Contacting the matrix
http://www.100md.com
《细胞学杂志》
Cell processes must be able to reach through filters to touch ECM for stimulation of collagen synthesis.
HAY
As early as 1955, Clifford Grobstein had proposed that the way one tissue induced another to develop might be through the presence of ECM (Grobstein, 1955). With his Millipore filter experiments he had shown that ECM alone could induce mouse salivary gland tissue to differentiate (Grobstein, 1953). A 1966 study showed that myoblasts plated onto collagen (then the known major component of ECM) would differentiate (Hauschka and Konigsberg, 1966). This was shocking to most researchers, Hay recalls, because, "at that time, ECM was believed to consist only of collagen and some proteoglycans. The idea that those things could be the embryonic inducer was repulsive to some because they thought it needed to be very specific."
The availability of Nucleopore filters with straight pores of varying diameters gave Meier, then a post-doc with Hay, a way to quantitate the level of contact between corneal epithelial cells grown on the top side of the filter and a killed lens ECM on the bottom. They also measured the level of differentiation using a biochemical assay of collagen synthesis. This set-up gave the team a definitive way to test whether physical contact with ECM or a diffusible molecule controlled induction.
By changing the pore size or using stacks of filters, the two were able to show that collagen synthesis by the epithelial cells increased as the pore size increased, and occurred only if the pores were big enough for the cells to make direct contact with the ECM deposited on the other side of the filter. Through this paper and further work, "it became obvious that there wasn't some specific and magical molecule coming from one tissue, but could be influenced in different ways by the normal molecules cells were putting into the ECM," says Hay.
In 1981, the laboratory showed that soluble ECM components collagen, laminin, and fibronectin could direct the differentiation of corneal epithelium in vitro, whereas albumin, IgG, and glycosaminoglycans had no effect (Sugrue and Hay, 1981). In addition, the differentiation was matched to actin filament reorganization in the cell cortex. These demonstrations that matrix contact influenced cell behavior led logically to the search for and discovery of integrins, receptor molecules that connected ECM components to the cell's cytoskeleton (Tamkun et al., 1986).
Grobstein, C. 1955. In Aspects of Synthesis and Order in Growth. D. Rudnick, editor. Princeton University Press. 233–256.
Grobstein, C. 1953. Nature. 172:869–870.
Hauschka, S.D., and I.R. Konigsberg. 1966. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 55:119–126.
Meier, S., and E.D. Hay. 1975. J. Cell Biol. 66:275–291.
Sugrue, S.P., and E.D. Hay. 1981. J. Cell Biol. 91:45–54.
Tamkun, J.W., et al. 1986. Cell. 46:271–282.(In 1975, the extracellular matrix (ECM) )
HAY
As early as 1955, Clifford Grobstein had proposed that the way one tissue induced another to develop might be through the presence of ECM (Grobstein, 1955). With his Millipore filter experiments he had shown that ECM alone could induce mouse salivary gland tissue to differentiate (Grobstein, 1953). A 1966 study showed that myoblasts plated onto collagen (then the known major component of ECM) would differentiate (Hauschka and Konigsberg, 1966). This was shocking to most researchers, Hay recalls, because, "at that time, ECM was believed to consist only of collagen and some proteoglycans. The idea that those things could be the embryonic inducer was repulsive to some because they thought it needed to be very specific."
The availability of Nucleopore filters with straight pores of varying diameters gave Meier, then a post-doc with Hay, a way to quantitate the level of contact between corneal epithelial cells grown on the top side of the filter and a killed lens ECM on the bottom. They also measured the level of differentiation using a biochemical assay of collagen synthesis. This set-up gave the team a definitive way to test whether physical contact with ECM or a diffusible molecule controlled induction.
By changing the pore size or using stacks of filters, the two were able to show that collagen synthesis by the epithelial cells increased as the pore size increased, and occurred only if the pores were big enough for the cells to make direct contact with the ECM deposited on the other side of the filter. Through this paper and further work, "it became obvious that there wasn't some specific and magical molecule coming from one tissue, but could be influenced in different ways by the normal molecules cells were putting into the ECM," says Hay.
In 1981, the laboratory showed that soluble ECM components collagen, laminin, and fibronectin could direct the differentiation of corneal epithelium in vitro, whereas albumin, IgG, and glycosaminoglycans had no effect (Sugrue and Hay, 1981). In addition, the differentiation was matched to actin filament reorganization in the cell cortex. These demonstrations that matrix contact influenced cell behavior led logically to the search for and discovery of integrins, receptor molecules that connected ECM components to the cell's cytoskeleton (Tamkun et al., 1986).
Grobstein, C. 1955. In Aspects of Synthesis and Order in Growth. D. Rudnick, editor. Princeton University Press. 233–256.
Grobstein, C. 1953. Nature. 172:869–870.
Hauschka, S.D., and I.R. Konigsberg. 1966. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 55:119–126.
Meier, S., and E.D. Hay. 1975. J. Cell Biol. 66:275–291.
Sugrue, S.P., and E.D. Hay. 1981. J. Cell Biol. 91:45–54.
Tamkun, J.W., et al. 1986. Cell. 46:271–282.(In 1975, the extracellular matrix (ECM) )