A sensitive measure of repression
http://www.100md.com
《细胞学杂志》
Small/Macmillan
Researchers have proposed that complex embryonic patterns are generated by multiple enhancers that respond differentially to gradients of repressor proteins. In a recent report, Dorothy Clyde, Dmitri Papatsenko, Stephen Small, and colleagues (New York University, New York, NY) combine genetics and bioinformatics to demonstrate that this model may be essentially correct.
The pattern of the fly embryo is influenced by combinations of enhancers and repressors that control expression of the pair rule gene eve in seven stripes along the anterior–posterior axis, which foreshadow the segmented body plan of the adult fly. Two enhancers, eve 3+7 and eve 4+6, control two stripes each. Ectopic expression of one of two repressor proteins that normally occur in opposing gradients, hunchback (Hb) or knirps (Kni), uniquely alters eve expression in different stripes. Thus, the enhancers respond differently to the same concentration of the repressors.
Using computational approaches to analyze the Kni and Hb binding sites in the two enhancers, Clyde et al. found that both the number of sites and the predicted binding strength varied between the two regulatory regions in a manner that correlated with the genetic results. Using a position weight matrix that evaluates the relative value of having a particular nucleotide in a specific site within a Kni or Hb binding site, the team was able to make detailed predictions of how an alteration would modify the binding affinity. To test whether the predicted binding strengths reflect biology, they mutated six out of 12 Kni binding sites in the eve 3+7 region, lowering their predicted affinity such that the mutant enhancer should have an intermediary affinity for Kni, relative to wild-type eve 3+7 and eve 4+6. As expected, the mutant enhancer had an intermediate response to a given concentration of Kni.
"We changed a few of these binding sites and we changed what we think is the binding strength of the enhancer," says Small. "That has really never been shown before. It opens up the real possibility that we can design more intelligent experiments to test how these enhancers work—and that we can predict the activities of DNA sequences just by using the computer." It also demonstrates the possibility of using such cluster analysis to locate previously unidentified regulatory regions in the genome, which Small calls a Holy Grail of genomics.
Reference:
Clyde, D.E., et al. 2003. Nature. 426:849–853.(Local increases in Kni disrupt individua)
Researchers have proposed that complex embryonic patterns are generated by multiple enhancers that respond differentially to gradients of repressor proteins. In a recent report, Dorothy Clyde, Dmitri Papatsenko, Stephen Small, and colleagues (New York University, New York, NY) combine genetics and bioinformatics to demonstrate that this model may be essentially correct.
The pattern of the fly embryo is influenced by combinations of enhancers and repressors that control expression of the pair rule gene eve in seven stripes along the anterior–posterior axis, which foreshadow the segmented body plan of the adult fly. Two enhancers, eve 3+7 and eve 4+6, control two stripes each. Ectopic expression of one of two repressor proteins that normally occur in opposing gradients, hunchback (Hb) or knirps (Kni), uniquely alters eve expression in different stripes. Thus, the enhancers respond differently to the same concentration of the repressors.
Using computational approaches to analyze the Kni and Hb binding sites in the two enhancers, Clyde et al. found that both the number of sites and the predicted binding strength varied between the two regulatory regions in a manner that correlated with the genetic results. Using a position weight matrix that evaluates the relative value of having a particular nucleotide in a specific site within a Kni or Hb binding site, the team was able to make detailed predictions of how an alteration would modify the binding affinity. To test whether the predicted binding strengths reflect biology, they mutated six out of 12 Kni binding sites in the eve 3+7 region, lowering their predicted affinity such that the mutant enhancer should have an intermediary affinity for Kni, relative to wild-type eve 3+7 and eve 4+6. As expected, the mutant enhancer had an intermediate response to a given concentration of Kni.
"We changed a few of these binding sites and we changed what we think is the binding strength of the enhancer," says Small. "That has really never been shown before. It opens up the real possibility that we can design more intelligent experiments to test how these enhancers work—and that we can predict the activities of DNA sequences just by using the computer." It also demonstrates the possibility of using such cluster analysis to locate previously unidentified regulatory regions in the genome, which Small calls a Holy Grail of genomics.
Reference:
Clyde, D.E., et al. 2003. Nature. 426:849–853.(Local increases in Kni disrupt individua)