behavioural changes. There was no evidence for decline on neuropsychological testing (2). The MRI (2) was reported as normal.

    Applying the automated fluid registration technique to MRI (1) and (2) revealed very focal left frontal atrophy, almost completely confined to the pars opercularis, occurring over the first 14 month period (fig 3).

    Figure 3 Sagittal MRI with voxel-compression-mapping overlay over time period one, showing very focal anterolateral left frontal lobe atrophy, particularly centred around the pars opercularis.

    Visit 3 (26 months)

    At the third assessment the patient remained well. Neuropsychological assessment (3) revealed that her verbal and performance IQs remained static. Despite intact naming skills she performed poorly on a verbal phonemic fluency task. However, she passed three further frontal tasks. Performance on other focal cognitive tasks including memory remained unchanged.

    The MRI (3) was reported as normal. Using rigid body registration and the BBSI we demonstrated that over the time period spanning the first three assessments there was 22.9 ml brain volume loss (assuming constant brain loss this equates to 0.96% of brain volume/year) (normal range: 0.1–0.54%/year).

    Fluid registration was applied to MRIs (2) and (3). Over this 12 month period diffuse left sided frontal lobe atrophy had developed, although the pars opercularis was still losing volume at the fastest rate. There was now clear, but lesser involvement of the pars triangualis, the pars orbitalis, and the middle frontal gyrus. The anterior caudate was slightly involved, but the primary motor cortex, paracentral lobule, temporal lobe structures (including the hippocampi), and cerebellum remained unaffected (figs 4 and 5).

    Visit 4 (45 months)

    At the fourth assessment, 19 months later, for the first time the patient reported symptoms. She was having difficulties expressing herself, and felt that her childhood stammer had re-emerged, although this was not apparent during the interview. She reported some difficulties with mental arithmetic. Throughout the interview she appeared more jocular than previously, and laughed inappropriately on occasion.

    Neuropsychological testing (4) revealed that her verbal and performance IQs remained unchanged. Her spelling and arithmetic had declined further. Nonetheless, memory, naming, speed and attention, visual perceptual, and visuospatial skills were unchanged. She obtained an impaired score on the Hayling Sentence Completion Test. Despite good scores on tests of speed and attention, her performance on the Trail Making Test was slow.

    For the first time her MRI (4) was abnormal, revealing enlargement of the lateral ventricles and widening of the sylvian fissure on the left.

    Visit 5 (51 months)

    By the time of the fifth assessment, 6 months later, the patient reported significant deterioration. She now had clear difficulties with expressive language yet was remarkably unconcerned by her symptoms. She had speech production difficulties and made several phonemic errors in both spontaneous speech and when reading a prose passage. She laughed inappropriately on several occasions and manifested bilateral limb dyspraxia. She had orofacial dyspraxia. She failed bedside tests of executive function. Neuropsychological testing (5) revealed a decline in her verbal and performance IQs. Her memory and naming continued to be unaffected, although single word comprehension had declined slightly. Spelling and calculation had declined further. There was impairment of visuospatial function, although visuoperceptual skills remained normal. There was evidence of further frontal executive impairment, with decline on the Wisconsin Card Sorting and Trail Making Tests. Her performance on tests of speed and attention remained normal.

    Standard MRI (5) demonstrated further cerebral atrophy, with increasingly prominent lateral ventricles and widening of the left peri-sylvian fissure.

    Visit 6 (56 months)

    At the sixth assessment she was seen at the Specialist Cognitive Disorders Clinic. She had previously attended alone, not wanting to burden her husband with taking part in a research project. Her husband was therefore for the first time able to provide a corroborative history. He had been aware of his wife’s difficulties expressing herself for about a year. Her childhood stammer had reappeared and her arithmetic had declined. She had become less tidy, but had never got lost. He also reported that she laughed inappropriately and that her food p

    references had changed. There was no change in religiosity or libido. Clinical examination was unchanged.

    Neuropsychological assessment (6) revealed further intellectual decline. For the first time there was evidence of language and verbal memory impairment. In contrast visual memory remained at a good average level. She failed to score on tests of calculation and spelling. Visuospatial and visuoperceptual skills had declined further. She failed all frontal executive tests, with the exception of the Weigl. Her performance on speed and attention tests remained within normal limits. Subsequently she was no longer able to tolerate formal neuropsychological testing.

    The MRI scan (6) was clearly abnormal with prominent ventricles, and asymmetric left temporal lobe atrophy. Atrophy calculated using the BBSI showed that over the 11 month interval between scans (4) and (6), 43.8 ml of brain volume was lost (that is 4.5% of brain volume/year, assuming linear decline).

    Fluid registration of MRIs (4) and (6) revealed increasing atrophy particularly involving the left orbito-frontal region and right anterior frontal lobe, including the operculum, over the 11 month period. There was more widespread atrophy diffusely involving the left temporal lobe, with the inferior temporal lobe gyrus and, to a lesser extent, the middle temporal gyrus being affected. There was also involvement of the left parietal lobe and both frontal lobes, with relative sparing of the orbito-frontal gyri. The primary sensory and motor cortices, superior temporal gyri, hippocampi, amygdalae, and cerebellum remained unaffected.

    Visit 7 (57 months)

    One month later she was admitted for investigation at the National Hospital. Clinical examination revealed her to be perseverative and to exhibit utilisation behaviour and bilateral grasp reflexes; there were no fasciculations and the remainder of the examination was unchanged from her previous assessment. Screening blood tests for reversible causes of dementia were normal or negative. The CSF was acellular, protein and glucose were normal, and oligoclonal bands were absent. The EEG was normal with preservation of rhythm. She was diagnosed with familial FTLD.

    Visit 8 (66 months)

    By this stage the patient was practically mute; she would say "yes" in response to questions, but not always appropriately.

    Visit 9 (69 months)

    At this final assessment, the patient’s only vocalisation was a giggle. She no longer recognised her friends. Her sense of humour had become puerile and she continued to enjoy simple comedy shows on television. Her oro-facial apraxia had deteriorated and interfered with mastication.

    The MRI (7) revealed further asymmetric left temporal atrophy, however, even at this stage frontal lobe atrophy was not prominent. Using the BBSI to compare scans (6) and (7) (an interval of 13 months) 76.3 ml of brain volume was seen to have been lost (8% of brain volume/year).

    DISCUSSION

    We report the clinical, neuropsychological, and imaging findings of a patient with familial FTLD over the time period she progressed from being asymptomatic to being profoundly affected. Using fluid registration we demonstrate early left sided focal brain atrophy with subsequent progressive clinical and neuropsychological decline. It seems reasonable to assume that this focal atrophy is responsible for the observed deficits years before the disease would have presented clinically. In addition, the focal left sided atrophy with associated speech production deficits is compelling evidence that our patient, despite being left handed, was left hemisphere dominant.

    Cross sectional MRI has been used to demonstrate strikingly different patterns of regional atrophy within the subgroups of FTLD.45,46 However, demonstrating the progression of atrophy, a hallmark of neurodegeneration, requires serial imaging. Analysis of serial MRI from the same patient can provide an accurate measure of change within an individual over time. Significantly increased rates of global atrophy have been demonstrated in individuals with AD and FTLD47,48 when compared with control subjects. In this study, we found excess global atrophy was occurring from the start of the study and accelerated during the course of the disease in line with both the clinical and neuropsychological progression.

    The development of non-linear matching algorithms (fluid registration) allows visualisation of the progression of regional brain atrophy in vivo. This technique has been validated in both AD and control subjects,42 and has been used to demonstrate presymptomatic change in individuals at genetic risk of AD.15 To our knowledge, this is the first study using this technique to report presymptomatic brain atrophy in FTLD.

    At this patient’s first visit, despite the reported lack of symptoms or abnormal clinical findings, it is notable that neuropsychological testing revealed significant intellectual impairment in the setting of well preserved cognitive skills. Recent studies have shown that the performance on tests of general intelligence, in particular tests of fluid intelligence such as the Advanced Matrices, is related to brain function in the lateral prefrontal cortex.49 Thus our patient’s impaired performance on tests of general intelligence may suggest early frontal dysfunction. However, Geschwind et al have shown that frontal executive impairment may be present in patients destined to develop FTLD decades before the onset of symptoms.50 In our patient there was unequivocal evidence of further neuropsychological decline only at the third assessment. This is compatible with the view that the intellectual impairment documented at first assessment may have been longstanding. However, the absence of a practice effect on the patient’s performance on the first three administrations of the WAIS-R also raises the possibility that some further intellectual decline was occurring.

    Fluid registration of the first and second MRI scans revealed highly selective left sided frontal atrophy almost completely confined to the pars opercularis. This change was accompanied by neither clinical nor neuropsychological evidence of decline. By the third scan this atrophy pattern had progressed and extended to involve the pars triangualis, the pars orbitalis, and, to a lesser extent, the middle frontal gyrus. This increased, but still focal, atrophy was not accompanied by clinical evidence of decline. However, neuropsychological testing did reveal evidence of a new selective verbal (phonemic) fluency deficit, implicating dysfunction in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. A recent review of the literature has proposed that lesions of the dominant pars opercularis may impair the ability to sequence words syntactically, and that lesions of the pars triangualis may impair the ability to generate words.51 Positron emission tomography studies have also shown activation of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, Broca’s area, and anterior cingulate during word generation tasks (for a review see Nathaniel-James and Frith52). We conclude that the demonstrated atrophy pattern is likely to be responsible for the observed impairment in verbal fluency, but that there was evidence of very focal atrophy in this region that preceded any clinical or neuropsychological evidence of progressive impairment.

    Our findings are broadly in keeping with previous functional neuroimaging studies of speech production in normal volunteers53 and after stroke.54 However, a recent PET study in PA, although demonstrating decreased activation in the caudal part of Broca’s area, showed maximum focal cerebral hypometabolism centred around the left anterior insula.55 It is notable that all patients in this latter study had established PA; it is therefore possible that insula involvement is a later feature of the disease. Alternatively, the differences may be due to the differences in age, disease duration, or possibly the underlying neuropathophysiology of the patient group. Thus, whilst these studies are clearly complementary, they are not directly comparable.

    The subsequent course of this patient’s disease was characterised clinically by a progressive decline in speech production and the emergence of increasing frontal executive and dominant parietal dysfunction. By the final neuropsychological assessment (6), there was further significant deterioration of intellectual function, with by now marked global impairment of executive function and severe dyscalculia and dysgraphia. Speech production difficulties were by now prominent. At this stage, performance on a demanding series of memory tests remained broadly within normal limits. Similarly, naming, verbal comprehension, and tests of speed and attention were satisfactory.

    Figure 4 Sagittal MRI with voxel-compression-mapping overlay over time period two, showing focal anterolateral left frontal lobe atrophy, extending from, but still centred around, the pars opercularis.

    Figure 5 Coronal MRI with voxel-compression-mapping overlay over time period two, showing marked asymmetric (left>right) frontal lobe atrophy at this stage.

    Fluid registration over the time period of scans (4)–(6) revealed increasing atrophy centred around the left frontal and left parietal lobes, findings consistent with those from clinical assessment and neuropsychological testing. No significant atrophy was seen in the hippocampi and medial temporal lobes, compatible with the patient’s well preserved memory. The re-emergence of primitive reflexes, generally implicated in frontal lobe disease, in the absence of long-tract or cerebellar signs is also compatible with the observed atrophy pattern. The increasing rates of global brain atrophy over the period of follow up are in keeping both with the increasing regional atrophy demonstrated using fluid registration, and clinical disease progression. Importantly, there were no abnormalities visible on cross sectional imaging until scan (4), 45 months into the study, and 31 months after clear focal changes had been demonstrated using fluid registration. When abnormalities did become present on conventional imaging, they were entirely in keeping with a diagnosis of FTLD.

    This study has a number of limitations. The patient attended alone until the sixth assessment, and the history given may therefore be incomplete. However, when she was accompanied by her husband, his account of her illness was broadly in keeping with our clinical assessment. We have no information concerning the early course of the disease in other affected family members. This patient’s brother was not assessed until late in his disease, at which time many of the reported clinical features appear to be consistent with FTLD. Given this, the family history, and similar young age at onset, it is highly likely that both siblings were suffering from the same disease process. However, as FTLD is a clinically and neuropathologically diverse entity, the pattern and progression of atrophy we describe in this individual are unlikely to be consistent amongst the different clinical presentations. Although the use of two different scanners could result in a systematic bias regarding the reported progression of atrophy, the earliest changes were all demonstrated on scans acquired on the first scanner and no "cross scanner" calculations or analyses were performed. Finally, the neuropsychological battery used in this study, although comprehensive, was initially designed to detect the earliest changes in familial AD, and not FTLD per se. Accordingly the selected tests were not specifically targeted to detect early speech production deficits. It is therefore possible that a more detailed assessment may have detected subtle speech production dysfunction even earlier than was documented in our study.

    Fluid registered MRI is an unbiased, non-invasive technique that can be used to accurately delineate focal atrophy occurring between serially acquired MRI scans. As this case demonstrates, this methodology may be a useful means of demonstrating the earliest features and progression of degenerative diseases in vivo.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    We thank the family members and their attendant physicians, the MRI staff at St Mary’s Hospital, London; David MacManus at the NMR Research Unit at the Institute of Neurology, London; Jennifer Whitwell for assisting with image analysis; and Dr Tamas Revesz for advice on the histopathology.

    REFERENCES

    Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L, et al. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology 1998;51 (6) :1546–54.

    McKhann G, Albert MS, Grossman M, et al. Clinical and pathological diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia: report of the Work Group on Frontotemporal Dementia and Pick’s Disease. Arch Neurol 2001;58 (11) :1803–9.

    Stevens M, van Duijn CM, Kamphorst W, et al. Familial aggregation in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 1998;50 (6) :1541–5.

    Foster NL, Wilhelmsen K, Sima AA, et al. Frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17: a consensus conference. Ann Neurol 1997;41 (6) :706–15.

    Hutton M, Lendon CL, Rizzu P, et al. Association of missense and 5'-splice-site mutations in tau with the inherited dementia FTDP-17. Nature 1998;393 (6686) :702–5.

    Poorkaj P, Bird TD, Wijsman E, et al. Tau is a candidate gene for chromosome 17 frontotemporal dementia. Ann Neurol 1998;43 (6) :815–25.

    Spillantini MG, Murrell JR, Goedert M, et al. Mutation in the tau gene in familial multiple system tauopathy with presenile dementia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95 (13) :7737–41.

    Hosler BA, Siddique T, Sapp PC, et al. Linkage of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with frontotemporal dementia to chromosome 9q21–q22. JAMA 2000;284 (13) :1664–9.

    Bird TD, Wijsman EM, Nochlin D, et al. Chromosome 17 and hereditary dementia: linkage studies in three non-Alzheimer families and kindreds with late-onset FAD. Neurology 1997;48 (4) :949–54.

    Basun H, Almkvist O, Axelman K, et al. Clinical characteristics of a chromosome 17-linked rapidly progressive familial frontotemporal dementia. Arch Neurol 1997;54 (5) :539–44.

    Lendon CL, Lynch T, Norton J, et al. Hereditary dysphasic disinhibition dementia: a frontotemporal dementia linked to 17q21–22. Neurology 1998;50 (6) :1546–55.

    Rosso SM, Kamphorst W, de Graaf B, et al. Familial frontotemporal dementia with ubiquitin-positive inclusions is linked to chromosome 17q21–22. Brain 2001;124 (10) :1948–57.

    Ashworth A, Lloyd S, Brown J, et al. Molecular genetic characterisation of frontotemporal dementia on chromosome 3. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 1999;10 (suppl 1) :93–101.

    Fox NC, Warrington EK, Seiffer AS, et al. Presymptomatic cognitive deficits in individuals at risk of familial Alzheimer’s disease. A longitudinal prospective study. Brain 1998;121:1631–9.

    Fox NC, Crum WR, Scahill RI, et al. Imaging of onset and progression of Alzheimer’s disease with voxel-compression mapping of serial magnetic resonance images. Lancet 2001;358 (9277) :201–5.

    Schott JM, Simon JE, Fox NC, et al. Delineating the sites and progression of in vivo atrophy in multiple system atrophy using fluid-registered MRI. Mov Disord 2003;18 (8) :955–8.

    Scahill RI, Schott JM, Stevens JM, et al. Mapping the evolution of regional atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease: unbiased analysis of fluid-registered serial MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99 (7) :4703–7.

    Folstein M, Folstein S, McHughs P. The "Mini Mental State": a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–98.

    Janssen JC, Hall M, Fox NC, et al. Alzheimer’s disease due to an intronic presenilin-1 (PSEN1 intron 4) mutation: a clinicopathological study. Brain 2000;123 (5) :894–907.

    Janssen JC, Lantos PL, Fox NC, et al. Autopsy-confirmed familial early-onset Alzheimer disease caused by the L153V presenilin 1 mutation. Arch Neurol 2001;58 (6) :953–8.

    Wechsler D. Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation, 1981.

    Raven JC. Advanced Progressive Matrices, sets I and II. London: HK Lewis, 1965.

    Warrington EK. Manual for the Recognition Memory Test for words and faces. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson, 1984.

    Warrington EK. The Camden Memory Tests manual. Hove: Psychology Press, 1996.

    McKenna P, Warrington EK. Testing for nominal dysphasia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1980;43 (9) :781–8.

    Warrington EK, McKenna P, Orpwood L. Single word comprehension: a concrete and abstract word synonym test. Neuropsychol Rehabil 1998;8:143–54.

    Nelson HE, Willison J. The National Adult Reading Test (NART) manual. 2nd ed. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson, 1991.

    Baxter DM, Warrington EK. Measuring dysgraphia: a graded-difficulty spelling test. Behav Neurol 1994;7 (3–4) :107–16.

    Jackson M, Warrington EK. Arithmetic skills in patients with unilateral cerebral lesions. Cortex 1986;22 (4) :611–20.

    Warrington EK, James M. The visual object and space perception battery. Bury St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company, 1991.

    Nelson HE. A modified card sorting test sensitive to frontal lobe defects. Cortex 1976;12:313–24.

    Shallice T, Evans ME. The involvement of the frontal lobes in cognitive estimation. Cortex 1978;14 (2) :294–303.

    Reitan RM. The validity of the trail making test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills 1958;8:271–6.

    Burgess PW, Shallice T. The Hayling Sentence Completion test. Neuropsychologia 1996;34:263–72.

    Weigl E. On the psychology of the so called process of abstraction. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 1948;36:3–33.

    Willison JR, Warrington EK. Cognitive retardation in a patient with preservation of psychomotor speed. Behav Neurol 1992;5:113–6.

    Freeborough PA, Fox NC, Kitney RI. Interactive algorithms for the segmentation and quantitation of 3-D MRI brain scans. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1997;53 (1) :15–25.

    Whitwell JL, Crum WR, Watt HC, et al. Normalization of cerebral volumes by use of intracranial volume: implications for longitudinal quantitative MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22 (8) :1483–9.

    Freeborough PA, Woods RP, Fox NC. Accurate registration of serial 3D MR brain images and its application to visualizing change in neurodegenerative disorders. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996;20 (6) :1012–22.

    Fox NC, Freeborough PA. Brain atrophy progression measured from registered serial MRI: validation and application to Alzheimer’s disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7 (6) :1069–75.

    Freeborough PA, Fox NC. The boundary shift integral: an accurate and robust measure of cerebral volume changes from registered repeat MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997;16 (5) :623–9.

    Freeborough PA, Fox NC. Modeling brain deformations in Alzheimer disease by fluid registration of serial 3D MR images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998;22 (5) :838–43.

    Crum WR, Scahill RI, Fox NC. Automated hippocampal segmentation by regional fluid registration of serial MRI: validation and application in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage 2001;13 (5) :847–55.

    Nelson HE, O’Connell A. Dementia: the estimation of premorbid intelligence levels using the New Adult Reading Test. Cortex 1978;14 (2) :234–44.

    Chan D, Fox NC, Scahill RI, et al. Patterns of temporal lobe atrophy in semantic dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol 2001;49 (4) :433–42.

    Perry RJ, Hodges JR. Differentiating frontal and temporal variant frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 2000;54 (12) :2277–84.

    Fox NC, Freeborough PA, Rossor MN. Visualisation and quantification of atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 1996;348 (9020) :94–7.

    Chan D, Fox NC, Jenkins R, et al. Rates of global and regional cerebral atrophy in AD and frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 2001;57 (10) :1756–63.

    Gray JR, Chabris CF, Braver TS. Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence. Nat Neurosci 2003;6 (3) :316–22.

    Geschwind DH, Robidoux J, Alarcon M, et al. Dementia and neurodevelopmental predisposition: cognitive dysfunction in presymptomatic subjects precedes dementia by decades in frontotemporal dementia. Ann Neurol 2001;50 (6) :741–6.

    Taubner RW, Raymer AM, Heilman KM. Frontal-opercular aphasia. Brain Lang 1999;70 (2) :240–61.

    Nathaniel-James D, Frith C. The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: evidence from the effects of contextual constraint in a sentence completion task. Neuroimage 2002;16 (4) :1094.

    Blank SC, Scott SK, Murphy K, et al. Speech production: Wernicke, Broca and beyond. Brain 2002;125 (Pt 8) :1829–38.

    Blank SC, Bird H, Turkheimer F, et al. Speech production after stroke: the role of the right pars opercularis. Ann Neurol 2003;54 (3) :310–20.

    Nestor PJ, Graham NL, Fryer TD, et al. Progressive non-fluent aphasia is associated with hypometabolism centred on the left anterior insula. Brain 2003;126 (Pt 11) :2406–18.(J C Janssen1, J M Schott1)
    婵犵數鍎戠徊钘壝洪悩璇茬婵犻潧娲ら閬嶆煕濞戝崬鏋ゆい鈺冨厴閺屾稑鈽夐崡鐐差潾闁哄鏅滃Λ鍐蓟濞戞ǚ鏋庨煫鍥ㄦ尨閸嬫挻绂掔€n亞鍔﹀銈嗗坊閸嬫捇鏌涢悩宕囥€掓俊鍙夊姇閳规垿宕堕埞鐐亙闁诲骸绠嶉崕鍗炍涘☉銏犵劦妞ゆ帒顦悘锔筋殽閻愬樊鍎旀鐐叉喘椤㈡棃宕ㄩ鐐靛搸婵犵數鍋犻幓顏嗗緤閹灐娲箣閻樺吀绗夐梺鎸庣箓閹峰宕甸崼婢棃鏁傜粵瀣妼闂佸摜鍋為幐鎶藉蓟閺囥垹骞㈤柡鍥╁Т婵′粙鏌i姀鈺佺仩缂傚秴锕獮濠囨晸閻樿尙鐤€濡炪倖鎸鹃崑鐔哥閹扮増鈷戦柛锔诲帎閻熸噴娲Χ閸ヮ煈娼熼梺鍐叉惈閹冲氦绻氶梻浣呵归張顒傜矙閹烘鍊垫い鏂垮⒔绾惧ジ鏌¢崘銊モ偓绋挎毄濠电姭鎷冮崟鍨杹閻庢鍠栭悥鐓庣暦濮椻偓婵℃瓕顦抽柛鎾村灦缁绘稓鈧稒岣块惌濠偽旈悩鍙夋喐闁轰緡鍣i、鏇㈡晜閽樺鈧稑鈹戦敍鍕粶濠⒀呮櫕缁瑦绻濋崶銊у幐婵犮垼娉涢敃銈夊汲閺囩喐鍙忛柣鐔煎亰濡偓闂佽桨绀佺粔鎾偩濠靛绀冩い顓熷灣閹寸兘姊绘担绛嬪殐闁哥姵鎹囧畷婵婄疀濞戣鲸鏅g紓鍌欑劍宀e潡鍩㈤弮鍫熺厽闁瑰鍎戞笟娑㈡煕閺傚灝鏆i柡宀嬬節瀹曟帒顫濋鐘靛幀缂傚倷鐒﹂〃鍛此囬柆宥呯劦妞ゆ帒鍠氬ḿ鎰磼椤旇偐绠婚柨婵堝仱閺佸啴宕掑鍗炴憢闂佽崵濞€缂傛艾鈻嶉敐鍥╃煋闁割煈鍠撻埀顒佸笒椤繈顢橀悩顐n潔闂備線娼уú銈吤洪妸鈺佺劦妞ゆ帒鍋嗛弨鐗堢箾婢跺娲寸€规洏鍨芥俊鍫曞炊閵娿儺浼曢柣鐔哥矌婢ф鏁Δ鍜冪稏濠㈣埖鍔栭崑锝夋煕閵夘垰顩☉鎾瑰皺缁辨帗娼忛妸褏鐣奸梺褰掝棑婵炩偓闁诡喗绮撻幐濠冨緞婢跺瞼姊炬繝鐢靛仜椤曨厽鎱ㄦィ鍐ㄦ槬闁哄稁鍘奸崹鍌炴煏婵炵偓娅嗛柛瀣ㄥ妼闇夐柨婵嗘噹閺嗙喐淇婇姘卞ⅵ婵﹥妞介、鏇㈡晲閸℃瑦顓婚梻浣虹帛閹碱偆鎹㈠┑瀣祦閻庯綆鍠栫粻锝嗙節婵犲倸顏柟鏋姂濮婃椽骞愭惔锝傛闂佸搫鐗滈崜鐔风暦閻熸壋鍫柛鏇ㄥ弾濞村嫬顪冮妶鍡楃瑐闁绘帪绠撳鎶筋敂閸喓鍘遍梺鐟版惈缁夋潙鐣甸崱娑欑厓鐟滄粓宕滃顒夋僵闁靛ň鏅滈崑鍌炴煥閻斿搫孝閻熸瑱绠撻獮鏍箹椤撶偟浠紓浣插亾濠㈣泛鈯曡ぐ鎺戠闁稿繗鍋愬▓銈夋⒑缂佹ḿ绠栭柣鈺婂灠閻g兘鏁撻悩鑼槰闂佽偐鈷堥崜姘额敊閹达附鈷戦悹鍥b偓铏亖闂佸憡鏌ㄦ鎼佸煝閹捐绠i柣鎰綑椤庢挸鈹戦悩璇у伐闁哥噥鍨堕獮鍡涘磼濮n厼缍婇幃鈺呭箵閹烘繂濡锋繝鐢靛Л閸嬫捇鏌熷▓鍨灓缁鹃箖绠栭弻鐔衡偓鐢登瑰暩閻熸粎澧楅悡锟犲蓟濞戙垹绠抽柡鍌氱氨閺嬪懎鈹戦悙鍙夊櫣闂佸府绲炬穱濠囧箻椤旇姤娅㈤梺璺ㄥ櫐閹凤拷

   闂佽娴烽弫濠氬磻婵犲洤绐楅柡鍥╁枔閳瑰秴鈹戦悩鍙夋悙婵☆偅锕㈤弻娑㈠Ψ閵忊剝鐝栭悷婊冨簻閹凤拷  闂傚倷鑳舵灙缂佺粯顨呴埢宥夊即閵忕姵鐎梺缁樺姉閸庛倝宕曞畝鍕厽闁逛即娼ф晶顔姐亜鎼搭垱瀚�  闂備浇宕垫慨鏉懨洪妶鍥e亾濮樼厧鐏︽い銏$懇楠炲鏁冮埀顒傜矆閸曨垱鐓熸俊顖濐嚙缁茶崵绱撳蹇斿  闂傚倷鑳堕幊鎾诲触鐎n剙鍨濋幖娣妼绾惧ジ鏌曟繛鐐珔闁告濞婇弻鈩冨緞鐎n亞鍔稿┑鈽嗗灲閹凤拷   闂傚倷娴囬~澶嬬娴犲绀夌€光偓閸曨剙浠遍梺闈浤涢崨顖ょ床婵犵數鍋涘Λ娆撳礉閺嶎偆涓嶆繛鍡樻尰閻撴洘绻涢崱妯兼噭閻庢熬鎷�   闂傚倷绀侀幉鈥愁潖缂佹ɑ鍙忛柟缁㈠枛閻鏌涢埄鍐槈缂備讲鏅犻弻鐔碱敍濠婂喚鏆銈冨劵閹凤拷