濡絾鐗犻妴锟�
闁哄牏鍠庨崹锟�: 鐎甸偊鍠曟穱濠囧棘閸モ晝褰� 闁革负鍔庨崵搴㈢▕閿斿墽娼� 閻犙冨閺嬧剝绋夌€n厽绁� 闁稿鍎遍幃宥夊级閸屾氨绠� 闁硅翰鍎遍崹鏃堟焻婢跺瞼妞� 闁糕晞娅i、鍛村礌鐠囧樊鍔� 濞戞挻娼欑花銉╁礌鐠囧樊鍔� 闁肩瓔鍨伴锟� 閻庢冻闄勬慨锟� 濞戞搩鍘煎ù妤呭礌鐠囧樊鍔� 闁告鍋嗛弫鎾诲箑閺勫浚鍟�
濞e洦绻傛禒锟�: 闁哄倷鍗冲锟� 閻犲洤瀚锟� 閻熸瑥妫涢崑锟� 閻㈩垱鐡曢惁锟� 闁汇倕澧藉锟� 闁汇儱娲ㄦ慨锟� 闁稿繗宕甸弫锟� 闁烩偓鍔忓畵锟� 闁硅翰鍊楅幃锟� 闁诡兙鍎查弲锟� 闁稿鍎撮棅锟� 缂傚洤楠搁锟� 濞戞挶鍊栭埀顒婃嫹 闁煎弶褰冮崝锟� 闁活澁鎷� 濠靛偊鎷� 闁煎府鎷� 閻忓骏鎷� 闁搞儲绋戦锟� 閻犲洩宕垫晶锟� 闁哄洦娼欓ˇ锟�
濞戞搩鍘肩亸锟�: 閻㈩垱鐡曢惁锟� 闁轰焦鐟﹀ḿ锟� 闁诡剚绻嗛埀顒婃嫹 濞戞搩鍙€瀹擄拷 闁告牞宕甸幃锟� 濞戞挻娼欑花锟� 闂佽棄鐗撻锟� 婵ɑ鍨跺Λ锟� 闁哄倸娲ょ€碉拷 闁戒焦銇炵紞锟� 濡ょ姴鏈弻锟� 闁搞儲宕樺锟� 濡炲鍠撻弸锟� 闁肩瓔鍨虫晶锟� 闁肩瓔鍨粭锟� 闁肩瓔鍨扮粩锟� 闁哄倹濯藉畵锟� 闁瑰吋绮庨崒锟� 闁兼槒椴搁弸锟�
当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《英国医生杂志》 > 2004年第5期 > 正文
编号:11343766
Colchicine in acute gout
http://www.100md.com 《英国医生杂志》

     EDITOR—Cox rightly points out that a total dose of colchicine has been introduced to advice in the BNF (British National Formulary) in recent years and is now at a 6 mg limit. The advice that has not changed is the traditional high dose regimen of 1 mg, followed every two hours by 0.5 mg, until relief of pain is obtained or vomiting or diarrhoea occurs.1

    In Ahern et al's study all patients given high dose colchicine developed diarrhoea or nausea in 12-36 hours with a mean dose of 6.7 mg2; many patients taking high doses who have been referred to us have gastrointestinal adverse effects below a total dose of 6 mg. We find that the total dose is not really relevant for acute situations with the low dose regimen.

    Sivagnanam wonders if our patients settled because of the residual effect of the previously administered high dose colchicine that we had stopped; we only reintroduced colchicine, however, if the gout was not settling or was worsening. We have treated other patients with acute gout by using low dose colchicine from the beginning, and symptoms in these patients settled promptly and without adverse event.

    Whether non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are less toxic than colchicine is debatable, particularly compared with low dose colchicine. Normally we use NSAIDs first unless there are contraindications or adverse events, as seen in our cases. Intrasynovial steroids are not always practicable.

    We cannot recommend intravenous colchicine and agree with Pawlotsky that although highly effective it should no longer be used, because of local and general complications associated with a risk of death.3

    Ian Morris, consultant rheumatologist

    ian.morris@kgh.nhs.uk

    George Varughese, senior house officer, Peter Mattingly, consultant rheumatologist

    Department of Rheumatology, Kettering General Hospital, Kettering, Northamptonshire NN16 8UZ

    Competing interests: None declared.

    References

    Joint Formulary Committee. British national formulary. London: British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, 2003;(46): 497.

    Ahern MJ, Reid C, Gordon TP, McCredie M, Brooks PM, Jones M. Does colchicine work? The results of the first controlled study in acute gout. Aust N Z J Med 1987;17: 301-4.

    Pawlotsky Y. Treatment of gout. Rheumatol Eur 1996;25: 142-4.
    濞e洠鍓濇导鍛閸涱剛杩旈柛娆忓€介埀顒€鍠涚槐婵囩▔瀹ュ棛鈧垶骞嬮幇顏呭床濞达絾娲戠粻锝咁嚈妤︽鍞撮柕鍡曠劍鐢綊鎳¢幇顓炵仐闁圭ǹ娲ょ槐鈺呭Υ閸屾稒鐎紒鏃傚Х婢ф寮堕崘銊ф剑濞存粌楠哥敮顐︽媼濡炲墽绋婇柡澶婂暕濮瑰鏁嶅畝鍐仧闁诡喓鍔忛缁樼▔閻戞﹩鍔冮柡鍌氭矗缁楀鈧绮忛~锕傚绩鐠鸿櫣绉垮〒姘☉閵囧洨鈧娉涢崢銈囨嫻瑜版帗顫夐悹鍥︾串缁辨繄鎷犻悜钘変粡濞寸姾鍩栭崹銊╂偨娴e啰妯堥梺顐f皑閻擄繝骞嬮幋婊勭拨闁挎稑鏈崹婊勭椤掍焦鏆柛鎺嶅嵆閳ь剚姘ㄩ悡锟犲触鎼搭垳绀夊ù鍏兼皑閻濇盯宕¢崘鑼闁诡喓鍔庡▓鎴炴媴濠婂啯鎯傚ù鐘插濠€鎵磾閹寸姷褰查柛鎺斿█濞呭酣濡撮敓锟�

   鐎甸偊鍠曟穱濠囧棘閸モ晝褰�  闁稿繗娅曢弫鐐烘儌閻愵剙顎�  閻犲洤瀚鎴﹀礄閻樻彃缍�  闁瑰吋绮庨崒銊╁即閺夋埈妯�   闁规亽鍔岄悺銊х磼濞嗘劖绠欓柛娆欐嫹   闁告梻濮撮崣鍡涘绩閹増顥�